Should I add information about the quiet game to the Bandito Tour page? Godhatessonny (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it'd be best to leave it out, I'd say it's too trivial and not necessary to add. EthanRossie2000 ^discuss 7:37, March 24, 2019 (UTC)

Hey! Seeing as you like Twenty One Pilots like me, I thought it could be a good idea to create a WikiProject to help improve all of the articles (as long as there are enough people that could be on board); it could be really useful. I'm still having a look to see if there are other Wikipedians that could join as well. Do you think it would be a good idea? Have a great weekend. MikeOwen ^discuss 22:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea, I'm on board for it. And same to you. EthanRossie2000 ^discuss 8:28, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Nice to know you're on board! I've read a bit more on setting up WikiProjects, so, as there are about 30 odd articles on Twenty One Pilots rather than 100+, I think it might be better to set up a task force under maybe Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music. Is that okay, do you think? MikeOwen ^discuss 15:33, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fine to me. EthanRossie2000 ^discuss 10:52, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I've put up a notice up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative music to see if there are any willing participants there. Have a great Christmas! MikeOwen ^discuss 18:00, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Periods are required at the end of complete sentences, even in image captions. They can be omitted when the caption isn't a complete sentence, like if the caption read "Gameplay screenshot", for example. TarkusAB^talk 10:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I'll try and fix the edits I've made where I've removed periods, won't happen again. EthanRossie2000 ^discuss 10:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I get you're trying but most of the time the decision you make to add/remove a period is incorrect. It's almost always right in the first place. Might I recommend stop making such edits? TarkusAB^talk 12:38, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello EthanRossie2000, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Meatsgains(talk) 16:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

EthanRossie2000, I wanted to be sure you were nominating Trench (album) to be a good article in your own name and that you planned to do any necessary work updating the article to meet the GA criteria when the review begins. What I found puzzling was that you put "Coda16" in as the nominator rather than yourself—there is no editor by that name on Wikipedia.

The GA nominee template has already been fixed so that you are listed as the nominee, and Albums is given as the subtopic (you hadn't supplied one). If you are nominating this yourself, then we're all set. If not, let me know, and I'll arrange to fix things as appropriate. Thanks for your interest in Good Article nominations! BlueMoonset (talk) 20:04, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that. For some reason Wikipedia always uses my nickname "Coda16" instead of my real username, such as when I use the four tildes to automatically set the time of a reply. I'm not sure why it does it, but I haven't been able to fix it. Anyways to answer your question, yes, I am Coda16. And thank you for fixing the GA nominee template! EthanRossie2000 ^discuss 20:11, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably some setting in the bowels of your Preferences (there should be a Preferences link at the top of the page when you're logged in—on my screen, it's after Talk and Sandbox); there are many pages available there). Best of luck in finding and fixing it. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've noticed you and MikeOwen are starting a task force for Twenty One Pilots articles. I'd like to help and actually, I need advice on making this draft for Regional at Best which can be found here: Draft:Regional at Best Also, is there any way we can privately message? Fandomroleplayer (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly there is no way to privately message on Wikipedia, but regarding the task force, you are more than welcome to join us and help out. I made a few improvements on your RaB draft, if you have any questions just ask me and I'll be happy to help. EthanRossie2000 ^discuss 16:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

While I appreciate your helpfulness in editing, I have reverted one of your changes to the article Twenty One Pilots. While the logo you uploaded is of a higher resolution, the grey-ish background is, in my opinion at least, unsightly. I will inform you though that my original logo upload was a higher resolution. A bot came along a resized it as was too large (see here). That was likely to happen to you as well. The image I got was directly from the press page, of Twenty One Pilots, so it is indeed very official. I am unsure of where you got yours, but I don't believe the grey background is an integral part of the logo. It looks better on black, as does the typeface logo, which I also got from the same press page. Please do not re-add your logo. I appreciate the help, but mine is closer to the official and is more visually appealing. Thank you.

NMGWP (talk) 00:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How can you be so sure that the ø signs are slashes through the Os and not one of the other ø symbols? That is very difficult, if not impossible, to tell from an unidentified font. At least one Wikipedia user thought it were empty set symbols, since this is what the text mentioned before my first edit. And at least one Wikipedia user (me) asked for a citation for your change. Could you please stick to the conventions of Wikipedia? Those dictate that you should not remove a request for a citation without concensus. And if you are so sure that it are slashes trough the Os, wouldn't it be more useful for the reader to link to the appropriate article for this symbol, Ø, than the trivial link to O? Gollem (talk) 06:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not linking the O to the Ø article because it is an official letter for use in a different language, the reason I continue to keep reverting your edits is because there is no source for what the "Ø" is, due to it simply being a design characteristic, nothing special (the empty set part was probably added because empty sets resemble it the most). Unless you can go and find some source where Joseph or Dun say that it isn't just a design characteristic, and believe me, I've already checked. EthanRossie2000 ^discuss 7:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for this constructive reaction. If you state that "there is no source" then it is better not to use the phrase "slashes through the Os" since this seems to imply Ø because the article on this character mentions "slashed o" as a synonym.

The only way I can find to try to draw a conclusion on the used symbol in the name is that at the bottom of the homepage www.twentyonepilots.com it says "© 2018 COPYRIGHT FBR AND TØP". When I copy that "Ø" in the search engine www.wolframalpha.com it answers that this is the unicode character 216 which is the same character as the Wikipedia article Ø. What do you think? Does this count as evidence? I am in doubt on this.

However, it does prove that it is not just a design decoration, as they use a symbol instead of a regular O in typed text. Gollem (talk) 19:08, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Ø is sometimed used in English texts too,^[1] so it could be this symbol. However, as you pointed out, it is hard to find really convincing proof that this symbol is the intended one. I suggest that we therefore link to the article on all similar looking symbols Ø (disambiguation). Gollem (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just letting you know that I've changed my username from but I'm still like to be on the Twenty One Pilots task force. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godhatessonny (talk • contribs) 10:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just wanted to tell you that I've started the task force for TOP at User:MikeOwen/Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music/Twenty One Pilots, so so far its unofficial, but I hope to move it to the mainspace once it gets enough members. See you. MikeOwen ^discuss 14:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to T-Series of additional citations for verification seems to be not appropriate as a good number of reliable primary , secondary and tertiary sources are there which otherwise verify the Article. Consider removing it or please leave your side feedback here.Manupriy Ahluwalia (talk) 19:33, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look through the article once more, there is a massive amount of unsourced content so I suggest you get working on providing reliable sources for everything or that tag stays there, simple. EthanRossie2000 ^discuss 22:11, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Trench (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sasuke Sarutobi -- Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 14:21, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I should be making my first posting on it by tomorrow morning, but please let me know if you need anything in the meantime! — Sasuke Sarutobi (push to talk) 14:26, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EthanRossie2000, if you wish to continue pursuing this GA nomination, you need to stop by the review page and post to it, since you haven't yet done so. If you don't, the review will likely be closed. Thank you for your interest in the good article process. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:57, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Music Barnstar
		This barnstar is to recognize all the work you do on music related articles, specifically Twenty One Pilots related articles. WildChild300 (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Trench (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Trench (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sasuke Sarutobi -- Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 12:02, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping you would have moved on from this type of disruptive behavior, but it seems unfortunately not. It has been a while since your last warning for this so I thought I'd give you the benefit of the doubt by asking you personally to refrain as opposed to a template message. Please stop with the unsourced or improperly sourced genres. It would be a shame if you lost your editing privileges to something so easily avoidable as your other edits are generally constructive but I will take this to WP:ANI if it happens again. Deleting these messages may be an attempt to make you look like a mostly productive editor but at ANI I will tag all the previously deleted warnings you have already received. Robvanvee 11:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The genres I added are all sourced in the article though. EthanRossie2000 12:51, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is your youtube channel called Epicgueyetoofhioof (talk) 11:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EDG 543 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

You have not changed much since last time minus cleaning up the refs but leaving them largely unchanged and adding a section about Mario's Mystery Meat (?) which doesn't really help with the notability. You may try again, but you may want to consider the fact that the subject may not be notable (considering the draft has been declined 4 times and the article has been previously deleted 3 separate times.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinesauce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vinesauce, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 16:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! This is a request for outside comments on an article I created which may be of interest to you, Nikocado Avocado. If you have any feedback or edits you could give the article, these would be greatly appreciated. --Bangalamania (talk) 12:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you added the comment "He has made note before that Red Vox is one of his favorite bands." on Tilian Pearson's page under the Musical style section. Where did this come from? Red Vox is one of my favourite bands and I'm surprised to hear that other notable musicians have actually discovered the band. Thanks! --MDirt (talk) 22:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see that you have attempted to remove the infobox caption on this article multiple times. Just letting you know that we already had an edit war about this. As a result, this was thoroughly discussed on the talk page and consensus was to keep the caption. Throast (talk) 16:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure you use/look for the simplest disambiguation for song titles before creating uncommon disambiguators. A redirect for "Morph" already existed at Morph (song), so you could have just created the article there instead of Morph (Twenty One Pilots track). I've put in a move request. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I'm not exactly Wikipedia-savvy in regards to this stuff. Won't happen again. EthanRossie2000 09:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Morph (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm struggling to understand how to place the refs in numerical order, sorry about that. I've never been that good with refs. EthanRossie2000 07:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This can get confusing when refs are moved around after review comments are implemented, but I'll explain. Make sure the refs are arranged in an ascending order throughout and after you have moved multiple sets around, use the show preview button to check that the changes don't need to be applied anywhere else. Understood? --K. Peake 08:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have not made any edits to the article since this comment; when do you think the changes will be implemented by? Also, feel free to ask for more help if you are confused. --K. Peake 12:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will make the changes soon, sorry for not being that responsive in regards to this. EthanRossie2000 12:34, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have listed everything and made it clear I'm open to discussion, so won't you implement soon? --K. Peake 15:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It has been over a good amount over a week and this is still clearly incomplete; do you have any plans to continue shortly?? --K. Peake 20:27, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think I did what you asked, but again I'm unsure, refs aren't my specialty. I apologize again for lack of responding. EthanRossie2000 06:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding charts unresolved: a chart table caption is missing, NZ position is still not backed up or removed, remove publisher from refs when I mentioned it is ones like Variety where a publisher should not be listed, MOS:QWQ issues refers to speech marks being added to the title parameter. --K. Peake 06:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everything else is done, but which refs are like Variety and should I simply remove the publisher and change the names of the refs, or?

Also, regarding QWQ, I am unsure what to do. EthanRossie2000 07:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Literally look at the review page, I have listed which refs need publisher removed. The QWQ issues are where double speech marks in titles need replacing with single speech marks; take Josh Dun Mashes Up "Morph", The Whit Stripes in Epic Drum Solo for instance. --K. Peake 10:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will you be covering these remaining issues today? --K. Peake 06:16, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I could fix the ref layout and charts for you since you are confused with them, but can you remove any remaining unreliable source(s)??? --K. Peake 10:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Morph (song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Morph (song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In future, please don't remove sources from directly below chart positions unless they're verified by the column header citation. While editors may remove sources that prove a song is a single if the single has an article on it that talks about it being one, the same isn't done (nor should be done) for chart positions, which should be verified on each article they are placed on. Even still, WP:V states this—the claim needs to be sourced on each article it is placed on. Thanks. Ss112 14:35, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I just didn't feel it was needed if the song had a dedicated article that already lists the chart positions. I'll be sure not to anymore. EthanRossie2000 20:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you would want to work together to bring Stressed Out, Ride (Twenty One Pilots) and Heathens (song) to GA? You know I'm shooting for the stars, aiming for the moon 💫 (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I note that you updated the statistics in a cricketer's infobox before the source has been updated.

Please don't do that again - we need to wait for the source to be updated - and, in particular, do not update stats in the infobox during a match. This requires WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH, which is a serious problem throughout Wikipedia. It tends to lead to errors, omissions, duplications and generally makes the statistics in the infobox even less reliable than they already are.

If you have a question about this please leave it here, on my talk page or on the talk page of the player you updated. Thank you. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I'd like to affirm that my stat change wasn't false however. I didn't mean it in bad-taste. EthanRossie2000 14:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. It just leads to so many issues - believe me! Always better to explain rather than just revert. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No substantive change in references since previous submission was declined.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Red Vox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Red Vox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen you revert the quotebox twice now with zero reasoning in your edit summaries and I can't understand why you reverted it at all. Is there a reason for why you've done this? --Rockmusicfanatic20 (talk) 19:31, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's a redundant quote with no reason to be there at all. EthanRossie2000 18:37, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Except it has clear significance to the forthcoming announcement which came the following day. It has every reason to be there so the viewers can know what the tweet was about. Look at Slipknot's wikipedia article, quoteboxes are used often. --Rockmusicfanatic20 (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quoteboxes with long, informative statements are present in Slipknot's article, not extremely short sentences. The quotebox is unnecessary and serves no reason to be there, plus it doesn't look nice either. EthanRossie2000 20:20, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Cristabel0 (talk) 23:15, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am here after your reverting my edits from Elon Musk page where you have restored the edit which was "alleged". I have felt like this wasn't the fact that Elon Musk spread misinformation about Corona virus. and more like allegations and moreover that all was a online discussion or whatever you say. I am new to Wikipedia as a contributor so I would tell appreciate to me right if I am wrong and explain me this. Thank you. Thecybergulf (talk) 07:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're asking the wrong person. EthanRossie2000 10:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 18:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I made the assumption that the issues were fixed in the time frame and thought the templates were just left unintentionally. EthanRossie2000 07:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I restored the redirect, sorry, I didn't notice the article had been at AfD twice three times already and repeatedly recreated. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it, thank you. And no worries. EthanRossie2000 13:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, I have found somebody who enjoys the band. Thank you for the contributions you have made; I use the articles you have written frequently. Pikiwedia98461 (talk) 00:17, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I highly appreciate it, thank you very much! I do my best because I adore the band. EthanRossie2000 17:04, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EthanRossie2000​, I noticed that you are a prominent editor of the Cr1TiKaL article so I was hoping you will participate in this discussion: Talk: Cr1TiKaL#Charlie's full name HappyGoLucky7 (talk) 18:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you saw that another early Twenty One Pilots album article was created: Johnny Boy (EP). I sent it to AfD as it has the same issues as Regional at Best: the songs are covered—because they are later re-recorded—but not the album. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Masato Hayakawa. Having been warned eight times previously, I suggest you read and acquaint yourself with these two policies: WP:WTRMT and WP:ICANTHEARYOU. In the future please attempt to seek consensus on the talk page before removing unsourced content or maintenance templates (within reason). Pabsoluterince (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have also noticed that you almost always edit without using an edit summary. Please fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Pabsoluterince (talk) 20:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about this. The only reason I really remove tags is because no one else seems to even when the issues have been resolved, it's honestly confusing as to whether or not the tags should even stay. Also, I'll try to write summaries from now on. EthanRossie2000 09:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries EthanRossie2000, thanks for the reply! I suggest asking in the talk page of the article who's templates you'd like to remove. Wait around three days for people to chime in with their opinions. Once you get their opinion you gain a better understanding of circumstances surrounding the templates inclusion and can make a more informed decision. If no-one chimes in after that period, be WP:BOLD and assume consensus to take action on the templates . Thanks for your efforts in improving Wikipedia and happy editing. Pabsoluterince (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Firestar464 (talk) 07:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you can tell by my more recent edits I've already began editing with summaries much more often than I used to, because I was already asked previously. But yes, I will continue to. EthanRossie2000 08:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EthanRossie2000, thank you for taking on board my advice about maintenance templates and edit summaries. Due to the sheer number of your edits (a complement to you) there are a few more things I think could help. First of all MOS:ENGVAR: "English Wikipedia prefers no national variety of English over any other." I notice that you sometimes change the phrasing of certain words to fit your preferences, usually it's better to just retain the existing variety used on the page. The other one is WP:REDLINKS: "Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject." Redlinks point out to editors which articles are in need of creation. Anyway, thanks for being resilient to the constructive criticism. Happy editing Pabsoluterince (talk) 01:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, thank you for the kind words. EthanRossie2000 17:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Starset, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EthanRossie2000,

Wikimania 2022 is almost here (11-14 August 2022) and will be held entirely online this year with the exception of a number of local mini-Wikimania's for local community members. I just wanted to let you know that two local Wikimania mini-events will be happening in South Africa; one in Cape Town and one in Johannesburg. Participants will be able to attend both the international event from these local events. If you are interested, available and in the area at the time we would be delighted to have you join us. For more information please checkout the South Africa mini-event page here. Discott (talk) 11:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonic Frontiers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not add uncited material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ian Flynn. The cited source does not mention Divergence. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. He did write it, though. EthanRossie2000 20:25, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CoryxKenshin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Favoritism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 15:26, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chris O'Neill (YouTuber)

added a link pointing to Producer

Zach Hadel

added a link pointing to Producer

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi; I'm sorry but this edit you made at Andrew Tate is a pretty clear-cut WP:BLP violation. Regardless of who the person is, we can't say someone is guilty of a crime (and especially not such an odious one) when there hasn't even been a trial yet. Best, DFlhb (talk) 01:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I wouldn't remove it as it is true, but I understand the reasoning. Won't happen again. EthanRossie2000 08:01, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dricus du Plessis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 02:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well I know an Ethan Ross, but I can't really believe you are him with the fact you are inspired by Tyler Joseph. Where can I find your music? The Ethan Ross I know makes aesthetic rap & emo rap type music Brentspine (talk) 06:26, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Robert Whittaker (fighter), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 01:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source was there already, the UFC rankings. EthanRossie2000 12:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not when you updated for I always check before I reverted since I am one of few who updated UFC rankings every week for the last 5-6 years. Cassiopeia talk 00:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just want to say thank you for helping me correct the gramma issues in twenty one pilots wikipedia pages. I'm an editor from mainland China and I hope I will improve my editing in English Wikipedia in the future. Oh and if you have any ideas for any pages regarding the band, i'm happy to contribute. Moonshimmer93 (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heathens (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]