Content deleted Content added
→The Wizarding World of Harry Potter: hopeless at present |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it meets the FA criteria. I have worked on this article to reach it to GA status. Most recently I requested a peer review which resulted in a variety of recommendations that I have incorporated. <span style="border:1px solid #0072BC;padding:1px;">[[User:Themeparkgc|<span style="color:#0072BC;padding-left:1px;">Themeparkgc</span>]] [[User_talk:Themeparkgc|<span style="color:#fff;background:#0072BC;"> Talk </span>]]</span> 06:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC) |
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it meets the FA criteria. I have worked on this article to reach it to GA status. Most recently I requested a peer review which resulted in a variety of recommendations that I have incorporated. <span style="border:1px solid #0072BC;padding:1px;">[[User:Themeparkgc|<span style="color:#0072BC;padding-left:1px;">Themeparkgc</span>]] [[User_talk:Themeparkgc|<span style="color:#fff;background:#0072BC;"> Talk </span>]]</span> 06:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
'''Oppose:''' There are grievous grammatical errors and riotous rhetorical disasters in each of the first three sentences of this article |
'''Oppose:''' There are grievous grammatical errors and riotous rhetorical disasters in each of the first three sentences of this article. Please archive expeditiously.—[[User:DCGeist|DCGeist]] ([[User talk:DCGeist|talk]]) 07:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:32, 3 September 2010
The Wizarding World of Harry Potter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Themeparkgc Talk 06:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it meets the FA criteria. I have worked on this article to reach it to GA status. Most recently I requested a peer review which resulted in a variety of recommendations that I have incorporated. Themeparkgc Talk 06:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Oppose: There are grievous grammatical errors and riotous rhetorical disasters in each of the first three sentences of this article. Please archive expeditiously.—DCGeist (talk) 07:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC)