Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin


A brownie for you! (I just would like to say thanks)[edit]

Brownie transparent.png Thank you for all of your contributions to WikiProject Aviation, and maintaining order and anti-vandalism on the pages. I really appreciate it! Henry Ingraham (talk) 16:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Coast Guard Star[edit]

USCG Barnstar.png The Coast Guard Star
I hereby award you the Coast Guard Star for your extensive and continuing efforts to fight vandalism and the posting of misinformation to Wikipedia articles relating to the United States Coast Guard. For your efforts, I hereby award you the Coast Guard Star. Thank you and Semper Paratus! Cuprum17 (talk) 13:10, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Viewing[edit]

Hey Bill hope all is well - Am wondering if you can tell me how your phone displays these 2 duplicate articles 1 & 2 - Do you see any difference / issues, other than the images coming before the table on (1) as opposed to the images coming behind the table on (2) - Thanks - FOX 52 talk! 20:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't use a phone to edit, sorry. BilCat (talk) 20:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks so much. - FOX 52 talk! 20:36, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FOX 52: The layout on the user sandbox page probably will not work that well on smaller screens with the images next to the main table. One or two of the columns in the table would need to removed for an OK fit on smaller screen, imo. This is based solely on viewing the pages on a PC. Regards -Fnlayson (talk) 20:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Without a phone you can get some idea on mobile: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:FOX_52/sandbox and then narrow your browser down to phone screen width... - Ahunt (talk) 20:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ahunt: Ah I see thanks for you help on that. - FOX 52 talk! 21:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea User:Ahunt, thx! -Fnlayson (talk) 21:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IJN Comment[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Could you please explain your editing comment in IJN? Thanks. --91.5.101.3 (talk) 09:37, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It should have read, "Take the gun, leave the canoli". BilCat (talk) 09:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I figured that, it's still a remarkably unclear editing comment. Please explain. --91.5.101.3 (talk) 09:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's a line from The Godfather. I probably should have said, "Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater." The point is to remove the space, not the note. BilCat (talk) 10:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Still not clear, on a different level. Just to recap, you are fine with removing the space, but you want to keep the comment that, in its entirety, reads "space"? And to reach that goal, you put the comments (including the MOS-contradicting space) back in? How does that makes sense? --91.5.101.3 (talk) 10:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I did not put "MOS-contradicting space" back in. BilCat (talk) 10:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In case that wasn't clear enough for you, I did "Check if [the] invisible comment does not change the formatting for example by introducing unwanted white space", and it does not. BilCat (talk) 10:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Correct, I missed the fact that you did not revert my change (as described in your edit comment), but modified it. Sorry for that.
So all that's left is the question why you would add this strange comment in the first place. I can see the reasoning behind the formatting comment, what's the point in your non-formatting one? --91.5.101.3 (talk) 20:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently to keep editors from deleting the line space which is an occasional problem in some articles. Anyway, this has gone one long enough. BilCat (talk) 20:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mil mi-10[edit]

due to mi-10 you are wrong it has not been used since 2010 78.63.5.217 (talk) 09:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are required to cite a reliable, published source when making such changes. This is not optional in English Wikipedia. BilCat (talk) 09:32, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mi 10[edit]

russian wiki read about mil mi-10 or russianplanes.net he will retire in 2010 78.63.5.217 (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

source: https://web.archive.org/web/20220620131315/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:BilCat

Leave a Reply