This user is no longer active on Wikipedia . I am grateful to arbcom for a tabula rasa, but it has come to my attention that there are SPI admins who are unable or unwilling to see through past mistakes, even despite arbcom decisions. I have become a great cynic in Wikipedia's ability to moderate such overzealous admins, whose heavily distorted focus on certain individuals can be described as nothing less than harassment, if not outright online targeted and repetitive bullying, spanning years. These accounts exist in a space above arbcom and other users, beyond any sort of effective oversight, in what can only be described as 1-man inquisitions, forever following users around with the intent of intimidating or arguing for blocking action. They do not contribute much to the encyclopaedia themselves, but have an almost messianic belief in their own missions and prejudices. They do not see intent to reform of the users they accuse, they do not engage in conversations with them to understand behaviour, they do not really believe in second chances. In one exchange, said admin trumpeted that he would be "out of luck" if he could not re-ban me.They scare away people who wish to contribute notable, well researched and sourced content, and never take such contributions into account when engaging in the exercises of perpetual harassment. I believe that contributing to a project that fails to keep such persons in check is ultimately futile. Editing in such an environment is extremely stressful and has taken a toll on my own mental and physical health of recent. This is meant to be an enjoyable community. With them, it is really anything but..

WIKI	This user knows that Wikipedia has become too Bureaucratic.