Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin

Didiogiorgio, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Didiogiorgio! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)


For example of major article revision...[edit]

...see Vitamin K. I started process of improving it for a Good Article nomination in August 2020, at 64,600 bytes and 92 refs. Cut bad and weak stuff to 60,000 bytes and 79 refs, then improved article to 67,400 bytes and 86 refs. Much of the expansion was after the GA review started, while I was responding to the reviewer's comments. Older versions of any article can be seen by clicking on View history (top menu) and then on any of the dates of the chronologically listed changes. David notMD (talk) 18:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Didiogiorgio! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, just started, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Barillot (July 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The cited sources are just contents published by the subject, trivial mentions, online profiles, and one obituary, which are not enough to demonstrate the subject's notability. Please make sure to remove the primary sources, and include multiple significant coverage from independent and reliable sources to show that the subject passes WP:NACADEMIC or WP:NBIO.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tutwakhamoe (talk) 00:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Didiogiorgio

Leave a Reply