Older talk is in User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 1, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 2, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 3, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 4, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 5, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 6, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 7, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 8, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 9, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 10, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 11, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 12, User talk:Stan Shebs/archive 13.

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John. W. Brown. Since you had some involvement with the John. W. Brown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 19:42, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amon Sûl. Since you had some involvement with the Amon Sûl redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Away team (Star Trek term). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 22#Away team (Star Trek term) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. NYKevin 22:32, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You just stay around to keep the tools, you just stay around to keep the tools! You think that we're all fools, you just stay around to keep the tools! Making minute edits every year, you make minute edits every year! We can see it's very clear, you make minute edits every year! Users such as yourself who make a significantly low amount of edits just to keep your administrative tools sicken me and many others. Just give up the tools already!!! What are you holding on to them for anyways!! What a selfish thing to do!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.35.104.149 (talk) 01:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article War of Wrath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War of Wrath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect River Teiglin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 15#River Teiglin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 02:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Back in 2006 you put up a message on Category:Fair use stamp images saying "As the template mentions, stamp images in this category should not be used solely as a cheap way to illustrate articles. In addition to the problem that images are often altered for artistic reasons and thus may not be factually accurate representations of their subject, Wikipedia:Fair use criteria does not allow for it." That seems to be a bit stronger than is needed, for example Category:Fair use images of book covers doesn't say something like that, even though Template:Non-free book cover says much the same thing as Template:Non-free stamp, and a number of fair use stamps are used just as illustrations, for example File:Lewis & Clark stamp 2004.jpg in Lewis and Clark Expedition and File:Nguyen Van Troi.jpg in Nguyễn Văn Trỗi, probably more. Honestly I don't see any difference between a fair use image that happens to have scalloped edges, and a fair use image that happens to have pasteboard book cover backing or an oak painting frame; they each either meet our fair use criteria or they don't, stamps aren't special. I'd like to remove the special message, or at least change it so it specifies that all we need to do is meet NFCC, stamps aren't special. --GRuban (talk) 12:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, that message is from a different age. Back then, imagery was in much shorter supply - nowadays we have a multitude of free-licensed celebrity photos, but that wasn't always the case, and stamp images were sometimes used as an imagined workaround, and then we would have to have an argument about it every single time. But you're right that stamps aren't special that way, and it sounds like a good idea to make all the categories consistent. Stan (talk) 15:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I simplified the message, I hope that is correct. If you're interested what this was about, it's from a request on User_talk:GRuban#Alba_Roballo - and if you know anything about the copyright term of Uruguayan stamps specifically, it would be great if you could add it to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stamps/Public_domain from where it is conspicuouosly absent. --GRuban (talk) 01:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BTW ... I just saw the sad anonymous message a few sections up in May. I, for one, am quite grateful you're still here, to discuss issues such as this one, and would like to thank you for sticking around. There is no minimum level of contribution required, we appreciate all the help anyone puts in. --GRuban (talk) 23:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the wub "?!" 18:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coin945 (talk) 11:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stan, we would love to use some of your desert images in a forthcoming book about the California Desert. Please contact me! User:Mkauffmann mk@backcountrypress.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkauffmann (talk • contribs) 18:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Mkauffmann: All images have a licence and you need to comply with the terms of each licence on the page as shown on each individual file page. This page Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content#Images and other media on wikipedia and this page c:Commons:Reusing content outside Wikimedia on the wikimedia commons will tell you everything you need to know about reusing our content. All wikipedia commons images are freely licensed but not all wikipedia image can be used, so check their location first. Hope that helps. BTW, we bottom post and you need to sign your posts with four tildes like this ~~~~ at the end of your post. ww2censor (talk) 21:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for passing on the info, I replied in an email (sometimes there are additional questions, like "do you have a higher-res original?") Stan (talk) 03:23, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Imcdc (talk) 14:35, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

The Saunders article stated he sometimes wrote under the name John P. Grier a Champion racehorse. I removed it as the reference given made no mention of "Grier" and I could find nothing to corroborate the claim. Although the horse in question existed, it belonged to Harry Payne Whitney who in fact named him after his stockbroker, the New York Stock Exchange member John P. Grier who might well warrant a Wikipedia article. [1]

Please advise as I was shortly going to do an article on the horse.

Thanks for your help. Stretchrunner II (talk) 17:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A curious situation. At the time I just copyedited, took the assertions at face value. My most charitable explanation is that some website author saw (presumed) quotes from the stockbroker displayed at forbes.com and decided they had to be the executive editor hiding his identity - which might actually be true, but we prefer to work with evidence. :-) Stan (talk) 12:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

The article Reference collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced in more than a decade and per Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:16, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 13:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 10:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of garden plants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced for 18 years; most plants can be garden plants; "garden plant" not a defining category

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 00:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 07:54, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 13:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HI! First, thank you for your mail, I appreciate it. But on another note; I see that you are an administrator. However, from the AfDs, I got the impression that you were some newbie, who created some articles in the distant past but wasn't really versed in Wikipedia policies. You don't seem to know anything about notability, deletion policy, .... Do you think it is wise to remain an administrator when you are so out of the loop on the day-to-day working of Wikipedia. It seriously increases the chances of you using the admin tools in incorrect ways. Fram (talk) 08:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. Stan (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Allegheny County and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 16#Allegheny County until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. eviolite (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 13:58, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of garden plants, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of garden plants until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 10:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Azores has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Yet another completely unsourced "List of people on the stamps of X". No sources, no verifiability, mostly redlinks, untouched since 2010

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Ascension Island has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another day, another unsourced, unverifiable, unencyclopedic "list of people on the postage stamps of X"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Namibia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another unsourced, unmaintained, unencyclopedic "list of people on postage stamps of X". Not a source in sight and woefully incomplete

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Afghanistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2010, un-maintained, unverifiable, just like all the other "list of people on the postage stamps of X"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Albania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, un-maintained, incomplete, literally no change in content since 2010. Just another piece of "list of people on the postage stamps of X" cruft

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Algeria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another "list of people on the postage stamps of X" that has seen no additions, sources, or maintenance of any kind since 2010. Given the current stance of the other postage stamp lists, I see nothing different here

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Zimbabwe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another hideously incomplete, unsourced, under-viewed, and very likely inaccurate "list of people on postage stamps of X"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Andorra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Un-maintained, unsourced, indiscriminate, full of redlinks, missing information. Just another "list of people on the postage stamps of X" with the same problems as all the others

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Zambia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, un-maintained, unused since 2010. Just like every other "List of people on the postage stamps of X" article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:48, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Cyprus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Yet another unsourced, unused, un-maintained "List of people on the postage stamps of X" without a single source in sight in 10+ years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Eswatini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm seriously getting tired of writing prod descriptions for these unsourced, untouched-since-2010, barely-a-list lists of people. This has all the same faults as the other "List of people on the postage stamps of X" lists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of the Italian colonies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Yet more unsourced philately-cruft from ages ago

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Angola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neglected for 10+ years, no sources, mostly redlinks

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Bahrain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Barely a list at all. Minimal sourcing, no content, no maintenance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Lesotho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and unmaintained, just like most of these lists

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Tajikistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN, abandoned, and not even complete until 2006, despite the claim to the contrary (De Coubertin? Chapuisat? Pele? ...). A disservice to the very few readers who actually visit this article (9 views in 90 days!)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Thailand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN. Unsourced and abandoned since its creation in 2004, for some reason doesn't include the Siam stamps (direct predecessor of Thailand), ends in 1983, starts in 1961 even though the first people on Thailand stamps appeared in 1941; and with 23 pageviews in 90 days, it doesn't look as if our readers are any more interested in the topic than our writers

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Trinidad and Tobago has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN. Created and nearly immediately abandoned in 2010, unsourced since ithe start, ends in 1984 for some reason, and is incomplete for the period it covers. E.g. for Trinidad separately, it only lists Victoria while in 1898 there was a stamp featuring Columbus. Luckily very few readers visit this page anyway, 12 pageviews in the last 90 days...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Botswana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and unmaintained since 2010

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Ghana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unused, un-maintained

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of the Cayman Islands has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Yet another unsourced un-maintained list

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Tajikistan has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Thailand has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Bangladesh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another unsourced and unmaintained list that hasn't been touched since forever

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:29, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Mozambique has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, un-maintained, woefully incomplete

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Bermuda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN. Unsourced, very short list, which isn't even complete for the years it covers (e.g. Churchill 1966 or Princess Anne 1973 are missing). With 18 pageviews in the last 90 days, again one of these lists with no interest from either editors or readers.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Brunei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN. Unsourced and abandoned since its creation in 2004, ends after the 1960s for some reason, not wanted by readers (12 pageviews in last 90 days).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Bulgaria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN. Unsourced and abandoned since its creation in 2003, tagged as such since 2010. Apparently Bulgaria has not put any people on postage stamps since the 1930s, if one was to believe this article. Not of any use to readers, and luckily they don't care to read it either (25 pageviews in the last 90 days excluding one very anomalous spike).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Brunei has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Bulgaria has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Belize has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unused, un-maintained since 2010

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Guyana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since forever, untouched, unmaintained, no sources, unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Uruguay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced and unmaintained

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Burkina Faso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, un-maintained, unchanged since 2010

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:50, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Cambodia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unused, un-maintained listcruft from 2010

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Cameroon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

blah blah blah yet another stupid postage stamp list with no sources, maintenance, or pageviews to justify its existence

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Nigeria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN. Unsourced since 2003, abandoned since 2010, incomplete even for the years supposedly covered (e.g. 1937, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 07:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Chad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN. Even the 1960s part, which looks filled, is very incomplete (e.g. the long series of Mexico 68 gold medal winners is lacking, and the many people on airmail stamps from the period). Largely abandoned since its creation in 2007, except some minor additions in 2013. Not of interest to our readers either, judging from the pageviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 08:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 08:36, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Chad has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:33, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Greece has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Kenya has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Liberia has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Malawi has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Sri Lanka has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of the Democratic Republic of the Congo has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Finland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Yet another unsourced, unmaintained, unused "list of people on the postage stamps of X"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of France has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unused, un-maintained, your average "list of people on the postage stamps of X" article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Germany has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unused, un-maintained listcruft

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Czechoslovakia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unused, un-maintained

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Hawaii has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While this one at least has a source, it's still extremely un-maintained, underused, and undersourced in general. Like all the other "list of people on the postage stamps of X", it serves no clear purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Kuwait has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unused, un-maintained blah blah blah same problems as all these other stupid stamp lists

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Jordan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and unused, just like all the other "list of people on the postage stamps of X" lists

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Italy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2010. No maintenance, same problems as all the other postage stamp lists

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of the United Arab Emirates has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, un-maintained, unused

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Jamaica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced entirely to a press release. No other sources, no notability, no maintenance, massively incomplete

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Puerto Rico has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, unsourced, unmaintained blah blah blah

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of South Africa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unmaintained, unused

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Sweden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While there is a source, this list is still horrendously incomplete and undermaintained

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Switzerland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unverified, unmaintained

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Mexico has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unmaintained, unused, same problems as the other postage stamps lists

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:09, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stamp US 1996 PNC big-700px.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 08:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 08:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 08:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 08:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you've been doing okay. I like strawberries, but feel free to substitute for your virtual favourite food of choice. Clovermoss (talk) 18:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those are some tasty-looking strawberries, thank you! It is a little unpleasant having one's past work slagged, but I suspect a close examination of my own edit history would show some less-than-shining moments, ha ha. Stan (talk) 03:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people on the postage stamps of Austria, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of people on the postage stamps of countries (A-B) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of the Democratic Republic of the Congo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We're still doing this? All the deletion discussions about these "list of people on the postage stamps of X" have failed to prove how this can possibly meet WP:SALAT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:47, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lists of people on postage stamps, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of people on postage stamps until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Resilient Barnstar
	19 years of contributions, and careful contributions at the AfD, huge respect to your almost two decades of contributions to this encyclopedia. CT55555 (talk) 16:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 13:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indy beetle (talk) 07:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Malaysia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 00:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 10:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Malaysia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Even if we can verify that these people were on these stamps, there is no proof that doing so is a noteworthy topic per WP:SALAT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:46, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 15:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Kenya has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:20, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stamp TZ 1980 5sh-500px.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Stamp TZ 1965 10c-120px.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Stamp TZ 1965 1sh-500px.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Stamp South Georgia 1963 4d.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stamp Peru 1970 1.20s Xmas.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stamp DK 1975 130o.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stamp DK 1983 200o.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stamp HU 1943 20f Xmas.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stamp US 1996 PNC big-700px.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:40, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:STS-8 flight cover 8912 back.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:STS-8 flight cover 8912 front.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]