Resolved

I've updated page WP:List of policies and guidelines, but I'm not sure how to do the same thing at WP:List of policies. Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions? —⁠andrybak (talk) 19:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've just simply removed the pages from the list to reflect their status. —⁠andrybak (talk) 10:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia policy. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 14#Wikipedia policy until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. — J947 ^[cont] 02:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The header writes: "Changing this page does not change policy." So the possibility exists, the text on this page does not reflect the right policies. Edit request is, to link to a source where users can find the official text of the policies that do have official status. So users can go sure what rules they have to follow, to be in line with the Terms of Use. Thanks! WillTim 2001:16B8:8C13:FF01:196F:BE90:43F6:9FEA (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I recently did myself no favors acting in a manner that some could call WP:IDHT, so after making amends and awaiting whatever punishment I deserve, I wish to ask a very important question: Should there be clearer guidelines about Template deletion for editors to rely upon? I know we got guidelines detailing the options for deletion for articles, but I wonder whether templates should have clearer guidelines, especially about nominating a template that already came out of a template deletion discussion with either "no consensus" or "keep". Like, should editors be advised not to nominate them again if they recently had been already. If I had found clearer guidelines, I think I would have saved a serious amount of headache for myself and others. GUtt01 (talk) 15:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia editors shouldn’t be allowed to abuse the section that shows contributions to stalk an ip address or other users who edit on Wikipedia. I had made an edit similar to other Wikipedia pages and because another user decided they didn’t like my edit based on their personal opinion I went to a different page to make an edit, again similar to other pages and the user stalked me there through my contributions to revert any edits I make. That’s very creepy and abusive behavior to do to anyone and should not be allowed to be done as that can make people feel uncomfortable as it has me and that needs to be respected. 2601:806:8300:D0D0:A197:355A:8C2A:6569 (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting problematic edits is not harassment, it's legitimate editing. You are entitled to disagree with your edit being reverted, and you should discuss this rationally on the Downton Abbey article talk page and hopefully work out a solution. Please see WP:BRD for an outline of how this works. Posting messages on a user's talk page accusing that person of "biased editing", "harassing" and "stalking" may, however, be seen as personal attacks, so you might want to tread more lightly here if you want to make any progress. Best of luck. Cnbrb (talk) 18:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]