This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Aviation: Accidents B‑class This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the Aviation accident project. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Death B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Disaster management B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Indonesia B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm dealing at the moment with an out-of-date PDF from JeppView, and can get the latest later today or another day but if anyone wants to look here https://vau.aero/navdb/chart/WIII.pdf at page 12 you'll see that appears to be the most logical DP aka SID that the flight was on. Specifically the DOLTA1B - however as I said this document is out-of-date so it's possible another SID has been created since this one which took the place of it, or that I'm not properly analyzing the flight path in relation to the fixes (waypoints). Just some food for thought, though. Psx1337 (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The KNKT preliminary report states 6 crew and 56 passengers - i.e. counting the deadheading crew as pax and not crew. Should the infobox and article be amended to reflect this? Mjroots (talk) 08:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• • I noticed that as well. considering this new update from NTSC, I think we should change the number accordingly. PaPa PaPaRoony (talk) 00:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article refers to the CVR's memory module, but in the modern era it's far more conventional to refer to it as a storage module or data storage module. The Wikipedia pages reflect the complicated and rather convoluted history, but modern industry reasonably consistently refers to non-volatile data containers as storage and volatile data containers as memory, and that sensible convention seems to be deepening.

A key concern is that most ordinary people think of memory as the volatile data containers in their personal cyber devices, and storage as the non-volatile data containers where all their media, apps, and the device's OS reliably reside. And that view is correct, and the products are indeed specified and advertised that way by the firms which design, manufacture, and sell them.

So referring to the CVR's storage module as a memory module probably confuses at least some readers, and it's contrary to a deepening sensible convention. So in the CVR paragraphs I suggest we replace all the memory module instances with storage module, or if a consensus prefers, data storage module.

Thoughts please! If none I'll render the change in about a week. Cheers! --H Bruce Campbell (talk) 18:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I rendered the change on 10 March 2021. --H Bruce Campbell (talk) 05:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

look at the result a Crashed shortly after takeoff due to pilot error, spatial disorientation and poorcrew resource management it!