This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pharmacology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chemicals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It should be mentioned that the name "AB-CHFUPYCA" is an acronym of N-(1-Amino-3-methyl-1-oxoButan-2-yl)-1-(CycloHexylmethyl)-3-(4-FlUorophenyl)-1H-PYrazole-5-CarboxAmide. Enix150 (talk) 10:05, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that AB-CHMFUPPYCA be merged into this page. The compounds, as described in their chemboxes, are identical. The reference for this page matches the compound in the chembox. I can't access the reference for AB-CHMFUPPYCA but based on the systematic name in the title the it appears to be describing the same compound (i.e. the papers are describing the same compound but they've give it different names). --Project Osprey (talk) 16:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed they do look identical, go ahead and merge unless anyone objects. With these ones there are several isomers as the cyclohexylmethyl group can be attached at the other N of the pyrazole ring instead, so I wondered if one page might be for each isomer, but this doesn't appear to be the case. Meodipt (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, no idea how I didn't notice that. Aethyta (talk) 20:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pages now merged. --Project Osprey (talk) 10:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]