I’ve worked with you on many articles and you were always a great editor to have around. Sad to see how your time on Wikipedia ended but maybe it is for the better. You left a legacy here and I hope that it is remembered positively.  Hamza Ali Shah  ^Talk 02:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only just saw. I'm so sorry.

Drmies (talk) 21:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry about this L. You are one of the best here on WikiP and in real life. Thanks for all your editing and for the things you shared with me over the years. Best wishes always. MarnetteD|Talk 22:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		I hereby award this barnstar to editor Lugnuts for his unrivalled and titanic contributions to the encyclopaedia. FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found out what happened a few weeks back and still can't believe it. Sorry I never said anything for you at the case, didn't see this one coming. FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since so many editors are reverting deletion notifications, have you considered Category:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages for preventing semi-automated deletion notifications from appearing on this talk page? Nythar^T.C 11:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is sad to see that your time is Wikipedia ended the way it did. I am one who has benefitted from your stub articles. I wouldn't have probably bothered to add more material to Devraj Puri, Santosh Reddy, Syed Moinuddin and others if you hadn't already created stubs for them. People who consider stubs as evil may not understand it. Tintin 13:06, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I'm sad that your time on Wikipeda has ended. You had made many pages and worked tirelessly to make many pages Coolberry-pedia (talk) 22:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	Top read of the day
	The top read article yesterday was the 2023 ICC World Test Championship final. It has achieved over a million readers since Lugnuts created it. Well played, sir! Andrew🐉(talk) 10:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 ICC World Test Championship Final, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ktin (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Im a related, he my dads cusin. How does Lugnuts know about him. 94.191.136.157 (talk) 20:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lugnuts won't be able to answer you. But he wrote articles about Olympians, mostly using online sources for info. Most articles on Wikipedia are written by people who don't personally know the subject. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 20:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can email Lugnuts if you really want to know, he cannot answer here unfortunately. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 22:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andras de Lisocky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NATHLETE, only source cited is a WP:TRIVIALMENTION

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 13:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tshepo Phaswana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tshepo Phaswana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 19:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andras de Lisocky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andras de Lisocky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ed Veal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails gng

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grant Esau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Esau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 19:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Rushmere is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rushmere until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 19:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul Ameer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Ameer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Allan Nonymous (talk) 23:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]