The Assessment department finds technological articles and rate them on Quality scale.
The articles are rated by examining them and comparing them to the Quality scale. A template is then place on the article's talk page stating that the article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology and displaying what rating the article has been given when compared to the Quality scale.
Requests for assessment[edit]
- Éolienne Bollée
- Rosalind Picard
- UE Boom
- Error concealment
- Prusa i3
- Ethernet
- Stereolithography
- Incremental encoder -- please reassess due to major rewrite and content expansion
- OnePlus Nord
- Asus ZenFone 6
- Lorgnette -- please assess this stub, feel like it should be at least a start
- Nuclear weapon design -- I am uncertain what the procedure is in this project. Over on Military History I could just downgrade it myself, but I don't know what you project's rules are. Either way, the article may have been B-class when reviewed many years ago, but now it is a mess with 98 citation needed by my count today. It is also awkwardly structured. Over on the Military History project I am looking for other editors to help rewrite the whole thing.Kylesenior (talk) 05:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Cryogenic gas plant
Technological articles can be found in Category:Technology and its subcategories
Template[edit]
Technology NA‑class | |||||||
|
Quality scale[edit]
Featured articles[edit]
Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review
Featured articles are selected at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates
A-Class[edit]
Reserved for articles that have received A-Class status after review by the project. Such articles are expected to largely meet the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written.
A-Class articles are selected by the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Review#A-Class Review.
Good articles[edit]
Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status.
Good articles are selected at Wikipedia:Good article nominations.
B-Class[edit]
The article meets the following six criteria:
- It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited.
- It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.
- It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
- It is free from major grammatical errors.
- It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
- It is written from a neutral point of view
Start Class[edit]
Start class article have a few paragraphs that provide all the key points but may not cover all aspects of the subject. These articles usually have an image or infobox to support the text.
Start-class articles are selected by individual assessors.
Stub Class[edit]
Stubs are very short articles which offer a quick description of the subject
Stub articles are selected by individual assessors
Simplified quality scale[edit]
Statistics[edit]
Current status[edit]
Log[edit]
April 23, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Process Window Index renamed to Process window index.
- Vulcan Inc. renamed to Vulcan Real Estate.
Reassessed[edit]
- Condair Group (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- OCLC (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Category:Academic staff of Guangdong University of Technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Cap torque tester (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Carbon copy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
- Ceramic nanoparticle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
- Function Health (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Historic vehicles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:History of radio technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Medical technology companies by country (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Motor vehicles manufactured in Canada (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:New Zealand technology and applied science templates (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Nuclear technology and the Russian invasion of Ukraine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Process window index (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t)
- Rectangular Micro QR Code (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Science and Technology in Bangladesh (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Science and technology in the Telugu states (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Solenoid (engineering) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Technology companies disestablished in 2024 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Unmanned surface vehicles by country (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Vulcan Real Estate (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
April 22, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Engineer's spirit level (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- OCLC (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Condair Group (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Membrane emulsification (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Spring scale (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
April 21, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Graham Stevens (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Halifax Tool Library (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Inner source (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Video Super Resolution (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Category:AITO vehicles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Boxing barcode (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- BrainScope Company, Inc. (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Brake horsepower per cubic centimeter (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Comparison of electric cars (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:DFSK vehicles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Fortra (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Foxtron vehicles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Guangdong University of Technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:JMEV vehicles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Legendary vehicles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Li Auto vehicles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Medical technology by country (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Medical technology in Russia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Medical technology in the United Kingdom (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Medical technology in the United States (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Missing vehicles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Oakland vehicles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Rising Auto vehicles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Shenyang University of Technology alumni (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Technology Council of Australia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Video scaler (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Yuanhang vehicles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
April 20, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Xeros Washing Machine renamed to Xeros washing machine.
Reassessed[edit]
- Diagnostikare (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- TechLive (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- Wacław Struszyński (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Category:Chainsaws (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Halifax Tool Library (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Maniv Mobility (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Qflix (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Technological literacy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Xeros washing machine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
April 19, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Joint Information Systems Committee renamed to Jisc.
Assessed[edit]
April 18, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Backhoe loader (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Category:Archival technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Asia Silicon Valley Development Plan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Dental technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Diagnostikare (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Electrical measurement technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Graham Stevens (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:History of medical technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Indian Institute of Information Technology, Ranchi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Kenyan biotechnologists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Microphone technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Printing technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Rajshahi University Of Engineering and Technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sensor technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Shenyang University of Technology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Technology CEO Council (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
Removed[edit]
- Advanced manufacturing (talk) removed.
April 17, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- GEOINT Singularity (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Bond tester (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Borehole image logs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Charging cable (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- Fire alarm call box (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Ontario Association of Certified Engineering Technicians and Technologists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Vehicles discontinued in 2024 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
Requests for assessment[edit]
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
- VHS - Please assess this article for "B" grade. I've made some significant additions and changes. I think the article fulfills the criteria as a "B" article. Thank you! Groink (talk) 08:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Millenniata - Please assess this article for "B" grade. I rewrote it as NPoV. I believe the company itself is only notable for the M-DISC technology (a type of specialty DVD-R), but I'm not sure of the best way to handle that. Advice appreciated! —Hobart (talk) 01:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- I noticed that in Talk:Fucking Machines that this unfortunate article has a Good Article status from this WikiProject. This status needs to be reconsidered and likely removed. Rlsheehan (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)