THC Science

EleosPrime → Eleos[edit]

Current username: EleosPrime (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Eleos (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 19:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Eleos^Prime (talk) 19:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made this request for the first time in May of 2007. The user:Eleos made two edits to the sandbox, and has done nothing since. The original request for usurpation was denied based on two edits in the sandbox. I am asking that the request be revisited. Thank you.

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
User has 2 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 875 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: Edits not significant in GFDL terms; nothing more than tests for formatting. Account over 2 years old. Cau lde 13:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, everything else is in order. The {{CUU}} template needs to be updated so that contribs=yes doesn't cut off the rest of the content... —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 09:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat note: there is a account with this name on elwiki: [1]. Is that you? WJBscribe (talk) 10:39, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, that is not me. Eleos^Prime 13:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done - The edits to this project are not problematic. That said, normally I would have declined a request where there is a user on another project with 90 edits, as they have a prior claim to the global name. However, on review of their edits, I see they were all to one article and introduced a copyvio. They were then resulted. As these cannot have GFDL significance, I will perform this rename. WJBscribe (talk) 22:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prom3th3an → Promethean[edit]

Current username: Prom3th3an (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Promethean (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 13:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
«l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 00:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
User has 3 undeleted edits, 3 deleted edits, and 6 total edits. Requesting user has 7121 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Usurpation is a courtesy we extend to users in good standing, which Prom3th3an is not. He has a history of selectively editing his history here to hide the fact that he has fomented a large number of disputes - e.g, he is a troll. This request is denied. Raul654 (talk) 01:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Editing his history" - sorry Raul, that is not true, he has never deleted any of his edits (he can't - he's not an admin). You have recently been in a dispute with him, and you have made very clear your desire to get him off Wikipedia. You rarely edit this page, so to me it looks like you are following Prom around, trying to bait him. DuncanHill (talk) 01:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bureaucrat, this page has been on my watchlist for years. I don't edit it often, but that doesn't mean I don't see what goes on here.

As for selectively wiping his history, I'm talking about edits like this and this wherein he deletes all negative commentary of him, thus making it more difficult to keep track of the (numerous) times he has fomented problems. Raul654 (talk) 01:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editors are entitled to remove anything they like from their talk pages, as I am sure you are well aware. It is a practice engaged in by some of our most notable admins. DuncanHill (talk) 01:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that we don't block people for "interesting" ways of archiving doesn't mean it can't be used as evidence of their desire to hide all the drama and disruption they cause. Raul654 (talk) 01:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"we prefer only to grant requests from reasonably well-established users". Your deny is not a valid reason per policy. If 6000+ edits does not make me established what does? Also if you want me to put the insult back on my userpage i will, i did it out of courtesy for you. Also im not hiding, if i was i would make a new account (quite easy to do). Also thier is a tab called "history". I am sorry for my remark, i have stated that numerious times. Im trying to move and to get back to what we are here to do, I would hope you do the same, This is not the place to hang out the dirty laundry. «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 01:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I said you were not a user in good standing - the fact that you barely avoided being community banned 2 days ago is pretty conclusive evidence of this. We do not extend the courtesy of renames and usurpations to users who are not in good standing, your own wikilawyering to the contrary not withstanding. Raul654 (talk) 03:56, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The vast majority voted against the ban, one user labelled it wiki drama and most said it was pre-mature. So if I propose a ban agaisnt you and it gets knocked back overwhelmingly, does that mean you no longer in good standing? thats what you imply. The blocks were very "Very minor disruption" (Ryanposs said that, one of the blocking admins) Also the words quoted are from the top of the page not you. So, your own un-written rules aside, there is no written rule that is stopping me from usurping, just your biased POV in an attempt to use punitive measures against me because I said something you didnt like and something I regret. «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 04:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that some people felt that it was premature to permanently ban you most certainly does not make you an editor in good standing. The facts are that you have, on numerous occasions [2][3][4][5][6], made personal attacks on other users, and disrupted wikipedia - that is why you are not an editor in good standing. The fact that there was substantial support (albeit not a majority) to ban you speaks for itself. There are consequences to your actions. Raul654 (talk) 05:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:JzG#Prom3th3an - Are you sure your watching usurp and not just me?
1/5th support is not substantial, its marginal by definition.
In your opinion im not in good standing.
[7] Strikin a remark that was borderline iffy (time for one less admin) on arbcom is very very minor and was not ill intentioned.
[8] another arbcome remark full of baseless accusations and ill faith remarks. Again in good faith.
[9] a ANI thread asking another admin to take over because it would be un-acceptable for him to make any adminly decisions re: me. Kind of like the situation your in.
[10] was an admin's mistake and was quickly reverted. 2 other admins said that it was wrong. «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[11] was for making an ANI thread about the above admin's block and another remark he made.

Again all low level stuff. So, whats your interest in all this? Why are you so persistent? Why do we not change username on editors in good standing, to punish the others? In 7000 edits, a handful are iffy, does that outway all the good? «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an absolute farce - I can't believe what I'm seeing up above. Raul, you are clearly the wrong person to be making this sort of judgement call, especially for such a minor rename which would not make identifying Prom difficult at all. This request should not be denied at all, he has two blocks for minor infringements and the ban discussion failed quite strongly just a few days ago. Prom is still an editor in good standing here, up until the point he's banned or placed under some community restrictions, neither of which have occurred thus far and I doubt will occur in the near future. I'm going to take on an informal mentoring role with Prom and I suspect we won't see any further minor problems we've seen in the past. I urge another crat to come and show some sense here and override this clearly wrong decision. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 09:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I agree with Ryan. I advise Raul as a Wikipedian to a Wikipedian to step away from this particular request. Considering that you were involved in a dispute with Prom, it seems that an impartial bureaucrat should at least give a second opinion. I also think that this discussion should be held on WT:USURP, or at another forum deemed appropriate; having an overly long discussion here merely clogs up a page that is heavily trafficked anyway. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 09:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~{{not done}}~~ but on different grounds to Raul654. Although the edits made to this project do not preclude usurpation in my view, I note that an account with this name has made 30 edits to dewiki. That account is the "home wiki" for the global name Promethean and thus the operator of that account has the best claim to usurp the name here. I do not think it is acceptable for enwiki users to ask bureaucrats to help them get into positions where they have superior claims to global accounts than the editor at the current home wiki, nor do I think creating new SUL conflicts at this stage is a good idea. See this archived discussion from July. WJBscribe (talk) 10:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, that seems fair. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 10:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note the last date for edit from that account, it is clearly innactive. I also own Promethean on Meta and commons as of earlier today «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 10:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It may be inactive, but it has edits and the best claim to the global name. I defer to a dewiki bureaucrat to determine whether it is appropriate for you to take over the name on dewiki. WJBscribe (talk) 10:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Promethean (my account) is on simple wikipedia is now the home wiki of the SUL name Promethean. I now have best claim. «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strike my objection to this request - I will reconsider my opinion based on the change in the global situation. WJBscribe (talk) 11:52, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On reflecting about the issues raised by this request, I believe it should be performed. Now that the account has been unified, Prom3th3an is the owner of this name globally. It would not be appropriate to allow anyone else to usurp the name on this project. There is some merit to Raul654's logic - we don't allow usurpation by very new accounts so good use is made of the names, therefore to allow an account likely to be indefinitely blocked in the near future would be a waste. That said, assuming that a user with some conduct issues will inevitably be banned at a later date seems totally contrary to the principle that we assume good faith, which much presumably extend to the possibility of reform. A recent discussion found no consensus to ban Prom3th3an, suggesting that the community is of the impression his misconduct has either not been particularly serious or that is capable of improvement. It is also worth noting that block logs no longer become detached whilst accounts are renamed, so a rename would not obfuscate past issues. In any event, the logic of putting names to good use doesn't run very far now that Prom3th3an is, by virtue of having obtained control of the Promethean global account, the only one who can use the name on this project anyway. I will ask Raul654 to reconsider his position with respect to this request. WJBscribe (talk) 12:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your time and guidance Will, I can assure you, I will put it to good use. «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 12:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with Will. Promethean did create an account on simple wiki today and gain control of the account. Raul654 is a crat and welcome on this CHUU board but we all know admins/crats should not take actions in cases in which they are involved and Raul654 is certainly involved in this case. I also ask him to reconsider his position here. As for usurping, Promethean does have the SUL rights to this name. The only remaining question about "well-established/good standing". Promethean's edits certainly make him well-established. Is he in good-standing--depends on how you define that (block log, likelihood to be indef'd, record of disruption, is the user banned, etc). Given that there was no consensus to ban him a few days ago, I have to say he's in good standing for rename purposes. However I strongly encourage him to quickly mend the areas that have caused him trouble in the past. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In any formal sense he is in good standing. He has made some egregious errors, but I believe others are working with him on these issues, which were more drama and breaches of AGF than anything one would normally worry about (we see neither article vandalism nor POV pushing for instance). Certainly the respelling of the username is not going to be a scrutiny issue as it's clearly identified as the same user, and as WJB has observed (and I can confirm, as I noticed it recently on a renamed user) block logs now follow a user around. Orderinchaos 23:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sympathetic to Raul's concerns, but I would also like to point out that, all considerations of standing aside, this rename could only minimally distance Prom3th3an from his former name, since the new name is orthographically almost identical, especially since '3' and 'e' belong to an orthographic equivalence class in l33tspeak and other discourses. I see no harm in granting this request. Raul, would you be willing to reconsider your decision here? — Dan | talk 23:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have informed Raul that because this is technacally an SUL usurp, the 7 waiting game is waived and the only thing / rule or person stopping this is waiting for Raul reconsider. «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 00:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since the other bureaucrats feel that it's OK to proceed with this rename despite the bad precedent it sets (that any user, no matter how disruptive, can request and get a rename), I'll drop my opposition. Raul654 (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done and noting that I think "any user, no matter how disruptive" is hyperbole. WJBscribe (talk) 00:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have one more thing to add and that is this: This has been a David vs. Goliath battle by principle, At the start the username change was just a nicety I could have lived without it, but as the discussion progressed it became more about moral principles than anything else. At any point I could have attacked Raul again for being punitive and mean-spirited as I was furious because I like others saw through the charade, But I didn’t instead I found going about things the right way and letting things pan out got me further, a valuable lesson, its restored some of my faith. The remark from Raul above is nothing but a final slap in the face from someone who obviously felt that he had lost. If you felt you lost Raul please remember two things, A) There are no winners or losers on wikipedia B) You should have more faith in the Community's and other crat's ability to make its/their own judgements C) Every editor no matter how "influential", is answerable for his actions and motives. My thanks go to those who voiced thier opinions, especially Will and Ryan. From a very very happy (now) Promethean «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 00:26, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Psolio42 → Psolio[edit]

Current username: Psolio42 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Psolio (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 15:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Psolio42 (talk) 15:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia that are now deleted. Usernames with only deleted edits can usually be usurped.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 2 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I own the account Psolio, but have forgotten the password, and I have no email address associated with that account --Psolio42 (talk) 15:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done bibliomaniac 15 19:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hankqq → Ski123[edit]

Current username: Hankqq (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Ski123 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 07:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)

Hankqq (talk) 05:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Yes[reply]

SoxBot has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, but as it has no contributions, it can be usurped at WP:USURP. SoxBot VI (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Moved from CHU. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 07:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 94 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 03:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Psolio42 → Psolio[edit]

Current username: Psolio42 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Psolio (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 15:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Psolio42 (talk) 15:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia that are now deleted. Usernames with only deleted edits can usually be usurped.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 2 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I own the account Psolio, but have forgotten the password, and I have no email address associated with that account --Psolio42 (talk) 15:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done bibliomaniac 15 19:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hankqq → Ski123[edit]

Current username: Hankqq (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Ski123 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 07:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)

Hankqq (talk) 05:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Yes[reply]

SoxBot has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, but as it has no contributions, it can be usurped at WP:USURP. SoxBot VI (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Moved from CHU. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 07:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 94 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 03:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RyanLupin → Possum[edit]

Current username: RyanLupin (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Possum (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 21:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
—— RyanLupin • (talk) 21:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 13254 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Dan | talk 23:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moon Star X1 → HK22[edit]

Current username: Moon Star X1 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: HK22 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 05:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Moon Star X1 ^{Talk to me!} 05:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 88 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have requested another name at CHU. Please clarify which name you prefer. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User contacted me on my talk page, saying that he wants HK22 for sure. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 04:20, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done bibliomaniac 15 03:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TylerPuetz → Tyler[edit]

Current username: TylerPuetz (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Tyler (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 21:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
TylerPuetz (^talk/_contribs) 21:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The current owner of "Tyler" had tried moving the account to the username "Tyler23", but "Tyler23"'s last contribution was May 18th, 2007, and "Tyler" does not have any contributions. I feel that the username is inactive and/or abandoned. -- TylerPuetz (^talk/_contribs) 21:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3870 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done You will have to remerge your SUL though, and perform numerous usurpations if you want a full set. bibliomaniac 15 03:14, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Theterribletwins1111 → Spitfire[edit]

Current username: Theterribletwins1111 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Spitfire (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 08:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Theterribletwins1111 (talk) 08:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 980 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done bibliomaniac 15 20:00, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SAM415 → Sammie[edit]

Current username: SAM415 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Sammie (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 09:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
SAM415 (talk) 08:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SoxBot has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, but as it has no contributions, it can be usurped at WP:USURP. SoxBot VI (talk) 08:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Moved from CHU. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 09:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 65 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:05, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 00:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC), well, I tried to, see "16:23, September 30, 2008 Bibliomaniac15 (Talk | contribs | block) has renamed User:SAM415 to "Sammiewood" ‎ (66 edits. Reason: WP:CHU)" this is what happens when you make multiple requests. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WBOSITG → Garden[edit]

Current username: WBOSITG (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Garden (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 13:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)

Well, I wish to change username primarily for the ease of any user trying to find me. As my username at present is an acronym (a fairly random one at that) it is currently more difficult than it perhaps should be to find me, so I would like to change my username to this similar one. Thanks for your time. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 13:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 16952 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you guys insist on changing your names?! First Jennavecia, then Coffee, then Caulde, then Possum, then Garden! Methinks this is a secret plot of TEH CABAL to crash the servers renaming you guys' overloaded accounts. bibliomaniac 15 03:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shhhhhh!!! :D Maybe that's why the servers are playing up more than the economy these days. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 19:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done - please create a redirect to your RfA from Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Garden for transparency. WJBscribe (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smgebru → Addis[edit]

Current username: Smgebru (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Addis (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 06:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Smgebru (talk) 23:52, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SoxBot has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, but as it has no contributions, it can be usurped at WP:USURP. SoxBot VI (talk) 23:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Migrated from CHU. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 39 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done bibliomaniac 15 02:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gustavo siqueira2230 → Gustavo Siqueira[edit]

Current username: Gustavo siqueira2230 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Gustavo Siqueira (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 05:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Gustavo §iqueira ^Yes??. 05:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
User has 5 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 5 total edits. Requesting user has 66 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the user Gustavo Siqueira and Gustavo siqueira2230, but I changed my username in other wikis and I have my all other logins unified, unless in wiki-en. I'm not still editing whit the name "Gustavo Siqueira" anymore because I want to restore my edits whit "Gustavo siqueira2230"._{excuse my poor English, I hope you understand me}. Gustavo §iqueira ^Yes??. 05:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand your English. Unfortunately though, we can't add the edits of Gustavo Siqueira to your current account. I presume that is what you are asking for? Caulde 08:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Clerk note: GS understands that the contirbutions of Gustavo Siqueira, will be lost when Gustavo siqueira2230's are moved there in the rename. He owns both accounts, so perhaps this is enough cause for a speedy usurp? Caulde 22:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done as he's owner of both. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Gustavo §iqueira ^Yes??. 06:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gustavo Siqueira (talk • contribs) [reply]

RyRy → RyanCross[edit]

Current username: RyRy (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: RyanCross (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 18:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
RyRy (talk) 18:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 18450 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tough one. The one mainspace edit was made 9 months ago. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 03:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I should show you this BN discussion. -- RyRy (talk) 03:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, CV. Shouldn't be an issue. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 04:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done I don't know if all of your user subpages have moved along as well, though, so you're going to have to check. bibliomaniac 15 01:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thank you, bibliomaniac. – RyanCross (talk) 01:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jafet.vixle → Jafet[edit]

Current username: Jafet.vixle (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Jafet (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 11:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)

Notes:

~~I believe the en.wikipedia account was created by me. The email address is probably non-working by now, though, and I've forgotten the login password.~~ (Now I doubt it a bit; kindly ignore. 11:45, 27 September 2008 (UTC)) In any case, it is rather old.
The en.wikiversity account is my own former-account-turned-doppelgänger (wikiversity:User:Jafet).
I went for unified login under the current name a while ago; if this request is approved can I change my unified login over to the new name? How easy/difficult would this be?

~ Jafet • business • pleasure • voicemail 11:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 761 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Jafet (talk · contribs) account was created back in September 2005. Were you active around that time? Cau lde

Well, I certainly browsed Wikipedia about that time; however the details are hazy now. Now I think it's a weak argument and have removed it. ~ Jafet • business • pleasure • voicemail 11:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The good news is that you are the holder of the right to rename all your accounts to Jafet, since you are the account with most edits (on all wikis - confirmation). Some of those other accounts, one on the Italian Wikipedia for example, was created back in 2006. However, since this English Wikipedia account is held by no-one as part of SUL, you should be able to rename to this in a week's time - the time taken so the user can return to view the message and raise any possible objections. Cau lde 11:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, can you help with my SUL renaming question? (See the third bullet of my "Notes".) ~ Jafet • business • pleasure • voicemail 11:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you've not yet unified your account, stop now. If you wish for your accounts to be renamed to Jafet, you will have to rename them all locally (at the the wikis you are active on) and then unify them through Special:MergeAccount, after which every account you operate will be called Jafet (beware though, as soon as you venture off onto unvisited wikis, accounts under the name Jafet will be created automatically). It is relatively easy. Cau lde 12:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have already performed unification on "Jafet.vixle"; do your instructions apply to that? ~ Jafet • business • pleasure • voicemail 12:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can ask at meta, if you wish. Stewards there deal with many SUL queries every week. (I was going to tell you to ask for deletion of the already unified account, but apparently that bug has been fixed, so maybe you just ask for the rename of the SUL there? I'm not sure. I should know, but I just returned to editing this board after an absence.) Cau lde 13:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. (woah, nine colons) ~ Jafet • business • pleasure • voicemail 15:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 00:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auric The Rad → Auric[edit]

Current username: Auric The Rad (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Auric (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 09:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Reason: I created this account nearly four years ago. I feel somewhat silly now with such a long name and title. Auric (talk) 04:43, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SoxBot has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible. SoxBot VI (talk) 04:45, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: I moved this request over from CHU. Original post can be found here. Useight (talk) 05:01, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 7672 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:07, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Note you may have trouble with some of your user pages moving, I got some error messages on that. Let us know if you need help. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christeld → Christel[edit]

Current username: christeld (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: christel (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 21:36, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Christeld (talk) 21:36, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I use the handle "christel" everywhere else, and note it's been unused here since 2005, wondering if there's any chance of a rename? Thank you.

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:37, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 00:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cream → Mixwell[edit]

Current username: Cream (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Mixwell (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 21:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
creaɯy!^Talk 21:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 6078 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done You will have to reunify your SUL though. bibliomaniac 15 02:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonsblast → DragonZero[edit]

Current username: Dragonsblast (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: DragonZero (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 04:51, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Dragonsblast (talk) 04:51, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 492 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 03:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bgtbgt → Bgt[edit]

Current username: Bgtbgt (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Bgt (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 08:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Bgtbgt (talk) 08:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made a request already in the August of 2007, which was rejected back then due to me not appearing as an established user. (as seen in this revision) Now I have been a registered member for over an year, I have edited and created more pages (in addition to the edits I have done without logging in, before and after registering), and I have the account name Bgt in the Finnish version and my personal web page comes as a first hit when searching for the word "bgt" (at least in the Finnish Google). The current holder of the username bgt is yet to make even a single edit under that username.

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 27 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. WJBscribe (talk) 23:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PrinceOfCanada → Roux[edit]

Current username: PrinceOfCanada (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Roux (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 02:19, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)

Usurped username has one contrib from 2005. I would like to usurp because I have realized I don't like my current name, and the new name is more reflective of how I think about my contribs to WP. I understand that recent blocks on my account could be an issue; if granted usurp I intend to put a link in my sig for a couple of weeks that notes my previous username. Thank you. Prince of Canada^{t | c} 02:19, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 6136 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 02:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: one edit was back in late '05, seems to have been reverting POVish vandalism. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 04:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does a revert count as a non-trivial edit? If not, can this usurp go forward? Raul654 (talk) 17:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 10:17, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Space_dude7 → Cboshuizen[edit]

Current username: Space dude7 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Cboshuizen (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 22:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Space dude7 (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 5 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

actually I did leave the message (User_talk:Cboshuizen) before lodging this request. Is something wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Space dude7 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a bot error; it's OK. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:37, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the problem, the {{user13}} link for Current username was done with an underscore. X clamation point 02:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Cboshuizen/Space_dude7 has discussed this in irC in #wikipedia-en-help. Users Prince Of Canada and Aervanath can vouch along with me that they say (inserted after the fact) are the same person, and Cboshuizen has simply lost the password to the old account. I would recommend a speedy usurp. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Err... actually all I can vouch for is that they say they're the same person, to be completely accurate. Just wanted to be clear. Prince of Canada^{t | c} 22:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a note, I have corrected the bot for clarification purposes. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 05:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 10:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EPWA airport → Whiteman[edit]

Current username: EPWA airport (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Whiteman (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 20:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
EPWA airport (talk) 20:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1197 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Whiteman on the Polish language wikipedia? If so, please make an edit to plwiki confirming this. WJBscribe (talk) 23:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am. I've made an edit confirming this (link). EPWA airport (talk) 07:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. WJBscribe (talk) 00:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Loqi_T. → Loqi[edit]

Current username: Loqi_T. (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Loqi (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 05:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Loqi T. (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I created the new account and made a few edits before I knew the proper way to rename an account. If it's not too technically difficult, I'd like to migrate Loqi_T. to Loqi without losing the past few days' edits under the new name. The usurpation procedure seems the most suitable to what I'm trying to do. If it's not practical to do this, just let me know and I'll continue on without taking the old account with me. Thanks, Loqi.

Done - the contributions you made as "Loqi" are can now be found as "Loqi (old)". WJBscribe (talk) 21:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flailing Breegull → Rejax[edit]

Current username: Flailing Breegull (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Rejax (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 19:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Flailing Breegull (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rejax is also my account. I'm wanting to move everything from Flailing Breegull. Flailing Breegull (talk) 19:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you make a comment here whilst signed as "Rejax" to confirm that the account is yours? WJBscribe (talk) 19:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was in the process when you made that edit. Confirming that I am Flailing Breegull. Rejax (talk) 19:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. WJBscribe (talk) 03:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Allness Null → Alcove[edit]

Current username: Allness Null (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Alcove (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 20:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Allness Null (talk) 20:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia that are now deleted. Usernames with only deleted edits can usually be usurped.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 6 deleted edits, and 6 total edits. Requesting user has 152 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On hold - while the tool which enables us to check whether edits have been made using this name to other Wikimedia projects is not functioning. WJBscribe (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 23:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michaelaltieri → MelissaHughes[edit]

Current username: Michaelaltieri (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: MelissaHughes (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 06:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Michaelaltieri (talk) 06:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
Requesting user only has 35 edits --Chris 03:41, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Andre (talk) 03:59, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XF Law → Law[edit]

Current username: XF Law (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Law (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 10:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
^{XF Law}_{talk at me} 10:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified. --Chris 03:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 03:13, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phpmenoodles → Gonefishing[edit]

Current username: Phpmenoodles (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Gonefishing (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 09:35, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Phpmenoodles (talk) 09:35, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As said on requested change username page: I started the Gonefishing user profile but have completely forgotton my login details. You will see that, because of this, there is no activity from that "user" (me). I'm requesting that the account be deleted or name changed (Phpmenoodles) is fine and that I can have my old username back. It's a username I use alot online and so would like to have it on Wikipedia. Thankyou.

Done. WJBscribe (talk) 22:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pXk → Straight Edge PXK[edit]

Current username: pXk (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Straight Edge PXK (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 15:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
I was this username but I changed, now I hate it and it auto created my old with my Global accountPXK ^T /_C 15:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 1120 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, the current username and the target username are the same user. pXk has requested username change several times... D.M.N. (talk) 16:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done - but this is the last rename I'm willing to perform given who many times you've been renamed in the past. WJBscribe (talk) 01:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Raunak777 → Raunak[edit]

Current username: Raunak777 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Raunak (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 16:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Raunak777 (talk) 16:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 12 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have notified him Raunak777 (talk) 11:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 00:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TatharNuar → Tathar[edit]

Current username: TatharNuar (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Tathar (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 18:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Requested username has no contributions, and over three years have passed since creation. TatharNuar (talk) 18:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 86 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to create a unified account with the above requested name, but my desired commons username is taken by someone who has a single edit that consists of a deleted image. Could someone please direct me to the appropriate place where I can make this request? --TatharNuar (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. You may request renaming at Commons:Changing username. bibliomaniac 15 23:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons says that page doesn't exist. --Tathar (talk) 06:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MiaTaylor → MTaylorD[edit]

Current username: MiaTaylor (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: MTaylorD (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 23:18, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
MiaTaylor (talk) 23:18, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like not to have my first name included.

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username has an email address set, and an email has been sent by a clerk or bureaucrat to notify them of this request.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 5 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:20, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done bibliomaniac 15 23:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Galaxy → Dasani[edit]

Current username: Lady Galaxy (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Dasani (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 08:23, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
I picked this username because it came from a Korean song that I was really quite fond of. However, several horrible incidents happened (I don't want to get into specifics but I will if asked to), and then I thought twice about using this as a Wikipedia name. Also, it's a little long and confusing. I had originally taken this case to WP:CHU, but they in turn redirected me here. Lady★Galaxy 08:23, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 5299 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:03, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat note: This target name also matches a well known product, Dasani. Any other thoughts? — Rlevse • Talk • 15:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's just a bottled water company... I personally think that if I chose to rename to Coca Cola Company or Dasani Company than sure, it might be considered a conflict of interest to other editors. But aren't there people out there with product names as their usernames here? Lady★Galaxy 19:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: - Discussion about this request at WP:BN. X clamation point 04:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Done, just pls don't promote the water company ;-) — Rlevse • Talk • 16:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joao Bosco → Jrodarte[edit]

Current username: Joao Bosco (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Jrodarte (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 17:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Joao Bosco (talk) 17:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ChunkyStyle → Needlenose[edit]

Current username: ChunkyStyle (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Needlenose (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 05:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
ChunkyStyle (talk contribs) 05:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1455 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: Email sent. X clamation point 11:53, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muddy muller → Michael F Muller[edit]

Current username: Muddy muller (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Michael F Muller (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 22:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Muddy muller (talk) 22:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: User "Michael F Muller" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Completed over at WP:CHU. Kingturtle (talk) 17:11, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jarvin56 → Jarvin[edit]

Current username: Jarvin56 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Jarvin (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 20:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Jarvin56 (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jarvin is my username in over 20 wiki project. Jarvin has no edit on en:wiki

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 164 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done seems to have already been done. — Rlevse • Talk • 18:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ad.sell → Austindavid817[edit]

Current username: Ad.sell (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Austindavid817 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 00:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Ad.sell (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: User "Austindavid817" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 18:55, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Olli_hki → Epiq[edit]

Current username: Olli_hki (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Epiq (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 15:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
I have a new global account fi:Käyttäjä:Epiq that I'd like to complete. User:Epiq has no edits. Olli (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Euhm... yes I did leave a message, see here. --Olli (talk) 18:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done seems already done. — Rlevse • Talk • 18:56, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Horge_de → Horge[edit]

Current username: Horge_de (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Horge (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 20:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
For the purposes of meta:SUL, I use Horge in wiki de. Horge de (talk) 20:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 18:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Melario → Penulis[edit]

Current username: Melario (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Penulis (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 16:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Melario (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 275 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:03, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified <--- means for what ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.53.157.145 (talk) 12:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The SUL owner is on mswiki. Can you prove you are that user? If not, we have to decline this request and you could pick a name with no SUL issues. — Rlevse • Talk • 15:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for confirmation left at ms:Perbincangan Pengguna:Penulis. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:38, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Rlevse. bibliomaniac 15 23:20, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

maceyhopeestes → mmmhhh[edit]

Current username: maceyhopeestes (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: mmmhhh (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 00:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Maceyhopeestes (talk) 00:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: User "Mmmhhh" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:08, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 03:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

am0e → amoe[edit]

Current username: am0e (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: amoe (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 15:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)

I left a message for the user ages ago and they haven't responded, so I have to conclude that it was in fact me. Am0e (talk) 15:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
User has 2 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 20:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eitot → Totie[edit]

Current username: Eitot (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Totie (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 20:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
I want to merge this account to my other Wikipedia accounts later. Eitot (talk) 20:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 8 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 20:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JRS.pl → JRS[edit]

Current username: JRS.pl (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: JRS (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 11:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
JRS.pl (talk) 11:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 37 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 20:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emilyzilch → Ogress[edit]

Current username: Emilyzilch (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Ogress (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 00:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
the Ogress _smash! 00:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The account I wish to usurp is permanent banned as a sockpuppet with zero edits.

Note:

This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3848 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. WJBscribe (talk) 12:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GeorgeZZ → Georgez[edit]

Current username: GeorgeZZ (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Georgez (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 13:17, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

My home wiki is pt.wikipedia.org. Only in en.wikipedia.org and in en.wikibooks.org I don't have this username.GeorgeZZ (talk) 19:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
GeorgeZZ (talk) 13:17, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
User has 21 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 21 total edits. Requesting user has 29 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 03:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juthani1 → World[edit]

Current username: Juthani1 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: World (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 21:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Juthani1 ^tcs 21:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The userpage that I want to usurp is on the Japanese Wikipedia
I can't seem to follow the above instructions, I can't leave a comment on the user's talkpage

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 5702 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 03:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kai81123 → Nextil[edit]

Current username: Kai81123 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Nextil (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 00:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
User:Kai81123 00:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The account 'Nextil' is one of which I created mid last year, but I seem to have used a different password than my regular one, as after several attemps at logging in with multiple possible passwords, none of them seem to work. I have been unable to make any edits with it as you will see and I have not posted the notification template on the talk page seeing as it is my own account, but I will if you require me to.

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 443 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Dan | talk 00:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism destroyer → Until It Sleeps[edit]

Current username: Vandalism destroyer (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Until It Sleeps (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 06:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Vandalism Destroyer 06:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 7256 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Dan | talk 00:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erud86 → Erud[edit]

Current username: Erud86 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Erud (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 14:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Erud86 (talk) 14:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 4 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Dan | talk 00:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fpoto → Pot[edit]

Current username: Fpoto (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Pot (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 21:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Fpoto (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: I have been on the Internet since the early ninetees, and have always used the nickname "pot" (from my surname Potortì) when possible, i.e., when not already taken. My user name on the Italian Wikipedia is in fact Pot, <pot@gnu.org> is my first email address, which I use when dealing with free software issues, and <pot@potorti.it> is my regular email address for private matters (the one I registered with Wikipedia), http://pot.potorti.it/ is my private web page. I do not like Fpoto (from my name and surname Francesco Potortì), it is just a fallback that I use when people request at least five characters and so on. Just today I discovered that the user Pot exists but is apparently unused, so I am here asking if I can change my nickname to reflect my historical and current habits and my usual network identity. --Fpoto (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 108 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Dan | talk 00:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jvbemen → Chemstar[edit]

Current username: Jvbemen (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Chemstar (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 21:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
chemstar (talk) 21:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 62 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Dan | talk 00:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Medievalista → Xaverius[edit]

guess who was here fareha baji

Current username: Medievalista (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Xaverius (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 14:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Xave ri us 14:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

I have been sent here from WP:RENAME

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 141 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:49, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat note: Please confirm you are the la wiki owner. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 21:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zombi77 → Zombi[edit]

Current username: Zombi77 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Zombi (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 12:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
My home wiki is the german. I have the username Zombi there and in the commons. Zombi77 (talk) 12:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 12:12, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jvbemen → Chemstar[edit]

Current username: Jvbemen (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Chemstar (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 15:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Jvbemen (talk) 15:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 66 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did add the usurp bit - ClueBot is mistaken!

You didn't WP:SIGN your post, though. X clamation point 03:03, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Rdsmith4. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:17, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ethan0 → Ethan[edit]

Current username: Ethan0 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Ethan (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 06:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
-Ethan (talk) • 2008-12-8 06:39 (UTC)

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 384 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done bibliomaniac 15 05:24, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RockManQ → VX[edit]

Current username: RockManQ (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: VX (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 22:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
RockManQ^{Review me} 22:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Privacy concerns, particularly this. I want a username that will reflect my interests (chemistry, milhist) and one that is less visible in google searches.

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2996 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: Email sent. X clamation point 02:22, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Please check to see if I have forgotten to move any of your subpages. bibliomaniac 15 05:27, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salih Abdusamad → Salih[edit]

Current username: Salih Abdusamad (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Salih (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 18:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Salih (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2044 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've speeded this up, waiving off the usual one week requirement. I had requested the user to go in for USURP since he was already using the Salih account as his talk page (user and talk page usurp). See his talk page for the conversation. =Nichalp «Talk»= 19:18, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bastie → 2fort5r[edit]

Current username: Bastie (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: 2fort5r (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 07:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Bastie (talk) 07:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2540 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 07:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ab1en → Ab1[edit]

Current username: Ab1en (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Ab1 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 09:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Reason: I am an Italian user, I'd like to unify with my Italian login it:utente:Ab1. I was probably the creator of Ab1 on Wiki.en, but I am not shure. Thank you, Ab1en (talk) 09:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Dan | talk 06:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elena_xxx → Elena[edit]

Current username: Elena_xxx (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Elena (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 17:51, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Elena xxx (talk) 17:51, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 80 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Target notified at 17:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC). —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 13:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Dan | talk 06:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opiumjones 23 → Catalpa[edit]

Current username: Opiumjones 23 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Catalpa (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 12:34, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Opiumjones 23 (talk) 12:34, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2656 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:37, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notified target at 13:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC). —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 13:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Dweller (talk) 11:12, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

flutefluteflute → fluteflute[edit]

Current username: flutefluteflute (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: fluteflute (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 18:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Flutefluteflute ^Talk ^{Contributions} 18:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1750 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changed 'notified' to 'yes' following message left on User talk:Fluteflute. -- Flutefluteflute ^Talk ^{Contributions} 19:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I should also mention I own the Fluteflute Wikimedia Commons account. -- Flutefluteflute ^Talk ^{Contributions} 19:48, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat note: Please log in to the Commons account and leave a message on the usertalk page there to back up the claim above. Then please leave a link here to the diff. Thanks. --Dweller (talk) 10:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, left message as requested. [12] -- Flutefluteflute ^Talk ^{Contributions} 11:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Dweller (talk) 11:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- Flutefluteflute ^Talk ^{Contributions} 11:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pday2387 → Ant2387[edit]

Current username: pday2387 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Ant2387 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 13:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
pday2387 (talk) 13:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 87 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: This account was created by pday2387, so since the owner of both accounts is one person, the seven-deadline can be skipped. Maxim_(talk) 00:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done Please click "my preferences" at the top of the page to sort out your global login. --Dweller (talk) 10:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

207.170.255.140 → Acobb[edit]

Current username: 207.170.255.140 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Acobb (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 20:57, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
207.170.225.140 (talk) 20:57, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I currently have no account, but have made several edits saved to my IP. I am becoming more active and would like all my information saved in one place, not tied to IP's that I don't own. This user name seems unused, and would work well for me as a professional yet reasonably anonymous account.
Update: Changed my account name to reflect that I did in fact leave a message on the user's discussion page.

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: AFAIK, IP contributions can't be reassigned to a user account. X clamation point 23:24, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not want my contributions reassigned (they are not all mine anyway), I just wish to take over this unused account.207.170.225.140 (talk) 18:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, get you. I'll clear the Acobb account off after the 7 day waiting period. You can then create a fresh account. =Nichalp «Talk»= 19:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done User:Acobb is now free to be used. --Dweller (talk) 13:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DepartedUser → Hipocrite[edit]

Current username: DepartedUser (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Hipocrite (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 02:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Returning to active editing. Would like my old user name back. The name was "stolen" after I was previously renamed by some sort of vandal unrelated to me. DepartedUser (talk) 02:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
User has 13 undeleted edits, -9 deleted edits, and 4 total edits. Requesting user has 9193 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 02:43, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a note to the note, the only edits made by the user behind the target user name were [[13], [14] and [15]. The other edits were edits of mine that were deleted when I was renamed, but undeleted afterwards. None of the "new" Hipocrite's contributions remains GFDL relevent (all were reverted immediately). DepartedUser (talk) 02:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Hipocrite account under your control? If so, this request can be speedily done, without waiting for the seven-day deadline. Maxim_(talk) 00:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not under my control. After my name change, Hipocrite was registered by a vandal who wished to trade on my history. DepartedUser (talk) 14:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat note: We're talking about usurping a blatant vandal account, so I think there's grounds to make an exception here too and expedite the request. I'm looking at this request now. Bear with me. --Dweller (talk) 14:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done And welcome back. --Dweller (talk) 14:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luinfana → Noir[edit]

Current username: Luinfana (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Noir (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 01:00, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Luinfana (talk) 01:00, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I have largely abandoned the name "Luinfana" on other websites; Wikipedia is probably the last on which I still have this handle. "Noir," which I use far more often, would be a much better representation of me as an editor on Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration.

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 344 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question (Jafet.vixle → Jafet)[edit]

A short time ago my request to be renamed from User:Jafet.vixle to User:Jafet was processed [16], but my original talk page User talk:Jafet.vixle has not been moved and the target talk page User talk:Jafet redirects to User talk:Jafet (usurped). Is it possible to have my talk page moved as well, or is it standard procedure to leave the talk page unchanged (on the other hand nothing linked to the usurpee's talk page until the usurpation [17]). ~ Jafet•work•play•watch 15:58, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Talk page moved to correct location. J.delanoy ^gabs_adds 17:13, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You might want to take a look at a few more talk pages not moved by User:Rlevse as well, eg. User:Auric, whose request came after mine, and apparently several later requests. ~ Jafet•work•play•watch 18:34, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ah... Rlevse has made a lot of renames since October. I fixed one or two, but I don't relish the idea of slogging through all those accounts. I'd say, if they were renamed that long ago and still have not complained, they can just ask at the admins' noticeboard or somewhere. J.delanoy ^gabs_adds 22:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mmartins → danceswithzerglings[edit]

Current username: mmartins (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: danceswithzerglings (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 23:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Mmartins (talk) 23:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 1794 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done bibliomaniac 15 02:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genius101 Wizard → Genius101[edit]

Current username: Genius101 Wizard (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Genius101 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 15:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Genius 101^Guestbook 15:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 880 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:05, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 21:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Berk2 → Berk[edit]

Current username: Berk2 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Berk (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 00:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Berk2 (talk) 00:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 521 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Message left on talk page. (Berk2 (talk) 00:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 21:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SacredOne2 → SacredOne[edit]

Current username: SacredOne2 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: SacredOne (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 02:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
SacredOne2 (talk) 02:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: User "SacredOne" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 02:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done by another crat. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SRX → Truco[edit]

Current username: SRX (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Truco (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 22:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
S RX 22:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 18351 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Dan | talk 02:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DrExtreme → Butterscotch[edit]

Current username: DrExtreme (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Butterscotch (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 04:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Dr. e X treme 04:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username has an email address set. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 10:18, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 19:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asahiko → 朝彦[edit]

Current username: Asahiko (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: 朝彦 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 01:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
Requesting for unified login. "Asahiko" is merely an alphabetic transcription of "朝彦". No significant edits from the requested account on enwiki except redirecting user pages to User:Asahiko. --朝彦 (Asahiko) (talk) 01:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In theory I don't see a problem here. The only issue is notifying the target. We may need to remove to redirect to do this. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 10:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
User has 2 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 795 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:09, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 19:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Philip G. Shushurin → Shushu[edit]

Current username: Philip G. Shushurin (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Shushu (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 15:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
80.240.215.180 (talk) 15:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 92 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:09, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done as tgt never made edits. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neurologic → Vague[edit]

Current username: Neurologic (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
Target username: Vague (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
Datestamp: 22:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
For bureaucrat use: Email target username (1) (2)
I wish a Username change due to issues with my username being so close to that of Neurolysis. Though my username is older, it's become a hassle with people thinking we're the same. And I wont ask him to change, as he is a more prominent wikipedian than myself. Neuro√Logic 22:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 786 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- An archive of the first request can be seen here --Chris 03:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Rlevse • Talk • 19:45, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]