Autopatrolled[edit]

Confirmed[edit]

User:JoeKhanMMA[edit]

• JoeKhanMMA (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting confirmed rights I have a lot of images to add and plan to improve wikipedia as a whole. JoeKhanMMA (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done – If the file you want to upload is available under a free license, it should be uploaded to our free media repository, Commons. You do not need any special permissions to upload there, and you can use the same username and password you use here. If it is not available under a free license, it should be requested using the Files for upload process, which does not require any special permissions. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Distrubioter[edit]

• Distrubioter (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting confirmed rights Distrubioter (talk) 18:36, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done – Not done, as there has been no reason given. Please reread the text at the top of this page and submit another request only if appropriate. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Extended confirmed[edit]

User:Abdul Muhsy[edit]

• Abdul Muhsy (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

In accordance with WP:CLEANSTART, I have been editing under a new account, the previous account having been long abandoned since many years. Since, over 4000 edits have been made from both accounts combined, and there were no (major) problems with my previous edits also, permission for extended confirmed status may be granted.-- Abdul Muhsy talk 03:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC) - Abdul Muhsy talk 03:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done sort of the point of cleanstart is that you are not connected to the old account anymore; you will need to establish your reputation anew. — xaosflux ^Talk 07:56, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

New page reviewer[edit]

User:Akevsharma[edit]

• Akevsharma (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have been editing Wikipedia articles for couple of years now. I am familiar with deletion and reviewing policies. I noticed that there is a 10,000+ page list of not reviewed pages. I'd like to help clear the backlog of unreviewed pages. Akevsharma (talk) 10:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Dandilero[edit]

• Dandilero (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I would like to get this rank to review new pages, especially footballers which is what I mainly edit on Wikipedia. I recently got the rank of Redirect patrol whitelist. Dandilero (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

( Peanut gallery comment), IMO too soon, only 930 edits - also no AfD participation. Zippybonzo (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

User:NiklausGerard[edit]

• NiklausGerard (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hello, I would like to continue to create and curate the encyclopedia and feel confident that I am ready to accept additional responsibility. I am applying for page reviewer rights after learning the proper procedure in not only editing and creating articles, but also converting them. I have created articles and never had them deleted, and I thoroughly understand the standards in review. I hope to identify drafts suitable for the mainspace and help the community reduce the number. NiklausGerard (talk) 07:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 467 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 08:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

User:SunDawn[edit]

• SunDawn (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Good day! I am applying for this permission because I think I can execute the responsibility of a new page reviewer. I have experience in rollbacks and I enjoy reverting vandalism, but I also want to learn other sides of Wikipedia. New pages reviewer seems interesting to me as it is a side of Wikipedia that I have rarely seen. I have read the guidelines and according to my own opinion, I am able to do the task as outlined. I have been blocked once for WP:3RR violation more than 6 months ago, and I have promised that I would be more careful in that regard. Thank you very much and have a great day to y'all. SunDawntalk 09:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

User:The Tips of Apmh[edit]

• The Tips of Apmh (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I am requesting new page reviewer as I have gotten more experienced with deletion, notability, netrality, advertising, and new drafts in general since I last requested new page reviewer. This time I would instead like a trial if possible, to see if I can correctly handle the right. The Tips of Apmh 14:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Petewarrior[edit]

• Petewarrior (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I've been editing Wikipedia for some time and might be able to help with this workload, if you'll have me. PetéWarrior (talk) 07:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Elminster Aumar[edit]

• Elminster Aumar (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hello, I used to be a new page patroller in the past when I was active, then I become inactive for a long while (still used Wikipedia for reading regularly, almost every day). In the past I was a new page patroller, I would like to help the community again by patrolling new pages.Elmisnter! (talk) 00:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC) Elmisnter! (talk) 00:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 286 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 00:50, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

User:3skandar[edit]

• 3skandar (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I would like to become a page reviewer so that I can help improve the quality of articles on Wikipedia. I am particularly interested in reviewing articles that have been tagged for cleanup or are in need of improvement. I believe that my experience and knowledge will be a valuable asset to the Wikipedia community. 3skandar (talk) 03:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 412 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 03:50, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Page mover[edit]

User:Super Dromaeosaurus[edit]

• Super Dromaeosaurus (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

In December 2021, I was temporarily given this permission for three months by Primefac [2]. As I stated there, I wanted this permission simply for editing more comfortably, and it has indeed been quite useful for me. I believe all the moves I've done over the last three months have been rightful, an exception being a certain one but that was the result of a disagreement (read about it here). Thus, I am asking for being granted this permission again, this time indefinitely. Super Ψ Dro 19:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

I am actually leaning towards declining, mainly based on the moves performed in early January - vitriolic edit summaries for one, but moves that didn't strictly require the suppression of a redirect for a second reason (the older titles seem to be reasonable alternate names, spellings, or just uncontroversial redirect titles). Will leave this for someone else to comment on. Primefac (talk) 12:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

I can justify those. With "vitriolic edit summaries" in early January I assume you mean this one. If we look at the article's history, we can see a relatively new user completely blank a page [3]. The edits were reverted by another user, but the move that the user performed without an edit summary was reverted by me. The fact that they blanked the page and that they moved the page like that prompted me to call their edits as vandalism. And, I mean, were they not? And there's also a CSM Târgu Mureș (women's basketball) page, so the new title that this user chose, "CSM Târgu Mureș (basketball)", was ambiguous. I don't see any problem with this case.

In January I also deleted this redirect. The article was titled by a user that has shown several problems in my opinion. I've left them many comments so far in their talk page and I had to waste time in nominating to AfD several of their articles (such as Armenian dialects in Romania or List of Romanian settlements in Kazakhstan). The dialect is simply not a language, so the title was wrong, and I didn't feel like explaining once again something to this user, although I probably should have.

I also deleted in January this one. I've checked some more and apparently "L'Aïnsa" is the Catalan name of the village. I restored the redirect, and take the fault with that one.

Finally, in early January, I deleted these [4] [5]. I wrote a long justification on the move that I did on the renamed article's talk page [6], in which I mentioned that the reason that I deleted the redirects were because they were ambiguous. "Vlach" in Bulgaria stands for Romanians (we got an article for them now) or Aromanians (they also have their page), so there was just no need for it. I explain more on the message left there.

I honestly think my actions when using this permission have been a net positive, except for the L'Aïnsa case, which I've rectified, and for the other case that I mentioned at my original comment here. Now, I can understand there might be some concerns, as I've acted on my own in several cases, and I probably should have followed the standard practices in some of them. However, I still believe that all the suppressions I did except those two were justified. I can act more carefully from now on, and be more respectful of processes like WP:RFD. Super Ψ Dro 15:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

I'll comment here, given the general paucity of administrators willing to deal with extendedmover. It is a higher-trust permission for good reason, and suppressredirect should only be used in limited circumstances. And while I believe that all of the moves were carried out with good intentions, I fear that they were carried out on a more simple "do I think a redirect is useful here?" basis rather than a policy-based line of reasoning. Maybe this is just process/policy wonkery on my part, but I think it's something worth thinking about for the reviewing administrator, who will have to weigh these concerns against the applicant's promise to act more carefully. ( Peanut gallery comment) Sdrqaz (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Styyx[edit]

• Styyx (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

My previous request was declined a few months ago because I didn't have 3000 edits. What I said there still counts. I've been patrolling new pages and draftifying some for a while now. I'm a global rollbacker, which already grants me suppressredirect. The problem when I draftify an article with the MoveToDraft script which I used until November, is that the script recognizes my global rights and moves without a redirect (breach of the global rights policy, I know), but since I don't have local rights, it immediately creates an empty page under the original title with CSD R2 tag (when there is no redirect). This obviously causes some confusion among deleting admins, and I was even told to "do something else" until I get PM. Since doing nothing wouldn't get me this right granted, I've continued to draftify by hand, which is quite inconvenient as it doesn't automatically notify the creator, nor does it do the regular clean up needed. Also see Special:PermaLink/1072169313#Weird problem with the script and User talk:Styyx/Archives/2021#Page mover and R2. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 22:04, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

User:Mhawk10[edit]

• Mhawk10 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I am involved in New Page Patrol and AfC; the ability to move pages to the draftspace without leaving a mainspace redirect has been helpful. I believe that my history of page moves while using the tool shows that I can use the tool appropriately and I am seeking to permanently obtain the right. — Mhawk10 (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC) — Mhawk10 (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Noting that consensus is to keep such redirects. My two cents is that if consensus is against deleting such redirects then they should not be suppressed. Am I wrong? casualdejekyll 18:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Mhawk10 is referring to redirects from mainspace to the draftspace, not the other way around. DanCherek (talk) 18:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Ah. Cheeky. (And by that I mean I should get more sleep before editing Wikipedia, hah) casualdejekyll 00:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Just to clarify, I am aware that Draftspace redirects to the mainspace should not be speedy deleted. The reason I am requesting this is that I’d prefer not to leave a redirect for someone else to clean up when I move things from the mainspace to the draftspace. I’ve patrolled ~1200 pages in the past year, so this situation does not only come up infrequently. — Mhawk10 (talk) 16:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

User:PhotographyEdits[edit]

• PhotographyEdits (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have currently around 3700 edits on the English Wikipedia. I have done a whole bunch of page moves over the last year and also made requests for technical moves. I also and engaged in various move discussions. I would like to be granted this right to help out other users with moving pages and be able to do technical moves myself. PhotographyEdits (talk) 21:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

User:DanCherek[edit]

• DanCherek (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I review reports at CopyPatrol where the bot sometimes flags cut-and-paste moves. When I come one of those and the move otherwise seems valid, I revert the edits and then post at WP:RM/TR so a page mover can carry out the intended move. This happened earlier today at Direct Factory Outlet: edit → revert → RM/TR → move. I'm requesting the page mover right because it would be convenient if I was able to fix these myself. DanCherek (talk) 23:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Terasail[edit]

• Terasail (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Pending changes reviewer[edit]

User:Hamza Ali Shah[edit]

• Hamza Ali Shah (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hi! I would like to become a pending changes reviewer. I have been on Wikipedia for 4 years now and I feel that I am now experienced with handling vandalism and that I can be trusted with these permissions. This will also help reduce the backlog. Thanks,  Hamza Ali Shah  ^Talk 20:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

 Done — MusikAnimal ^talk 00:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Casualdejekyll[edit]

• Casualdejekyll (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hi! I do a bit of vandal reverting and stuff. I have read the guidelines and as far as I can tell the only requirements for getting the permission are having a clue about how to use it and wanting it, correct? Honestly don't know whether or not I'll be accepted but I'll have you know I'm a big fan of backlog emptying (I have a good chunk of edits that are dealing with edit requests for example) so this will be another backlog for me to chip at occasionally. ~~~~ casualdejekyll 18:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

User:BastianMAT[edit]

• BastianMAT (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Rollback[edit]

User:Endrabcwizart[edit]

• Endrabcwizart (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hello, Reapplying for permission/rollback Endrabcwizart (talk) 12:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot ^talk 12:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done No valid reason for granting rollback was provided -FASTILY 23:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Pavlov2[edit]

• Pavlov2 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hi, I'm Pavlov2, a rollback from Chinese wikipedia and a long-term antivandalism across different wikis. I also patrolled a lot in enwiki to fight against vandalism. I'd like to get the right of rollback to use Huggle if permitted. Many thanks. Pavlov2 (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY 05:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Usernogood[edit]

• Usernogood (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I can use permission to use rollback for vandalism? I’ve edited 207 in mainspace of 368 edits. Can this enough? Thank you Usernogood (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done You had a previous request denied not two days ago - please wait a while before re-requesting. firefly ( t · c ) 19:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Furthermore, was this a good idea, really? firefly ( t · c ) 19:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Why? Usernogood (talk) 19:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Because it looks an awful lot like an attempt to conceal the fact that you had a previous request denied (which, for the record, wouldn't work - not only does a bot post messages logging that sort of thing, but admins will check anyway). firefly ( t · c ) 19:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Fine. I will re-request next month (April 20, 2022 at 19:01) if other administrators denied. Usernogood (talk) 19:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

When someone says re-request next month or week, they don’t mean at the exact time of the exact day, they mean around that time. Zippybonzo (talk) 08:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

OK I understand. I will re-request this on April 30, 2022 or May 1, 2022 Usernogood (talk) 11:39, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

User:AirshipJungleman29[edit]

• AirshipJungleman29 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs ^{(blocks • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hi. I'd like to gain access to rollback rights so I can use Huggle. Many thanks. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

( Peanut gallery comment) no anti-vandalism track record, last undo was on the 15th of March, you don’t need the tool realistically. Zippybonzo (talk) 14:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Also, whenever you revert disruptive edits, please do warn those users. Kpddg ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Done --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 14:31, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Template editor[edit]