Hi CopperyMarrow15! I noticed your contributions to Minigame and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:57, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, CopperyMarrow15! I saw you listed a move request to an unused (red-colored) title. As you've been registered here for over 6 months now, you could move such pages in the future to avoid waiting for days and weeks to generate community opinions an/or takes on it/them. Only list requests when your preferred target title(s) for the moves are hyperlinked or blue in color (in that case, use WP:RMTR). In short, be bold when you have to and take community scrutiny and advice on the chin as you move around here on WP! Happy editing! Intrisit (talk) 06:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I see. Thank you, Intrisit! Just when I think I know all the relevant policies, there's always something else. Would I be able to rename the article now that I've listed it? Or must I wait for consensus? –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 18:38, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry for replying to you a bit later than usual, as my head spins anytime when I'm here on WP! Let me use my over 13-month-old WP experience with these renamings and moves as examples. As I'm writing to you now, I'm embroiled in page renaming battles on numerous talk pages, half of which you can judge for yourself through my contributions. Renaming a page or pages here on WP is called "page moving/moving pages/a page". As you stated on reviewing every iota of WP policy/guideline, the co-founder of WP once put out a statement; ignore all rules; one component of which made up that is what I already stated to you, that unless the preferred titles are blue or already taken, if such titles are instead red-linked or their link are red (signifying them as currently non-existent/unavailable), move (rename) them. If they get undone or reverted, list them at RMTR. That is where the consensus part comes in where you then show off to justify why the titles you picked should be changed. Remember to only look/wait for consensus when your page moves are contested/doubted and are in discussion once listed from you at RMTR.

  Think of the policies as guides to avoid yourself getting blocked from WP than having yourself backed at a "boxing corner" of timidity, hence the "ignore all rules" statement. Sources via websites and books/prints and neutrality are what rules here on WP than baseless arguments by others. When they arrive, state your stance, rules or no rules (hence, "Be Bold!") on why it should be so through such sourcing and you're good to go! Happy editing!! Intrisit (talk) 15:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Title. My fault, not yours!  Self-trout ^user:A smart kitten_meow 21:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• All good!

Did you know that Harry Truman's middle name was S? It wasn't an abbreviation for anything; just S.^{[1] [2]} This is my talk page! I get to say as many fun facts as I want! –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 21:44, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
225		Canon EOS 5D (talk)	Add sources
5,110		Nintendo (talk)	Add sources
65		State-sponsored Internet propaganda (talk)	Add sources
597		Hard problem of consciousness (talk)	Add sources
278		Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's (talk)	Add sources
244		Premium-rate telephone number (talk)	Add sources
28		Data fabrication (talk)	Cleanup
3,134		T-Mobile US (talk)	Cleanup
34		Carrier IQ (talk)	Cleanup
208		Legal affairs of Donald Trump as president (talk)	Expand
197		Kaluza–Klein theory (talk)	Expand
1,138		High Speed 2 (talk)	Expand
1,336		Third gender (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,694		Acronym (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,317		HiSilicon (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
361		Oyster card (talk)	Merge
186		Hard sign (talk)	Merge
229		Road signs in the United Kingdom (talk)	Merge
58		Seascape (talk)	Wikify
12		Media censorship and disinformation during the Gezi Park protests (talk)	Wikify
1,002		Political positions of Donald Trump (talk)	Wikify
8		Mums for Lungs (talk)	Orphan
9		Frank Clegg (Microsoft) (talk)	Orphan
17		Martin Pall (talk)	Orphan
15		Mexrrissey (talk)	Stub
11		HiperMAN (talk)	Stub
6		Salvia dombeyi (talk)	Stub
4		Dudyan (talk)	Stub
28		Conscription in Mexico (talk)	Stub
34		Charles Bourseul (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Nononsense101. I found that you reverted an edit on Among Us and called it vandalism. It looks perfectly good faith, and therefore is not vandalism, so why did you use the user warning template you did? Nononsense101 (talk) 20:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Nononsense101, You are correct in that I have failed to assume good faith. Thanks for calling me out. I had immediately assumed that someone calling a meme "cringe" would simply be trying to crack a joke and be disruptive, but after thinking about it I understand how it might be possible for someone to do so in good faith. To be fair, the level-one vandalism warning template does say "your recent contributions [...] did not appear constructive", which is true to this situation; they did not appear constructive to me, even though I was possibly mistaken and thus maybe should have used a different template. Sorry, Amoguslol! –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 23:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at WT:EL § Notes formatting. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]