• User talk:Bfpage/archive/March 2014 to December 2014
• User talk:Bfpage/archive/January 2015 naming error, this archive page includes Feb 2015
• User talk:Bfpage/archive/March 2015
• User talk:Bfpage/archive/April 2015
• User talk:Bfpage/archive/May 2015
• User talk:Bfpage/archive/June 2015
• User talk:Bfpage/archive/July 2015

29 March 2024
Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year Interview: Interview on Wikimedia Foundation fundraising and finance strategy Special report: 19-page PDF accuses Wikipedia of bias against Israel, suggests editors be forced to reveal their real names, and demands a new feature allowing people to view the history of Wikipedia articles Op-Ed: Wikipedia in the age of personality-driven knowledge Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors News and notes: Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee Charter ratified In the media: "For me it’s the autism": AARoad editors on the fork more traveled Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune Humour: Letters from the editors Comix: Layout issue
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
114		Non-gonococcal urethritis (talk)						Add sources
745		Naegleriasis (talk)						Add sources
24		New Concept English (talk)						Add sources
78		Cervicitis (talk)						Add sources
178		Anal cancer (talk)						Add sources
40		Lactobacillus brevis (talk)						Add sources
110		Balanoposthitis (talk)						Cleanup
32		Influenzavirus C (talk)						Cleanup
162		Robert Kotick (talk)						Cleanup
575		Slavic languages (talk)						Expand
397		Gardasil (talk)						Expand
913		Sex toy (talk)						Expand
102		Hermann Zapf (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
33		Kim Rodriguez (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
4		United States Student Association (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,097		New Deal (talk)						Merge
252		Lichen sclerosus (talk)						Merge
18		Bramalea, Ontario (talk)						Merge
84		Herpes simplex research (talk)						Wikify
24		Butcher's wart (talk)						Wikify
285		Māori culture (talk)						Wikify
12		Chicken as biological research model (talk)						Orphan
7		Biotechnological Research (talk)						Orphan
23		The Amazing Boobzilla (talk)						Orphan
23		Molluscum contagiosum virus (talk)						Stub
4		Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (talk)						Stub
376		Becoming Us (talk)						Stub
5		Kammanu (talk)						Stub
27		Prevotella intermedia (talk)						Stub
4		The Last Dispatch (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:30, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Geology of Pluto. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Barbera,

I saw your name on a view history listing of edits and thought I'd call by. I was hoping to see that you were still involved but didn't expect to be put to shame :)

I'm really pleased to see how things are apparently going and hope that, with many things hopefully being chalked productively to experience, things are going smoothly.

I have not seen any similar case get raised as the one that we were involved in but I haven't been looking too hard. It remains a concern to me that little emphasis is given to resolution of differences but it didn't seem that other editors shared this view but no worries.

The edit count facility wasn't working when I tried but I would be interested to know where your interests have taken you and what are you doing?

regards GregKaye 10:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for checking up on me. I really need to put your talk page on my watchlist so we can stay in touch. I am still very interested in working on the process that I was involved in. If it weren't for you, I probably would have stopped editing altogether. I believe that, in the meantime, I would like to eventually become an administrator and focus on working on the whole process from that angle. It will take me a year to 'prove' myself and prepare answers to the more typical questions that will be raised in the process. So I won't apply for admin status until then. So put me on your 'to-do' list and send me helpful suggestions.

Things are going smoothly, I believe. Ironically, very recently I was being 'followed' around and having a large number of edits reverted by an editor-so I stopped putting myself in this editor's 'sphere of influence' and editing articles that I knew would be critically examined and reverted. So I am walking away from this situation at this time. If you would like to see what I am talking about, see the talk page of the article ketogenic diet and the talk page history of project medicine. Look for my name. Any advice from you would be greatly appreciated. I feel that I am being treated inappropriately and that my editing is being hampered due to these situations. I am not asking or canvassing you to make any responses at all to these already outdated discussions.

I have found it difficult to find other editors who will collaborate in editing articles with me. I was working on bringing the article Pelvic inflammatory disease up to GA status, asked for assistance on the proj med talk page and received no response from the other 350 proj med editors. Stay in touch and let me know of any situations that appear to be similar to what I experienced/am experiencing. I seriously wonder how many editors have been lost due to the process that is not encouraging and does not adhere to WP:HERE. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  12:51, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. Please do. --BrianCUA (talk) 23:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC) This source is an excellent source of up-to-date information.[reply]

  Bfpage |leave a message  23:06, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Infectious medicine. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Just a heads up that you have new email concerning Visiting Scholars at the University of Pittsburgh. --Ryan (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assume you mean, articles should not be deleted because their *sources* do not meet MEDRS. Agree with this, as long as reliable sources can be found to replace them (i.e the subject is notable for an article). This particular article did contain a few more reliable sources, but as I explained in the rationale, no reliable sources can be found which use the term. Therefore the topic is not notable for an article, and is a neologism which does not belong here. Matthew Ferguson (talk) 19:16, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that we are in agreement. I can't argue that the term was/is not a neologism, though I don't remember that being brought up. That would have been a reason for not including the article in the encyclopedia-but there was much discussion about not meeting MEDRS as a reason for its exclusion. I find this troubling. Feel free to continue this discussion on my talk page. I believe it is worth exploring. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  00:55, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bfpage, I am writing a new article in my sandbox. It has over 100 references. I see from example how to insert the reference and the wiki automatic numbering system. Question 1: How do I reference the same publication in several places in my article? Question 2: When I enter multiple references at the same point it reads [34][35][36]? Can I make it read [34-36]? EE483597 (talk) 22:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:GJ 1214 b. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC) Hi Bfpage, That would be very helpful. If you just change enough to show me the pattern I can probably go from there. The article I am writing is an update and reformat of a 2000 U.S. Gov. publication in "Review of Scientific Instruments" of which I am the only author. I understand that as a Gov. publication there is no copyright problem. The unformatted text at the end is the original text pasted from the RSI article - waiting for my attention. The duplicated figures are just space holders until I can get the correct ones uploaded. Another question: Are all the keyword links to other Wikipedia articles added automatically at some point? I have found working for Wikipedia educational and enjoyable. I have made some significant edits to "Inverted Pendulum" and "Capstan Equation" Thank your for your help with this. All comments are welcome.2601:281:8100:B0B6:345F:6591:C22D:11C9 (talk) 16:04, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bfpage, OK, I responded on my user talk page. I am still a little confused about user talk works. EE483597 (talk) 00:44, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are getting better all the time. If you look at the coding here, you will see that I created a new heading with the name or title of the message with '== ==' on each side. Also when you left your previous message here you weren't signed in with your user name so all I could see was your IP address. I didn't really know that it was you leaving the message but I guessed it was you. New editors are given a lot of 'grace' and time to learn all the things they need to know. I only suggest that you read other pages that explain the referencing process and other editing tutorials that will help you learn even faster. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  09:15, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Respected sir ,

       ty for replying earlier regarding following topic  . 

Ref :"Recent edits to Guru Granth Sahib[edit source] Information.svg Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Bfpage |leave a message 09:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)"

1. 1 Could you please give more information on what you meant , for future reference . Was it edited as it was not brief or something else ?

1. 2 Also why did you remove the topics/headlines/pointers i added (i understand the explanations were a bit long) , eg the point about "There is one god who is found by grace of god "

This is actually an important text and the granth/book starts with this (in Gurmukhi dialect of course) , and it has so much significance that the original author The 5th Guru had added that to the beginning of all the prayers .

you can verify also it at website www.srigranth.org which is a digital version .

p.s. sorry to read about your health . Hope you get well soon .

Thanks n Regards Bikramjit Singh . Bikram88 (talk) 10:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This edit and this message were serious newbie bashing. Did you not see what Havilahwiki (talk · contribs) was doing? You should be ashamed of yourself. I expect to see an apology on Havilahwiki's talk page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:42, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes! What about 'oldie' bashing? My longer response is on Havilahwiki's talk page. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  17:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just got this message regarding my sandbox: Not suitable for Wikipedia. This appears to be taken from a collection of essays, which may or may not be copyrighted (I've been unable to verify this). The tone is not suitable for an article in any case, appears a case of using us as a web host. Mdann52 (talk) 09:45, 28 August 2015 (UTC) What is going on here? EE483597 (talk) 22:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per your advice I have added information about my connection and motivation for this article on my user page. EE483597 (talk) 21:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

First, on behalf of WikiProject X, thank you for trying out the WikiProject X pilot projects. I would like to get some anonymous feedback from you on your experience using the new WikiProject layout and tools. This way, we will know what we did right, and if we did something horribly wrong, we can try to fix it. This feedback won't be associated with your username, so please be completely honest. We are determined to improve the experience of Wikipedians, and your feedback helps us with that. (You are also welcome to leave non-anonymous feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject X.)

Please complete the survey here. The survey has two parts: the first part asks for your username, while the second part contains the survey questions. These two parts are stored separately, so your username will not be associated with your feedback. There are only nine questions and it should not take very long to complete. Once you complete the survey I will leave a handwritten note on your talk page as a token of my appreciation.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Harej (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just sending a reminder to complete the survey linked above. (This is the only reminder I'll send, I promise.) Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions. Thank you!!! Harej (talk) 22:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lists of mathematicians. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Eagle Scout (Boy Scouts of America) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
195		Vaginitis (talk)						Add sources
59		Congenital cytomegalovirus infection (talk)						Add sources
138		Urethritis (talk)						Add sources
583		Saath Nibhaana Saathiya (talk)						Add sources
18		Guts (game) (talk)						Add sources
636		Persimmon (talk)						Add sources
135		Copenhagen (tobacco) (talk)						Cleanup
397		IGATE (talk)						Cleanup
110		Graphic arts (talk)						Cleanup
2,264		Serotonin (talk)						Expand
15		Scouting in Ohio (talk)						Expand
14		Timeline of Pittsburgh (talk)						Expand
77		Grizzly (tobacco) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
268		Disability-adjusted life year (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
268		Metrication in the United States (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
10		Writers of Guru Granth Sahib (talk)						Merge
7		Midsternal line (talk)						Merge
45		Right iliac fossa (talk)						Merge
13		Hukam (talk)						Wikify
365		Curing (food preservation) (talk)						Wikify
29		Double seam (talk)						Wikify
4		Douglas Scherr (talk)						Orphan
2		Theriruveli (talk)						Orphan
9		Fleet media (talk)						Orphan
6		Goran Janković (talk)						Stub
8		Fort Prince George (talk)						Stub
4		Mycoplasma penetrans (talk)						Stub
101		Lithotripsy (talk)						Stub
156		Buguri (talk)						Stub
659		Rapunzel syndrome (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scouting in popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eagle Scout. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trypophobia. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry legobot, I'm not touching this discussion with a ten-foot pole. I have nothing inspiring to add to this discussion.

  Bfpage |leave a message  23:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, I think we're about complete on this GAN? All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello-I aplogize, I should finish today. I was distracted by some interaction with the folks at WikiEd who have allowed me to become a Widipedia Visiting Scholar with the University of Pittsburgh, there was a lot of 'paperwork' involved. I need one more 'read-through' and that should do the trick. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  10:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Faith healing. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Legobot, there again is way too much drama for me in the discussion and my comments most certainly would not be of benefit, but please feel free to call me again. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  00:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bfpage I finally submitted my article for review. Looking for feedback soon. I notice that the explanation of my relation to this article that you asked me to put on my talk page has been deleted. What is going on here/ EE483597 (talk) 15:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad you made it through 'your trial by fire'. I found that responses by others can be more discouraging than encouraging. What you've done is very important and has much significance. I saw your notice of your connection to the article on your talk page. I'll go see if it is still somehow connected with the article during its review process. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  17:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Kiss (Munch) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 19:41, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Kiss (Munch) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Kiss (Munch) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 00:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vitamin E, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reduction. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Cite doi. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
21		Microbial genetics (talk)						Add sources
793		Infection (talk)						Add sources
22		Navarro (TV series) (talk)						Add sources
21		Daska (talk)						Add sources
89		Neonatal conjunctivitis (talk)						Add sources
1,067		ESPN (talk)						Add sources
247		Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (talk)						Cleanup
57		Ashland, Wisconsin (talk)						Cleanup
7		Streetsville Secondary School (talk)						Cleanup
945		Urinary tract infection (talk)						Expand
120		Vaginal flora (talk)						Expand
1,909		Human papillomavirus (talk)						Expand
471		Frederick Law Olmsted (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,408		Vitamin K (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
286		Iron lung (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
141		Singapore Management University (talk)						Merge
809		Cervix (talk)						Merge
1,652		3D computer graphics (talk)						Merge
270		History of Palestine (talk)						Wikify
69		Communism in Vietnam (talk)						Wikify
3		Congenital malaria (talk)						Wikify
5		Nélson Moutinho (talk)						Orphan
12		Miss Glam Narayani (talk)						Orphan
1		John-Paul Kaplan (talk)						Orphan
36		Ureaplasma infection (talk)						Stub
29		Kishkinta (talk)						Stub
6		Blue Line (Pittsburgh) (talk)						Stub
59		Borage seed oil (talk)						Stub
27		Doraemon: Nobita and the Castle of the Undersea Devil (talk)						Stub
15		Vilain Pingouin (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Homo naledi. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:C/1980 E1. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of custom Android firmware. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Citation overkill has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. edg ☺ ☭ 19:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Climate change denial. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Barnstar of Diligence

You've made significant efforts to improve the encyclopedia, even a situation came up where a long-ish block could've been justified and I asked you to follow some guidelines to make sure the situation didn't recur. You basically doubled the guidelines, and then got to work improving ENWP content in a meaningful way without blinking at the fact that you had been briefly justifiably blocked with the possibility of a longer block. If every person I ever blocked had a similar reaction, ENWP would have a lot more high quality content. Thank you for being willing to set aside any pettiness, and focus on improving the encyclopedia. Kevin Gorman (talk) 19:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar. As for not 'blinking', I can't possibly characterize or minimize my block in this way. As for contributing to the encyclopedia in a 'meaningful way'...well, hmmm...that's what I thought I was doing all along. Yes, there was the possibility of being blocked even longer but I am not sure that is a tactful thing to put into a barnstar...why bring up a past threat, twice? There is no pettiness to set aside and I have always focused on improving the encyclopedia. You probably don't need to mention the justifiability of the block, twice, either. You're a good guy and I wish you the best. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  00:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, FRS I have participated in discussions with other editors in this project with next to zero responses to my posts. In addition, there are edit wars occurring related to this discussion. I am afraid that I don't have much to bring to such a heated discussion at this time. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  12:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
2,127		Pittsburgh (talk)						Add sources
990		Kuch Toh Hai Tere Mere Darmiyaan (talk)						Add sources
38		South Asian Pickles (talk)						Add sources
10		Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America (talk)						Add sources
3		ChemAdvisor (talk)						Add sources
1,071		Mirko Filipović (talk)						Add sources
503		Pro Wrestling Illustrated (talk)						Cleanup
48		The Gifted (film) (talk)						Cleanup
159		Illeism (talk)						Cleanup
14		Scouting in Pennsylvania (talk)						Expand
1,437		Hypothalamus (talk)						Expand
117		Ahsaas Channa (talk)						Expand
9		Karve Road (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
2,677		Aspirin (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
35		Padmashree Laloo Prasad Yadav (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
118		Oral microbiology (talk)						Merge
1,031		Phimosis (talk)						Merge
152		Resilience (materials science) (talk)						Merge
710		Stress (biology) (talk)						Wikify
1,238		Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (talk)						Wikify
39		Cups and balls (talk)						Wikify
19		David G. McAfee (talk)						Orphan
		Elizabeth Weise (talk)	{2.0}	{2.0}	{2.0}	{2.0}	{2.0}	Orphan
6		Zita Martins (talk)						Orphan
73		Anejaculation (talk)						Stub
211		Ureaplasma urealyticum (talk)						Stub
2		Batodonoides (talk)						Stub
2		Medina College-Pagadian (talk)						Stub
24		Periventricular nucleus (talk)						Stub
7		Allegheny Commons (Pittsburgh) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fields Medal. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

William Barclay Foster

added links pointing to Irish, Patriot, Founder, Revolutionary war and Scotch

Hospital-acquired infection

added links pointing to Treatment and Survey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be happy to accept this position! On HT's village pump I will present a plan for attracting more users who will have fluency on the language WhisperToMe (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should list yourself as a supporter at ht:Wikipedya:Administratè, just so that there can be no question about whether you've changed your mind or are neutral. Also, I redirected the English userpage for User:MdmPaj here; feel free to change that and/or to redirect the user talk page as well. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see that WTM has accepted the nomination, which is good, but I meant that MdmPaj should probably "officially" vote in favor of her proposed candidate.  ;-) Numbers matter. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We win! WhisperToMe has been created as an admin, for the next 3 months. Assuming that there are no complaints, then re-appointments should be easy. (The stewards are usually nervous about creating a permanent admin at a place with such a tiny community.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:11, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are not needed. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to question this. Is this an opinion of an editor or some kind of MEDRS guideline? Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  22:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I think you have an interest in Animal attacks. Wiki-years ago, in the last couple of days actually, I saw an article in wp:AfD (biogaphy/Canadian) which was about a woman attacked by a shark ( forget the type) in Mexico. I was going to tell you about it, but got distracted. and now I cannot find it, sigh... Ottawahitech (talk) 20:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. I usually update the page by doing a news search for recent incidences. I did a historical search once and then that's where I found out that house cats have killed infants. If you like searching for such things, just post a url here on my talk page and I will follow up on it. The Very Best of Regards.

  Bfpage |leave a message  00:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I found the AfDed article, Nicole Moore. It was created by a new editor and A7ed the minute it appeared on wikipedia, and after some wrangling the CSD was finally declined by an admin. It looks like this new editor (who is now being disparaged at AfD) put some work into it -- a real shame how we treat editor wannabes here, sigh.. Ottawahitech (talk) 02:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

We need to ask for some stats on how many people never add content again after they've been treated like that. What a shame, what a terrible shame. I keep trying to find new editors to encourage and I just can't seem to find them...they appear and then vanish. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit...and then watch the edit disappear in five seconds. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  20:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Most courteous Greetings to you, Bfpage! Your participation is ardently sought in helping to establish one of Wikipedia's newest projects - 19-century American Music a collaborative venture to improve the coverage of '19th-century American Music' the English Wikipedia. A treasure trove of adventure awaits you as we improve and expand upon the wealth, heritage, history and impact of this music genre. What is a project without participants like you? If your interest is piqued please leave your calling card and add your name to our proposed Project page. You will be kept informed of the development of this new project in the coming weeks. To leave your valuable opinions and suggestions, please contact me. With All Cordiality and The Very Best of Regards, Barbara (WVS) (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:CobraNet. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You recently accepted an edit by an IP user to the article Happy Birthday to You. I wanted to let you know that generally, changes to the name (of the birthday person) within the article are not considered constructive, because the original published version of the song contains the name "John" rather than any other name. Of course, people who sing this song change the name (while singing it) to the name of the birthday person, and this is reflected in the article, but the lyrics should report the official version. Thank you for your contributions and thank you for patrolling edits to articles such as these -- your help is invaluable. Etamni | ✉ | ✓  17:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Just making myself "un-bored" :)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Séralini affair. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Hi, Barbara! I wanted to ask you some questions about Wikipedia. I saw you "reviewed" my article (Human milk oligosaccharide). How is "reviewing" differentiated from "patrolling"?

Also, when I looked up your primary account I was interested to find out that you're participating in a "visiting scholar" program. How do people get selected for that? I assume, of course, that you actually have to be a scholar! But what are the other criteria? That seems like a pretty neat program. Snazzywiki (talk) 16:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
4		Holodomor Genocide Memorial, Washington, DC (talk)						Add sources
1,452		Anorexia nervosa (talk)						Add sources
51		Omphalitis of newborn (talk)						Add sources
1,100		Calcium (talk)						Add sources
883		Chlamydia infection (talk)						Add sources
53		Protein losing enteropathy (talk)						Add sources
448		Stress (psychological) (talk)						Cleanup
32		Subfornical organ (talk)						Cleanup
891		Anatomical terms of location (talk)						Cleanup
2,775		Multiple sclerosis (talk)						Expand
827		Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (talk)						Expand
2,546		Istanbul (talk)						Expand
958		Endometriosis (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,226		Photon (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
115		Michel Chossudovsky (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
108		Tiger attack (talk)						Merge
333		Hydrocele (talk)						Merge
110		Non-gonococcal urethritis (talk)						Merge
279		Silver Banshee (talk)						Wikify
109		Allegheny College (talk)						Wikify
90		Affective neuroscience (talk)						Wikify
83		Observational methods in psychology (talk)						Orphan
16		Retail in the Republic of Ireland (talk)						Orphan
10		Entero (talk)						Orphan
5		Lobation (talk)						Stub
3		Sassa (talk)						Stub
8		Intercostal lymph nodes (talk)						Stub
74		Scrotal inflation (talk)						Stub
10		Brachial lymph nodes (talk)						Stub
4		Mantoida (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:15, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016!

Hello Bfpage, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Happy editing, Caballero/Historiador (talk) 09:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

--Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 16:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year!
	Best wishes for a wonderful 2016!---- WV ● ✉ ✓ 23:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, the page was protected. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 13:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an expert vandalism finder, but I find your comment above encouraging. The very best of regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  13:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ExxonMobil. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Savvyjack23 (talk) 06:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for editing the First Around the World by Horse Drawn Caravan page. The first citation would fit in best at the end of the article relating to when the family returned to Scotland. Fsmgrant (talk) 15:32, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Charles R. Knight, 1922)

(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Bfpage: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. North America1000 01:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

I am brand new to Wikipedia and I'm going to make a mess of the references/ citations, so I'll leave it in your capable hands. However, hopefully this will help: I will number the references in order of where they would fit in best to the article, from 1 to 8 or whatever. That way you know where to to put each citation. Lemme know if that works. Thanks

I've sorted out the numbering for the citations etc. Have a good holiday and let me know when you return. Thanks!

And you are invited to celebrate a truly meaningful anniversary on Saturday Jan 16 for Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wikipedia Day 2016!--Pharos (talk) 21:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• NVermeys (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Cyberjustice (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

Thank you for your review and your notes. I am sorry I did not get back to you sooner, I only saw the message you sent me a few minutes ago.

The reason for which the formatting appears to have been copied and pasted is because I wrote the article in Microsoft Word, which I find easier to edit in, and then inserted it into the Wikipedia page. I assure you that, other than the sections which are specifically in quotations, none of what I have written violates any copyright. The reason I have been able to come up with so much content is because I am very familiar with the subject matter, being a researcher for the Cyberjustice Laboratory, which I describe briefly in the article. My aim in writing this article was to essentially increase awareness on the subject of electronic justice, or cyberjustice.

As for the language, I will re-read what I have written over the next couple of days and try to word it in simpler language.

Thanks again for everything.

Best regards,

NVermeys (talk) 18:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gilles-Éric Séralini. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bfpage! I would like to invite you to join at the event for Wikipedia:Meetup/Pittsburgh/ArtAndFeminism 2016/Carnegie Mellon University on Friday February 26, they could use the help of an extra Wikipedian on hand. I can also put you in touch by email with Carnegie Mellon organizers.--Pharos (talk) 18:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the 'heads up'! They already know I am coming. It will be nice to see all the faces that go along with the signatures.

  Bfpage |leave a message  00:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a little list for you: w:ht:User:WhatamIdoing/WikiProject_Medicine It's all the articles on htwiki that have interlanguage links to WPMED articles here. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! I love your persistence! I will take a look and I semi-promise to get an article done today. I hope we meet one day. I've been very busy with the WVS improvements to medical articles. Even WikiEd recognizes the difficulties editing in this project.The Very Best of Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  13:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you predicted someone came along and said the First Around... article was not suitable, mainly due to the referencing. I'll try my best to find more suitable articles and sources, but surely the article and acheivement is worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia, when there are plenty of things with far less significance on it. I'm sure you're busy with other projects too, but let me know what you think. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fsmgrant (talk • contribs) 19:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monkey Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
1		Salim Abdallah Khalfan (talk)						Add sources
1,346		Antibiotics (talk)						Add sources
146		Urethritis (talk)						Add sources
12		Martinka (talk)						Add sources
38		The Apprentice (UK series eight) (talk)						Add sources
949		LS based GM small-block engine (talk)						Add sources
67		Drug facilitated sexual assault (talk)						Cleanup
11		Chinese funeral rituals (talk)						Cleanup
467		Epic Rap Battles of History (talk)						Cleanup
20		Scouting in Ohio (talk)						Expand
21		Glossary of neuroanatomy (talk)						Expand
67		Deep operation (talk)						Expand
129		Congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
19		State Council of Crimea (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
697		Insulin resistance (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
239		Segmented sleep (talk)						Merge
28		Congenital hyperinsulinism (talk)						Merge
1,341		Nutrition (talk)						Merge
1,470		Deepwater Horizon oil spill (talk)						Wikify
77		Nuchal cord (talk)						Wikify
875		Porter Ranch, Los Angeles (talk)						Wikify
15		Arrayent (talk)						Orphan
7		Glushkov's construction algorithm (talk)						Orphan
13		Retail Intelligence (talk)						Orphan
89		Isotype (immunology) (talk)						Stub
36		Anterior nuclei of thalamus (talk)						Stub
13		84 Lumber Arena (talk)						Stub
12		Glycoprotein hormones, alpha polypeptide (talk)						Stub
40		Ben Hanlin (talk)						Stub
20		Lateral aortic lymph nodes (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox medical condition. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eliza Clayland Tomlinson Foster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopalians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Prices. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Coca-Cola treatment of phytobezoars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gnuish (talk) 02:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mitsubishi Magna. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		Infection (talk)						Add sources
		Beautiful Dreamer (album) (talk)						Add sources
		Chandidan Detha (talk)						Add sources
		Parasailing (talk)						Add sources
		Vaginal yeast infection (talk)						Add sources
		Vympel (talk)						Add sources
		Gau wu (talk)						Cleanup
		Counter Logic Gaming (talk)						Cleanup
		Virtual reality (talk)						Cleanup
		Gang rape (talk)						Expand
		Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (talk)						Expand
		Gastroenteritis (talk)						Expand
		Vitamin K (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Rape of males (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Monopoly (game) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Kidney (talk)						Merge
		Wireless sensor network (talk)						Merge
		Vitamin C (talk)						Merge
		Empathy (talk)						Wikify
		Stephen Foster Handicap (talk)						Wikify
		Double seam (talk)						Wikify
		Anti-dribble valve (talk)						Orphan
		Abdoulaye Faunal Reserve (talk)						Orphan
		Andrew Symeou (talk)						Orphan
		The Glendy Burk (talk)						Stub
		Chaeteessa (talk)						Stub
		Rickettsia aeschlimannii infection (talk)						Stub
		Harmony Lane (talk)						Stub
		Coriobacteriaceae (talk)						Stub
		J.J. Totah (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gee, it been a year since I got back to writing and with all the ups and downs, I still remember you. I still haven't gotten back to re-doing One wall paddleball but by a rough count this past year I've done or lent a hand on 17 or so articles, the longest of which, (Institutional racism)- had the only edit war which ended when the other party threw their cards in the air and gave up on the fight. I'm still fighting, got one in draft that Afc doesn't like, but I took your advice and won't let them tear it down. I have one that was totally rejected, two that were white-washed, one with insufficient access to sources from the 1800's and so far, no real help from Afc. I put a partial list on my user page...

So thanks, someone asked me today how much does Wikipedia pay? I was tempted to throw out a barnstar, but they wouldn't have a clue... Any hoo... Cheers! User:BeeCeePhoto

		The Helping Hand Barnstar
		message Robco311 (talk) 09:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to invite you to an upcoming Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon. We'd love to have the support of some awesome local Wikipedians. Check out the details on our Meetup Page. And let me know if you have questions! Go Stillers! Aolivex (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Star Alliance. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vaginoplasty, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pedicle and Inguinal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stack Overflow. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Deepak Chopra. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a cupcake to thank you for taking the time to review Sexuality after spinal cord injury and help it get to featured status! delldot ∇. 16:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		OpenWSN (talk)						Add sources
		Antimicrobial resistance (talk)						Add sources
		Gynaecology (talk)						Add sources
		Melanin-concentrating hormone (talk)						Add sources
		Vulva (talk)						Add sources
		Panorpa (talk)						Add sources
		March of Dimes (talk)						Cleanup
		Deftones (talk)						Cleanup
		Vulvovaginal health (talk)						Cleanup
		Preterm birth (talk)						Expand
		Amazon Mechanical Turk (talk)						Expand
		Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (talk)						Expand
		Prenatal diagnosis (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Ilya Ponomarev (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		B. H. Liddell Hart (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Phalloplasty (talk)						Merge
		Body Odour and Sexual Attraction (talk)						Merge
		Management of dehydration (talk)						Merge
		Woman (talk)						Wikify
		Tocotrienol (talk)						Wikify
		Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (talk)						Wikify
		Hiroka Matsumoto (talk)						Orphan
		Digital Twins (talk)						Orphan
		Female intrasexual competition (talk)						Orphan
		Alan Alan (talk)						Stub
		Dauha Al-Uloom International School (talk)						Stub
		Derek Sivers (talk)						Stub
		Paraaortic lymph nodes (talk)						Stub
		Kawartha Lakes (Ontario) (talk)						Stub
		Nani Darnell (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Exponential function. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Clitoridectomy page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1 metre. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. Your wanting to include 'anus' goes against the majority of sources that do define the vulva as consisting of the external female genital organs and nowhere is the anus regarded as such. It is sometimes included in diagrams but not as a part of the vulva just as a reference point or landmark. Could you take the time to investigate other sources as I'm confident they will outweigh your sources. The separation as a vulvar area of the urogenital triangle clearly excludes the anus. If you want to include it you will have to change the accepted definition. --Iztwoz (talk) 08:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DearIztwoz your opinion matters to me. I've not found in any source that the statement or content that states: "the vulva consists of the external female genital organs". This is probably because the urinary meatus is not an external genital organ. Also, there are tissues and other structures in the vulvar area that are not "external female organs" such as the nerve supplies, vascular tissue and lymphatics. But without references to establish what you are stating, it makes it difficult for me to accept the idea that 'it's a minority opinion' (on the talk page, for example). If another editor wants to take the time to find the other sources and finds what you and the others are saying, then they can be bold(!) and insert the supporting citations. Also, why are we still discussing this anyway? I have not reverted the content about the anus. Respectfully,

  Bfpage |leave a message  12:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously! WHAT are you talking about? You are replying now to a posting dated ten days ago - there is no discussion going on anywhere. happy editing. --Iztwoz (talk) 18:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to get behind in commenting on my talk page, seriously. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  22:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vulva, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paget disease and Lumps. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Order of approximation. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vulvar cancer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lumps. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MDMA. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Legobot. There seems to be a lot of input (drama) in the discussion already. If any editor wants to know my opinion it is that content belongs in the article and references in the reference section. It is difficult to jump between content in an article and long notes in the reference section. It makes reading tedious. At least to me. Thank you for the invitation.

  Bfpage |leave a message  09:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		Dietary fiber (talk)						Add sources
		Go (game) (talk)						Add sources
		High-speed steel (talk)						Add sources
		ThunderByte Antivirus (talk)						Add sources
		Date palm (talk)						Add sources
		Sentry Parental Controls (talk)						Add sources
		Population Planning in Singapore (talk)						Cleanup
		Stephen Foster (talk)						Cleanup
		Shenandoah (beard) (talk)						Cleanup
		Voter suppression (talk)						Expand
		ICD-9-CM Volume 3 (talk)						Expand
		Treponema pallidum (talk)						Expand
		Vulvectomy (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Hair (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Glabrousness (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Body odour and sexual attraction (talk)						Merge
		Peace (talk)						Merge
		Kurds in Turkey (talk)						Merge
		Bharat Sitaula (talk)						Wikify
		UMTS (telecommunication) (talk)						Wikify
		Stress (biology) (talk)						Wikify
		BOLT IOT Platform (talk)						Orphan
		Denuvo (talk)						Orphan
		Flying Fox Jodhpur (talk)						Orphan
		John Henson (puppeteer) (talk)						Stub
		Ran Poliakine (talk)						Stub
		Subcutaneous tissue of perineum (talk)						Stub
		Jones Dole equation (talk)						Stub
		External sphincter muscle of male urethra (talk)						Stub
		Ischioanal fossa (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ten citations to support a single statement? Try twenty. This template was obviously useful and I miss it. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Schulze method. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Second law of thermodynamics. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	A chrysler cirrus for you.
	You are a great wikipedian. Thanks for being da bomb! FixCop (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		Sexual attraction (talk)						Add sources
		Aloo tikki (talk)						Add sources
		Puberty (talk)						Add sources
		Human sexuality (talk)						Add sources
		Egg cell (talk)						Add sources
		Frenulum of labia minora (talk)						Add sources
		Fallopian tube (talk)						Cleanup
		Head and neck cancer (talk)						Cleanup
		Foreskin restoration (talk)						Cleanup
		4-Androstenedione (talk)						Expand
		HIV (talk)						Expand
		Home automation (talk)						Expand
		Data quality (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Estradiol (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Pregnancy options counseling (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Internal pudendal artery (talk)						Merge
		Asado (talk)						Merge
		Non-gonococcal urethritis (talk)						Merge
		Birth control in the United States (talk)						Wikify
		HIV/AIDS in Africa (talk)						Wikify
		Teenage pregnancy in the United States (talk)						Wikify
		Colonisation resistance (talk)						Orphan
		Carbohydrate digestion (talk)						Orphan
		Armenian archeology (talk)						Orphan
		Bamiyeh (talk)						Stub
		Pudendal canal (talk)						Stub
		Deep branch of the perineal nerve (talk)						Stub
		Granulosa cell (talk)						Stub
		Grapevine Fires (talk)						Stub
		Akira Akatsuki (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:YouTube. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you agreed to not do stuff like this anymore. It is not good on any level. Please do as you agreed to do. Jytdog (talk) 04:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Barbara!

Sorry it took so long getting back to you.

• The first thing I'll suggest to getting a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar going with GLAM is to contact @Mary Mark Ockerbloom:, a very experienced Wikipedian in Residence, and the nicest person you'll ever meet.
  • If you are ever in Philadelphia on the 1st Tuesday of the month, there is a Digital humanities/Wikipedia meeting that she started (pretty informal, check for time and place)
• 2nd, get on the GLAM-US mailing list. It's just an occasional contact point but useful when needed
  • Send GLAM-US mailing list submissions to glam-us@lists.wikimedia.org
  • To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to glam-us-request@lists.wikimedia.org
  • You can reach the person managing the list at glam-us-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
• Most GLAMers love photos uploaded, as do I. When in doubt see if you can get some photos
• I love videos, especially external videos posted e.g. on Vimeo or You Tube by the copyright owners. I was thinking of posting one on Joe Negri explaining how Gene Kelly helped him get started at age 5. A bit too short though - do you know of any good, no copyright problems, video of Negri? Now if you could convince Negri to make a video for Wikipedia playing Stephen Foster (and his own improvisations, no copyright problems), then I'd be ecstatic.
• Do you have a list of articles you might need help with?

That's about all I can think of for now, but I won't hesitate to make specific requests. Of course, requests are just that - requests - and I often expect answers like "How do you expect me to get a video of Joe Negri playing Sephen Foster songs?"

All the best. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 13:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for the comprehensive reply. At this point, I am a Visiting Scholar with the University of Pittsburgh (as Barbara (WVS) and in my work it seems that I have already been doing a lot of what is listed in the GLAM descriptions of activities. I have uploaded a number of archive photos and contents. I love the idea about Negri playing Foster and since I am scheduled to work with the librarian who manages the Stephen Foster memorial, I will be sure and ask her. I will be training the librarians and their interns and staff how to upload content. This should be an exponential increase in the contributions from the University of Pittsburgh Library System - seems like a GLAM thing to me. In addition, I met some librarians from the Carnegie Museum of Art, which is not affiliated with Pitt at an Edit-a-thon here in Pittsburgh. I will pass on information to them when I can. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  10:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Giraffe. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
7		Music of Madeira (talk)						Add sources
4		Özgür Özkaya (talk)						Add sources
159		Turkish Football Federation (talk)						Add sources
13		Zona Roja (talk)						Add sources
17		Music of the Canary Islands (talk)						Add sources
449		Indio, California (talk)						Add sources
97		Shaw Direct (talk)						Cleanup
278		Kirby Buckets (talk)						Cleanup
22		CING-FM (talk)						Cleanup
12		Index of Eritrea-related articles (talk)						Expand
8		The Torch (film) (talk)						Expand
185		ATSC standards (talk)						Expand
943		Disney XD (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,406		Wander Over Yonder (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
44		Foreign relations of Eritrea (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
127		Music of Zimbabwe (talk)						Merge
122		Cinema of Mexico (talk)						Merge
34		Multiplex (television) (talk)						Merge
95		Music of Morocco (talk)						Wikify
10		Energy in Eritrea (talk)						Wikify
1,033		The Suite Life on Deck (talk)						Wikify
3		Ümit Can Batman (talk)						Orphan
3		Arabic Toilers' Movement (talk)						Orphan
27		2012 College Station, Texas shooting (talk)						Orphan
4		Fortunato Maycotte (talk)						Stub
5		Adem Alkaşi (talk)						Stub
6		Gerardo Torres (talk)						Stub
4		Arif Şahin (talk)						Stub
11		Music of the Comoros (talk)						Stub
14		Music of Western Sahara (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Microbiology. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your welcome message.Litifbranifcham (talk) 20:17, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just created a page to show basic information about a new (founded 2013) 3D printer company. I have added 2 references to the article. It's not my intention to promote any products, but rather to provide neutral information on the existence of this new company. I hope the page is acceptable as is. I intend to continue editing it and adding useful content as I get more proficient with Wikipedia. Thank you.Rsandhuwiki (talk) 02:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James Hopwood Jeans. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I have reviewed your changes. Unfortunately, they are completely invalid and without merit. My previous contributions to the article have been reinstated. If you have any questions feel free to contact me. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.12.28.153 (talk) 05:41, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's okay. It didn't seem to have a neutral tone and I sincerely doubt the source contained the statement that you reinserted into the article. I totally agree that violence against men is probably un-represented on Wikipedia, but that is only my opinion. Best Regards,

User:Bfpage

On second thought I noticed that you've received quite a few warnings on your talk page, I might not be the one with a problem. I gave you a welcome message.

 Hi,

 I am someone who occasionally adds a few notes to articles here and there. Most of the cities and towns in Colombia have only stubs or very scant material. I live in Monteria part of the year. Deleting a reference to Monteria being known as the home of Alvaro Uribe Velez makes no sense to me.(June 8, 2015) I pulled up towns like Crawford, Texas and Independence, Missouri and the famous US Presidents from there are mentioned prominently, sometimes in the first paragraph. 

As you travel around Colombia, and mention that you live in Monteria, invariably the person you are talking to will mention that it is the home of Uribe.

I have been hesitant to contribute much to WikiPedia as it seems that it is not a very welcoming place. I hope you will reconsider this edit as the only reason given was "I thought the article was better without it"

Vanwely (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Vanwely[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Horizontal line test. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Mssemantics (talk) 17:43, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
4,577		Digit ratio (talk)						Add sources
935		Luteinizing hormone (talk)						Add sources
25		Lung microbiome (talk)						Add sources
545		Yo (talk)						Add sources
322		Passiflora incarnata (talk)						Add sources
798		Follicle-stimulating hormone (talk)						Add sources
66		Concealed ovulation (talk)						Cleanup
20		Retractor muscle of the penis (talk)						Cleanup
86		Motorcycle personal protective equipment (talk)						Cleanup
6,054		Alzheimer's disease (talk)						Expand
922		Lactobacillus (talk)						Expand
3,585		Languages of India (talk)						Expand
55		Isolation (microbiology) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
417		Horse breeding (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
222		Hydrogen breath test (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,622		Gene (talk)						Merge
1,109		Human gastrointestinal tract (talk)						Merge
1,996		Hypothalamus (talk)						Merge
221		Hygiene hypothesis (talk)						Wikify
532		Cryopreservation (talk)						Wikify
375		Bacillus anthracis (talk)						Wikify
3		Dennis Gratz (talk)						Orphan
4		Sabina Ćudić (talk)						Orphan
3		O-eo (talk)						Orphan
3		Chalicodoma (talk)						Stub
2		Megachile albonotata (talk)						Stub
15		Medulla of ovary (talk)						Stub
9		Overpelt (talk)						Stub
25		Follicular fluid (talk)						Stub
78		Theca of follicle (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Augustin-Louis Cauchy. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Borel regular measure. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Visiting scholars talk page template has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catechin. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
500		Implantation (human embryo) (talk)						Add sources
2,598		Antibiotics (talk)						Add sources
318		Double-barreled shotgun (talk)						Add sources
32		Interlabial sulci (talk)						Add sources
2,934		Testosterone (talk)						Add sources
256		Vibrio (talk)						Add sources
133		Billings ovulation method (talk)						Cleanup
2,093		Chromosome (talk)						Cleanup
236		Doctor–patient relationship (talk)						Cleanup
271		Vaginal flora (talk)						Expand
204		Gut–brain axis (talk)						Expand
1,593		Probiotic (talk)						Expand
3,476		Aspirin (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
23,744		Ronald Reagan (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
270		Tumescence (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
164		Oral microbiology (talk)						Merge
162		Bacterial spore (talk)						Merge
75		Puborectalis muscle (talk)						Merge
238		Embryo transfer (talk)						Wikify
816		Humidifier (talk)						Wikify
15		Serous cystadenocarcinoma (talk)						Wikify
103		Microbiomes of the built environment (talk)						Orphan
4		Fuquan Olympic School (talk)						Orphan
5		McGillivray syndrome (talk)						Orphan
22		Theca externa (talk)						Stub
51		Theca interna (talk)						Stub
3		Megachile hungarica (talk)						Stub
17		Membrana granulosa (talk)						Stub
19		Pubocervical ligament (talk)						Stub
10		Kasaragod railway station (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Orders of magnitude (acceleration). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:SIG MCX. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gamergate controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Miniature Australian Shepherd. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
67		Ashley Ortega (talk)						Add sources
228		Crypto-Judaism (talk)						Add sources
272		Basilica Cistern (talk)						Add sources
500		Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (talk)						Add sources
1,653		Gram-negative bacteria (talk)						Add sources
6,137		Vulva (talk)						Add sources
1,820		Female (talk)						Cleanup
938		Stress (biology) (talk)						Cleanup
312		Hatay Province (talk)						Cleanup
15		Luteal support (talk)						Expand
6,934		Fellatio (talk)						Expand
201		Ingles (talk)						Expand
16		Motorcycle saddle (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
317		Motorcycle safety (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,156		Cambrian explosion (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,000		Radiation therapy (talk)						Merge
46		Khanom chin (talk)						Merge
9		Resting spore (talk)						Merge
123		Honda CR series (talk)						Wikify
282		Steam car (talk)						Wikify
100		Women's baseball (talk)						Wikify
27		David Sleet (talk)						Orphan
4		Sayed Abdul Ghafar Sayed Zadah (talk)						Orphan
4		Ahmad Khan Daryabeigi (talk)						Orphan
47		Filamentation (talk)						Stub
39		Faecalibacterium (talk)						Stub
19		Vulpinic acid (talk)						Stub
5		20-Dihydroprogesterone (talk)						Stub
29		Gonocyte (talk)						Stub
9		Laura Harling (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jaguar (microarchitecture). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Impact of the privatisation of British Rail. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:SIG MCX. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Two-letter English words, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. McGeddon (talk) 18:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We'd like to invite you to participate in a user study closely related to SuggestBot. User:Another Article is seeking to understand more about the workflow and time commitment of contributors to the English Wikipedia. As part of this study you will occasionally be prompted to answer questions about your editing activity, and these questions should never take more than a minute or two to complete. The intended length of the study is two weeks, but your actual time commitment is totally up to you. If you would like to see more details you can read the project proposal at Research:Measuring editor time commitment and workflow (on meta), but if you are feeling bold and would like just like to sign up right now you can add the line importScript("User:Another_Article/workflowstudyclient.js"); to your common.js. Contact User:Another Article if you have any questions about this study!

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
1,090		Estradiol (talk)						Add sources
726		The Cell (talk)						Add sources
9,026		Vincent D'Onofrio (talk)						Add sources
4,188		Human sexuality (talk)						Add sources
2,141		Puberty (talk)						Add sources
941		Raisin (talk)						Add sources
712		Fallopian tube (talk)						Cleanup
895		Head and neck cancer (talk)						Cleanup
48		Nursing in Germany (talk)						Cleanup
1,861		Pertussis (talk)						Expand
160		Granulosa cell (talk)						Expand
4,169		Polycystic ovary syndrome (talk)						Expand
814		Infertility (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
409		Polyol (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
972		Nurse practitioner (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
5,776		Orgasm (talk)						Merge
63		Cervical canal (talk)						Merge
354		Levator ani (talk)						Merge
3,258		Health (talk)						Wikify
5		NLRP12 (talk)						Wikify
80		Nursing in Australia (talk)						Wikify
10		Microbial symbiosis and immunity (talk)						Orphan
10		Colonisation resistance (talk)						Orphan
9		Microbial dark matter (talk)						Orphan
36		3α-Androstanediol (talk)						Stub
18		Bifidobacterium breve (talk)						Stub
21		Deep branch of the perineal nerve (talk)						Stub
6		Spot test (lichen) (talk)						Stub
75		Corpus cavernosum of clitoris (talk)						Stub
34		Derbi GPR125 (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:53, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vani Hari. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most geography, wildlife and women articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 55 African countries, so should be enjoyable! Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African wildlife articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance. If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing any article related to a topic you often work on, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Might be a good way to work on fleshing out articles you've long been meaning to target and get rewarded for it! Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:53, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Twin paradox. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm working with WP:1 and we're starting to put a new collection of articles together for offline use, aimed at high schoolers, especially in developing countries. We noticed that the article Feminine hygiene - which we considered to be fairly important - was listed as "Low importance" for the Women's Health WikiProject; is that an oversight, or is there a specific reason? I also see that it needs some work. Is this something the Women's Health project might work on? Thanks! Walkerma (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aquatic ape hypothesis. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vehicle registration plates of Vietnam. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
616		Egg cell (talk)						Add sources
9,438		Masturbation (talk)						Add sources
959		Bacterial cell structure (talk)						Add sources
334		Dysbiosis (talk)						Add sources
33		Immature ovum (talk)						Add sources
1,214		Thyroid hormones (talk)						Add sources
31		Host-pathogen interface (talk)						Cleanup
18		South Mountain Community College (talk)						Cleanup
117		Neonatal nursing (talk)						Cleanup
83		Myxobacteria (talk)						Expand
80		Ovulation induction (talk)						Expand
165		Western pattern diet (talk)						Expand
122		Sim racing (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
6		Bijarani Buledi (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
11		Seyyal Taner (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
694		Psyllium seed husks (talk)						Merge
203		Central hypoventilation syndrome (talk)						Merge
32		Ovarian follicle atresia (talk)						Merge
5		Susan Lark (talk)						Wikify
25		Septum of the penis (talk)						Wikify
11		Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (talk)						Wikify
8		Vampirococcus (talk)						Orphan
32		Skin immunity (talk)						Orphan
6		Progesterone devices used in farm animals (talk)						Orphan
21		Stigma (anatomy) (talk)						Stub
87		Perineal sponge (talk)						Stub
58		Fossa of vestibule of vagina (talk)						Stub
190		Selectable marker (talk)						Stub
18		Filamentous bacteriophage (talk)						Stub
16		Vesicular appendages of epoophoron (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bfpage,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Anatomy newsletter (#5)

Previous - Next

Released: November 2016

Editor: Tom (LT)

Hello WP:Anatomy participant! This is our fifth newsletter, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest. There hasn't been too much worthy of news, and I have less time to dedicate to this project, so I've slowed down the release of this newsletter.

I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list

What's new

• Adrenal gland, thyroid ima artery, Ear, Heart, Esophagus and Lung are promoted to good article status
• Our previous barnstar has changed to the new shiny "Golden galen" barnstar to celebrate contributions to anatomical articles
• We are featured in the journal Clinical Anatomy [1]

How can I contribute?

• Participate in discussions - a number of discussions such as those on our talk page or about our infobox would benefit from your opinion!
• Continue to add content to our articles
• Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!

Focus - how far we've come

How far have we come since our first newsletter... the answer is quite a lot! Here goes:

• Hundreds to thousands of articles improved and standardised by many, many editors.
• 14 new good articles created or added to our project [2]
• Improved quality of our articles - subjectively and objectively. GAs quadrupled from 5 to 16, B-class articles doubles from 62 to 115, C-class article well on the way to trebling from 219 to 611, Start-class increased from 1,082 to 1,570.
• Tens to hundreds of mergers performed between tiny, unedited articles - a remnant of our Gray's Anatomy (1918) heritage.
• Layout guidelines changed and layout standardised for the majority of our articles
• In the project space:
  • WikiProject Animal Anatomy created
  • 20-30+ new members
  • 200+ new editors welcomed with our new welcome template
  • Interdisciplinary category system to help new editors
• Active integration with wikidata in our infoboxes
• Overhaul of all of our navboxes
• Review and integration of all of our templates
• External link templates reviewed to ensure they all work
• To help improve anatomical literacy:
  • Creation of a suite of five Anatomical terminology articles, and overhaul of existing articles
  • Creation of the {{Anatomy-terms}} template created
  • Links provided in infoboxes
  • Simplifying anatomical terminology essay released

These are substantial improvements and my thanks go out to our many editors who played a part in this. These improvements are almost always the result of consensus, compromise, collaboration and discussion between multiple editors.

I hope we can continue to improve in the future. How can you help? Continue to edit, add content, and create a welcoming atmosphere so that new editors will join us.

Well done to us all, and the many anonymous editors who've helped along the way!

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WP:ANATOMY users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list

Message delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bfpage,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Female genital mutilation. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate.

• Use {{subst:The Challenge series invitation}} to invite others using this template.
• Sent to users at Northamerica1000/Mailing list using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Norepinephrine. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
327		Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (talk)	Add sources
35		Lung microbiome (talk)	Add sources
128		Corona radiata (embryology) (talk)	Add sources
17		Tajiks in Pakistan (talk)	Add sources
238		Lactobacillus plantarum (talk)	Add sources
208		Oligoclonal band (talk)	Add sources
75		Concealed ovulation (talk)	Cleanup
589		Bacillus anthracis (talk)	Cleanup
39		Patterns in the menstrual cycle (talk)	Cleanup
9		Hilvan (talk)	Expand
1,138		Lactobacillus (talk)	Expand
215		Myometrium (talk)	Expand
176		Isolation (microbiology) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
706		Evaporative cooler (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
115		Nursing in India (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
40		Follicular atresia (talk)	Merge
12		Coxiella (bacterium) (talk)	Merge
33		Disability in the United States (talk)	Merge
258		Hygiene hypothesis (talk)	Wikify
83		Pharmacoeconomics (talk)	Wikify
123		Yamaha YZ450F (talk)	Wikify
6		Michael Fischbach (talk)	Orphan
3		METAGENassist (talk)	Orphan
21		Microbial drug delivery (talk)	Orphan
22		Bab-e-Pakistan (talk)	Stub
142		Theca of follicle (talk)	Stub
12		Lactobacillus jensenii (talk)	Stub
575		First pass effect (talk)	Stub
8		Bozova (talk)	Stub
34		Follicular fluid (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stevo Todorčević. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Hope you are well! Just wanted to let you know that I'm planning a Wikipedia beginner's workshop on Feb. 24 as part of a workshop series at the Pitt library. You're invited, of course, if you want to come - or if you know anybody who would like a beginner's guide, please let them know! There will be a tutorial and then a hands-on editing session. Details on the Redd-up-a-thon page. Would love to see you, but if you can't make it (I understand as it's in the middle of the day!), any target pages or ideas welcome! --TheLeaper (talk) 16:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Issues of the Evolution v.s. Creation Debate. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I would really appreciate it if you could help review and provide any feedback for Healthcare in Nicaragua, a page that I created a couple of months ago, when you get the chance. I recently nominated it for GA status to receive some more comments from Wikipedians. Please let me know if you have any comments and/or suggestions! Thanks for your time! Mtran99 (talk) 02:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bfpage. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 12:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Chronic fatigue syndrome. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

	Christmas cookies
	Merry Christmas and happy New Year! Thanks for keeping an eye out for me :) MidwestCuttlefish (talk) 14:55, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Silicon Alley. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
163		Echogenicity (talk)	Add sources
108		Inoculation loop (talk)	Add sources
527		Implantation (human embryo) (talk)	Add sources
780		Follicle-stimulating hormone (talk)	Add sources
21		L. C. Bird High School (talk)	Add sources
320		Cervical dilation (talk)	Add sources
68		Population planning in Singapore (talk)	Cleanup
940		Uveitis (talk)	Cleanup
139		Teenage pregnancy in the United States (talk)	Cleanup
3		Villers, Loire (talk)	Expand
2,267		Human papillomavirus infection (talk)	Expand
96		Nutrition and pregnancy (talk)	Expand
702		Breech birth (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
36,069		Vladimir Putin (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
256		Prenatal diagnosis (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
178		Water birth (talk)	Merge
533		Prenatal development (talk)	Merge
41		Psychiatric disorders of childbirth (talk)	Merge
164		Nuchal cord (talk)	Wikify
102		Birth control in the United States (talk)	Wikify
10		Society for Women's Health Research (talk)	Wikify
4		Almaz Sharman (talk)	Orphan
10		Obesity and fertility (talk)	Orphan
2		Canadian Perinatal Network (talk)	Orphan
7		Journal of World-Systems Research (talk)	Stub
139		Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (talk)	Stub
40		Vaginal ultrasonography (talk)	Stub
49		Vesico-uterine pouch (talk)	Stub
57		Uterine horns (talk)	Stub
109		Circumvallate placenta (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 12:03, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of earthquakes in 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome, and thank you so much for saving my article from deletion! I'm actually not experienced at all, just kind of tried to figure out the Wikipedia format as I went, so thank you again for your help! 'Jas95' User_talk:Jas95 00:24, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You did really well if this was your first article. It took me three months to write my first article! The person you wrote about seems pretty interesting. So for your next article leave out references to facebook, blogs, youtube and amazon and you will be a great editor! Best Regards,

  Bfpage  _{let's talk...} 

Hi, note that for my healthcare pages, the word "affordable" is blacklisted in the title, so I requested that it be moved from "affordabl" (on purpose I did) to "affordable" asap by someone with permission to do that. Thanks for reviewing the pages. Ethanbas (talk) 00:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing-it is good that I don't have a COI because I can envision someone (an angry person who is angry about the election) nominating it for deletion or using the spelling mistake as a reason for deletion. I tried to move it but I guess I am not qualified or something. I suggest you copy the code to a word document in case someone doesn't like what you have written. Best Regards,

  Bfpage  _{let's talk...}  00:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Influenza vaccine. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pedophilia. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
558		Vaginal yeast infection (talk)	Add sources
303		Round ligament of uterus (talk)	Add sources
509		Pessary (talk)	Add sources
66		Gynecologic ultrasonography (talk)	Add sources
90		Gynecologic hemorrhage (talk)	Add sources
378		Fundal height (talk)	Add sources
86		Reserved political positions in India (talk)	Cleanup
8		FNA Mapping (talk)	Cleanup
29		Glucagon rescue (talk)	Cleanup
3,324		Victoria's Secret (talk)	Expand
2,262		Doula (talk)	Expand
14		Outline of obstetrics (talk)	Expand
72		Symphysiotomy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
36		International Center for Research on Women (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,306		Insulin resistance (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
131		Fetal surgery (talk)	Merge
15		Fetal intervention (talk)	Merge
35		Prenatal development (biology) (talk)	Merge
246		Child benefit (talk)	Wikify
982		HELLP syndrome (talk)	Wikify
8		Obstetric hospitalist (talk)	Wikify
21		No Pain Labor & Delivery – Global Health Initiative (talk)	Orphan
11		Postmenopausal confusion (talk)	Orphan
15		Vitamin D deficiency in Australia (talk)	Orphan
4		Mast Arboretum (talk)	Stub
11		Arzoxifene (talk)	Stub
56		Infundibulum of uterine tube (talk)	Stub
9		Uterine venous plexus (talk)	Stub
133		Bloody show (talk)	Stub
163		Cervical effacement (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bfpage,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Genital pain should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genital pain .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

JamesG5 (talk) 03:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Earthquake prediction. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nintendo Switch. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Clean coal technology. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

for your message. especially in light of others reverting, mudslinging being unconstructive etc. the banality of darkness/evil maybe.--Wuerzele (talk) 20:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry it took so long for me to reply to your kind message. Yes, you and I should do more collaborative editing. Then we can totally ignore all mudslinging. I've been on the receiving end when the mud hits me as the target. I'll be in touch and would welcome the opportunity to help you with your projects.

Best Regards,

  Bfpage  _{let's talk...}  20:45, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sirius. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thank you for the suggestion. Could you help me further related to content addition. John.Smith123 (talk) 05:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Field-programmable gate array. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Sungenis. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Smith & Wesson M&P15. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bf. There is a group studying offline medical content in Haiti. Wondering your thoughts about creating an offline medical app in that language? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:24, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:North American Aerospace Defense Command. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Microscope. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American Pekin. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox software. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:W56. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Mabalu. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Juan German Marcos, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Mabalu (talk) 15:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Microscope. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pratia pedunculata. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for earlier affirming interactions. See User:Leprof_7272 page for details if interested. Bonne chance. Le Prof 73.210.155.96 (talk) 16:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BFP! I found this article today about the Ghost Bomber of the Monongahela and I thought of you. You may have seen it already, but I was reminded of your proposed new page on the topic! Hope you are well! --TheLeaper (talk) 12:46, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping me out. I am working on adding better citations - I'd removed that text from another article beecause it seemed clear that it belonged in its own discrete space - and with it came all the broken citations. I'm fixing that now! -- Jenniever —Preceding undated comment added 00:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Messages like the one I left you are intended to simply give you a heads-up. It's one of the ways editors (including me) can learn about the various policies and guidelines governing different types of material in different types of articles. Thanks for your message.

Also, please make sure you sign your talk page posts, which makes it easier for everyone to know who they're addressing. You can do this by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of them, which also automatically time stamps them. I wasn't sure who the message was from at first because you didn't include your username. (I've since added it, so don't worry about it.) Happy Editing! :-) Nightscream (talk) 02:03, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that...I'm getting sleepy and all my page patrolling is making my eyes cross. Thanks for your nice answer.

  Bfpage  _{let's talk...}  02:07, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Deaths by type of illness. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I saw that you reviewed an article I just created (Ecologist group (Senate)). You indicated that it ought to be more neutral in tone, but I'm not sure what you're referring to – could you give any examples?

Thanks, Mélencron (talk) 21:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you nice note about the Michigan year article. I'm slowly trying to build them out. So far, 1950 in Michigan, 1955 in Michigan, 1962 in Michigan, 1974 in Michigan, and 1980 in Michigan are in a reasonably good start mode. If you have any suggestions regarding content or formatting, let me know. Thanks again. Cbl62 (talk) 21:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic calendar. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and nice comment on Madiun River. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 01:10, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change it to Awards of Tracey Ullman? The page is for the television show entitled Tracey Takes On..., not the actress Tracey Ullman. She already has a page for her awards and nominations, List of awards and nominations received by Tracey Ullman. The page was correctly titled List of awards and nominations received by Tracey Takes On... There was no need to change it. Partyclams (talk) 01:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Calendar. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vegeta (condiment). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Joey the squirrel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an individual animal, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — IVORK _Discuss 10:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I'm sorry, but how does this article meet notability requirements at all? Past the fact the media covered the story, there is no evidence or other suggestions that the squirrel is relevant. News outlets today do release feel good stories just to fill the gaps / get clicks, and I'm struggling to see how it's anything more than that since there is no evidence of anything actually happening. — IVORK _Discuss 10:19, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Friend, please review the criteria for speedy deletion. If what you say is true, then nominate the article for deletion. It is inappropriate to tag it for a speedy deletion.

Bfpage (talk) 10:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the CSD tag. While I wouldn't normally trust Fox News as far as I could throw it, we would need to check to see if other sources covered the story, and if there are enough to write a detailed article about it (cf. Larry (cat)). I'm skeptical myself, but that's what AfD is for, not CSD. I am worried about Barbara's unhealthy obsession with squirrels, and have a good friend of mine who shares the same affliction - perhaps the two of them could meet up for coffee and squirrel throwing? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:46, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't seen anything yet. Here is whats on the burner. (for Brits this means "What articles about squirrels are forthcoming"): Montreal squirrel thieves, Squirrel with a Go Pro. It's too bad I always have to wait for squirrely things to calm down before I work on my next masterpiece. Hopefully this won't embarrass the University of Pittsburgh who may now disavow me since I'm using my old account. Bfpage (talk) 12:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the aforementioned squirrel from the "Notable people" section on Meridian, Idaho for the what I would think is obvious reason that squirrels are not people. I echo the concerns above about the notability. It fails WP:NOT x 2 (news and everything), but in respect of your stature around here, I'll give you a while to show me I'm wrong prior to nominating it. Others mileage may vary. John from Idegon (talk) 00:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please consider archiving your talk page. My browser is complaining heavily trying to load it. John from Idegon (talk) 00:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article nominated for deletion as the event is already mentioned in Animal attacks#Squirrels and Squirrel attacks. Oh yeah, and agree on archiving — IVORK _Discuss 00:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IVORK, How could you?! (My lengthy talk page was supposed to be a tactic to prevent any messages like yours from being left on my talk page). Best Regards, Bfpage (talk) 01:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trying to fix a hot mess of an article.

Bearian (talk) 19:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:0.999.... Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Google memo. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I got your notice and will aim to edit and revise accordingly. Thanks for flagging! AustrianArch (talk) 21:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox scientist. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bfpage, Even WP:NOTCENSORED is a valid rule for encyclopedia, I see some people are using WP as a porn site and I feel it is true in name of not censored. You can not reach limits of pornography found here. A little amount of diagrams of female and male anatomy are enough. I don't feel there is need of having picture of every female who ever went nude by her desire. Most of pictures show smiling faces of topless or nude women. Comment.119.160.101.242 (talk) 08:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't agree with you more. There are far more images of women without clothes on WP than men. It is gender-bias at its worst. Best Regards, Bfpage (talk) 23:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Suzuki Hayabusa. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abortion. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Metric. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BMW. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your prod on Wojtek Zbijewski -- despite the coi, his citations are high enoughthat he will probably pass WP:PROF; they do need to be added.

I also removed your prod on Johns Hopkins Biomedical Engineering; it is probably a sufficiently famous department to pass AFD. (I am very reluctant to have us include articles on academic departments unless they are actually famous, and have listed many for deletion--byt I think this passes. You are of course welcome to test it--nobody can really predict a AFD result in a case like this.

I am considering what to do about The Johns Hopkins University Center for Imaging Science.. I'm even more conservative about research centers. I'll decide on this one in a day or two, but if I do remove the prod, I shall probably send it to AfD myself.

Please see also my comment on the contributor's talk page , and Doc James' talk p. DGG ( talk ) 06:09, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BFP: Thank-you for encouraging m through your prod to review the historical accuracy and neutrality. Two predominant issues have been brought up and I would like to comment on each of these. 1. Conflict of interest/promotionalism. I was unaware of Wikipedia policies when I created the page, which I did in good faith. Once I understood the policies, and thank-you to the editors who helped me with that, I stopped editing the page and instead sought the help of the Wikipedia community (DGG and others). Even though I created the page, the content is all factual and I am looking for the 3rd party citations to support all claims as necessary. Several editors have already removed content to improve neutrality, and I fully support the removal of any additional statements that lack adequate 3rd party documentation. The notability of the department (see below) warrants that this page be kept and improved rather than deleted. As stated above, I will refrain from making additional edits to this page but I would like to suggest the following to again ensure a neutral point of view: Remove: “ Johns is the individual credited[by whom?] with establishing the discipline of biomedical engineering as a graduate program in the School of Medicine, leading to the rise of similar programs nationwide in the decades that followed.[citation needed]” Replace with: “In 1961, Johns Hopkins, along with the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Rochester, established the first graduate programs in biomedical engineering. Established in the School of Medicine, the program at Johns Hopkins is the oldest continually-funded PhD program in the nation.” Incorporate relevant citations provided below.

This suggestion is based on facts obtained from the following article, among others, available on Pubmed (see page 697) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1929656/pdf/pubhealthreporig00104-0055.pdf This article quotes: “Biomedical Engineering. A program leading to a doctoral degree in biomedical engineering will be initiated at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, in the fall of 1961. It will combine, for the first time, advanced training in engineering subjects particularly pertinent to research in biological systems with systematic study of the application of principles of physical and engineering sciences to biological systems. The University of Pennsylvania and the University of Rochester are cooperating with Johns Hopkins in establishing similar programs.” NIH Reporter, which tracks the training grants given to fund PhD programs, shows that of the original 3 programs only JHU is still funded. The following reference also explains that we are the oldest continually-funded program in the US: http://ethw.org/Oral-History:Richard_J._Johns RICHARD J. JOHNS: An Interview Conducted by Frederik Nebeker, IEEE History Center, 26 April 2000; Interview # 393 for the IEEE History Center, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Inc. 2. Notability. I appreciate that noteworthiness is not an absolute metric. I wanted to just share some thoughts on possible measures indicating that Biomedical Engineering as a discipline is significant, and that JHU BME is noteworthy within the field. a. While h-index is not an absolute measure of noteworthiness and comes with its own caveats, Wikipedia says and I am quoting "…an outstanding scientist [has] an h-index of 40, and a truely unique individual an h-index of 60". Currently we have 8 faculty with h-index greater than 60, 12 faculty with h-index greater than 50, and 19 over 40. For comparison, I looked at Duke, Stanford and Georgia Tech in this manner and none have as many highly-cited faculty. Georgia Tech and Stanford have 5 faculty with h-index greater than 50. b. We have 5 listed members of the National Academies. According to Wikipedia "Election into the National Academies is one of the highest honors in the scientific field.” c. The size of our discipline is significant, and the scale of leading BME departments is similar to that of other outstanding programs which have wiki pages. For example, Georgia Tech, Duke, UCSD and JHU all have ~40 tenure line faculty in Biomedical Engineering. d. The acceptance rate of 7.8% into the JHU BME undergraduate program is currently more competitive than acceptance into CalTech and MIT, based on current U.S. News and World Report statistics. This could be considered an indirect measure of the prominence of our program. e. The scope of our activities is international in scale. In addition to international research collaborations, our department has partnerships with prominent institutions from around the world, including Tsinghua University. Just this year, we were awarded funding to establish a new engineering design partnership with universities in the Middle East through the Stevens Initiative. If there are other measures that Wikipedia uses for noteworthiness of academic institutions I would be happy to address them. Thank-you for your participation in Wikipedia. Mim.cis (talk) 21:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Intelligent design. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:International System of Units. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not mess with or tamper with any articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlstauffer (talk • contribs) 14:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Darwin (operating system). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Released January 2018  · Previous newsletter  · Next

Hello WikiProject Anatomy participant! This is our sixth newsletter, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest.

I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list.

Yours truly, --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What's new[edit]

	new good articles since last newsletter include Thyroid, Hypoglossal nerve, Axillary arch, Human brain, Cerebrospinal fluid, Accessory nerve, Gallbladder, and Interventricular foramina (neuroanatomy)
	I write an Introduction to Anatomy on Wikipedia in the Journal of Anatomy [3]
	Vagina receives a lot of attention on its way to good article status.
	We reach two projects goals of 20 good articles, and less than half of our articles as stubs, in July 2017. [4]
	A discussion about two preferred section titles takes place here.

Introduction to WikiProject Anatomy and Anatomy on Wikipedia[edit]

Seeing as we have so many new members, and a constant stream of new editors to our articles, I would like to write in this issue about how our project and articles are arranged.

The main page for WikiProject Anatomy is here. We are a WikiProject, which is a group of editors interested in editing and maintaining anatomy articles. Our editors come from all sorts of disciplines, from academically trained anatomists, students, and lay readers, to experienced Wikipedia editors. Based on previous discussions, members of our project have chosen to focus mainly on human anatomy ([5]), with a separate project for animal anatomy (WP:ANAN). A WikiProject has no specific rights or abilities on Wikipedia, however it does allow a central venue for discussion on different issues where interested editors can be asked to contribute, collaborate, and perhaps reach a consensus.

Project and article structure

Wikipedia has about 5,500,000 articles. Of these, about 20,000 fall under our project, about 5,000 of which are text-containing articles. Articles are manually assigned by editors as relating to our project (many using the rater tool). As well as articles, other Wikipedia pages in our project include, lists, disambiguation pages, and redirects. Our articles are improving over time, and you can have a look at our goals and progress, or last newsletter, to get a better idea about this.

Our articles are structured according to the manual of style, specifically here. The manual of style is a guideline, which "is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply", and prescribes the layout of anatomy articles, most of which follow it.

Our articles are organised in a particular way. Most articles have a infobox in its lead, describing key characteristics about the article. Because we have so many articles, articles are often linked together in different ways. An article tends to focus on the primary topic it is written about. Further information can be linked like this, or piped (like this). We use navboxes, which are the boxes at the bottom of articles providing links to similar topics, as well as hatnotes. Typical hatnotes in articles include {{main}}, {{see also}} and {{further}}. This lets us link to relevant and related articles. The bottom of articles also shows categories, which store groups of related articles.

Tools

For interested editors, our project offers a number of additional tools to help edit our articles. On our main page appears a log of the most edited recent articles. An automatic list of recent changes to all our articles is here. We have a list of the most popular pages (WP:ANAT500). To keep abreast of news and discussions, it is best to monitor our talk page, newsletters, and our article alerts, which automatically lists deletion, good article, featured article, and move proposals. We also have a open tasks page for editors to create lists of tasks that other editors can collaborate with. Articles are also manually assigned to a "discipline", so interested editors in for example, gross anatomy, histology, or embryology can easily locate articles via here.

Our project has all sorts of smaller items that editors may or may not know about, including a barnstar, user box ({{User WPAnatomy}}), welcoming template ({{WPANATOMY welcome}}) and fairly comprehensive listing of templates (here).

Invitation

We are always happy to help out, and I invite new editors, or for those with any questions relating to how to get around the confusing environment that is Wikipedia, to post on our talk page or, for a kind introduction to questions, at the WP:TEAHOUSE.

How can I contribute?[edit]

• Ask questions! Talk with other editors, collaborate - and if you need help, ask!
• Continue to add content (and citations) to our articles
• Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
• Find a space, task or type of article that you enjoy editing - there are lots of untended niches out there

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WikiProject Anatomy users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ReleaseTheMemo. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sex. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I hope you are well. I sent you an email about a month ago but thought I would try to get in touch this way. Carnegie Museum of Art is hosting another Wiki Edit-a-thon this Sunday, March 25, 2018 from 10:30-4:30. It was so wonderful having you there last year and it would be great to see you and have you participate again. Would you be available? Let me know! Hanturp (talk) 00:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(by talk reader) @Hanturp: Pharos sent word about this event. I had called the museum, to no avail. Wikipedia:Meetup/Pittsburgh/ArtandFeminism2018CMOA has the details for this event on-wiki, and a geonotice request has already been submitted. I plan to be there to help with instruction. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By consensus of the community, as determined here, you – Barbara (WVS) (talk · contribs), also editing as Bfpage (talk · contribs) – are topic-banned (WP:TBAN) from medical articles, and you are also banned from interacting with Flyer22 (talk · contribs) (WP:IBAN). Sandstein 20:20, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that your sanction has been amended as described in this AN/I thread. Sandstein 08:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Apache OpenOffice. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vitamin B3. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Upper Kotmale Dam. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Open access in Italy. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that ADAM is NOT public domain.[6] The NIH has just bought a license to it.

I have found blocks of it copied and pasted into articles (specifically nipple discharge). Are there other articles in need of clean up? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Recently, a request was made for someone to revise the User:Bility/convert24hourtime.js user script. I (DannyS712) took up that challenge, and have fixed the bug with the "thanks" button, fixed the bug regarding blocked users, fixed the bug regarding converting the times when examining a diff, and even added the feature to convert times when looking at logs. I have some more features planned, but I thought that, since you are currently importing Bility's script, you may want to know that a less buggy version is available at User:DannyS712/12Hours. This is intended as a one-time note. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 20:07, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've just found this page, which has been deleted in 2015 but is still linked at two other pages:

Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Bfpage/editing_line_spacing,_to_include_punctuation_according_to_WP:MOS

Not a big deal, but I just thought you might want to clean up those links if no longer necessary. :)
Best regards, CiaPan (talk) 12:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sad that you've been pressured into resigning a VS position due to a particular individual's muckraking. I'm resisting this with regard to Meta:Talk:Tech/Ambassadors#Stanton McCandlish, but if an external entity like a university is involved, I can see how simply the suggestion you've done something offensive to a certain group is likely to result in the university demanding a resignation for CYA purposes. [sigh] The sad thing is that the muckraker looks to be getting away with it this time, though a repeat will probably result in a re-instatement of their topic ban. I made a mistake in taking the matter to ANI; I hadn't realized until afterward that the pre-existing prohibition on incivility and canvassing in relation to that topic, as a condition of their topic ban being lifted, meant that it could go straight to ArbCom, who would have been more likely to examine the behavior as canvassing and incivility, period, not as a popularity contest about the content. Live and learn. Of course that last also goes for daring to put out a humor piece that is apt to be misinterpreted by people looking for things to misinterpret and work up some offense over.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  06:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.

We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.

Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.

The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nipple anatomy and disorders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bfpage! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Linux kernel on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ea Ea on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Released September 2020  · Previous newsletter

Hello WikiProject Anatomy participant! This is our seventh newsletter, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest.

I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list.

Yours truly, --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What's new[edit]

	new good articles since last newsletter include Epiglottis, Human nose, Pancreas, Prostate, Thymus, Trachea, T tubule, Ureter and Vagina, with Anatomical terms of location also awaiting review
	A made-up eponymous term is used in our article that eventually makes it in to university anatomy teaching slides and a journal article
	We reach a project goal of 150 B-class articles in July 2020, increasing by about 50% over five years, and are one good article away from our goal of 40 GAs, doubling over the last five years
	In the real world, Terminologia Anatomica 2 and Terminologia Embryologica 2 are released ([7], [8]). Terminologia Anatomica 2 is now included in anatomy article infoboxes, and there is ongoing discussion about updating TE as well
	A beautiful new barnstar is released ({{subst:The Anatomist Barnstar}})
	Portal:Anatomy receives some attention, and two related portals are deleted (vale Human body and Cranial nerve portals)
	Some things left out from past newsletters - A large amount of redirects are created to help link plural structures, and Cerebellum ([9]) and Hippocampus ([10]) are published in Wikiversity.

Newsletter topic: anatomy and featured articles[edit]

I have been asked to write up something introducing the Featured article (FA) process to anatomy editors, but I took a more general approach to explaining why one might want to contribute featured content and the benefits to the editor and to Wikipedia. I also tried to address some misconceptions about the FA process, and give you a guide that is somewhat specific to health content should you decide to take the dive.

A vital purpose of Featured articles is to serve as examples for new and aspiring Wikipedia editors. FAs are often uniquely comprehensive for the Internet. They showcase some of our best articles, and can enhance Wikipedia's reputation if they are maintained to standard—but in an "anyone can edit" environment, they can easily fall out of standard if not maintained. Benefits to the writer include developing collaborative partnerships and learning new skills, while improving your writing and seeing it exposed to a broader audience—all that Wikipedia is about!

Looking more specifically at WP Anatomy's featured content, the Featured media is impressive and seems to be an Anatomy Project strength. The Anatomy WikiProject has tagged 4 FAs, 1 Featured list, and 30 Featured media. Working towards upgrading and maintaining older Featured articles could be a worthwhile goal. Immune system is a 2007 FA promotion, and bringing it up to date would make a nice collaboration between WikiProject Medicine and the Anatomy WikiProject. Hippocampus is another dated promotion that is almost 50% larger than when promoted, having taken on a bit of uncited text and new text that might benefit from a tune-up.

Whether tuning up an older FA at Featured article review, or attempting a new one to be reviewed at Featured article candidates, taking the plunge can be rewarding, and I hope the advice in my essay is helpful.

You can read the essay "Achieving excellence through featured content" here.

SandyGeorgia has been a regular FA reviewer at FAC and FAR since 2006, and has participated in thousands of nominations

How can I contribute?[edit]

• Ask questions! Talk with other editors, collaborate - and if you need help, ask at our project page!
• Continue to add content (and citations) to our articles
• Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
• Find a space, task or type of article that you enjoy editing - there are lots of untended niches out there

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WikiProject Anatomy users. To opt-out, remove your name from the mailing list

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2020 Atlantic hurricane season on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You worked on this 5 years ago, it was a project of a research initiative of PennPraxis, University of Pennsylvania * PennPraxis, University of Pennsylvania. "New Deal Resident Camps for Unemployed Women".January 22, 2021 She-She-She Camps CaptJayRuffins (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Medical ultrasound on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bfpage! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over two years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in two years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
3. Paste {{Frs user|Bfpage|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bfpage, you're receiving this message because you were previously listed at WikiProject Anatomy as a participant, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 years.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the participant list, so that we stop spamming you with newsletters and have a better idea of who to contact for active discussions. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting here when you become active again.

Thank you, and all the best on your WikiVoyages! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

User:Bfpage/registering new users, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bfpage/registering new users and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Bfpage/registering new users during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bfpagehhs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bfpagepmed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bfpagewho has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Request a username has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Older med refs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Artist kevin photo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, Barbara!

The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikipedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]