Cannabis Ruderalis

ClerkBot2 → ClerkBot[edit]

  • Current username: ClerkBot2 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: ClerkBot (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 18:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    BJTalk 18:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I'm going ahead with this usurp, as it's a non-flagged (and never-functioning) bot account of Essjay's. He's not coming back, and we can bank on that. EVula // talk // // 18:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ulm_temp → Ulm[edit]

  • Current username: Ulm_temp (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Ulm (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 18:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)

Hi, I'm active on German Wikipedia under username "Ulm" and started to contribute also to the English Wikipedia, so far as IP only. Would be nice if I could use the same username here, as User:Ulm has no significant edits (in fact, only one edit in his own talk page). --Ulm temp (talk) 18:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is his only edit, made in 2006. I doubt it is GFDL significant because, had any admin seen it, I assume they would have deleted it as vandalism. J.delanoygabsadds 19:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Excluding that one probably GFDL insignificant edit, here's a summary:
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 1 undeleted edit, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edit. Requesting user has 3 edits.
Xclamation point 08:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In case you need some verification of my identity, see here. --Ulm temp (talk) 11:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 21:19, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scroolik → Scrool[edit]

  • Current username: Scroolik (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Scrool (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 02:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Scrool (talk) 02:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scroolik is my alternative nick and it is possible that I've created Scrool long time ago.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 37 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 02:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: User being usurped has now been correctly notified. Scrool (talk) 14:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 04:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JD → MarchHare[edit]

  • Current username: JD (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: MarchHare (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 20:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    German wiki admin asked if he could take over my username. I have graciously aceeded to his request. JD (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 124 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneRlevseTalk 22:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SWik78 → Big Bird[edit]

  • Current username: SWik78 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Big Bird (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 18:47, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)

SWik78 was created when I didn't think I would contribute to Wikipedia on a regular basis. Since then, I've found that a name that appears to most people as a semi-random sequence of numbers and characters (which is what SWik78 was intended to be) can be difficult to remember, repeat or refer to in a discussion because it's probably difficult to figure out how it should be pronounced.

Thanks! SWik78 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 11909 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: User being usurped has now been notified. Thanks! SWik78 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. The edits should be reassigned as soon as the database gets round to it. — Dan | talk 00:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shillika → Clocks[edit]

  • Current username: Shillika (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Clocks (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 05:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)

User requested me to do the required paperwork. The target account is a suspected sockpuppet. So am not planning to leave a message. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 05:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question. Will the block log be cleared on a rename? Please advise. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 05:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 23 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Names are changed in block logs just as in everything else (this wasn't originally the case, but it is now). This request is  DoneDan | talk 01:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


joethompson1 → joethompson[edit]

I'm almost certain that I signed up to Wikipedia under "joethompson" a while back, but since I didn't add my email address I can't recover the account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joethompson1 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneDan | talk 01:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aon_fi → Aon[edit]

  • Current username: Aon_fi (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Aon (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 19:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Aon fi (talk) 19:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneDan | talk 01:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aarondoucett → GLaDOS[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 474 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if it's an issue but GLaDOS is a character from Portal Nil Einne (talk) 11:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: I noticed that, but I don't see a real problem with it. It is not a violation of username policy, and there is much precedent for video-game-based usernames. bibliomaniac15 04:55, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - I can't imagine why video game names might be thought inappropriate. — Dan | talk 01:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


KJ temp → KJ[edit]

  • Current username: KJ temp (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: KJ (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 14:48, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)

KJ temp (talk) 14:48, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:52, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneDan | talk 01:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eurocopter_tigre → Eurocopter[edit]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 7 undeleted edits, 1 deleted edits, and 8 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments This is my third such request, as the previous ones were denied because an User:Eurocopter account exists and made 7 edits (6 on 1 June 2008 and 1 on 14 June 2008). However, that user did not make any new edit since then. I strongly need this name change, given that I am a coordinator of the Military history WikiProject and i'm talking every day with quite many different people (even officials sometimes). Due to these, my current username is innapropiate for serious conversations. I also own "User:Eurocopter" on ro:wiki. I wonder if anything could be done in order to move that user together with his 7 edits to something like "Eurocopter 2"? Thank you very much. --Eurocopter (talk) 09:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneDan | talk 01:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Terrillja_Temp → Wiggles[edit]

  • Current username: Terrillja_Temp (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Wiggles (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 16:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)

Now requesting from a temp account to facilitate the process. I will leave a note on my (Terrillja's) talkpage confirming that this is my account and showing my edit status. I would like an additional account to use from public terminals and unsecured wireless networks. I have read all policies on alternate accounts. --Terrillja temp (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm that this is me, not just a new user. --Terrillja talk 16:43, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 22 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 22 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've reviewed the target user's contribs, they are all vandalism that was likely reverted. However, there may be SUL issues with accounts at ja. and de. –xeno (talk) 15:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well there is no global SUL right now, so even if the users at ja or de want to get the SUL, they will have to usurp the user at en. That is assuming that the accounts at ja and de are from different people, not just the en user who never unified them. --Terrillja talk 15:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not quite; the ja. user would just have to make a single edit and they would be entitled to the SUL. –xeno (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, OK. Learning new things every day. --Terrillja talk 15:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneDan | talk 01:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Xenocidic → Xeno[edit]

  • Current username: Xenocidic (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Xeno (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 00:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    xeno (talk) 00:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 23102 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It should be noted that this was declined once before due to the no.wiki user, they have been inactive since 9. aug 2007 14:37. –xeno (talk) 00:58, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done nowiki user has not edited in 18 months and this won't affect his edits. RlevseTalk 20:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Secrets → Midway[edit]

  • Current username: Secrets (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Midway (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 02:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Secrets (talk) 02:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 787 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I have now informed the user. (Mistakenly put it on User page instead of Talk page.) Secrets (talk) 03:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneRlevseTalk 20:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ali Said → Ali Saeed[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The requesting user is primarily active in the Arabic wiki [1] Nil Einne (talk) 11:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: ali can you please confirm that you are the same user as the Ali Saeed on the Arabic Wiki?---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 23:23, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: User posted a link on my talk page but as I don't speak Arabic, I can't read it... I'll leave this in the capable hands of the 'crats.---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 14:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm the same user as Ali Saeed on the Arabic Wiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali Said (talk • contribs) 13:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneRlevseTalk 20:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

XBeanyx → Beany[edit]

  • Current username: XBeanyx (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Beany (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 18:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    XBeanyx (talk) 18:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have posted confermation on nl User:Beany.
The log entries of traget username are image uploads which are deleted. XBeanyx (talk) 18:45, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 1 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 18 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note:Are you the same Beady from the NL-Wiki? If so can you please confirm your identity? Helps to read the whole request, identity confirmed already on the NL Wiki. Target wiki's edits are from 2006---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 23:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneRlevseTalk 20:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RenatoAbella → Renato Abella[edit]

 Clerk note: User "Renato Abella" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Should technically be CHU request though. bibliomaniac15 03:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ElectricRush → Download[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2557 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did notify Download about this, and I did put the template on his/her talk page. -electricRush (T C) Sign! 22:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Fixed bot error. Xclamation point 04:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Do I need to wait one week for the username change to take effect if Download does not reply? Thanks, -electricRush (T C) Sign! 20:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Says so at the top of the page. TopGearFreak 18:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: account exists on about 10 other wikis, it's been blocked "til infinity" on one, and has no more than 3 edits on any of the others. Are you the owner of those accounts?---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 07:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, I only have a unified account electricRush. My username was also Cool Piplup before I previously renamed it about 5 months ago. -electricRush | Sign! 17:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneRlevseTalk 02:00, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot log in as Download. When I attempt to, it displays this message:

A database query syntax error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software. The last attempted database query was:
(SQL query hidden)
from within function "User::saveSettings". MySQL returned error "1062: Duplicate entry 'ElectricRush' for key 2 (10.0.0.235)".

Thanks, ElectricRush (talk) 02:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, false alarm, just figured out I needed to wait. -download | Sign! 02:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AKoan → Kenshin[edit]

  • Current username: AKoan (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Kenshin (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 16:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    AKoan (talk) 16:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 524 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I forgot to leave a message for current holder of the username, now I have corrected that. AKoan (talk) 11:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note:Kenshin exists on about 20 different wiki's with the PLwiki being the one with the most edits. A SUL does not exist. Are you the owner of the pl account? If so, please log in and confirm it.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 07:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is not me. AKoan (talk) 09:12, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 14:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TopGearFreak → Queenie[edit]

  • Current username: TopGearFreak (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Queenie (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 18:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)

I know it isn't commonplace for a relatively new user to change their name, but I'm fed up of being mistaken for a male. TopGearFreak 18:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2684 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just notified the user on their talk page. TopGearFreak 19:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Account is registered on 9 other wiki's. Are you the owner of Queenie on those wikis? If not, you won't be able to usurp as the name appears to be part of a global account. Is there another name you would like? ---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 07:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC) EDIT: On second look a SUL does not exists.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 08:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm not Queenie on those wikis. I'm TGF on everything. What do you mean by an SUL? TopGearFreak 21:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure he means a unified account, where you are able to log in using one username and password in all Wikimedia projects. -electricRush | Sign! 21:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So.. am I stil able to take Queenie, or do I have to pick another name? TopGearFreak 17:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(reset) There's a Queenie on these wikis:

  • enwikibooks
  • enwiktionary
  • eswiki
  • mswiki
  • svwiki
  • viwiki
  • zh_yuewiki
  • zhwiki

So if you want to create a global account, I would suggest you use another name. Otherwise, you can usurp the account. -electricRush | Sign! 00:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'll ursup the acount, please. I don't need a global account, I only edit Wikipedia. TopGearFreak 16:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 14:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arachnowhat → Subverted[edit]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 105 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note:Single edit of target was to indicate a location on own pages.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 07:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -- Andre (talk) 02:10, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sadra2010 → Sadra[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 35 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Message placed on 23 January 2009. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note:are you the Sadra from the CSWIKI? If so, can you log in and verify that? SUL does not exist.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 07:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note:The following comment was placed in the wrong location by Sadra2010, moved it to be with the request:---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 18:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have notified the user:Sadra who I wish to take over the username of, by leaving this template: Request for Usurpation. Please change my username. Thank you. Sadra2010 (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: As the message wasn't placed until the 23rd, I'm moving this request to be fulfilled on the 31st. EVula // talk // // 17:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Moved. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 15:06, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 19:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spankr → MikeyMoose[edit]

  • Current username: Spankr (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: MikeyMoose (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 01:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Spankr (talk) 01:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Plzthx! --Spankr (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does this just happen or do I need to notify someone that the seven day period is up? --Spankr (talk) 22:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia that are now deleted. Usernames with only deleted edits can usually be usurped.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 3 deleted edits, and 3 total edits. Requesting user has 224 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: All edits for MikeyMoose are from March 2008, and were deleted as vandalism.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 18:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Old MikeyMoose account had no e-mail address. Time enough has passed since message was posted on talk page. Kingturtle (talk) 17:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Middlesex Fire → Mycroft[edit]

  • Current username: Middlesex Fire (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Mycroft (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 11:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)

Middlesex Fire (talk) 11:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 130 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
When am I likely to hear more info on this? To answer the ClueBot's point about the target having one edit - that one edit was in 2004, and was reversed very soon after as the edit itself was a mistake that was very soon reversed. The user then never edited again. On my part, I wish to usurp the name because I will mainly be editing in and around the topic of Freemasonry and I no longer use the tag 'Middlesex Fire' in this regard on other online projects - instead I am increasingly using the name 'Mycroft'. Middlesex Fire (talk) 07:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The former has no specified e-mail address. We have waited a sufficient amount of time since the message was placed on the talk page. Kingturtle (talk) 17:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nsa1001 → Thelongview[edit]

  • Current username: Nsa1001 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Thelongview (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 12:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Nsa1001 (talk) 12:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The target name has never been used; I would like to take it over as my current username is too closely tied to my rl initials. I've been using WP for nearly three years, and wish to make more contributions on subjects that I wish not to be traceable to my identity. Many thanks for considering this.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 152 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Message now left for target user. Nsa1001 (talk) 12:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 16:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terraxos → Robofish[edit]

  • Current username: Terraxos (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Robofish (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 22:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Terraxos (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The existing user 'Robofish' has no edits, and their userpage was last edited in 2005, so this should be uncontroversial. No particular reason for a rename, except that I've been using this name for over three years now, and feel it's time for a change. Terraxos (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 20302 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 13:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bagatelle47 → Bagatelle[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 509 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


LunaRain → Palindrome[edit]

  • Current username: LunaRain (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Palindrome (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 17:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)


As I posted on here, I feel the need for a change.Luna RainHowLCry 03:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 178 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This one looks better, the only other global user is de.wiki with only 11 edits and none since 2007. –xeno (talk) 17:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Bureaucrat note: This user (Palindrome) has not specified a valid e-mail address. Kingturtle (talk) 17:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I made this request on Feb 4th. See my contribs. Luna RainHowLCry 02:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you sir. :] ...Ω.....¿TooT?....¡StatS!.. 05:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Holder-als → Holder[edit]

I'm Holder from the Alemannic Wikipedia. When I started to merge my accounts to a single login for all Wikimedia projects, I found the user user:Holder, who is blocked since several years. I want to submit an application that this blocked user is usurped, so that I can create a global account under the name Holder. Thanks, Holder-als (talk) 15:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 4 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The target user seemed to have been blocked as an WP:SPA. –xeno (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for 24 hours, in '05. Doesn't seem too serious, especially considering that this guy is trying to unify. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In other news, I've gone ahead and notified the user of requested usurpation. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I initially read that as indef. –xeno (talk) 00:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: This user (Holder) has not specified a valid e-mail address. Kingturtle (talk) 18:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The requesting user is trying to unify, and the target name was used but once. Kingturtle (talk) 15:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Holder (talk) 19:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redbluefire1 → Redbluefire[edit]

  • Current username: Redbluefire1 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Redbluefire (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 22:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Hi, "Redbluefire" is the name I use as my single online identity, and I'd like to contribute to Wikipedia under a user account rather than anonymously as I have for some time; I know it's unorthodox to grant a usurpation to a new user account, but I'd appreciate it if I could take over this account, which has no activity. My memory may even be so bad that I have forgotten that I registered this account sometime ago, and thus the password escapes me. Maybe i'm posting from the same IP range this account was registered from? I am the only "Redbluefire" evident in any major search engine, and this may be proven because I control any and all accounts that are returned in a web search's results, and will be glad to verify them if need be. Thank you for your assistance, even if you cannot grant this request. Redbluefire1 (talk) 22:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Verification will not be necessary; it will, however, fall into the bureaucrat's discretion with regard to whether such a new account can be renamed. Your reasoning is quite clear, though. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for February 17. Kingturtle (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 13:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Araignee537 → Araignee[edit]

Simpler name, common handle, and apparently not used by the current owner.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 24 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for February 19. Kingturtle (talk) 03:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pietru il-Boqli → Pietru[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: On 12 September 2008 your username was changed to Pietru il-Boqli. Why the need for this change? Kingturtle (talk) 14:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'd wanted to change it to Pietru but the user already registered took ages to respond: I'm now willing to wait to 'usurp' my originally intended username. Quand le jour se lève les ténèbres s'évanouissent. (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: The target username has not specified a valid e-mail address. Everything is in order for February 21. Kingturtle (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2665 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 16:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Peephole → Sloane[edit]

  • Current username: Peephole (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Sloane (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 16:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Peephole (talk) 16:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for February 21. The target name is in use on eswiki, but has only 2 edits. Kingturtle (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 4025 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anafarooq → ANN[edit]

  • Current username: Anafarooq (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: ANN (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 15:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Anafarooq (talk) 15:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it is to be stated that my current username is anafarooq. and i want to change it to ANN. i will b very greatfull. thankyou

 Bureaucrat note: I've reformatted this request. Everything is in order. The target username has not specified a valid e-mail address. Kingturtle (talk) 19:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 15:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sapph42 → sapph[edit]

  • Current username: sapph42 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: sapph (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 20:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Sapph42 (talk) 20:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for a 2 March usurpation. Kingturtle (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, this request is for a SUL unification. Should I delete the request and recreate it on the SUL usurpation page, or am I committed to the standard process? Sapph42 (talk) 14:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: There's no technical difference between this page and the SUL usurpation page. They are just different pages, really. Since you made your request here first, let's leave it here. Kingturtle (talk) 14:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 142 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Since this is for SUL purposes, we can waive the time limit. bibliomaniac15 01:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sowhy → Sowhy (usurped)[edit]

  • Current username: Sowhy (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Sowhy (usurped) (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 19:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    I'd like to usurp this name as a doppelganger account for my current name. The target account has only three edits in 2006, all of them vandalism. SoWhy 19:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 3 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 3 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So what you're really requesting is a change from User:Sowhy to Sowhy (usurped) pending your taking of the name. I'll amend the request to reflect that. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And it will actually be the current to be informed of this request, not the target. Done. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh, thanks for the fixes. Yes, I'd like to rename that user so I can doppelganger it. Regards SoWhy 12:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Let me see if I get this right...User:SoWhy wants User:Sowhy changed to User:Sowhy (usurped), and User:Sowhy (usurped) changed to Sowhy (usurped) (usurped). Right? Kingturtle (talk) 22:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't think so. Sowhy (usurped) is not an account name that current exists. Admin SoWhy wants Sowhy changed to Sowhy (usurped) so that the now-vacant Sowhy can be used as a doppelganger by admin SoWhy. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Sowhy has been renamed to Sowhy (usurped). bibliomaniac15 05:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DTGardner → PizzaBox[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for a 3 March usurpation. Kingturtle (talk) 12:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 613 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 05:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kenllama → Kenirwin[edit]

  • Current username: Kenllama (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Kenirwin (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 01:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)

Reason: My current username (Kenllama) is one associated with my personal life, but I'm increasingly talking about Wikipedia in my professional life. I'm a librarian, and have started giving talks on how librarians can include WP in their professional activities. I'd like to be able to show them the work that I've been doing without sharing the personal username that appears in other parts of the internets. It appears that the requested username (Kenirwin) was created over two years ago and has never been used. (It's just faintly possible that I created that account; I really don't know. That was right around when I started using WP for work-related purposes.) Whoever User:Kenirwin is or was, I would be grateful if I could move User:Kenllama's history to that username. Thanks! Kenllama/(talk) 01:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified. Xclamation point 05:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for usurpation on March 4. Kingturtle (talk) 14:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ThisIsADummy → Sachse[edit]

User:Sachse is my original account, however I lost the password and I lost access to the email long ago. The account is unused today, but I would like to change name so that I am able to integrate it into my unified login. Thanks ThisIsADummy (talk) 00:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for usurpation on March 5. Kingturtle (talk) 12:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 12:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A444 → A333[edit]

  • Current username: A444 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: A333 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 18:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    A444 (talk) 18:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 20 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: The target username is used in five Wikimedia databases, with over 100 recent edits in fiwiki. A444, is that you? Kingturtle (talk) 02:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that is me.A444 (talk) 14:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed. Kingturtle (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 23:36, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

docsis → caldwelljt[edit]

  • Current username: docsis (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: caldwelljt (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 14:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Docsis (talk) 14:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did notice the request suggested being an established user. The username I am requesting reflects my last name and FI/MI. I thought i created this username, but can't seem to recover it. I have not been established as this user, but I have made quite a number of edits using anonymous due to this name being taken (i have hard time keeping track of different user names, so i typically use this one on all my non-financial websites. with one of three passwords based on my desired security. none of these passwords seem to be working.

I do however wish to mark the sites that I have been editing anonymously (or via IP): A. Most all of my edits are adding internal links to articles that are missing them. correcting internal inaccuracies (such as artical A says article B as saying 50,000 troops, but clicking on the link says something like 55,000 troops. I correct artical A to reflect what has been established in article B.

B. I also ocasionally add/update links to external "offical" sites for items/products referanced without links.

C. Once in a great while I update spelling or grammer (specifically obvious problems where re-editing has left extra words such as "widget a was and/or considered failed", I read around it to see what was intended and update it.

That's it, hope you can help me out. I'm not overly "bold" but I do contribute and it would help me out a lot to login as caldwelljt.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for March 8 usurpation. Note: None of your anonymous edits or edits from other accounts will be included in this usurpation. Kingturtle (talk) 21:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 04:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikikez → Keezie[edit]

  • Current username: Wikikez (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Keezie (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 03:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Wikikez (talk) 03:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 7 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everthing is in place for March 9. Kingturtle (talk) 22:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 12:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Nageeeh → Nageh[edit]

  • Current username: Nageeeh (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Nageh (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 21:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Nageeeh (talk) 21:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Email sent. Xclamation point 23:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in place for March 10. Kingturtle (talk) 12:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 11:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


EleanorMusic → BlueTree[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 23 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: user notified. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Make due note of this request at CHU. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for March 12. Kingturtle (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 13:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Nezek → Bitbit[edit]

  • Current username: Nezek (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Bitbit (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 20:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Nezek (talk) 20:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 476 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: The target name's home wiki is at jawiki, with 19 edits since 02 December 2007. Also the target name has 5 edits in metawiki since 26 February 2009. Kingturtle (talk) 12:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC) Kai Haywood[reply]
metawiki acount is my account, meta:User:Bitbit. --Nezek (talk) 18:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can you have the local Meta account confirm this? —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Added a link to my Wikipedia account on my user page there. --Nezek (talk) 01:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You sure did; however, you did it as an IP. Please log in as Bitbit and make the confirmation. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, I didn't notice. There you go. (: --Nezek (talk) 06:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, is it possible to have my new username as all lowercase, like this: bitbit? I would prefer it much more. --Nezek (talk) 02:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: It is not technically possible to have the first letter of a username be lowercase. However, to make the first letter appear lowercase add {{lowercase}} to your userpage, and/or customize your signature. Kingturtle (talk) 02:25, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 13:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


reeceweddell → john smith1989[edit]

 Clerk note: see Wikipedia:Changing_username#reeceweddell_.E2.86.92_johnsmith1994, FWIW. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: The plan here is to change User:John Smith1989 to something else so that User:reeceweddell can become User:john smith1989 without confusion. User:John Smith1989 was a vandalism-only account in April 2008. I see no reason to wait for that user to approve. I'll make the fix shortly. Kingturtle (talk) 11:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The user "John Smith1989" has been renamed to "Unused0019". The user "Reeceweddell" has been renamed to "John smith1989". Kingturtle (talk) 12:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shapiros10 → Shappy[edit]

  • Current username: Shapiros10 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Shappy (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 22:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Sam Blab 22:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 6404 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for March 14. Note that the target name was registered in th.wiki on 11 September 2006 and in ja.wiki on 02 October 2008, but neither have any edits thus far. Kingturtle (talk) 22:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've sent out requests there. Sam Blab 01:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 04:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RamenJunkie → JoshMiller[edit]

I am requesting to change user names to better align with other online accounts. Also JoshMiller does not appear to be an actual registered user.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 22 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for March 15. Are you aware of (and comfortable with) the dangers of using a real name? Kingturtle (talk) 17:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 05:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Elemael → Elemesh[edit]

  • Current username: Elemael (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Elemesh (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 16:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
  • Reason: My old account on here was called Elemesh. As you can see he has 1 edit to Windlesham House School in the year 2006. For continuity purposes (as Elemesh is my standard internet alias) I would like to use the old account name I created. I cannot use the account itself because I have forgotten the password and the email account used to set it up has been closed. Elemael (talk) 16:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 232 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for March 15. Kingturtle (talk) 17:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 05:09, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sawblade05 → Sawblade5[edit]

I also need help as I already move my Userpage over I don't know how this will affect the process. Sawblade05 (talk to me | my wiki life) 17:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I reverted the pagemove. It will be completed by the closing crat if they approve this request. –xeno (talk) 17:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Although the target name has not been used in en.wiki, it was created only a month ago (4 February 2009). On meta,wiki the target name has two talk page edits on 16 November 2008; on commons.wiki the target username has two userpage edits on 31 May 2008. Are all or any of these you? Kingturtle (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2567 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:45, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Both usernames belong to me! The edits are me on that other Wiki an my email address should match there. Where did this six month rule come in? But I need them merged. It stated to go here on the Wikipedia:Changing username to go here. How in the heck do I get them merged? I really don't want to start over as I created the other account by acident think that was the only way to change names based on WP:Sock. Sawblade05 (talk to me | my wiki life) 05:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note I also posted a note on my newer account tring to prove its me per the notice at Wikipedia_talk:Changing_username/Usurpations#Accout less than 6 months. I didn't make a GFDL Significant edit there just a little tiny note on the talk page on the new account. Sawblade05 (talk to me | my wiki life) 06:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 15:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply