An article you recently created, Drake(Bart Baker song), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PATH SLOPU 06:53, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 07:51, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All singles from the EP are aa part of the full-length album also. So please revert all your recent edits. Neel.arunabh (talk) 15:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Mii Channel Theme requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CheatCodes4ever,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CG5 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:49, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, CG5, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AaronWikia (talk) 02:17, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Famous(Mason Ramsey EP), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PATH SLOPU 14:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Tom Thum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PATH SLOPU 04:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Level 1(Cheat Codes EP) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 07:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Level 1(Cheat Codes EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Level 1(Cheat Codes EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 08:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Level 1(Cheat Codes EP) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 08:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Daniel Budden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -Nahal^(T) 07:57, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I am creating a redirect page in case one of my songs is used in something famous, they can use that link to the redirect to iTunes Store! CheatCodes4ever (talk) 02:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that the repeated deletions by administrators would make it clear, but apparently, that's not the case here. So, let me say this clearly: stop recreating the redirect. Wikipedia does not have redirects just in case your songs are used in something famous. When they get famous, they can have their own article. Until it happens, do not create the redirect again, and do not point it to iTunes Store—it does not make any sense at all. Your actions can be seen as disruptive editing, and disruptive editors may be blocked from editing. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 03:02, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn’t know I was being disruptive. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 03:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would my user page be a good redirect if it did get used in something famous? (Don’t worry, I’m not creating one unless it is featured in something famous) CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Cutie(Daniel Budden song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -Nahal^(T) 08:10, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CheatCodes4ever,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Theme Music EP for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing this ages after this was added to my talk page. I need to note that it is deleted now, as you know, but some of the things you said are not true. Peppa Pig’s My First Album exists as a page, and you say the artist dosen’t have an article. Fun fact: the artist actually does have an article. The one about the TV show is basically the artist’s article. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 20:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever,

Thank you for creating Theme Music From Peppa Pig.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add references with in-depth coverage about the subject from independent reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:51, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I've Been Waiting for You (ABBA song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page So Long (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CheatCodes4ever,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peppa Pig discography for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Selfish(Jessica Mauboy Song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selfish(Jessica Mauboy Song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. From AnUnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 19:41, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Selfish(Jessica Mauboy Song), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 10:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Comfort Page requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not intended to be an encyclopedic article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 09:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Comfort Page, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 09:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Comfort Page, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. jaclar0529 (talk) 09:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TenPoundHammer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, What You See Is What You Get (album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I fixed the refs in Bing Bong Christmas. Please look at the changes I made and use that information to fix the refs in your article Bing Bong Zoo(Peppa Pig song), thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 16:21, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bing Bong Christmas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero independent notability. Fails WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:32, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited So Fresh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock and Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CheatCodes4ever,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged So Fresh: The Hits of Spring 2016 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TomCat4680 (talk) 08:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Genius is a WP:USERG website. We do not cite websites where users can go on the website and add whatever they like with minimal oversight. It's like citing a fake news blog. We don't do it, so stop adding Genius links to all these articles. They will be removed. Thank you. Ss112 01:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and your claims of "not doing pages anymore" clearly didn't last very long. You asserted that you're semi-retired but two days after this, you attempted to create So Fresh: The Hits of Spring 2016. Ss112 01:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

“They can add whatever they like”. And that’s not what Wikipedia is?

You're right, Wikipedia can be edited by anybody. Wikipedia is not a reliable source, and nobody out there should be citing Wikipedia articles for this very fact. They should only be taken as a reference point to do further research. However, this doesn't make websites where anybody can add whatever they like now acceptable because we're on a site that allows that. Wikipedia itself demands better sourcing than sites like itself. See WP:RS. Ss112 10:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome CheatCodes4ever!

Please slow down a bit and read some of our guidelines. Your contributions are appreciated but some of your edits have not conformed to our policies and guidelines. In particular please read our guidelines on encyclopedic notability and copyright. If you have any questions please drop me a line. I am an administrator and my job is to help. Happy editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get discouraged. There is a learning curve but it's not steep. If you have questions or concerns feel free to drop me a line. -Ad Orientem (talk) 06:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t actually go on talk pages. I don’t know why, I’m just not allowed to for some reason. Here’s the problem, I can’t do links to refs because even though I’ve had another box open for me to see how to do it right, it never works. Please tell me what’s going on. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 08:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why do you only make pages of people who are famous? There are some people who know them and they might want to look them up.

Hi CheatCodes4ever. If you can edit in articles, and here on your talk page, then you can also edit on the talk pages of articles. Citing refs can take a few minutes to figure out. There is a whole page dedicated to helping you learn the basics (and more advanced) of citing your sources. It can be found at WP:CITE. If you have questions or need help with something of a technical nature you can go to the WP:Help Desk and you should get a more timely response. Lastly when you post on a talk page, please remember to sign your posts. This is done by ending your post with four tildes. Those are the squiggly lines that look like this... ~~~~. That will sign your user name with a date and time stamp. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But can you just tell me why this won’t work, for example?^[1]

Then...

References[edit]

When you are editing a page and looking to add a reference first mark the spot where you plan to add the reference and then go to the top of the editing box. Then click on the word "Cite" towards the right of the top of the editing box. This will expand the toolbar and you will see a drop down box with the word "Template" in it. That's your tool for adding references. Click on the drop down menu and then click on which type of source you are using. Then fill in each field that is applicable. When you are done you can either preview it or just click "insert" and it will put the reference code in the spot you had first marked with your mouse. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Also by the way, do not tell me that So Fresh isn’t notable. That’s not what I’m asking. I’m saying that I have copied the coding of people doing refs that work, and for some reason, I do the exact same thing and it dosen’t work.

Our notability guidelines are generally found at WP:GNG and WP:NSONG. Please give me a link to what you are trying to cite as a source and I will code it for you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On Spotify, it says that Jacob Sartorius’s Better With You is an album, https://open.spotify.com/album/5B6tCFDLdMHbd1P3p8ApL5?si=wAbuAS-mTD26vi-i72kIoQ, so can you try that? (Also by the way, there is no source for it being an EP, there is a source for it being an album anyway)

Just why do you just create pages of people who are famous? There are some people out there who know them. Oh and by the way, my song “Cutie” has over 1,000 streams on Spotify, and Girl In Red has a page because of her debut single has over 1,000 streams on Spotify, and I can tell because barely any of her songs charted. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an indiscriminate collection of information. To that end we have guidelines adopted by the community for determining what we are prepared to include and what we are not. Also we do not allow the encyclopedia to be used for promotion of any kind. To that end editors are strongly advised not to edit or create any article where they have a connection to the subject. See WP:COI for details on that. And I do need to caution you here. If the community comes to the conclusion that you are engaged in some kind of self advertising or promotion, you will end up getting blocked. So tread carefully. You really need to steer clear of articles where you have some sort of connection. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would you accept a page for Bart Baker’s debut album, Celebritease, if it had good references? Just asking.

Unfortunately, music is not a genre that I work in. You would be better off asking the advice of some experienced editors in that field who could evaluate the album. Perhaps Lk95 or Ss112 could give you a hand with that and your request in the above section. Also, and I don't want to nag, but please remember to sign your posts on talk page discussions using the four tildes. Thanks... -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:48, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ad Orientem, this new editor is using the mobile wikitext editor, which provides no buttons or other assistance with signing comments. It's also difficult for most new folks to find the article talk pages on the mobile site (you have to scroll to the end of the page, past all the references and other appendices, and then find the Talk button). Editing on desktop is a lot easier. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that information. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:19, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Be Alright (Dean Lewis song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to your edit summary: We still have to mention it though. According to WP:COVERSONG, no we don't. It clearly states "Only cover versions/renditions important enough to have gained attention in their own right should be added to song articles. Merely appearing in an album track listing, a discography, etc., is not sufficient to show that a cover version is noteworthy. Cover songs with only these types of sources should not be added to song articles, either as prose or in a list." So this particularly cover song does not need to be mentioned until it has met WP:GNG or WP:NSONG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:55, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Daniel Budden, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —J. M. (talk) 01:58, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Super Bass, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Robvanvee 12:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively, you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 01:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you’re talking about my stuff about Blue Tiger and things, I’m creating them because I can’t make pages about them. Please don’t delete my page, and don’t revert those edits. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 02:00, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Schazjmd is right. Your user page violates the user page guideline (excessive unrelated content, user pages that look like articles). The user page guideline also explains that the user page is not a place for self-promotion, and you cannot treat it as your personal homepage. It does not belong to you. I agree that you should either remove the content from your user page, or the page should be deleted.—J. M. (talk) 03:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:CheatCodes4ever, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:14, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --CheatCodes4ever (talk) 04:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed all the things that make the page need to be deleted. You cannot delete it anymore!

That works. I have removed the CSD tag. Happy editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:37, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One question, can I still make an Infobox for myself and my discography? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 04:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Want You Back (5 Seconds of Summer song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Better Place (Rachel Platten song). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Robvanvee 04:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Um, excuse me, I just changed the date which was shown on the album! On the album page for Wildfire, it says the single date is March 25, 2016. On the page, it says April 4. I changed it to a date on the page for Wildfire, which may not have been sourced, but neither was April 4. By the way, I said “album says so” in my edit summary, so don’t revert it!CheatCodes4ever (talk) 19:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue with your disruptive behavior and attitude, you are very likely to get blocked. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was just changing the date to what it said on the album “Singles” in the Infobox. How is that disruptive? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know the album article is correct over the article for the single? Did you confirm it from a reliable source? Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just believed the album date was more reliable than the single. The reason is because, I honestly think that album articles are created before the song page sometimes. When somebody creates an article for a Song after that, I’m pretty sure it would be a different person. It’s because they believe something else, and usually, it’s a theory that came after it, and I think the first one is right. CheatCodes4ever^{Talk To me} 4:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Your beliefs won't suffice, only a reliable source will. And if you intend to make date changes or other edits generally you will need to supply such sources. If not, as was pointed out earlier, expect to be blocked. Robvanvee 07:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I’ll stop doing it. I won’t do that again CheatCodes4ever (talk) 07:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Love You (Billie Eilish song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CheatCodes4ever,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Regard (artist) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 00:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Regard (artist). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 06:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at YouTube. —J. M. (talk) 05:40, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. How do I create pages without having to create a Red link for them and clicking on it to create a page? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 18:41, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CheatCodes4ever, on the search page for a title without an article, there is a link to

Create the page "search term" on this wiki!

press this.

If you're on a mobile editor or something where that doesn't want, you can make redlinks to your hearts content in your sandbox. User:CheatCodes4ever/Sandbox.

Thanks, ~~ OxonAlex - talk 09:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jessie Paege has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources do not establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robvanvee 05:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, the sources do establish notability, she has over 1 million subscribers on YouTube! CheatCodes4ever (talk) 18:43, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever! I'm OxonAlex. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 08:32, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nevada is notable enough, his song “The Mack” peaked at number 9 on the ARIA!!! CheatCodes4ever (talk) 02:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nevada is notable enough! His single “The Mack” peaked at number 9 on the ARIA CheatCodes4ever (talk) 02:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nevada (DJ) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nevada (DJ) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 01:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jacob Sartorius discography. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 05:38, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 19:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jessie Paege, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 23:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Last Text(Jacob Sartorius song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It’s just a redirect and it’s perfect. Why was it deleted? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, somebody reverted everything! Blame them! CheatCodes4ever (talk) 03:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Regard (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regard (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 03:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Regard (artist). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please start reliably sourcing your edits. Your problematic editing is becoming disruptive. Robvanvee 13:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Willbb234 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect PP2 (album), created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 23#PP2 (album).

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have blanked the page. Since I don’t know how do, please delete it. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 06:10, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peppa Pig (British singer and rapper) for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TomCat4680 (talk) 22:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Child singer. We are going to end up at ANI very soon at this rate. Your aversion to sourcing is highly disruptive. Robvanvee 05:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The subject shows notability, she has over a million subscribers. If her birthdate and full name source is not reliable, I can remove that. Any other unsourced content that needs to be sourced I can remove it. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 07:12, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you talking to and what are you talking about specifically? Robvanvee 07:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to the part about Jessie Paege being declined! How did it end up here? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 07:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not doing edits anymore. I might visit Wikipedia to find things out, but I don’t edit anymore because now I understand that I do not understand how to edit this website. I’d like to apologise to anyone who I disagreed with because I didn’t understand things. I’m going to stop. Also, please don’t say anything mean if you reply to this like “Yay He’s Gone!” because I tried and I’m going to stop. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 09:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That seems rather dramatic and no one wants you to leave. Perhaps I only speak for myself here but there are a few things that are getting on the nerves of some of the more experienced editors that are quite simple to address that would ultimately make your experience here a lot more enjoyable. These have been mentioned several times by several different editors, including me over the last few weeks but as yet, you have not listened. Let's start there: listening. There is much to learn at Wikipedia and even though you might think you know how, you probably don't. So slow down, put the brakes on and listen to what the more experienced editors are saying regarding your edits. That brings me to the next one: slow down. As hard as that is, just start slow and learn from others as you go. Creating loads of 5 worded stubs about non-notable YouTube personalities is unproductive. Your time would be better spent improving the quality of existing articles. If you are not sure ask a more experienced editor to help but stop with the reverting when someone reverts your edits. Instead, take it to the article talk page as throwing your toys out the cot won't be tolerated. That's the next thing: the attitude. I realize you are young but don't let that compromise your editing abilities and skills by means of you coming across as a spoilt child not getting their way when you are reverted, which to be honest, is what your above message comes across as. Remember, many of us have been here for some time and we are not punishing you. We just have a better understanding of how things work around here. So in a nutshell: take it slow and ask questions, be civil, respectful, open minded and learn from others as you go. I'm open to any help you may need but for a start I'll need you be receptive to these issues. Robvanvee 10:09, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just don’t know what I could edit that would be helpful, and what page I could create that would be notable. I tried to create a page for One Direction’s song “Na Na Na (One Direction song)” because the first thing I have to mention is that it peaked at number 86 in Australia. That probably isn’t a very high number. The second thing I have to say is that it also peaked at number 27 in Ireland. I sourced the page with the sources on One Direction discogaphy (which it now redirects to) that said it charted in these countries. The pages were redirected to One Direction discography, (as I said before), which I’m a little confused about. Also, I created a page called In This Place (Julia Micheals song) which I thought peaked at number 3 on Billboard, but it was Children’s Music Charts (I’m starting to think it was also a Billboard chart, but not the official Billboard Hot 100) but wouldn’t that be enough? I’m a little confused. After all, 3 is an extremely high number on the charts. Not really something about music, but probably about being notable, later, I created a page for the Talking Tom and Friends character, Angela, it was marked for deletion (very recently). I thought the character is notable because Talking Tom and Friends is an extremely successful show, and the character Angela is an extremely populated character. She has a toy, she has two apps, a third one is coming, in the show, she is like the third main character and she is literally the girlfriend of the main character. I don’t get what else notability is for a character, because it’s not like a character is like a song, album or EP that charted. It’s more like a popular character, and that’s what Angela is. Can you tell me where I went wrong? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 20:09, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I think that the page I created might have been In This Place (song) Though.

Did you even read a single word I wrote? What an absolute waste of my time! Robvanvee 21:51, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did read what you wrote. By the way, improving an existing article, I don’t really know many. I did help Child singer, a bit, but would you mind giving me an example of an article that needs to be fixed? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 22:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and by the way, if what I said wasn’t related to what you were talking about, I’m sorry. Speaking of what you said, I will listen to what users say and be careful with my edits. You said I should spend my time improving articles, which is what I’m going to do. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 02:28, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Angela (character) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don’t see how this character has achieved independent notability to have its own article. A redirect would be fine but the title of this article is ambiguous (there must be lots of characters named Angela).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 09:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angela (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:33, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 17:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I’m going to retire because you want to block me even though I’m just trying to help. If I’m not helping the Wikipedia, I’m just going to retire. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The root cause of all the problems you're facing is that you haven't been paying any attention to the advice anyone gives you. That doesn't come across as confident, it comes across as immature.

Saying you'll retire only to immediately turn around and say you're not retiring likewise tells us that you don't really understand how things work here. I've written a guide that covers a variety of problems new users face, and there's a game that explains how to edit properly. If you do get to stay on this site, I strongly recommend you play that game and look over my guide before getting involved in anything.

Some people might hesitate to block you if you promise to not edit anything until you complete the tutorial game and study my guide -- but you have to follow through on it. You can't just start up the tutorial, quit it after the first page, and then lie about having read the guide because it will show when you go and screw things up again. But this might not work, thanks to your history of ignoring what everyone tells you, threating to leave, misunderstanding our "clean start" rules, and unretiring immediately after retiring. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have been listening. I have re-replied to Robvanvee’s advice on “I’m Retiring”. I am not going to create articles anymore until I am sure about them. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 02:19, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also by the way, I will read that. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 02:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have read everything from that, however, I have not clicked on much pages with a blue link. Do I need to do that, or just read the page? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 08:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I’m trying to play the game, but when I click “Start the adventure” it dosen’t work. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 08:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are not currently blocked on this account. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 07:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When I try to edit, it dosen’t work. If this is about the IP address 101.177.163.148, I am not that account. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 08:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account is not blocked. You can see the block log: here. If you cannot edit it is likely because the underlying IP address has been blocked. The notice you get when you try to edit a page will tell you which IP has been blocked. You will need to follow the simple instructions at Template:Autoblock to request an unblock. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 08:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tones and I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy.

Don't post your name or age again. Saying you're a kid in Australia is fine, but don't get any more specific than that. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:46, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full years are preferred per MOS:DATERANGE, so that means we prefer "2019–2020" rather than "2019–20". While another part of the guideline page says we can shorten the year where space is limited, space is not particularly limited in the header of a wikitable that is significantly wider than the text "Chart (2019–2020)". So please stop making unnecessary edits or "correcting" people when you're not even correct. Thank you. Ss112 05:54, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cheatcode, what you’re changing it to is not wrong, it’s just that how it is just fine the way it is per the Wikipedia style guide. Don’t just change things to change things. Fix things that are wrong or add things that aren’t there (as long as you provide a reliable source, of course). Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 07:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Twice you have been asked to stop doing this. Refrain from shortening dates unless space is an issue, which it is not. STOP! Robvanvee 04:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop messing with things you don’t understand such as you did here. All you’re doing is creating more work for other editors who have to fix your mistakes. Just leave well enough alone. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 06:38, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I just thought of being nominated for deletion would be described an "issue", but I guess I was wrong. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 06:40, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you create a redirect from a user page to the user's talk? That user's last edit was in July 2015. Also, why did you do the same at an IP's user page? Johnuniq (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not redirect other editors' userpages to their talk page, as you did at User:Danieldart, without a good reason and providing an explanation. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 09:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CheatCodes4ever! You created a thread called What? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's become clear to me that you're either not here to work constructively, or just are not listening to the requests and advice given to you. As a result, I have no choice but to block your account. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But I am here to build an encyclopedia, and I do listen to advice. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I commented on the discussion about your editing at WP:ANI, I am not able to rule on your unblock request. However, I agree with the consensus that your edits, including but not limited to the creation of a slew of unviable articles and drafts, is disruptive. Perhaps WP:STANDARDOFFER may apply in the future (i.e., six months or more), but at the moment, it appears that allowing you to edit is not beneficial to the encyclopedia. Please note that this applies to you as a person; if you attempt to create a new account or edit while logged out, it will be considered block evasion, and the likelihood that you will be able to legitimately edit here in the future will likely be reduced to zero. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:16, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I"m sorry. I tried to help Wikipedia. I guess I just didn't understand. I'm trying to do the Wikipedia Adventure, but there have been many issues. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 22:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CheatCodes, two weeks ago you said you wanted a fresh start yet since that time there has not been any improvement in your editing, and more importantly you still the fail to grasp the core concept of notability as it applies to this encylopedia. You may want to ask if you can participate in and complete the Wikipedia Adventure as a condition before being allowed to edit again. You click on "Mission 1" not "Join the Adventure" to get started. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m still confused though. When I click on Mission 1, it just says “Check your stats”. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get a pop up that says "Welcome to Wikipedia" with a blue box that says "Get equipped for the trip"? Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can't use a tablet or smart phone to do the adventure. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The adventure requires editing, which I can't do. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:53, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have now done an edit on the talk page, which helped me do the adventure. I have received a badge, but then I have to click Make it even better! And it isn't working. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 22:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment re unblock request I'm not familiar with what precipitated the indefinite block, with no previous block. But I am not altogether convinced that this is a case of NOTHERE. This editor does seem to have made various constructive edits and I am not seeing evidence of malice. It looks more like the kind of rookie mistakes we generally expect from newer editors. To which WP:CIR may be an issue. I am open to correction if I am missing something here. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem: the ANI thread may be helpful. Short summary is: there is a 2 year history from this user of problematic and often disruptive editing, with little sign of improvement. I tend to agree that there isn't malice here, but there is a competency question. Best, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 00:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Calling this editor's contributions "rookie mistakes" is absurd. First of all, this editor has been editing Wikipedia for two years, under two (known) accounts, and has been a very active editor. How long can an editor be considered a rookie? Secondly, the editor has received a monumental number of warnings, countless people have been trying to help, explain things, but the editor keeps ignoring everything (despite constantly saying that they read and understand those explanations, which is very obviously not true). Evidence of malice? What about vandalising the YouTube article? What about deleting speedy deletion notices from their articles, despite receiving countless warnings that they cannot remove the notices? What about creating countless poor and speedily deleted articles that are a waste of time for everyone involved, ignoring everyone's requests to stop? What else do you want? This is a perfectly clear example of WP:DONTGETIT, WP:CIR, chronic, endless disruptive editing with no chance of improvement. Even the user's unblock request clearly shows that the user still has absolutely no clue what the problem is (or pretends that he/she does not know, which does not matter anyway). If the user, after two years of constant stream of warnings, explanations and requests, is still unable to understand anything anyone ever tells them, an indefinite block is the only option. The only mistake here is that it took so long.—J. M. (talk) 01:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do listen to advice! I’m not lying! CheatCodes4ever (talk) 01:57, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CheatCodes4ever! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:47, Thursday, January 9, 2020 (UTC)

Hi CheatCodes4ever! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:54, Thursday, January 9, 2020 (UTC)

Hi CheatCodes4ever! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:54, Thursday, January 9, 2020 (UTC)

I"m happy too. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

YAY! CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:59, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CheatCodes, what is the point of above? You're going to lose user talk access if you continue with these types of edits on your talk page. Please don't use your talk page as a sandbox. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 02:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but why can’t I edit my user page and sandbox while blocked? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 03:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How were their edits similar? They created a page for Apple & Blackcurrant Juice. I work on music! CheatCodes4ever (talk) 04:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my editing to Wikipedia. I am sorry for everything I did - including using my talk page as a sandbox. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 03:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Take my advice from your unblock request above. Take the next year off and then if you are still interested you can ask for a standard offer. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:13, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will take a break. I might not take a year off, but I will take a break for at least two or three months, I will probably take more. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 03:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is very little chance of your being unblocked in less than a year. Whether intentional or not, your problematic editing has annoyed a lot of your fellow editors. And when you do come back, don't be surprised if there are editing restrictions imposed as a condition of being unblocked, assuming that you are. See you in January of 2021. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to say one more thing, can you unblock Magicworld888? Users think the account is me, but it’s not. The reason they think so is because it is using the same IP address as 101.177.163.148, and that user was told it was “obvious” that they were me, but I’m not them. So I would like you to unblock Magicworld888. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 03:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also I would like to say that I know that you did not block any of those users, but since you are an admin, you can block and unblock users. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 03:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That editor can post their own unblock request. But I would strongly caution them not to do so if there is any connection between you and them. It's certain that a check user will be run on both accounts and if it is concluded that you are attempting to evade your block, your chances of ever being unblocked would drop to about zero. So I would not go there. Nor would I ever even think of trying to evade your block if you hope to be readmitted to the community one day. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That editor was not blocked when CheatCodes4ever posted the unblock request. What made CheatCodes4ever think the user was blocked? I would suggest taking a look at their previous unblock request. Again, CheatCodes4ever thought they were blocked, but they were not. But 101.177.163.148 was. CheatCodes4ever claimed the IP address was not them, but the first edit on the IP user page was made by CheatCodes4ever. Now, Magicworld888 created their account yesterday, and immediately made edits similar to CheatCodes4ever. How did CheatCodes4ever find this user so quickly? Where did anyone tell them about the user? And why did Magicworld888 claim they were not CheatCodes4ever when they were neither blocked nor accused of anything?

In light of these questions, I find the January 2021 date too optimistic. Someone suggested a three-year block, and while that sounds much more reasonable, I think there are fundamental personality traits that are the real, permanent problem here. Some editors at the ANI page suggested watching for possible new accounts created by CheatCodes4ever, and that's what I would recommend, too.—J. M. (talk) 04:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They created a page for apple and blackcurrant juice. How is that related? I work on music. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 04:52, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested a check user. If the report comes back as confirmed socking then I am done here. Crystal clear warnings were given about trying to evade your block. I really hope I am wrong. But I would be surprised if I am. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To that person who said I should have a three year block, what they said is actually quite offensive. I’m sure there are many matured people out there who don’t know how to edit the Encyclopedia. Age has got nothing to do with editing skills. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 07:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing offensive about it. But I don't think age is the primary factor here, that's why I don't think a three year block would be sufficient. The problem is much deeper.

By the way, User:Wiiuplayer is most probably yet another account that was used by Money12122 (now CheatCodes4ever), so it should be blocked, too. You can see for example the edits when Money12122 forgot to log in as Wiiuplayer, but also the Draft:Celebritease(Bart Baker album) revision history or their user page edits (Cutie, which they were adding under the other two accounts, too).—J. M. (talk) 07:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was using Wiiuplayer, but I have a reason. When I created the account, it was because I wanted to edit on Wii U, but at the current time I was using Money12122, and I did not know my password off by heart, I was logged in permanently to Money12122 on my iPad, so that’s why I could still use it after creating Wiiuplayer. I also originally didn’t know my password to CheatCodes4ever off by heart either when I continued editing with Wiiuplayer after creating CheatCodes4ever. However, now I know my password to CheatCodes4ever off by heart so I will not use Wiiuplayer anymore. Hope this is an excuse. I’m sorry if it isn’t. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 08:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just wanted to ask about something. Does anyone know any wikis where you can write whatever you want which looks more like this rather than how the fandom ones look like? Just wanted to ask. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 07:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone revoke this account's talk page access as well? Dorsetonian (talk) 08:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 08:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA restricts what I can say. Construct your own sentence which includes the words "breathtaking" and "arrogance". Dorsetonian (talk) 08:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I concur regarding talk page access revoking. Robvanvee 08:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But why should I not be able to edit the talk page? Please tell me why. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 08:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but you were warned about evading your block. I offered you a gift on a silver platter with the possibility of having your block reviewed after one year and you threw it back in my face. Now we are done. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sammy (singer). Since you had some involvement with the Sammy (singer) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CG5, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username North8000 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Mehki Raine, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehki Raine.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CG5".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tom and Angela (musical group). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17#Tom and Angela (musical group) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 09:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eliza Bird, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Drake (Bart Baker song), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Drake (Bart Baker song), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eliza Bird".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cyrus discography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jimmy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 11:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Figures (Jessie Reyez song), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have received your email requesting to be unblocked. Any unblock request should be made via the WP:UTRS system. Given your history of socking and block evasion, I would be reluctant to support any unblock for at least one year and then only after a check user has confirmed no evident socking. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 09:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Figures".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drink Too Much".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 09:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Let It Grow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bing Bong Zoo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User requests unblock at UTRS appeal #43693 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem: could restore TPA? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ad Orientem has retired.. Restored TPA so user nay request unblocking here. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon What do you mean? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you mean that thing about the sockpuppeting, I did that when I was immature. I used to be stupid and I didn't understand things. I wasn't smart at all. I've improved my maturity and intelligence since then and I wish I never did that. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 22:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? @Jpgordon CheatCodes4ever (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't email me. If you want someone else to consider your unblock after all this bad behavior, make an unblock request; I'm not going to reconsider this, but there are 1097 other admins who can look at it. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I am not finished yet.

1. Add sources for and remove the following things on the Jacob Sartorius discography article:
   1. In the extended plays section:
      1. Left Me Hangin'^[1]
      2. Better with You^[2]
      3. Lost but Found^[3]
   2. In the singles and promotional singles sections:
      1. "Sweatshirt"^[4]
      2. "Hit or Miss"^[5]
      3. "All My Friends"^[6]
2. Add information to the Ocean Eyes (song), Six Feet Under (Billie Eilish song), Don't Smile at Me, Billie Eilish#2015-2017: Don't Smile at Me and Billie Eilish discography#Singles pages and sections that mention that Billie Eilish's debut singles are actually "She's Broken" and "Fingers Crossed" which were released in 2015, while "Ocean Eyes" is a follow-up released in November of the same year.^[7] "Six Feet Under", on the other hand, was released in 2016.^[8] Note that the reason why I believe that they were singles even when exclusive to SoundCloud is because even though it is not clearly stated that they are singles, "She's Broken," "Fingers Crossed," "Ocean Eyes," and "Six Feet Under" were all released before any project (such as an extended play, mini-album, mixtape, studio album, etc.) was proven to be released and therefore they have not been proven to have been released along with anything. The only other possibility is that they were promotional singles, and there needs to be something clearly stating that they are promotional singles for that to be the case. Also note, I won't add all of the information when it's not necessary obviously.

References[edit]

Discussion[edit]

@331dot: can you please block my other accounts? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC) {{reflist-talk}}[reply]
@331dot: Are you still there? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 10:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you have summoned me here, but if you wish to be unblocked, please follow the instructions above and then make another request, which will be reviewed by someone else. I would suggest that you take your time in considering what you want to do. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please tell me what's wrong with my coding? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 06:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

I can see that you're trying to exercise the "standard offer", but the editing task you've chosen is possibly too complex. Choose something simpler? You don't need to master the intricacies of discographies and other tables to meet the requirements of the SO. Trying to use Spotify as a reference is, all by itself, evidence that you are not following relevant policies. Stick to simpler stuff where you can demonstrate your ability to follow the rules. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Understood. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 07:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This—using the anonymous website as a source (BTW, the article looks computer-generated, with generic template text copied by many dubious websites) and violating copyright by copying text from it—again, as always, shows you haven't learned anything at all. This seems to be a permanent, incorrigible problem, as people have been trying to explain the most basic things to you for years, to no effect.—J. M. (talk) 08:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@J. M.: I get what you mean, but for what it's worth, I was actually quite unsure about the source myself. Also, I don't remember being told that it was wrong to copy text. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 08:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmcgnh: However, I don't get what you mean about Spotify. I am only using Spotify to prove certain songs' existence. I understand it is not exactly the best source to use, but I don't see how it's unreliable. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmcgnh: Hello? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 23:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spotify is a storefront, so, just like Amazon, we don't link to it. Also, presence on Spotify does not confer any sort of notability or noteworthiness. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, then. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 02:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmcgnh: However, I thought that redirects exist because they were mentioned on an article with a notable topic, not because their topic was notable. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you are asking about redirects. Redirects come about in a number of different ways. It is one way to set up a plausible search target (such as alternate spellings, alternate names, or names with our without diacritics) for a notable topic. In some cases, an article about a topic determined to be non-notable will be redirected to another topic where they are a relevant part: for example, a band member who does not meet notability requirements as an individual may have their name redirected to the band, which has met them. It's an alternative to outright deletion.

Or perhaps you are thinking of redlinks? – links that do not point to an article at present but which someone thinks may be notable. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, I thought you were saying that Spotify was not something that would guarantee notability for The Lorax Singers. As much as I do agree with that and also agree with not using Spotify as a source at all, I wasn't trying to suggest the topic was notable. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 03:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: Please could you move unblock requests 6 and 7 to WP:AN#CheatCodes4ever's unblock request and ping all of the users who participated in this discussion? Thanks, CheatCodes4ever (talk) 06:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you for the request. If questions or concerns are raised, you are welcome to respond to them here on your talk page, pinging the user you're talking to. Make sure to include a signature in the exact edit that contains the ping, or use an edit summary like [[User:Username|Username]] for a more failsafe approach. If there are questions about the procedure itself, feel free to ping me for any questions. To take one away from the beginning: The duration of this discussion isn't fixed, but you can generally expect at least 72 hours, up to weeks. If the discussion is archived automatically and you believe that there was consensus for unblocking despite no action happening, please ping me as well. All the best, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@J. M.: @Yamla: @DoubleCross: @RickinBaltimore: @Kinu: I no longer think the kappaphobia topic is a notable topic, or at least, I no longer think those sites are reliable, also please see my previous unblock requests for more information. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 22:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@HighInBC: The editors that I just pinged have not responded to my message, so I don't think it's fair to close the discussion yet. There has only been one new vote since I pinged the users. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 06:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Our canvasing policy does not allow you to seek out users to support you. The outcome of the discussion was clear. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 06:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HighInBC: Okay, but it's still an unfair argument. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to your opinion and you are welcome to seek review from another administrator. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 23:36, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on the source, some are primary sources, secondary sources. Wikipedia is a tertiary source. Obviously that information has to come from somewhere. It depends on the source. Naleksuh (talk) 09:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So essentially, primary sources need to verify their claims, secondary sources are considered fully trustworthy? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 02:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What Wikipedia policy states that you can't use stores as sources? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 11:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]

You must first get unblocked- but a store as a source only documents that something exists and is available. That is not significant coverage of the topic. 331dot (talk) 12:48, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Okay, but why exactly can't we use it as a source to prove something exists? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 13:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because the only proof we need of existence is significant coverage in independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 14:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: But what if there is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources but it still deserves a mention due to being related to a notable topic (ex. an artist's discography, a maxi-single release of a notable single)? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 00:35, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no reliable source then we do not include it. That falls under the heading of original research. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I get it now. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 00:41, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested reading WP:V, WP:RS, WP:CITE, and WP:OR. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you copypaste a URL while citing sources? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 07:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You only have access to this page to request to be unblocked- not for asking editing questions. If you intend to request to be unblocked, you should do so. 331dot (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: But didn't you say that I should state what edits I will make and if I have questions, I can ask them using the {{help me}} template? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 22:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may ask questions if you are preparing an edit to demonstrate to us, but you haven't said that's what you are doing, these just seem to be random questions. 331dot (talk) 22:54, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: I am curious because I am currently working on something that requires citing sources and I would like to know if you can copypaste URLs. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 22:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to submit a new unblock request you may do by following the instructions linked in the above notice. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Me Brain Hurts and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#Me Brain Hurts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Nominator comment: This is unrelated to your current status; I'm following wiki practice in notifying the creator of a redirect of the deletion. It's just due to the title of the song being corrected, rendering the redirect an orphan. 23skidoo (talk) 19:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is open. User needs to appeal at AN. Mulling allowing them to edit AN directly, to optimize the appeal's process. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will change block to allow user to participate at WP:AN -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:35, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making changes on your talk page. This happened before. Please hold yourself in readiness to address your unblock request. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:20, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: The unban discussion on administrators' noticeboard appears to have been archived despite no official discussion closure by an administrator. What should be done? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 20:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Hello? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 20:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That means there was no consensus to unblock, then. Please try again in six months. @Tamzin, RickinBaltimore, and Ad Orientem: can you offer greater clarity than my muddled thoughts? I guess we should reset the block? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Above is per their most recent failed unblock request. FWIW, it is my opinion that this user is something close to a blackhole level time sink. I remain opposed to their being unblocked and it is unlikely that will ever change. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm of the opinion that TPA never should been restored to begin with. Maybe in a year or two they can come back, but the density of this black hole is massive. RickinBaltimore (talk) 00:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User may an unblock request no sooner than six months from today, and only if they have a significant number of problem-free, non-trivial edits on another wikimedia project. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be responding to your email. Please do not email me again. --Yamla (talk) 14:08, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]