TheLionHasSeen (talk | contribs) Undid revision 1050152184 by Redvince1 (talk) Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. We should be discussing, but you blatantly showed for WP:advocacy. I will not risk being blocked from Wikipedia edit warring. Enough is enough. Don't dilly dailly by abusing Wikipedia's policies without understanding them all...I made that mistake years ago... Tags: Undo Reverted |
My last reversion for today. Hopefully our continued debate over content will encourage more editors to get involved and calm this clear dispute over what content should be in this article. Tag: Manual revert |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Christian theology}} |
{{Short description|Christian theology}} |
||
'''Modalistic Monarchianism''' (also known as '''Modalism''' or '''Oneness [[Christology]]''') is a [[Christian theology]] that upholds the oneness of God as well as the deity of [[Jesus|Jesus Christ]]. It is a form of [[Monarchianism]] and that stands in contrast to [[Trinitarianism]]. Modalistic Monarchianism considers God to be one while working through the different "modes" or "manifestations" of [[God the Father|Father]], [[Son of God (Christianity)|Son]], and [[Holy Spirit in Christianity|Holy Spirit]], without limiting his modes or manifestations.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Bernard|first1=David|url=http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/pentecostal/One-Ch6.htm|title=The Oneness of God|publisher=Word Aflame Press|year=1993|isbn=978-0-912315-12-6|chapter=The Father is the Holy Ghost|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080209202633/http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/pentecostal/One-Ch6.htm|archive-date=February 16, 2008}}</ref> Following this view, all the [[Godhead in Christianity|Godhead]] is understood to have dwelt in Jesus from the [[Incarnation (Christianity)|incarnation]]. The terms "Father" and "Son" are then used to describe the distinction between the [[Transcendence (religion)|transcendence]] of God and the incarnation (God in [[immanence]]). Lastly, since God is a |
'''Modalistic Monarchianism''' (also known as '''Modalism''' or '''Oneness [[Christology]]''') is a [[Christian theology]] that upholds the oneness of God as well as the deity of [[Jesus|Jesus Christ]]. It is a form of [[Monarchianism]] and that stands in contrast to [[Trinitarianism]] and [[Arianism]]. Modalistic Monarchianism considers God to be one while working through the different "modes" or "manifestations" of [[God the Father|Father]], [[Son of God (Christianity)|Son]], and [[Holy Spirit in Christianity|Holy Spirit]], without limiting his modes or manifestations.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Bernard|first1=David|url=http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/pentecostal/One-Ch6.htm|title=The Oneness of God|publisher=Word Aflame Press|year=1993|isbn=978-0-912315-12-6|chapter=The Father is the Holy Ghost|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080209202633/http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/pentecostal/One-Ch6.htm|archive-date=February 16, 2008}}</ref> Following this view, all the [[Godhead in Christianity|Godhead]] is understood to have dwelt in Jesus from the [[Incarnation (Christianity)|incarnation]]. The terms "Father" and "Son" are then used to describe the distinction between the [[Transcendence (religion)|transcendence]] of God and the incarnation (God in [[immanence]]). Lastly, since God is a [[Spirit (animating force)|Spirit]], it is held that the Holy Spirit should not be understood as a separate entity but rather to describe God in action. |
||
Modalistic Monarchians believe in the deity of Jesus and understand Jesus to be a manifestation of [[Yahweh]], the God of the Old Testament, in the flesh. For this reason they find it suitable to ascribe all worship appropriate to God alone to Jesus also. Modalistic Monarchianism is closely related to [[Sabellianism]] and [[Patripassianism]]. |
Modalistic Monarchians believe in the deity of Jesus and understand Jesus to be a manifestation of [[Yahweh]], the God of the Old Testament, in the flesh. For this reason they find it suitable to ascribe all worship appropriate to God alone to Jesus also. Modalistic Monarchianism is closely related to [[Sabellianism]] and [[Patripassianism]]. |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==History== |
==History== |
||
{{Main|Sabellianism|Patripassianism}} |
{{Main|Sabellianism|Patripassianism}} |
||
A Biblical passage in the Old Testament attributed to the Jewish prophet [[Isaiah]] that is used as evidence for Modalism is found in Isaiah 9:6 (NIV) <ref>{{Cite web|title=Bible Gateway passage: Isaiah 9:6 - New International Version|url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%209%3A6&version=NIV|access-date=2021-10-07|website=Bible Gateway|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | Theologian and church historian [[Adolf von Harnack]] first used the term '' |
||
[[File:Modalism Theology Diagram 2.jpg|thumb|Modalism Theological Model]] |
|||
''"For to us a child is born,'' |
|||
'' to us a son is given,'' |
|||
'' and the government will be on his shoulders.'' |
|||
''And he will be called'' |
|||
'' Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,'' |
|||
'' Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace."'' |
|||
[[File:Shield-Trinity-Scutum-Fidei-English.svg|thumb|Trinitarian Theological Model]] |
|||
Here Isaiah predicts that the [[Messiah in Judaism|Messiah]] and [[Son of God (Christianity)|Son]] will be the Everlasting Father. No distinction is made describing two separate persons of Father and Son as is found in [[Trinity|Trinitarian]] and [[Arianism|Arian]] theological doctrines. An issue that Modalist theologians have with Trinitarianism is the popular diagrams used to describe the Trinity are logically questionable. Trinitarian theologians describe God as three coequal persons that are separate from each other but each is still said to be God. |
|||
The reasoning behind this Trinitarian idea can be shown to be problematic by a symbolic logical representation. If Father=A, Son=B, Holy Spirit=C, and God=D, then Trinitarians say A=D, B=D, C=D, but A ≠ B, etc. Modalists claim that if A equals D, and B equals D, then both A and B should be logically equivalent to each other. This rather obvious shortcoming of Trinitarian doctrine may have encouraged some individuals such as [[Thomas Jefferson]] to believe in [[Arianism]]<ref>{{Cite web|last=Holmes|first=David|date=2005|title=Jefferson and Religion - A View by Professor David Holmes|url=https://www.monticello.org/thomas-jefferson/jefferson-s-three-greatest-achievements/religious-freedom/was-jefferson-a-unitarian/|url-status=live|access-date=6 October 2021|website=www.monticello.org}}</ref>. |
|||
In the Gospel of John, Chapter 14, Jesus made the following claim to [[Philip the Apostle|Philip]] which Modalist theologians use to support their perspective. In verses 9-12,<ref>{{Cite web|title=Bible Gateway passage: John 14:8-12 - New International Version|url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%2014%3A8-12&version=NIV|access-date=2021-10-07|website=Bible Gateway|language=en}}</ref> Jesus stated: |
|||
''"Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time?'' |
|||
''Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?'' |
|||
''Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me?'' |
|||
''The words I say to you I do not speak on my own authority.'' |
|||
''Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work.'' |
|||
''Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me;'' |
|||
''or at least believe on the evidence of the works themselves."'' |
|||
⚫ | Theologian and church historian [[Adolf von Harnack]] first used the term ''Modalism'' to describe a doctrine believed in the late 2nd century and 3rd century.{{Sfn|McGrath|2013|p=56}} During this time period, Christian theologians were attempting to clarify the relationship between God the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.{{Sfn|McGrath|2013|p=54}} Concerned with defending the absolute unity of God, modalists such as [[Noetus]], [[Praxeas]], and [[Sabellius]] explained the divinity of [[Jesus Christ]] and the Holy Spirit as the one God revealing himself in different ways or modes: |
||
#God revealed as the [[Creator deity|creator]] and lawgiver is called "the Father". |
#God revealed as the [[Creator deity|creator]] and lawgiver is called "the Father". |
||
#God revealed as the [[Salvation in Christianity|savior]] in Jesus Christ is called "the Son". |
#God revealed as the [[Salvation in Christianity|savior]] in Jesus Christ is called "the Son". |
||
#God revealed as the one who [[Sanctification|sanctifies]] and grants [[Eternal life (Christianity)|eternal life]] is called "the Spirit".{{Sfn|McGrath|2013|p=57}} |
#God revealed as the one who [[Sanctification|sanctifies]] and grants [[Eternal life (Christianity)|eternal life]] is called "the Spirit".{{Sfn|McGrath|2013|p=57}} |
||
By the 4th century, a consensus had developed in favor of the doctrine of the [[Trinity]], and |
By the 4th century, a consensus had developed in favor of the doctrine of the [[Trinity]], and Modalism was generally considered a [[heresy]].{{Sfn|"Monarchianism"}} Modern Catholic theologians such as Gjergji Evangjeli suggest that Modalism implies that God is a [[Ventriloquism|ventriloquist]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Evangjeli|first=Gjergji|date=2019-01-30|title=Countering Modalism|url=https://bctorch.com/2019/01/30/countering-modalism/|access-date=2021-10-07|website=The Torch {{!}} Boston College's Catholic Newspaper|language=en-US}}</ref> |
||
==Modern adherents== |
==Modern adherents== |
||
Modalistic Monarchianism is accepted within [[Oneness Pentecostalism]]. Oneness Pentecostals believe in the deity of Jesus and understand Jesus, the [[Son of God]], to be a manifestation of the God of the Old Testament, Yahweh, in the flesh. When Jesus was on Earth, he referred to God as his Father since God caused his conception through the Holy Spirit. They also believe that, since God is spirit, the Holy Spirit is used to describe God in action. In this way, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are considered titles pertaining to the one God, not descriptions of distinct individuals. |
Modalistic Monarchianism is accepted within [[Oneness Pentecostalism]]. A leading 21st Century advocate of Modalism among Oneness Pentecostals is the General Superintendent of the [[United Pentecostal Church International]], [[David K. Bernard]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bernard|first=David|date=2000|title=Essentials of Oneness Theology|url=https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/15f35b82/files/uploaded/Essentials%20of%20Oneness%20Theology%20-%20David%20Bernard.pdf|journal=Word Aflame Press}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=David K. Bernard General Superintendent|url=https://www.upci.org/about/leadership/profile/david-k-bernard|url-status=live|access-date=13 October 2021}}</ref> Oneness Pentecostals believe in the deity of Jesus and understand Jesus, the [[Son of God]], to be a manifestation of the God of the Old Testament, Yahweh, in the flesh. When Jesus was on Earth, he referred to God as his Father since God caused his conception through the Holy Spirit. They also believe that, since God is spirit, the Holy Spirit is used to describe God in action. In this way, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are considered titles pertaining to the one God, not descriptions of distinct individuals. |
||
Much of their theology attempts to begin with an Old Testament understanding of God in order to understand what the first apostles would have believed about Jesus. They also seek to avoid use of theological categories produced by [[Platonism|Platonic]]-[[Aristotelianism|Aristotelian]] [[epistemology|epistemologies]], preferring rather to tell the story of redemption through narrative.{{Sfn|Norris|2009|p=27}} Thus, the distinction found in the New Testament writers between God the Father and Jesus is understood to be from the attempts to identify God the Father and Jesus together, rather than to separate them more than necessary. |
Much of their theology attempts to begin with an Old Testament understanding of God in order to understand what the first apostles would have believed about Jesus. They also seek to avoid use of theological categories produced by [[Platonism|Platonic]]-[[Aristotelianism|Aristotelian]] [[epistemology|epistemologies]], preferring rather to tell the story of redemption through narrative.{{Sfn|Norris|2009|p=27}} Thus, the distinction found in the New Testament writers between God the Father and Jesus is understood to be from the attempts to identify God the Father and Jesus together, rather than to separate them more than necessary. |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
Revision as of 03:46, 16 October 2021
Modalistic Monarchianism (also known as Modalism or Oneness Christology) is a Christian theology that upholds the oneness of God as well as the deity of Jesus Christ. It is a form of Monarchianism and that stands in contrast to Trinitarianism and Arianism. Modalistic Monarchianism considers God to be one while working through the different "modes" or "manifestations" of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, without limiting his modes or manifestations.[1] Following this view, all the Godhead is understood to have dwelt in Jesus from the incarnation. The terms "Father" and "Son" are then used to describe the distinction between the transcendence of God and the incarnation (God in immanence). Lastly, since God is a Spirit, it is held that the Holy Spirit should not be understood as a separate entity but rather to describe God in action.
Modalistic Monarchians believe in the deity of Jesus and understand Jesus to be a manifestation of Yahweh, the God of the Old Testament, in the flesh. For this reason they find it suitable to ascribe all worship appropriate to God alone to Jesus also. Modalistic Monarchianism is closely related to Sabellianism and Patripassianism.
History
A Biblical passage in the Old Testament attributed to the Jewish prophet Isaiah that is used as evidence for Modalism is found in Isaiah 9:6 (NIV) [2]
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20240831101234im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/be/Modalism_Theology_Diagram_2.jpg/220px-Modalism_Theology_Diagram_2.jpg)
"For to us a child is born,
to us a son is given,
and the government will be on his shoulders.
And he will be called
Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace."
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20240831101234im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Shield-Trinity-Scutum-Fidei-English.svg/220px-Shield-Trinity-Scutum-Fidei-English.svg.png)
Here Isaiah predicts that the Messiah and Son will be the Everlasting Father. No distinction is made describing two separate persons of Father and Son as is found in Trinitarian and Arian theological doctrines. An issue that Modalist theologians have with Trinitarianism is the popular diagrams used to describe the Trinity are logically questionable. Trinitarian theologians describe God as three coequal persons that are separate from each other but each is still said to be God.
The reasoning behind this Trinitarian idea can be shown to be problematic by a symbolic logical representation. If Father=A, Son=B, Holy Spirit=C, and God=D, then Trinitarians say A=D, B=D, C=D, but A ≠ B, etc. Modalists claim that if A equals D, and B equals D, then both A and B should be logically equivalent to each other. This rather obvious shortcoming of Trinitarian doctrine may have encouraged some individuals such as Thomas Jefferson to believe in Arianism[3].
In the Gospel of John, Chapter 14, Jesus made the following claim to Philip which Modalist theologians use to support their perspective. In verses 9-12,[4] Jesus stated:
"Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time?
Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?
Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me?
The words I say to you I do not speak on my own authority.
Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work.
Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me;
or at least believe on the evidence of the works themselves."
Theologian and church historian Adolf von Harnack first used the term Modalism to describe a doctrine believed in the late 2nd century and 3rd century.[5] During this time period, Christian theologians were attempting to clarify the relationship between God the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.[6] Concerned with defending the absolute unity of God, modalists such as Noetus, Praxeas, and Sabellius explained the divinity of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit as the one God revealing himself in different ways or modes:
- God revealed as the creator and lawgiver is called "the Father".
- God revealed as the savior in Jesus Christ is called "the Son".
- God revealed as the one who sanctifies and grants eternal life is called "the Spirit".[7]
By the 4th century, a consensus had developed in favor of the doctrine of the Trinity, and Modalism was generally considered a heresy.[8] Modern Catholic theologians such as Gjergji Evangjeli suggest that Modalism implies that God is a ventriloquist.[9]
Modern adherents
Modalistic Monarchianism is accepted within Oneness Pentecostalism. A leading 21st Century advocate of Modalism among Oneness Pentecostals is the General Superintendent of the United Pentecostal Church International, David K. Bernard.[10][11] Oneness Pentecostals believe in the deity of Jesus and understand Jesus, the Son of God, to be a manifestation of the God of the Old Testament, Yahweh, in the flesh. When Jesus was on Earth, he referred to God as his Father since God caused his conception through the Holy Spirit. They also believe that, since God is spirit, the Holy Spirit is used to describe God in action. In this way, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are considered titles pertaining to the one God, not descriptions of distinct individuals.
Much of their theology attempts to begin with an Old Testament understanding of God in order to understand what the first apostles would have believed about Jesus. They also seek to avoid use of theological categories produced by Platonic-Aristotelian epistemologies, preferring rather to tell the story of redemption through narrative.[12] Thus, the distinction found in the New Testament writers between God the Father and Jesus is understood to be from the attempts to identify God the Father and Jesus together, rather than to separate them more than necessary.
See also
References
Citations
- ^ Bernard, David (1993). "The Father is the Holy Ghost". The Oneness of God. Word Aflame Press. ISBN 978-0-912315-12-6. Archived from the original on February 16, 2008.
{{cite book}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; February 9, 2008 suggested (help) - ^ "Bible Gateway passage: Isaiah 9:6 - New International Version". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2021-10-07.
- ^ Holmes, David (2005). "Jefferson and Religion - A View by Professor David Holmes". www.monticello.org. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Bible Gateway passage: John 14:8-12 - New International Version". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2021-10-07.
- ^ McGrath 2013, p. 56.
- ^ McGrath 2013, p. 54.
- ^ McGrath 2013, p. 57.
- ^ "Monarchianism".
- ^ Evangjeli, Gjergji (2019-01-30). "Countering Modalism". The Torch | Boston College's Catholic Newspaper. Retrieved 2021-10-07.
- ^ Bernard, David (2000). "Essentials of Oneness Theology" (PDF). Word Aflame Press.
- ^ "David K. Bernard General Superintendent". Retrieved 13 October 2021.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Norris 2009, p. 27.
Sources
- McGrath, Alister E. (2013). Historical Theology: An Introduction to the History of Christian Thought (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-470-67286-0.
- "Monarchianism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. July 10, 2015.
- Norris, David S. (2009). I Am: A Oneness Pentecostal Theology. Hazelwood, Mo.: Word Aflame Press. ISBN 9781567227307. OCLC 312444348.