Hello, IntegerSequences. Thank you for your work on Hooley's Delta function. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:46, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Directly creating articles in mainspace seems to be more convenient than using AfC. IntegerSequences (talk | contribs) 04:58, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 11:56, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate your attempt to improve this article, there were some major problems with the way you went about it. The article when you started was not unsourced. It did lack inline citations and indicators of where in the source particular statements could be found, but the documentation at Template:Unreferenced is extremely clear: Don't add this template to articles that contain even one general reference, bare URL, or citation-containing footnote. A citation is any description of a reliable source that supports any of the article content. The format of the citation and the name of the section heading are not what determines whether a link or citation is a source. (A more appropriate template would have been Template:More citations needed.) Further, the sources you added are very poor -- course notes scraped off of some professor's website, a random arXiv posting from six months ago, ResearchGate are all much lower quality sources than the book that was already there. I've removed two of them as clearly worse than leaving no citation at all. --JBL (talk) 19:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. When I opened that article I just had a quick scan on it and I didn't find any sources in the main paragraphs so I put the {{Unreferenced}} template. Next time I must take a look at the bottom of articles.

Since I'm in mainland China I am not very familiar with Google search and other searching methods. When I copied text to the Google search box, this comes out and there are not many good, reliable sources that sufficiently support the statements. WP:RSP states that ResearchGate and arXiv are unreliable and I understand. I also found that in most articles cite academic sources from journal publications or doi. But ResearchGate ranks first in search results, and how can I find ResearchGate publications in doi or other journal websites? It is certain that news and media sites will not publish these contents, and the subject only has a little chance to be included by secondary source. I'm stuck. Please give me some advice about finding sources. IntegerSequences (talk | contribs) 09:00, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IntegerSequences,

The following doesn't exactly answer your question directly. For an article like Prime power, where all of the present content is classical (well established results, many dating to the 19th century), the natural place to look for sources is in high quality textbooks, rather than internet searches or research papers. If I were trying to add sources to that article, I would start by looking at the textbooks I own on abstract algebra and number theory and seeing what they have to say. I'm a professional mathematician, so I have a lot of math books already sitting around my home and office; if I weren't, I might instead see what relevant textbooks were available at my local library or via Google Books. In particular, it seems like it would be natural to look at the book that was already listed as a reference in the article (Elementary Number Theory by Jones and Jones).

Happy editing, JBL (talk) 18:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. From your above discussion I understand why a single source can support the article. I also noted that mathematics articles are largely professional work. Professional mathematicians must have found much better sources than I did. It may be hard to improve a well-established mathematics article, and we should respect those classic theorems and mathematicians' work. IntegerSequences (talk | contribs) 04:53, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. The study is scheduled to end on Monday, January 9, 2023. Please note this is a bit later than the initial estimate specified in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
7		Multiplicative digital root (talk)	Add sources
17		Ease of Access (talk)	Add sources
44		23rd parallel north (talk)	Add sources
4		Thomas Douglas Forsyth (talk)	Add sources
28		Prince of Yan (talk)	Add sources
116		WQHT (talk)	Add sources
140		Parexel (talk)	Cleanup
107		Arithmetic function (talk)	Cleanup
157		Lijiang (talk)	Cleanup
277		2022 North Indian Ocean cyclone season (talk)	Expand
4,580		Libya (talk)	Expand
2,852		Air France Flight 447 (talk)	Expand
17		Wuzhong, Ningxia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
33		Ancient Chinese urban planning (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
77		Cheryl Mills (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
649		Greek letters used in mathematics, science, and engineering (talk)	Merge
173		Protest and dissent in China (talk)	Merge
5,614		Twitter, Inc. (talk)	Merge
89		Open Firmware (talk)	Wikify
97		UCLA–USC rivalry (talk)	Wikify
27		Joseph Li Shan (talk)	Wikify
2		Robert Connor Dawes Foundation (talk)	Orphan
2		Personalized genomics (talk)	Orphan
2		Shandong Vocational College of Industry (talk)	Orphan
7		Song County (talk)	Stub
6		Tongxu County (talk)	Stub
7		Amenable number (talk)	Stub
11		Polewali Mandar Regency (talk)	Stub
6		Bumdeling Wildlife Sanctuary (talk)	Stub
19		Kechana Kawal (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IntegerSequences! Your additions to Draft:Logic Masters India have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I know, but I want to copy-paste these contents into Wikipedia first, then describe these in my own words that is more convenient (I don't need to frequently switch the tabs). IntegerSequences (talk | contribs) 13:46, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Sniperkill has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 1 § Sniperkill until a consensus is reached. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 22:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
160		2019 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Add sources
105		2017 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Add sources
336		Digital television transition (talk)	Add sources
24		Fortuna, North Dakota (talk)	Add sources
1,168		Typhoon Haiyan (talk)	Add sources
2,751		Matchbox Twenty (talk)	Add sources
55		North Indian Ocean tropical cyclone (talk)	Cleanup
642		Nonogram (talk)	Cleanup
24		Games World of Puzzles (talk)	Cleanup
124		Mỹ Tâm (talk)	Expand
20		Thedford, Nebraska (talk)	Expand
121		2018 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Expand
492		Puzzle (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
75		Square-1 (puzzle) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
339		Speedcubing (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
117		2013 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Merge
59		2004 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Merge
59		2009 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Merge
146		Tropical cyclones in 2022 (talk)	Wikify
1,059		Crossword (talk)	Wikify
7		Ron Tingley (talk)	Wikify
21		Takuzu (talk)	Orphan
2		Abu al-Hasan al-Ahmar (talk)	Orphan
2		Baazi Dimaag Ki (talk)	Orphan
59		Darlington County (song) (talk)	Stub
6		Nongshim Cup (talk)	Stub
3		Mok Jin-seok (talk)	Stub
51		World Sudoku Championship (talk)	Stub
4		Fan Yunruo (talk)	Stub
4		Typhoon Tess (1953) (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

References from independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atcoder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:35, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IntegerSequences! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 09:35, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 05:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IntegerSequences. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 11:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

15:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 13:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 14:37, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 02:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 05:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 15:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 03:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]