Hello, Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Hypnotize (album) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlightTime (talk • contribs) 20:16, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of England women's national rugby union team matches, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richmond and Worcester.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Template:2021 Rugby World Cup Pool A shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your side started this war and you don't have any relent in all your narcissism. I'm bored. We would all be in a much rosier place if we remained apart. You see I no longer edit the 6N or the RC or the WC because I know differences make people hate each other. That is why I do all the women's stuff, because that is where I do not have to interact with anyone else I dislike. If you don't like it, go away, then I don't have to put up with you, and you don't have to put up with me. Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel (talk) 16:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]