Hi Dallavid! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The article The Right To Struggle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Current Version + WP:BEFORE does not give me any result which could establish sufficient notability per WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dallavid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:UAVs Made In Armenia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dallavid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "UAVs Made In Armenia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noted you edit, where you removed sourced information. Could you please explain your vision in more details? Because the source states It is also revealed that a new force of 200 armed members of the Grey Wolves organization has been dispatched from Turkey in preparation for a new Azeri offensive and to train units of the Azeri army. i.e. dispatched in preparation to train units. We also do not have any Rsources claiming participation of Gray Wolfes in any kind of combat or millitary operations in this war. A b r v a g l ^(PingMe) 04:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Aznvadzor, you may be blocked from editing. KHE'O (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC) (please stop removing content)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Arevis, you may be blocked from editing. KHE'O (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC) (please stop removing content)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tsapatagh, you may be blocked from editing. KHE'O (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC) (please stop removing content)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jil, Armenia, you may be blocked from editing. KHE'O (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC) (please stop removing content)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Aghberk, you may be blocked from editing. KHE'O (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC) (please stop removing content)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Antaramej, you may be blocked from editing. KHE'O (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC) (please stop removing content)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Yeraskh, you may be blocked from editing. KHE'O (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC) (please stop removing content)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Areguni, you may be blocked from editing. KHE'O (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC) (please stop removing content)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Nerkin Shorzha, you may be blocked from editing. KHE'O (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC) (please stop removing content)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Verin Shorzha, you may be blocked from editing. KHE'O (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC) (please stop removing content)[reply]

The provided sources are very much reliable given they are products of the scientific research of both Azerbaijani and Armenian authors. These sources are used in many important articles across Wikipedia as well. I don't understand how you relate the age of the source with its reliability. Please discuss it in the respective talk pages of each article before removing any sourced content. The text could be improved instead of entirely removed if you see any discrepancies, otherwise it is just pure vandalism.--KHE'O (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is thread name. Thank you.) A b r v a g l ^(PingMe) 16:54, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dallavid. You added the reference Smith 2020 to Charles Aznavour, but no such work is defined in the article. Could you add the required cite to the article, or if you let me know what work this I can do so. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 14:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ActivelyDisinterested: Thank you for letting me know about the error, I have corrected it. --Dallavid (talk) 16:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stifle (talk) 10:12, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charles Aznavour you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Charles Aznavour for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Olympian ^loquere 09:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Dallavid. Thank you. Brandmeister^talk 20:12, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are warned that edit warring and having a battleground attitude are not acceptable on Wikipedia. If you engage in this conduct in the future you may be sanctioned, such as with blocks or topic bans. You have been warned in response to this AE thread. This warning is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of this arbitration decision and the procedure described at Wikipedia:Contentious topics. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. You may appeal this sanction using the process described here using the arbitration enforcement appeals template. Even if you appeal this warning, it remains in place until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm leaving you this message to let you know that I've removed your Good Article nomination at Giorgio Petrosyan. It appears you have not substantially contributed to this article before nominating it. While "drive-by" nominations have always been discouraged, there is now a consensus that they are subject to removal without review. The relevant discussion can be found here, and any further questions can be posted at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dallavid, I've decided to respond here. The dispute resolution policy details the steps you can take to resolve disputes. When you consider the edit warring policy as well, you need to stop editing the article and engage in the dispute resolution process instead. If others are edit warring you can report it, but it doesn't justify you edit warring yourself. Those aren't personal attacks. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Armenia-Azerbaijan_2 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Sincerely, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dallavid,

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 10, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.

For the Arbitration Committee, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Garry Kasparov you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Billsmith60 -- Billsmith60 (talk) 16:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The review has been completed and the article has failed GA. Please assess the findings and help with improving it Billsmith60 (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Garry Kasparov you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Garry Kasparov and Talk:Garry Kasparov/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Billsmith60 -- Billsmith60 (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While you are encouraged to be as active as possible on Wikipedia, do not nominate any more articles for GA status unless you have made a significant contribution to them. You are creating extra work for other people who have to remove them. The work you have done on Alain Prost, for example, comes nowhere near what is expected. Twenty times as much would be needed to the text of any article – and not merely tidying up references. Thanks Billsmith60 (talk) 20:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dallavid,

Three parties have been added to the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 arbitration case. The evidence phase has been extended and will close on February 21, 2023.

Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 21, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.

For the Arbitration committee,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again,

I see you've done lots of work to this. If your edits are complete for now please let me know. Thanks Billsmith60 (talk) 07:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my third assessment is ready now. All the best, Billsmith60 (talk) 15:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to your substantial changes tomorrow afternoon. Thanks Billsmith60 (talk) 00:33, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's the fourth assessment done now. We're nearly there! Regards Billsmith60 (talk) 15:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to let you know that we're at the last few changes now. Regards Billsmith60 (talk) 16:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Still one section to address, the we're there! Billsmith60 (talk) 21:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final update for today: see last two changes needed, then it'll definitely pass. Cheers Billsmith60 (talk) 23:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I restored the dates in the first para. because, if you recall, the "Hook" reviewer said he couldn't see that shown clearly. So let's hope that's everything, as I'm entirely satisfied we've addressed that person's concerns. Thanks again, Billsmith60 (talk) 19:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you are incorrect about the Acorn brought to Baku being the "first of its kind in the SU": that is a reference to the computer chess club Kasparov established in Moscow! Nor does it refer to the Western-made Atati he presented to it in 1986. Let that text stand as it is and be more careful about interpreting sources. Thanks Billsmith60 (talk) 20:14, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But the "Soviet Union" tweak is correct, fortuitously! Billsmith60 (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dallavid, there isn't a way to appeal an expired block. There might be an exception for a very recently appealed block but not one which expired some time ago. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alain Prost you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:42, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Garry Kasparov you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Garry Kasparov for comments about the article, and Talk:Garry Kasparov/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Billsmith60 -- Billsmith60 (talk) 15:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dallavid, in the open Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. 

Specifically, your sanction history has been summarized, a lack of escalating sanctions has been described as an error, and three sanctions (topic ban / one-revert restriction / site ban) have been proposed.

Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An arbitration case about the conduct of editors in the Armenia-Azerbaijan topic area has now closed. The final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

• Abrvagl (talk · contribs)
  • is topic banned from pages about Armenia, Azerbaijan, and related ethnic conflicts, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • may make only 1 revert on any page in any given 24 hour period. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • is indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, ZaniGiovanni anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions). This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Dallavid (talk · contribs)
  • is topic banned from pages about Armenia, Azerbaijan, and related ethnic conflicts, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • may make only 1 revert on any page in any given 24 hour period. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Olympian (talk · contribs)
  • is topic banned from pages about Armenia, Azerbaijan, and related ethnic conflicts, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • may make only 1 revert on any page in any given 24 hour period. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• ZaniGiovanni (talk · contribs)
  • is topic banned from pages about Armenia, Azerbaijan, and related ethnic conflicts, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • may make only 1 revert on any page in any given 24 hour period. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • is indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, Abrvagl anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions). This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Golden (talk · contribs) and Grandmaster (talk · contribs) are placed on indefinite probation. If any party to this case is found to be edit warring within the area of dispute by an uninvolved administrator, the administrator should impose the following sanction: [Editor name] is indefinitely topic banned from all pages about Armenia, Azerbaijan, and related ethnic conflicts, broadly construed. Topic bans imposed via this remedy may only be appealed to the Arbitration Committee. For a topic ban imposed under this remedy, an editor may make their first appeal at any time; further appeals may be made every twelve months after an unsuccessful appeal.
• When deciding on whether or not to issue an Arbitration Enforcement sanction, Administrators are encouraged to consider all behavior, including the seriousness of the violation and the possible recidivism of the editor in question. For instance, users who do not heed warnings or who engage in sustained, low-level misconduct should be sanctioned rather than re-warned. Where editor conduct frequently results in enforcement requests that are dismissed or closed with warnings, administrators are encouraged to impose robust restrictions on editors.

For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:08, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Armenia-Azerbaijan 3: Arbitration case closed

The article Alain Prost you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Alain Prost for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]