Note also no evidence is provided of a community ban discussion having been held.

==Evidence of recruiting, directing meatpuppets to continue campaign from WikipediaReview==

* Example of Moulton's original editing campaign at [[Rosalind Picard]]: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rosalind_Picard&diff=152813788&oldid=152465684]

* Moulton's article at WikipediaReview advocating continuing his campaign at [[Rosalind Picard]] and [[James Tour]]: [http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080405/so-i-am-disgusted-with-wikipedia/ "So I am disgusted with Wikipedia" April 5th, 2008]

**Cannot be reasonably read as advocating anything.

*Moulton recruiting meat puppets at WikipediaReview: [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99091][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99100][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99187][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99196][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99198][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99256][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99366][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99367][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99369][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99470][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99484][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=17882&view=findpost&p=99638], and so on for 4 more pages... {{verify source}}

**Links 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 verified as not supporting this assertion - they don't even contain any vague thoughts about what he thinks articles or other wikipedia pages should look like.

**Link 10 contains a vague statement that he believes an article has undue weight and [[WP:COATRACK]] issues - but does not propose any particular changes.

**Link 13 is an explanation of a proposal he made before being blocked - it could reasonably be misinterpreted as advocating that edit be made.

* Moulton stating he intends to bring the matter to the press: [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=17882&st=40]

**This link goes to a post by [[User:Derktar]]. To be fair, another post on the same page (link 8 above) does mention the press.

* A WikipediaReview editor arrives at [[Rosalind Picard]] walking in Moulton's footsteps, making the edits he's advocated: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rosalind_Picard&diff=210229385&oldid=180918202 May 4, 2008]

* Moulton advising meatpuppets on edits on his behalf to scuttle a hard-won consensus{{fact}}: [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=17882&st=140# WikipediaReview, May 12, 2008] {{verify source}}

**Link is to a post about NotTheWikipediaWeekly. TBF, the comment at link 13 above (see above though for problems with this characterization of the comment) is on the same page.

* Brand new user making his first two edits matching Moulton's above requested content word-for-word within hours of Moulton's request: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rosalind_Picard&diff=prev&oldid=212025422 May 12, 2008][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Tour&diff=prev&oldid=212026316 May 12, 2008] Same, acknowledging he's acted in response to Moulton's call: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFeloniousMonk&diff=212175522&oldid=210744893]

* Acknowledgements of directing meatpuppets: [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=17882&pid=100041&mode=threaded&show=&st=80&#entry100041][http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=17882&pid=100047&mode=threaded&show=&st=80&#entry100047] {{verify source}}

**Acknowledges correspondence, does not state or imply that the nature of the correspondence includes directing anyone to edit articles.