Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
Wikipedia Arbitration
Open proceedings
Active sanctions
Arbitration Committee
Audit
Track related changes
Shortcuts

This is the central log for all sanctions issued pursuant to an Arbitration Committee contentious topics remedy in 2011 as well as any appeals or modifications made to sanctions issued in 2011.

The required information is the user or page the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), basis or context (such as link to AE request), and a diff of the user notification (if applicable).


Yearly Logs (Full Log)
2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 • 2007 • 2006 • 2005

2011

Abortion

  • User:Risker banned DMSBel (talk · contribs) for one year for continuing the battlefield editing and commentary with respect to another editor sanctioned in this case. Risker (talk) 03:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Risker banned Captain Occam (talk · contribs) for one year for continued battlefield editing and commentary, which began during the course of voting on the proposed decision of this case (in which he was not a party) with respect to another editor sanctioned in this case. After three months, Captain Occam's ban may be modified after three months to permit him to contribute to content-related areas only; please see the block notice on his user talk page.[1] Risker (talk) 03:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Esoglou (talk · contribs) warned per this AE Report. --WGFinley (talk) 03:00, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia-Azerbaijan 2

  • Because of continued nationalistic edit-warring and associated disruption, no editor may make more than one revert per week on this article, and all editors with Armenia/Azerbaijan-related sanctions are banned from editing this article and its talk page. See talk page notice, edit notice.  Sandstein  21:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Atabəy (talk · contribs) topic banned from all edits in article and article talk space concerning the topic of Eastern European or West Asian nationalism, for six months starting October 16 00:00 UTC, but ban will be suspended on good behavior. Details found here.--Tznkai (talk) 06:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Khodabandeh14 (talk · contribs) topic banned from all edits in article and article talk space concerning the topic of Eastern European or West Asian nationalism, for six months starting October 16 00:00 UTC, but ban will be suspended on good behavior. Details found here.--Tznkai (talk) 06:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kevorkmail (talk · contribs) blocked indefinitely for constant edit warring, battleground mentality, and being on Wikipedia only to push an agenda (i.e., being a giant prick). Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • ArmOvak (talk · contribs) blocked 24 hours for edit warring and not discussing; after warning. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Orartu (talk · contribs) blocked for one month, see talk page. Block log message got cut off. This was intended to be the full message: "Disruptive editing and personal attacks/accusations: WP:NPA, WP:BATTLE, WP:EW: Treating Wikipedia as a battleground for ethnic conflicts, making serious accusations against other users with real-life implications, ignoring numerous admin warnings and repeating the same disruptive activities that led to last block." Khoikhoi 01:49, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Vacio (talk · contribs) is restricted indefinitely from evaluation of sources' reliability or neutrality based upon any criterion not listed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources, and especially based upon the national origin of the source or author. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ayn Rand

Climate change

  • Blocked 24 hours for violating that sanction[4]. NW (Talk) 18:20, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Europe

  • Jacurek (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from the topic of Eastern Europe (see WP:TBAN).
  • Dr. Dan (talk · contribs) is banned from the topic of Eastern Europe (see WP:TBAN) for three months and indefinitely banned from changing names as described below.
  • Lokyz (talk · contribs) is banned from the topic of Eastern Europe (see WP:TBAN) for three months and indefinitely banned from changing names as described below.
  • Volunteer Marek (talk · contribs) is banned from changing names as described below for six months and warned not to express what sounds like nationalist prejudice.
  • The sanction is vacated for the reasons described in this appeal discussion and replaced with a warning not to continue nationalist edit wars by others and not to engage in a pattern of apparently nationalistically motivated name-changing.  Sandstein  06:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • M.K (talk · contribs) is warned about the possibility of discretionary sanctions.
A ban from changing names means that the editor is banned from editing articles to change, remove or add names (including translations) in a Eastern European language with respect to a subject that the same article already designates with a name in another Eastern European language. This includes names in other pages that are displayed as part of the article, such as categories, images or templates, and it also forbids moving articles that have a name in a Eastern European language to a name in another language. For the purpose of this ban, "Eastern European language" includes German.  Sandstein  06:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The above two topic bans are modified to allow participation by Igny and TLAM in Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/02 October 2011/Holodomor. The mediators of that case have the exclusive prerogative of reporting any editorial misconduct by Igny or TLAM during the mediation to an administrator familiar with the topic bans or to WP:AE. If that administrator is satisfied that misconduct occurred by TLAM or Igny: (1) the modification to the topic ban for that editor will cease; (2) the topic ban for that editor will be reset and doubled in length and (3) the editors will lose the right to dispute the outcome of the MedCab case. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Samofi (talk · contribs) topic-banned indefinitely from all Hungarian-Slovak national and ethnicity issues, for continued tendentious battleground editing [12]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sanctions all round after a particularly nasty bout of revert-warring on Ukrainians. See Talk:Ukrainians#Sanctions [13] for more details and background.
    • Voyevoda (talk · contribs) indefinitely blocked for long history of edit-warring and personal attacks.
    • SeikoEn (talk · contribs) indefinitely topic-banned from all edits related to Ukraine, for a long history of tendentious editing and an aggressive national battleground attitude.
    • Bandurist (talk · contribs) blocked 48 hrs for breach of earlier topic ban.
    • Bandurist (talk · contribs), Galassi (talk · contribs) and Lvivske (talk · contribs) placed under revert limitation: max 1rv/48hrs per article, with additional slow-down rule: must precede every revert by explanation on talk plus min.6hrs waiting period. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Omen1229 (talk · contribs) topic-banned from all edits relating to Slovak-Hungarian history for a period of 6 months, due to a persistent history of ethnic battleground editing [14]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of Biographies of Living Persons

Falun Gong

  • Asdfg12345 (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned (as per WP:TBAN) from Falun Gong, per this AE thread.  Sandstein  23:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • PCPP (talk · contribs) is topic-banned (as per WP:TBAN) from Falun Gong for four months, per this AE thread.  Sandstein  23:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Falun Gong placed under a 1RR/week restriction pending final disposition of a related AE request, see [15]. T. Canens (talk) 08:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per AE thread:
    • Olaf Stephanos (talk · contribs), HappyInGeneral (talk · contribs), and Dilip rajeev (talk · contribs) are each banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to Falun Gong, broadly construed across all namespaces, for a minimum of one year. After one year, and every six months thereafter, they may apply to have this sanction reviewed at AE. They may also appeal this sanction to AE once within the next year, and may appeal to the arbitration committee at any time. The topic ban shall remain in force until it is lifted on appeal.
    • PCPP (talk · contribs) is banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to Falun Gong, broadly construed across all namespaces, for a minimum of eight months. After eight months, and every four months thereafter, they may apply to have this sanction reviewed at AE. They may also appeal this sanction to AE once within the next eight months, and may appeal to the arbitration committee at any time. The topic ban shall remain in force until it is lifted on appeal. T. Canens (talk) 16:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar

*For the reasons explicated in much greater detail in this AE thread:

  1. Wee Curry Monster (talk · contribs), Imalbornoz (talk · contribs), Pfainuk (talk · contribs), and Richard Keatinge (talk · contribs) are placed on the following restriction: they may not make any substantive edit to Gibraltar unless they have posted on Talk:Gibraltar explaining their proposed edit, and 48 hours have elapsed since the time of the posting, and no editor objected to the proposed edit. For the purposes of this restriction: "substantive edit" means any edit that is not purely a typo fix, formatting change, or an exemption to the 3RR rule; "object" includes any expression of opposition to the proposed edit, regardless of the reason behind the opposition.
  2. The four editors listed above are further banned from starting or participating in any discussion concerning any events, occurrences, or incidents that occurred between 1600 AD and 1900 AD, if such event, occurrence, or incident took place in, or is otherwise related to, Gibraltar, broadly construed. This restriction applies to all namespaces and all pages.
  3. Violations of either of the above restriction will result in an immediate ban from Gibraltar and its talk page, as well as any further sanctions an uninvolved administrator may choose to impose.
  4. Any uninvolved administrator may, for good cause, grant an exemption to the restriction in item 2 on a case-by-case basis. Such exemptions may be revoked if abused.
  5. As an application of item 4, an exemption to item 2 is granted to all four editors as follows: item 2 does not apply to participation in a binding content RFC regarding their present disputes. The RFC is to be supervised by an uninvolved administrator, who may set such limitations as necessary to ensure the smooth progress of the RFC. Like all exemptions, this exemption may be revoked if abused.
  6. Restrictions 1 and 2 will be lifted upon the conclusion of the content RFC referred to in item 5, provided that such RFC yields a consensus on the wording to be used, and the editor accepts the outcome of the RFC and conform their future edits to it. They may not attempt to change the outcome except by initiating a new RFC no less than one year after the original RFC concludes.
  7. All involved editors are warned in the strongest terms that disruption of the RFC process, in whatever form, will be viewed with great disfavor, and will lead to sanctions up to and including a lengthy block and/or topic ban.
T. Canens (talk) 08:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above restriction, placed by T. Canens in May 2011, has been lifted on appeal per this AE discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 03:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Longevity

Macedonia

See [16]. T. Canens (talk) 04:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monty Hall problem

Palestine-Israel articles

  • Per this notice, Jiujitsuguy's existing topic ban is extended by two months under the original terms, which per WP:TBAN include talk pages. The revised expiry date is 4 November, 2011. EdJohnston (talk) 04:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Topic-ban of Nableezy (talk · contribs) vacated by discussion, and replaced by a revert restriction with the terms set down here. This sanction expires at the same time as the vacated ban would have, so on 10 July 2011. AGK [•] 22:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Gilabrand (talk · contribs) blocked indefinitely for persistent evasion of AE sanctions and continued disingenuous response; the first year of this block is an AE block made under the authority of #Discretionary sanctions. See AE thread. T. Canens (talk) 20:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Supreme Deliciousness (talk · contribs) banned until 00:01, 30 November 2011 (UTC) from editing any P/I article, in connection with this AE thread. AGK [•] 23:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lutrinae (talk · contribs) banned until 11:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC) from editing any I/P page, and from then until 11:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC) from editing any I/P page from any account other than his primary account, in connection with this AE thread. AGK [•] 11:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Two rangeblocks issued here due to Lutrinae's violation of the above ban. EdJohnston (talk) 13:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lutrinae went on to violate his topic ban using his registered account, so he's been blocked for one month. This block can be lifted if he agrees to follow all relevant policies and restrictions. EdJohnston (talk) 02:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • AgadaUrbanit (talk · contribs) banned until 19 December 2011 from editing any I/P page, in connection with this request for enforcement. AGK [•] 21:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC
  • Nableezy (talk · contribs) prohibited until 27 December 2011 from interacting with Cptnono (talk · contribs), in connection with this request for enforcement. AGK [•] 22:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cptnono (talk · contribs) prohibited until 27 December 2011 from interacting with Nableezy (talk · contribs), in connection with this request for enforcement. AGK [•] 22:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Chesdovi (talk · contribs) banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces, for one year, per AE thread. T. Canens (talk) 09:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reenem (talk · contribs) banned from all articles and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all non-Talk namespaces, for three months. Reenem is allowed to participate in discussions related to the topic area. See AE thread. T. Canens (talk) 18:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Prideful (talk · contribs) blocked indefinitely by Zero0000 shortly after making first edits all changing "city" to "settlement" in the ledes of articles on Arab towns in the West Bank from account created two and a half years earlier. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • ZionistSufi (talk · contribs) blocked 1 month and topic-banned for 6 months, per this notice, after a discussion at AE. EdJohnston (talk) 17:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Someone35 (talk · contribs) banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Middle East, broadly construed across all namespaces, for a period of no less than 3 months. The ban may be appealed to AE every 3 months, or to the Arbitration Committee at any time, and will stay in place until it is successfully appealed or lifted by the Arbitration Committee. See AE thread. T. Canens (talk) 09:25, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Modified on appeal [26] - topic banned for three months fixed period from Arab-Israeli conflict anywhere on the project. Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • NoHasbaraHere (talk · contribs) blocked indef for username violation and clear POV-pushing in applicable articles. Daniel Case (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hearfourmewesique (talk · contribs) blocked 2 weeks for 1RR violation, per AE thread. T. Canens (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Modinyr (talk · contribs) placed under a 1RR per week restriction from the topic of the Arab-Israeli conflict anywhere on the project, per an AE thread. They are warned that this could be extended to a full topic ban if they continue to make reverts without appropriate discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 02:03, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Chesdovi (talk · contribs) and Debresser (talk · contribs) are under a six month interaction ban, along with a six month ban on edits having to do with naming issues concerning Palestine or Palestinian in both articles and talk pages, broadly construed. Breaches of these bans will be followed by a block of one month, swiftly lengthening to indefinite for any later breaches. Please see [27] and [28] for the wordings of these bans as posted to each editor. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:24, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Both blocked a month for interaction ban violations. T. Canens (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Golan Heights had a unique 1RR sanction placed on it in Aug 2010 which held the article to 1RR as well as required editors to discuss reverts. The talk page notice of this was inadvertently removed when the new P-I sanctions template was done per the Nov 2010 community decision on 1RR for P-I. This restriction is still in effect and I have reinstated the talk page notice for the restriction.[29] --WGFinley (talk) 18:13, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Golan Heights discussion requirement was lifted on 29 November 2012 per consensus at WP:AN. The 1RR remains in effect, since it applies to all ARBPIA articles. EdJohnston (talk) 13:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Irgun protected for 7 days due to edit warring, editors reminded of 1RR restriction on P-I articles.[30] --WGFinley (talk) 03:03, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Someone35 (talk · contribs) banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces for one year, expiry 10 Dec 2012 per this AE report. --WGFinley (talk) 06:00, 11 December 2011 (UTC)}}[reply]
    Ban reset per subsequent AE report below. --WGFinley (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hearfourmewesique (talk · contribs) topic banned indefinitely[31] per AE report. NW (Talk) 01:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • 173.238.69.86 (talk · contribs) Blocked for one month, for persistent disruptive and contentious editing and edit warring in relation to Palestine. Numerous efforts have been made to communicate with the user on this, and the user has previously been blocked for a short period. The user has made it abundantly clear that they have no intention of cooperating. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Increased block to indefinite as result of Checkuser verification of socking. --WGFinley (talk) 02:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Epf (talk · contribs) banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces indefinitely per this AE report, confirmation of socking via anonymous editing in P-I space. --WGFinley (talk) 02:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Talknic (talk · contribs) banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces for six months per this AE request, with expiry on 26 June 2012. EdJohnston (talk) 16:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudoscience

Race and intelligence

  • Blocked for a week for evading their block using IP Contributions/91.122.93.70. NW (Talk) 21:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scientology

Church of Scientology IP addresses blocked (remedy 2)

Other remedies

Senkaku Islands

September 11 conspiracy theories

  • Vexorg (talk · contribs) limited to 1RR for articles and talk pages in the area of conflict for six months from 2 March 2011 (after the expiration of an edit warring block) Courcelles 04:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soxwon (talk · contribs) blocked 24 hours for edit warring. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Shurusheero (talk · contribs) banned from the 9/11 topic area, and the False flag article for continued pushing of fringe POV. Courcelles 13:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare authorship question

The Troubles

Transcendental Meditation movement

Tree shaping

Anonimu

Carl_Hewitt

  1. Due to ongoing violations of the topic ban, the articles Actor model and Gödel's incompleteness theorems have been under a mixture of semiprotection and pending changes protection from 2010-2-15 to present. Noted at AE on 2010-11-28 [56].
  2. Due to overbearing comments from numerous IP editors, Talk:Gödel's incompleteness theorems semiprotected for one month starting 2011-1-22. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Semiprotected Actor model for 3 more months; IP editors seem to have returned. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_enforcement_log/2011

Leave a Reply