Could you please stop steamrolling with 2015 Baltimore riots? The consensus on Talk:Death_of_Freddie_Gray was not to split. -- Fuzheado | Talk 03:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

by the time I did, the consensus was to split Sebwite (talk) 03:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! I was just working on responding to a couple bug reports for a script that I worked up as part of a request from this project, and I noticed that only a couple people (who weren't even on this mailing list) are actually using the script. A little history on the script: In March of 2014, Jim Cartar came to my user talk page and said he needed some help in acquiring a script for a backlog drive that he was working on that could keep track of and score deOrphanings for a scored backlog drive. I took that request to the project's talk page (BackLog Drive "DO" (De-Orphaning) script proposal) and there was near unanimous support for this. I thought about the proposal and decided the best way to do it was to build a new script (which is still no where near as comprehensive as Manishearth's OrphanTabs) and build into it a mechanism that will make BLD scoring easy.

What I'm wondering at this point is, since there appears to be only two people using the script, should I continue to develop this script with a goal of using it for scoring BLDs or just debug the existing script and leave it at that. Thanks for any replies or comments.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

• This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 14:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Baltimore curfew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doubleheader. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist (talk) 01:21, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sebwite/DCbus, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sebwite/DCbus and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Sebwite/DCbus during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 20:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Recreation of previously deleted pages, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Recreation of previously deleted pages and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Recreation of previously deleted pages during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —teb728 t c 11:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of street view services is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of street view services until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 03:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gsvlink has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:37, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sebwite,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just heads up that there is currently work on an extension in order to enable CSS styling in templates. Please check the document here to discuss best storage methods and what we need to avoid with implementation. Thanks--Melamrawy (WMF) (talk) 19:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts). Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 05:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New page has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 21:38, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FallsRoad.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of public transport routes numbered 19 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of public transport routes numbered 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 17:50, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Essayproposal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:55, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion of newly created pages, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion of newly created pages and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Deletion of newly created pages during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. PorkchopGMX2 (talk) 16:03, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:DELREASON. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:DELREASON redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 11:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of street view services is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of street view services (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. fgnievinski (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Essayproposal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:LOCLIST. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:LOCLIST redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. J947 ^(c), at 04:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:MTAMD5bus.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:MTAMD24bus.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia essays has been nominated for merging with Template:Essays on building Wikipedia. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 10:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Go ahead, vandalize, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Go ahead, vandalize and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Go ahead, vandalize during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Aasim 17:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coverage of Google Street View is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coverage of Google Street View (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walwal20 ^{talk ▾ contribs} 00:40, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bullneck Road. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 21#Bullneck Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 02:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BrooksideFox.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kuttappan Chettan (talk) 13:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:PTR. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 3#Wikipedia:PTR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) (formerly DePlume) 20:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LocalLink 80 (BaltimoreLink), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LocalLink 80 (BaltimoreLink) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Loved your "Go ahead, Vandalize" essay. Certainly something to be included on all wikis.

Paghalavan (talk) 06:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Libertydam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 06:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LochRaven.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 07:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Orphaned Wikipedia essays indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wikipedia:15 minutes of fame has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 2 § Wikipedia:15 minutes of fame until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Prettyboy Reservoir, seen through trees.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused low-quality photo; better free alternatives exist

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Central Booking has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 14 § Central Booking until a consensus is reached. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 19:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]