![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220322035336im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/Book_of_Knowledge3.jpg)
![]() | This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin[edit]
I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
Admin statistics | |
---|---|
Action | Count |
Edits | 61137 |
Edits+Deleted | 64241 |
Pages deleted | 3939 |
Revisions deleted | 14 |
Pages restored | 30 |
Pages protected | 80 |
Pages unprotected | 9 |
Protections modified | 23 |
Users blocked | 101 |
Users reblocked | 1 |
User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog[edit]
WP:AIV[edit]
Reports[edit]
Bot-reported[edit]
User-reported[edit]
2A02:14C:363:DC00:8C70:8FDF:3D69:C432 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) troll. Super Ψ Dro 18:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- 2600:387:F:4315:0:0:0:6 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Killing Me Softly with His Song (diff): vandalism after recent release of block. Binksternet (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- 2803:1500:1200:15D2:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) Elimination massive of text for no reason or adding stupidities since January. This IP group should be blocked for a the rest of the school semester. Pierre cb (talk) 22:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- 209.91.200.151 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – adding hoaxes relating to kids' tv. wizzito | say hello! 23:09, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- 76.89.153.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Tony Hinchcliffe:. Continuation of vandalism after block. Atlantic306 (talk) 02:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- 186.111.161.232 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Yet another IP address that vandalizes by changing 2019 and 2021 to 2020. Link20XX (talk) 02:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- 2600:387:0:9C2::/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – vandalism after recent release of block. On range resumed off 1 year block. Last at User talk:2600:387:0:9C2:0:0:0:58 Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs[edit]
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP[edit]
Bot-reported[edit]
- Typicaloser8 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "loser" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Deathsmallcaps (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Sf1official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Entertainment Oasis (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- LucasBOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Bobamanwastaken (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:41, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:41, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 21:41, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- Urmomstanskz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported[edit]
- MATE TRAXX (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Draft:Mate Traxx. -Liancetalk/contribs 17:58, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 18:40, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
|
China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735[edit]
- China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Disruptive edits by multiple IPs. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore the morgue) 14:22, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem: I'm not sure this was necessary. Most edits were constructive, with only maybe a few isolated instances of deliberate vandalism. PC might have been better? RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- The volume of editing precludes PC. But I will take another look. - Ad Orientem (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Unprotected Ad Orientem (talk) 16:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- The volume of editing precludes PC. But I will take another look. - Ad Orientem (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem: I'm not sure this was necessary. Most edits were constructive, with only maybe a few isolated instances of deliberate vandalism. PC might have been better? RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Module:Ns has subpages[edit]
- Module:Ns has subpages (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Full protection: Match protection level with Template:Ns has subpages, which was fully protected by Trialpears. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:16, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Already protected. Already Template protected. Additional protection does not appear to be necessary. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Anne Boonchuy[edit]
- Anne Boonchuy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attempt by new user to remove redirect w/ no discussion. wizzito | say hello! 23:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Not done for now. Final warning might have done it. El_C 23:47, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Zenica[edit]
Reason: This is the third time I am placing this request. So far it has been ignored, while there is an unregistered user who persists in reverting good edits. What's going on? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaush (2nd nomination)[edit]
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaush (2nd nomination) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP and newbie editors. 180.194.127.148 (talk) 01:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
People's Liberation Army[edit]
- People's Liberation Army (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amigao (talk) 01:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Battle of Kryvyi Rih (2022)[edit]
- Battle of Kryvyi Rih (2022) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 02:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Jamison Crowder [edit]
- Jamison Crowder (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Megurine Luka[edit]
- Megurine Luka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from unregistered IP users and newly created users. It has been continued for months, which involves replacing the name or codename with words or phrases. OThreeSys (talk) 02:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Girls (Rita Ora song)[edit]
- Girls (Rita Ora song) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Greek IPs. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dealer07. The same protection is needed for Me tana. Binksternet (talk) 02:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
|
Sharon, Ariel[edit]
- Sharon, Ariel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent with the target article, Ariel Sharon. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 21:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- This is a new request with a different desired result CreecregofLife (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t see any vandalism and the target page is ECP. I’m not seeing a case for reducing protection of the redirect to SP. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- In which case the redirect should be unprotected. There is just simply no reason for this redirect to be fully protected. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 02:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- It was protection due to reasons that you cannot see ([1]). Couretsy ping @NawlinWiki: (CC) Tbhotch™ 02:47, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Neveselbert, the case you put forward doesn’t hold up - Vandalism? Consistent with the target article? Nor can you see the BLP violation, now deleted, that necessitated the protection. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I did notify NawlinWiki, but they appear to be inactive. I waited a day before requesting unprotection here, which was declined and archived before I had the chance to respond. So I've since requested a reduction in the protection level, to SP which would be consistent with the level for the redirect's target. I don't believe the rationale for locking the page still holds up, since the subject of the redirect has since died, voiding any possible further violation. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 03:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- The target page is ECP not SP. If only you were clear in your initial request - you asked for SP due to persistent vandalism, consistent with the target page. Why don’t you start again and ask for a lowering of protection to ECP without any mention of vandalism? It won’t be lowered further than that because the page falls under arbitration enforcement as it can be reasonably construed as belonging to the Arab–Israeli conflict. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry of course, I've struck out the mention of vandalism and I apologise for not being clear in my initial request (I did mean ECP, not SP, sorry again for the confusion). ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 04:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Of course it could be lowered to ECP, but why? Is there an urgent need to do so, an article to be written? Or is the intent just to synchronize the protection levels? Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- An argument against "synchronizing" the protection levels is that the article currently has 690 watchers while the redirect has 3. Undesirable changes to the redirect by an EC user are thus much more likely to go undiscovered. Favonian (talk) 09:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think this is a particularly controversial redirect, like Hitler for example. The vast majority of redirects in Redirects from sort names are not protected, let alone fully protected, like this. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- You still haven't answered the basic question: why? Why does it need to be unprotected? Are you planning on turning into an article that differs from it's current target? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I originally wanted it unprotected to tag the redirect, which has since been done by an admin. It's still however tagged as a fully-protected redirect, which I think is unnecessary for the reasons I've given. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how this page got protected at all. The protection log says it was protected because of persistent vandalism. There have only been 3 edits to the page, and none of them were vandalism. As far as I know, if the target of a redirect is getting vandalized, that doesn't justify protection of its redirects. My vote would be to unprotect it altogether until there is evidence that it is actually a target for vandalism. —ScottyWong— 16:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- The explanation may be found in the deleted revision log. Someone moved the article (when that was still possible) to an unpleasant/derivative name involving the words "War Criminal", and a bot obligingly fixed the double redirect. Then it got deleted, recreated with the proper target and protected. As there's no need for changing the current redirect that cannot be handled with an edit request, I prefer keeping it fully protected. Favonian (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how this page got protected at all. The protection log says it was protected because of persistent vandalism. There have only been 3 edits to the page, and none of them were vandalism. As far as I know, if the target of a redirect is getting vandalized, that doesn't justify protection of its redirects. My vote would be to unprotect it altogether until there is evidence that it is actually a target for vandalism. —ScottyWong— 16:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- I originally wanted it unprotected to tag the redirect, which has since been done by an admin. It's still however tagged as a fully-protected redirect, which I think is unnecessary for the reasons I've given. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- You still haven't answered the basic question: why? Why does it need to be unprotected? Are you planning on turning into an article that differs from it's current target? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Of course it could be lowered to ECP, but why? Is there an urgent need to do so, an article to be written? Or is the intent just to synchronize the protection levels? Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry of course, I've struck out the mention of vandalism and I apologise for not being clear in my initial request (I did mean ECP, not SP, sorry again for the confusion). ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 04:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- The target page is ECP not SP. If only you were clear in your initial request - you asked for SP due to persistent vandalism, consistent with the target page. Why don’t you start again and ask for a lowering of protection to ECP without any mention of vandalism? It won’t be lowered further than that because the page falls under arbitration enforcement as it can be reasonably construed as belonging to the Arab–Israeli conflict. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I did notify NawlinWiki, but they appear to be inactive. I waited a day before requesting unprotection here, which was declined and archived before I had the chance to respond. So I've since requested a reduction in the protection level, to SP which would be consistent with the level for the redirect's target. I don't believe the rationale for locking the page still holds up, since the subject of the redirect has since died, voiding any possible further violation. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 03:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- In which case the redirect should be unprotected. There is just simply no reason for this redirect to be fully protected. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 02:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t see any vandalism and the target page is ECP. I’m not seeing a case for reducing protection of the redirect to SP. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- This is a new request with a different desired result CreecregofLife (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
Handled requests[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 13:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC) |
0 template-protected edit requests | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
There are no outstanding requests for the autopatrolled flag. |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit] |
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed[edit]User:JoeKhanMMA[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights I have a lot of images to add and plan to improve wikipedia as a whole. JoeKhanMMA (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
User:Distrubioter[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights Distrubioter (talk) 18:36, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit]User:Abdul Muhsy[edit]
In accordance with WP:CLEANSTART, I have been editing under a new account, the previous account having been long abandoned since many years. Since, over 4000 edits have been made from both accounts combined, and there were no (major) problems with my previous edits also, permission for extended confirmed status may be granted.-- Abdul Muhsy talk 03:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC) - Abdul Muhsy talk 03:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC) |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]User:Akevsharma[edit]
I have been editing Wikipedia articles for couple of years now. I am familiar with deletion and reviewing policies. I noticed that there is a 10,000+ page list of not reviewed pages. I'd like to help clear the backlog of unreviewed pages. Akevsharma (talk) 10:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC) User:Dandilero[edit]
I would like to get this rank to review new pages, especially footballers which is what I mainly edit on Wikipedia. I recently got the rank of Redirect patrol whitelist. Dandilero (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
User:NiklausGerard[edit]
Hello, I would like to continue to create and curate the encyclopedia and feel confident that I am ready to accept additional responsibility. I am applying for page reviewer rights after learning the proper procedure in not only editing and creating articles, but also converting them. I have created articles and never had them deleted, and I thoroughly understand the standards in review. I hope to identify drafts suitable for the mainspace and help the community reduce the number. NiklausGerard (talk) 07:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
User:SunDawn[edit]
Good day! I am applying for this permission because I think I can execute the responsibility of a new page reviewer. I have experience in rollbacks and I enjoy reverting vandalism, but I also want to learn other sides of Wikipedia. New pages reviewer seems interesting to me as it is a side of Wikipedia that I have rarely seen. I have read the guidelines and according to my own opinion, I am able to do the task as outlined. I have been blocked once for WP:3RR violation more than 6 months ago, and I have promised that I would be more careful in that regard. Thank you very much and have a great day to y'all. SunDawntalk 09:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC) User:The Tips of Apmh[edit]
I am requesting new page reviewer as I have gotten more experienced with deletion, notability, netrality, advertising, and new drafts in general since I last requested new page reviewer. This time I would instead like a trial if possible, to see if I can correctly handle the right. The Tips of Apmh 14:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC) User:Petewarrior[edit]
I've been editing Wikipedia for some time and might be able to help with this workload, if you'll have me. PetéWarrior (talk) 07:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC) User:Elminster Aumar[edit]
Hello, I used to be a new page patroller in the past when I was active, then I become inactive for a long while (still used Wikipedia for reading regularly, almost every day). In the past I was a new page patroller, I would like to help the community again by patrolling new pages.Elmisnter! (talk) 00:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC) Elmisnter! (talk) 00:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
User:3skandar[edit]
I would like to become a page reviewer so that I can help improve the quality of articles on Wikipedia. I am particularly interested in reviewing articles that have been tagged for cleanup or are in need of improvement. I believe that my experience and knowledge will be a valuable asset to the Wikipedia community. 3skandar (talk) 03:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC) |
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]User:Super Dromaeosaurus[edit]
In December 2021, I was temporarily given this permission for three months by Primefac [2]. As I stated there, I wanted this permission simply for editing more comfortably, and it has indeed been quite useful for me. I believe all the moves I've done over the last three months have been rightful, an exception being a certain one but that was the result of a disagreement (read about it here). Thus, I am asking for being granted this permission again, this time indefinitely. Super Ψ Dro 19:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
User:Styyx[edit]
My previous request was declined a few months ago because I didn't have 3000 edits. What I said there still counts. I've been patrolling new pages and draftifying some for a while now. I'm a global rollbacker, which already grants me User:Mhawk10[edit]
I am involved in New Page Patrol and AfC; the ability to move pages to the draftspace without leaving a mainspace redirect has been helpful. I believe that my history of page moves while using the tool shows that I can use the tool appropriately and I am seeking to permanently obtain the right. — Mhawk10 (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC) — Mhawk10 (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
User:PhotographyEdits[edit]
I have currently around 3700 edits on the English Wikipedia. I have done a whole bunch of page moves over the last year and also made requests for technical moves. I also and engaged in various move discussions. I would like to be granted this right to help out other users with moving pages and be able to do technical moves myself. PhotographyEdits (talk) 21:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC) User:DanCherek[edit]
I review reports at CopyPatrol where the bot sometimes flags cut-and-paste moves. When I come one of those and the move otherwise seems valid, I revert the edits and then post at WP:RM/TR so a page mover can carry out the intended move. This happened earlier today at Direct Factory Outlet: edit → revert → RM/TR → move. I'm requesting the page mover right because it would be convenient if I was able to fix these myself. DanCherek (talk) 23:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC) User:Terasail[edit]
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]User:Hamza Ali Shah[edit]
Hi! I would like to become a pending changes reviewer. I have been on Wikipedia for 4 years now and I feel that I am now experienced with handling vandalism and that I can be trusted with these permissions. This will also help reduce the backlog. Thanks, Hamza Ali Shah Talk 20:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
User:Casualdejekyll[edit]
Hi! I do a bit of vandal reverting and stuff. I have read the guidelines and as far as I can tell the only requirements for getting the permission are having a clue about how to use it and wanting it, correct? Honestly don't know whether or not I'll be accepted but I'll have you know I'm a big fan of backlog emptying (I have a good chunk of edits that are dealing with edit requests for example) so this will be another backlog for me to chip at occasionally. ~~~~ casualdejekyll 18:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC) User:BastianMAT[edit]
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]User:Endrabcwizart[edit]
Hello, Reapplying for permission/rollback Endrabcwizart (talk) 12:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
User:Pavlov2[edit]
Hi, I'm Pavlov2, a rollback from Chinese wikipedia and a long-term antivandalism across different wikis. I also patrolled a lot in enwiki to fight against vandalism. I'd like to get the right of rollback to use Huggle if permitted. Many thanks. Pavlov2 (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
User:Usernogood[edit]
I can use permission to use rollback for vandalism? I’ve edited 207 in mainspace of 368 edits. Can this enough? Thank you Usernogood (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
User:AirshipJungleman29[edit]
Hi. I'd like to gain access to rollback rights so I can use Huggle. Many thanks. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
---|
Template editor[edit] |
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220322035336im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2f/Barnstar_of_Diligence.png)
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember[edit]
- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
![]() |
WP:AIV | WP:ANI | ![]() |
WP:NPP | ![]() |
WP:RPP | ![]() |
WP:RFR | ![]() |
WP:AFD | ![]() |
WP:XFD | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
CAT:CSD | ![]() |
WP:CSD | ![]() |
WP:RM | ![]() |
WP:RAA | ![]() |
WP:DR | ![]() |
WP:TM | ![]() |
WP:TT | ||||||
![]() |
WP:RCU | ![]() |
WP:LOP | ![]() |
CAT:AB | ![]() |
WP:BS | ![]() |
WP:RD | ![]() |
WP:NFC | ![]() |
WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"[edit]
On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:[edit]
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list[edit]
- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers[edit]
Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps[edit]
For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [8] does edit counts though)
Pictures[edit]
Maps[edit]
- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system