Trichome

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Severa (talk | contribs)
15,365 edits
Edit statement unsupported by source per discussion at Talk:Fetal pain where 3 editors agree there is no grounds for labelling RCOG "pro-choice."
Rv. It is false that 3 editors dispute this. KillerChihua said she would think about it. And you have not responded at Talk:Fetal Pain re. RCOG statement opposing reduction of time limits.
Line 3: Line 3:
This Royal College was founded as the '''British College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists''' in 1929 by Professor [[William Blair-Bell]] and Sir [[William Fletcher Shaw]]. It was granted a [[Royal Charter]] on [[21 March]] [[1947]].<ref>[http://www.privy-council.org.uk/output/Page44.asp Privy Council web site.] Retrieved [[2007-05-25]].</ref> It has as its object "The encouragement of the study and the advancement of the science and practice of obstetrics and gynaecology", although its governing documents impose no specific restrictions on its operation.<ref>RCOG, [http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/Public/pdf/2005_final_accounts.pdf "Annual Report and Accounts"] ([[2005-12-31]]). Retrieved [[2007-05-25]].</ref> Its offices are near [[Regent's Park]] in [[central London]].
This Royal College was founded as the '''British College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists''' in 1929 by Professor [[William Blair-Bell]] and Sir [[William Fletcher Shaw]]. It was granted a [[Royal Charter]] on [[21 March]] [[1947]].<ref>[http://www.privy-council.org.uk/output/Page44.asp Privy Council web site.] Retrieved [[2007-05-25]].</ref> It has as its object "The encouragement of the study and the advancement of the science and practice of obstetrics and gynaecology", although its governing documents impose no specific restrictions on its operation.<ref>RCOG, [http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/Public/pdf/2005_final_accounts.pdf "Annual Report and Accounts"] ([[2005-12-31]]). Retrieved [[2007-05-25]].</ref> Its offices are near [[Regent's Park]] in [[central London]].


The RCOG's position on [[abortion]] is that "[it] is an essential part of women's healthcare services and adequate investment and workforce is essential".<ref>[http://www.rcog.org.uk/index.asp?PageID=1918 "RCOG statement on article 'Abortion crisis as doctors refuse to perform surgery' (Independent, 16 April 2007)."] Retrieved [[2007-05-25]].</ref> In England, RCOG is "opposed to a reduction in the time limits for abortion".<ref>Abortion Rights, [http://www.abortionrights.org.uk/content/view/112/106/ "Government robustly rejects minority push for abortion law review"] ([[2006-07-04]]). Retrieved [[2007-05-25]].</ref> <ref>Hennessy, Patrick and Donnelly, Laura. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/06/nabort06.xml "MPs prepare for abortion fight"], ''Sunday Telegraph'' ([[2007-05-07]]). Retrieved [[2007-05-26]].</ref>
RCOG takes a [[pro-choice]] position that [[abortion]] "is an essential part of women's healthcare services and adequate investment and workforce is essential."<ref>[http://www.rcog.org.uk/index.asp?PageID=1918 "RCOG statement on article 'Abortion crisis as doctors refuse to perform surgery' (Independent, 16 April 2007)."] Retrieved [[2007-05-25]].</ref> In England, RCOG is "opposed to a reduction in the time limits for abortion."<ref>Abortion Rights, [http://www.abortionrights.org.uk/content/view/112/106/ "Government robustly rejects minority push for abortion law review"] ([[2006-07-04]]). Retrieved [[2007-05-25]].</ref> <ref>Hennessy, Patrick and Donnelly, Laura. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/06/nabort06.xml "MPs prepare for abortion fight"], ''Sunday Telegraph'' ([[2007-05-07]]). Retrieved [[2007-05-26]].</ref>


On [[5 November]] [[2006]], the college submitted a proposal to the [[Nuffield Council on Bioethics]] calling for consideration of permitting the [[euthanasia]] of [[disabled]] [[newborn|newborns]].<ref>Templeton, Sarah-Kate. [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2437921.html "Doctors: let us kill disabled babies"], ''Sunday Times'' ([[2006-11-05]]). Retrieved [[2007-05-25]].</ref> The proposal states, "We would like the working party to think more radically about non-resuscitation, withdrawal of treatment decisions, the best interests test and active euthanasia as they are ways of widening the management options available to the sickest of newborns."
On [[5 November]] [[2006]], the college submitted a proposal to the [[Nuffield Council on Bioethics]] calling for consideration of permitting the [[euthanasia]] of [[disabled]] [[newborn|newborns]].<ref>Templeton, Sarah-Kate. [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2437921.html "Doctors: let us kill disabled babies"], ''Sunday Times'' ([[2006-11-05]]). Retrieved [[2007-05-25]].</ref> The proposal states, "We would like the working party to think more radically about non-resuscitation, withdrawal of treatment decisions, the best interests test and active euthanasia as they are ways of widening the management options available to the sickest of newborns."

Revision as of 17:06, 26 May 2007

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) is a professional association based in England. Its members, including people with and without medical degrees, work in the field of obstetrics and gynaecology worldwide. [1] RCOG is dedicated to "improving sexual and reproductive healthcare worldwide",[2] and just over half of its 11,000 members live outside Britain, spread among 83 other countries.[3]

This Royal College was founded as the British College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in 1929 by Professor William Blair-Bell and Sir William Fletcher Shaw. It was granted a Royal Charter on 21 March 1947.[4] It has as its object "The encouragement of the study and the advancement of the science and practice of obstetrics and gynaecology", although its governing documents impose no specific restrictions on its operation.[5] Its offices are near Regent's Park in central London.

RCOG takes a pro-choice position that abortion "is an essential part of women's healthcare services and adequate investment and workforce is essential."[6] In England, RCOG is "opposed to a reduction in the time limits for abortion."[7] [8]

On 5 November 2006, the college submitted a proposal to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics calling for consideration of permitting the euthanasia of disabled newborns.[9] The proposal states, "We would like the working party to think more radically about non-resuscitation, withdrawal of treatment decisions, the best interests test and active euthanasia as they are ways of widening the management options available to the sickest of newborns."

References

  1. ^ RCOG, "Summary of Membership Categories". Retrieved 2007-05-26.
  2. ^ RCOG, "International Office Strategy." Retrieved 2007-05-25.
  3. ^ RCOG, "International". Retrieved 2007-05-25.
  4. ^ Privy Council web site. Retrieved 2007-05-25.
  5. ^ RCOG, "Annual Report and Accounts" (2005-12-31). Retrieved 2007-05-25.
  6. ^ "RCOG statement on article 'Abortion crisis as doctors refuse to perform surgery' (Independent, 16 April 2007)." Retrieved 2007-05-25.
  7. ^ Abortion Rights, "Government robustly rejects minority push for abortion law review" (2006-07-04). Retrieved 2007-05-25.
  8. ^ Hennessy, Patrick and Donnelly, Laura. "MPs prepare for abortion fight", Sunday Telegraph (2007-05-07). Retrieved 2007-05-26.
  9. ^ Templeton, Sarah-Kate. "Doctors: let us kill disabled babies", Sunday Times (2006-11-05). Retrieved 2007-05-25.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Royal_College_of_Obstetricians_and_Gynaecologists&diff=133669554&oldid=133668934

Leave a Reply