Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin

Neuropedia → Neuro[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 793 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:07, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: This is a global account with fr.wiki as the home wiki. If the fr.wiki user is not you, you will loose the global account to that user. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Ah, I missed that the SUL hadn't been created. Since you have more edits that the fr.wiki account, you'd then have the home wiki here on en.wiki once you make the SUL. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, thank you! —Neuro (talk) 12:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AE7 → AE[edit]

  • Current username: AE7 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: AE (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 04:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    I am American Eagle here and AE on the Simple English Wikipedia. "AE" is my account for public computers and such. Thanks --AE7 (talk) 04:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm. --American Eagle (talk) 01:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 8 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 09:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vespa64 → Amirreza[edit]

  • Current username: Vespa64 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Amirreza (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 17:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Amirreza (talk) 17:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1366 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I left a usurp notice on the user's behalf. –xeno (talk) 19:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Amirreza's home wiki is fa.wiki. The fa.wiki user has primary rights to the name. Are you the fa.wiki user? — Rlevse • Talk • 22:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I own the User:Amirreza in fa.wiki.Amirreza (talk) 11:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 12:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auawise → Aua[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 4017 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Macys123 → Macy[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 5148 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: the home wiki of the target account is eswiki. If this is not you, it will cause SUL problems. Please pick another name or show this eswiki user is you. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Confirmation. doña macy [talk] 20:00, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 20:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beepertemp → Beeper[edit]

I use Beeper in other wiki like Meta, Commons and Fr. Thanks Beeper

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 20:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mariánko → Marián_2[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 00:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slater79 → Runt[edit]

  • Current username: Slater79 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Runt (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 03:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)

I used to be a slater (on roofs) by trade, which is why I named myself that, but I was fired and am currently filing a lawsuit with my ex-employer for the reason that I was fired. I am quite bitter about the situation, naturally. I would prefer to use my nickname that all of my old high school buddies know me by, which is "Runt". Could you be kind enough to let me use Runt as my username? Thank you. I enjoy Wikipedia very much, and as you can see, my edits have really been appreciated by others. I like Wikipedia a real lot. It's enjoyable, it is fun, it's a great way to learn things, and furthermore, it's an intellectual pursuit that can help people with such things as learning stuff. It's great! I feel that it's a noble pursuit. Slater79 (talk) 03:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2860 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done And suggest you activate your SUL account. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canals87 → Canals[edit]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 1 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Edit not to content, no GDFL significance, should be fine. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:18, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Suggest you unify your global accounts. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

&x=? → Dna[edit]

  • Current username: User:&x=?
  • Target username: Dna (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log) (SUL conflicts?)
  • Datestamp: 05:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    &x=? (talk) 05:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 534 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:57, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 22:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Endeavourr → Endeavour[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 22:40, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Svilleneuve → Khayman[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 32 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 22:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kent county → Telos[edit]

Confused note: I tryed to just move my account normally, and SoxBot VI told me that I had to usurp. I searched user:Telos and yet no such user appeared. It would seem that I'm being asked to usurp an empty account.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 466 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I did add the message to the user's talk page, I just did it after I submited the request here. Kent county (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Altered note to note this. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In reply to your concern about usurping an "empty" account: Telos is registered and therefore not "empty", just merely has not edited and has no userpage. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you for explaining. Kent county (talk) 15:14, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 00:38, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bole2 → Bucs[edit]

Note:
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 9467 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:04, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Target has Created one user account. Should be fine to usurp. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:15, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Thanks for the tip and research AD. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HouseOfScandal → Boston[edit]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 16320 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 02:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: the one edit is probably GDFL significant, but it was made late 2004 and it was only the one edit, so renaming should be fine here. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was adding Image:Example.jpg to Boston Red Sox, obviously a test. Maxim (☎) 14:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The user Boston is currently blocked indefinitely, as of 11 June 2008, for personal attacks on the Russian Wikipedia. They also have 10 contribs. Another "Boston", this time at the Swedish Wikipedia, has 40 edits. If HouseOfScandal is considering making a SUL with Boston, this is something he should really consider. Maxim (☎) 14:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I haven't thought about making an SUL as my non-English language skills aren't great. I'm okay with not being able to make it with the user name Boston.- House of Scandal (talk) 14:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
{{notdone}} I'm taking HouseOfScandal's comment above as withdrawing of the request. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry. I only meant that I was okay with not making an SUL with "Boston". I didn't intend to withdraw the request. - House of Scandal (talk) 22:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do I have to restart the request from scratch? Re-reading what I wrote, I see that I didn't withdraw the request but can see how it easily could have been misread. Thanks for considering my usurpation request. My cheeky current user name doesn't categorize my efforts on Wikipedia very well at all! - House of Scandal (talk) 15:46, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: HouseOfScandal in fact wants to be renamed. Can a 'crat please push the buttons? ;-) Maxim (☎) 21:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: The current Boston home wiki is svwiki. If HoS is renamed to Boston, it'd be the owner, but he doesn't want to SUL/globablize his account. Would this be fair to the svwiki user? — Rlevse • Talk • 01:24, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Per input from Rdsmith4, I've contacted the svwiki user about this...asking how active he is, if he objects, if so, he needs to unify his accounts. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done no response. last svwiki edit was in 2004. only one enwiki edit, also in 2004. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Yeung → David Y[edit]

  • Current username: David Yeung (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: David Y (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log) (SUL conflicts?)
  • Datestamp: 17:02, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    This was a bad username choice on my part, since my wife does anti-vandalism work and has been trolled a couple of weeks ago. See [1]. David Yeung (talk) 17:02, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 15 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:05, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 21:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sup3rior → A[edit]

  • Current username: Sup3rior (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: A (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log) (SUL conflicts?)
  • Datestamp: 19:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    I wish to usurp this username, which hasn't contributed to anything. Thanks! Sυρєrıor (Reply!,Contribs) 19:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3591 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer this username, rather than the one below. Sυρєrıor (Reply!,Contribs) 20:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

scoogie → Scoog[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: - notified target for user. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 15:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 10:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Balloonman_sock → PoppaBalloon[edit]

  • Current username: Balloonman_sock (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: PoppaBalloon (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log) (SUL conflicts?)
  • Datestamp: 02:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    A few months ago, I started using a signature with both Balloonman and PoppaBalloon in it. At the time I was going to create a Doppelganger account under PoppaBalloon, but user:Poppaballoon already existed. That account has not made any edits and has been inactive for over six months now. I would thus like to usurp it to ensure that nobody uses it to impersonate me.Balloonman sock (talk) 02:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Yes, this is a legit request from me.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 02:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: User "PoppaBalloon" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Response: PoppaBalloon is not registered, but Poppaballoon is, and the two names are too similar to create one without usurping the other.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 03:06, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
couldn't you just create the account from Bman while logged in and click "Ignore spoofing checks" ? –xeno (talk) 03:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Honest truth, because I didn't know we could do that... guess I should start spending more time in this area ;-) ---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 05:01, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Balloonman has created the doppelganger account. Useight (talk) 05:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M_Miah → Mohsin[edit]

  • Datestamp: 17:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    M Miah (talk) 17:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3241 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request has been removed from CHU. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 18:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitsu → Sujit[edit]

  • Datestamp: 06:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Sujit (talk) 06:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 167 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:46, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 18:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

foundationexpo88 → laserforce[edit]

Reason for requested renaming. Same as domain name. Foundationexpo88 —Preceding undated comment was added at 07:37, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • SoxBot has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, but as it has no contributions, it can be usurped at WP:USURP. SoxBot VI (talk) 12:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:58, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

avineshjose → avinesh[edit]

  • Datestamp: 04:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Avinesh Jose  T  04:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 2657 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:47, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note:
The edit:
12:44, 16 March 2005 (hist) (diff) Genetic algorithm
Should be fine. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 01:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LeiaY → Glacier Wolf[edit]

  • Current username: LeiaY (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Glacier Wolf (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log) (SUL conflicts?)
  • Datestamp: 17:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    This username is one that most people know me by, and I'd like to switch back to it.

NOTE TO BUREAUCRAT: This account used to be mine until I changed to LeiaY. I forgot to get the Global Account deleted, which is why the account was created automatically. LeiaY 17:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1103 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed. This account does belong to LeiaY. Glacier Wolf (talk) 17:29, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: As one user owns both accounts, this request can be done immediately. Maxim (☎) 17:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Your commons account was renamed from Glacier Wolf to LeiaY just in July (see SUL output). And you wish to do the opposite on enwiki? All these renames wreak havoc with SUL accounts. How certain are you that you want this to be your last rename and that you'll stick to? — Rlevse • Talk • 21:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very certain. This is a username most people know me by, and it was a mistake for me to rename originally. I apologize for that. LeiaY 22:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done per statement on my talk page comfirming finality. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emdee3000 → Emdee[edit]

  • Datestamp: 01:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Emdee3000 (talk) 01:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no "New user account"-log entry, using "Emdee" in other wiki-projects, bringing together the accounts

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: "Emdee" is my global account, see here. regards, -- Emdee3000 (talk) 12:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 23:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, -- Emdee (talk) 00:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Orenadam → Adam Oren[edit]

  • Datestamp: 13:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
  • Reason: Reason for requested renaming. Makes my username more readable (my name is Adam Oren, and I would like my username to be the same) Orenadam (talk) 12:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • SoxBot has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, but as it has no contributions, it can be usurped at WP:USURP. SoxBot VI (talk) 13:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: Moved from WP:CHU. Maxim (☎) 13:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 4 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: The Adam Oren account was created today (20 Aug), most likely by the same vandal that has been creating requested names at CHU. The account 'Adam Oren (vandal account)' was also created. The original Adam Oren account can still be usurped, but you may not want the name now that it has been used by a vandal. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 13:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The 'crats can still blast it. :-) Maxim (☎) 00:22, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 23:44, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jacobhodgen → Phrenology[edit]

I would very much like to change my name to something more anonymous, since I have recently been more involved in Wikipedia and have started using Wikipedia as a tool in my classroom. I *think* I might have created the account Phrenology a long time ago, but I cannot remember. Either way, I would like to usurp it. User Phrenology apparently does not have an email address to request a password change, so I cannot confirm if this was me or not. I placed a notification on Phrenology's talk page as directed. I am still learning how this all works. Please let me know if there is something else I should do. Thank you. Jacob Hodgen (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 138 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 02:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Akhran2 → Akhran[edit]

Hello. I am Akhran (here Akhran2) at other Wikipedia projects (specially at spanish and catalan Wikipedias) and I would have and unified login. I have seen that Akhran of this Wikipedia had not user or discussion page so I don't know if anybody uses this count. If somebody uses it and don't want to have renamed his count don't worry, I will be happy too with an no completed user merge, but if he or she agrees, I want if it is possible be Akhran at all Wikipedias. Goodbye. Akhran2 (talk) 14:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Email sent. Maxim (☎) 19:30, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 20:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LindsayL → ZoeL[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set, and an email has been sent by a clerk or bureaucrat to notify them of this request.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 227 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Email sent. X! who used to be Soxred93 01:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 21:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

kempson null → kempson[edit]

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For clarity: account created in early April, so still very within the 6 months threshold. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - this a SUL request so I have renamed Kempson to allow the global account holder to automatically recreate it on their next visit to enwiki. WJBscribe (talk) 21:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beeblbrox → Beeblebrox[edit]

  • Current username: Beeblbrox (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Beeblebrox (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log) (SUL conflicts?)
  • Datestamp: 08:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Hey guys, I really only want it as a doppleganger, I've kind of gotten used to it being spelled the wrong way. So, how do we do that, can you fancy 'crats sort that out for me? Beeblbrox (talk) 05:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC) changed my mind on that one. Beeblbrox (talk) 18:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Beeblbrox (talk) 08:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 5615 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 22:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Soaringgoldeneagle → Jonathan Hall[edit]

Soaringgoldeneagle (talk) 09:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 1635 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Edit made to CHU in April '08... —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 11:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blnguyen → YellowMonkey[edit]

  • Current username: Blnguyen (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: YellowMonkey (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 04:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Turns out that I had created this myself last year [2]. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - I strongly recommend you recreate the old account to guard against impersonation. WJBscribe (talk) 04:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Davin7 → Davin[edit]

I am Davin from nl.wikipedia.org and I come often here on en.wikipedia.org as Davin7 (talk). There is a username of Davin here that has not been used a long time (since 9 January 2006 - not active anymore) and was just used for 82 edits. Can I use my account name 'Davin' here please? I would be pleased if this is possible. Davin7 (talk) 14:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As Davin I have made 15.167 edits on nl.wikipedia.org Davin7 (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 82 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 82 total edits. Requesting user has 1850 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Asked requestor if target was contacted. That's a lot of edits to usurp. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
English user:Davin cannot be contacted by e-mail; s/he didn't activate this option. I could leave a message at her/his talk page but there has been no activity since two and a half years so I might wait for a long time an maybe even in vain. Do you have a option what I could do? Davin7 (talk) 09:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, if it's a lot of edits to usurp: when Davin will be my account here, I could make a redirect from Davin7 to Davin too if that would be an option - just a suggestion; I don't know if that is desirable. Davin7 (talk) 09:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: We're discussing this. SUL policy isn't totally clear on these situations. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Based on discussion and SUL is headed this way it seems. — Rlevse • Talk • 18:48, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boss555 → Boss[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: ClueBot false positive, user forgot to sign. X! who used to be Soxred93 07:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
User note: The notification is signed. Boss555 (talk) 20:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 19:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auseklis → Auseklis[edit]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 13 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 13 total edits. Requesting user has 16 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: only two of these edits would be GDFL significant. They were made drawing on 2 years ago. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Of the the 13 edits, only about 3 are not to talk pages. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jorrit-H → Thoth[edit]

I'm Thoth on the Dutch Wikipedia and commons. Jorrit-H (talk) 18:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 240 undeleted edits, 16 deleted edits, and 256 total edits. Requesting user has 27 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: We're discussing this. SUL policy isn't totally clear on these situations. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 15:27, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Ahmadi2 → Ahmadi[edit]

  • Current username: Ahmadi2 (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Ahmadi (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 21:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Reason: For unknown Reason the creation of the account Ahmadi failed that time but I uses Ahmadi as account in es.wikipedia.org and de.wikipedia.org and I liked to use an unique account name. Ahmadi2 (talk) 20:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • SoxBot has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, but as it has no contributions, it can be usurped at WP:USURP. SoxBot VI (talk) 20:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1257 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:54, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 15:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: I've fixed up the duplication. Maxim (☎) 15:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are really quick. Thank you for your service! Greetings. --Ahmadi (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nazrani → Nasrani[edit]

  • Current username: Nazrani (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: nasrani (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 19:36, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Nazrani (talk) 19:36, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 16 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:38, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: - notified on behalf of user. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 00:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editorofthewiki's sock → EOTW[edit]

This is to be my sock account, on public computers and whenever I want it. 0 edits. Editorofthewiki's sock (talk) 23:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 5 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:58, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Message now left. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Editorofthewiki, do you own the target username? If so, this request can be speedily done. Maxim (☎) 20:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: E-mai sent. Maxim (☎) 20:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I do not own the target username. That was registered before me, I do, however, confirm that the requesting username is me. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 20:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done You'll need to consider doing something about any global accounts you have under User:Editorofthewiki's sock as I could only change the en: one. --Dweller (talk) 11:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheGreatZorko → Gunrun[edit]

Both these accounts are mine (as you can see from Gunrun's talk page) but I forgot about the Gunrun account soon after making it. I have now switched to using this username pretty much everywhere else on the internet and wish to use it here too while keeping my edit history and such. Is it possible to just have the names swapped around? If not I don't mind what you rename the Gunrun account. TheGreatZorko (talk) 13:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 12 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 12 total edits. Requesting user has 225 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: As the requesting user owns the target username, this request can be done now. Maxim (☎) 20:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: post here with the Gunrun account to prove it's yours. We can not merge accounts. We can rename Gunrun though. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Will this do? I'm TheGreatZorko and Gunrun posting as Gunrun and I'd like TheGreatZorko to be called Gunrun and I don't care what this account is renamed because chances are I'll never use it again. Gunrun (talk) 12:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Gunrun renamed to "Gunrun (usurped)". — Rlevse • Talk • 13:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CyclonicWhirlwind → Tartarus[edit]

  • Current username: CyclonicWhirlwind (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Tartarus (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 08:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    CYCLONICWHIRLWIND talk 03:35, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • SoxBot has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits. SoxBot VI (talk) 03:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Moved from CHU, as the one GDFL edit was made Nov 2005. leaving to 'crat discretion. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Also, it is a questionable GFDL edit, as it made one typo into another typo. Xclamation point 15:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 294 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:40, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All is good aside from the edit, I've left a notification for the requester. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Edit is not GFDL significant. I'm happy to do the usurp. However, please note that there is one edit on Turkish Wikipedia, so you won't be able to unify the account straightaway, though I'm optimistic a Crat at that Project would help you. --Dweller (talk) 09:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MattWT → Matty[edit]

  • Current username: MattWT (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Matty (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 06:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    MattWT (talk) 06:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 2 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 351 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: edits were only two talk page edits. — Rlevse • Talk • 15:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does this mean the usurpation can go ahead? I was wondering if talk page edits were GFDL significant. Thank you, MattWT (talk) 09:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it should mean that the request will be fulfilled soon. Caulde 13:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 16:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terra → Dark Mage[edit]

  • Current username: Terra (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Dark Mage (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 10:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    This username is the name which I've been using on Wikiversity, Meta and Wikibooks - this was created by me but by SUL which was removed - my Dark Mage account had only made one edit over on the Administrator's noticeboard, but if you need confirmation I'll access my Dark Mage account here - and also my main Wikiversity Dark Mage account to confirm this request - I had left previously due to the increase in vandalism and the rise number of threats but however though I wouldn't mind returning to this site but under my current username which I'm using on Wikiversity. Terra (talk) 10:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 4 undeleted edits, 7 deleted edits, and 11 total edits. Requesting user has 4312 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Do you operate the Dark Mage account? Caulde 10:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, here's the confirmation you require - I don't want to loose the contributions which I've done which is one reason why I'm placing this request. Dark Mage (talk) 10:26, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the history link on Meta [3]which was the username change log and also here which was the request to remove the SUL Link. Dark Mage (talk) 10:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And I've just logged back into my Terra account, as you can see I created Dark Mage by SUL from Meta - but didn't realize it would create an account under the new username which I'm using on Meta and on Wikiversity - so it was created by accident over here on Wikipedia. Terra (talk) 10:32, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If my username does get changed to my new username could the renaming bureaucrat, please recreate the Terra account and have it blocked so that it couldn't be in use like the bureaucrat over on Meta did. Terra (talk) 10:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you mean. You must've been logged in on the other sites you are active on and the SUL meant that Dark Mage was created automatically on viewing en.wp pages. Fortunately, you operate the SUL so I see no problem is this happening; you will lose all contributions under the current Dark Mage account though. It's my understanding from what I've read, you are already aware of that. Caulde 13:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If my Terra account gets renamed to Dark Mage which I'm using on Wikiversity, Wikibooks and also Meta - then all of the contributions which I've done on this site will not be lost - I am intending to return to the site, but only semi-active but I want to be known by Dark Mage - Changing a username will not lose the contributions and besides the SUL link is no more, I had it removed and it'll not affect my Dark Mage accounts on other Wikimedia Sites, I didn't realize though that SUL would indeed create the Dark Mage username on this site, if the SUL didn't have done automatically then I would have placed my request on the main Changing username page and not here. Terra (talk) 16:01, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say that. If you re-read what I said, these contributions may be lost. Caulde 16:37, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you mean, I'm not particularly bothered about those contributions is only a few edits whereas with my Terra account I've made over 4312 edits which I don't want to lose - could this request proceed, my apologies for misreading your comment. Terra (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How long will this take, I operate the Dark Mage account and have even accessed it to confirm this - that account was created by SUL by mistake, the reason why it was created could have been when I was viewing one of the pages and didn't realized it created it - I've also updated my main page on Wikiversity and provided a link to my Terra username here which I'm currently using, I placed the request here because I've made substantial edits on this username which I don't want to loose - I had thought about using the Dark Mage as it is, but what's the point when I've already made edits with this username. If a bureaucrat sees this could he/she process this and re-create + block the Terra account to prevent impersonation. Terra 19:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The time ordinarily should be what's here, however, since you operate the account a  Clerk note: should mean attention is drawn to this to process this faster. Picking up on what you say last, the requestee should re-create the account which has been renamed, since if there are any active contributions coming from the account which was created by a person other than the requestee, I'm sure you could the see the possible implications involved. Caulde 19:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done As this isn't a "standard" usurping, there's no reason to wait the usual usurping time. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Templarion1 → Templarion[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 315 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 23:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SesquipedalianVerbiage → Verbal[edit]

The account called Verbal hasn't been used since its creation in 2005, and my current account name has cause problems by being to long. Realising Verbal wasn't used (and thinking it hadn't been created) I started to use the nick, but was surprised I couldn't register the name. I eventually realised it had been created but not used, and that this is the place to request usurpation. I chose the nick Verbal as someone who is Verbal might employ large amounts of sesquipedalian verbiage. Verbal chat 07:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2388 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 07:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Suggest you unify your new account under SUL. — Rlevse • Talk • 14:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paparokan → Burgaz[edit]

  • Current username: Paparokan (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Burgaz (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 11:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email target username   (1)  (2)
    Paparokan (talk) 11:20, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • SoxBot has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, but as it has no contributions, it can be usurped at WP:USURP. SoxBot VI (talk) 11:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from CHU. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Rlevse • Talk • 01:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Superflewis → Flewis[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2122 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I own the commons user accounts Superflewis, as well as Flewis. Would it be possible to do something similar there as well (Providing that the usurpation on wikipedia is succesful)? (Superflewis → Flewis in Commons) Thanks --Superflewis (talk) 10:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you can make the request here. bibliomaniac15 04:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 10:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Changing_username/Usurpations/Completed/11

Leave a Reply