Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
This article is about the industrial scale process. For the attachment of polyethylene glycol to pharmaceuticals, see PEGylation.

In organic chemistry, ethoxylation is a chemical reaction in which ethylene oxide (C2H4O) adds to a substrate. It is the most widely practiced alkoxylation, which involves the addition of epoxides to substrates.

In the usual application, alcohols and phenols are converted into R(OC2H4)nOH, where n ranges from 1 to 10. Such compounds are called alcohol ethoxylates. Alcohol ethoxylates are often converted to related species called ethoxysulfates. Alcohol ethoxylates and ethoxysulfates are surfactants, used widely in cosmetic and other commercial products.[1] The process is of great industrial significance, with more than 2,000,000 metric tons of various ethoxylates produced worldwide in 1994.[2]

Production[edit]

The process was developed at the Ludwigshafen laboratories of IG Farben by Conrad Schöller and Max Wittwer [de] during the 1930s.[3][4]

Alcohol ethoxylates[edit]

Industrial ethoxylation is primarily performed upon alcohols. Lower alcohols react to give glycol ethers which are commonly used as solvents, while longer fatty alcohols are converted to fatty alcohol ethoxylates (FAE's), which are a common form of nonionic surfactant. The reaction typically proceeds by blowing ethylene oxide through the alcohol at 180 °C and under 1-2 bar of pressure, with potassium hydroxide (KOH) serving as a catalyst.[5] The process is highly exothermic (ΔH = -92 kJ/mol of ethylene oxide reacted) and requires careful control to avoid a potentially disastrous thermal runaway.[5]

The starting materials are usually primary alcohols as they tend to react 10–30× faster than do secondary alcohols.[6] Typically 5-10 units of ethylene oxide are added to each alcohol,[7] however ethoxylated alcohols can be more prone to ethoxylation than the starting alcohol, making the reaction difficult to control and leading to the formation of a product with varying repeat unit length (the value of n in the equation above). Better control can be afforded by the use of more sophisticated catalysts,[8] which can be used to generate narrow-range ethoxylates. Ethoxylated alcohols are considered to be a high production volume (HPV) chemical by the US EPA.[9]

Ethoxylation/propoxylation[edit]

Ethoxylation is sometimes combined with propoxylation, the analogous reaction using propylene oxide as the monomer. Both reactions are normally performed in the same reactor and may be run simultaneously to give a random polymer, or in alternation to obtain block copolymers such as poloxamers.[5] Propylene oxide is more hydrophobic than ethylene oxide and its inclusion at low levels can significantly affect the properties of the surfactant. In particular ethoxylated fatty alcohols which have been 'capped' with ~1 propylene oxide unit are extensively marketed as defoamers.

Ethoxysulfates[edit]

Ethoxylated fatty alcohols are often converted to the corresponding organosulfates, which can be easily deprotonated to give anionic surfactants such as sodium laureth sulfate. Being salts, ethoxysulfates exhibit good water solubility (high HLB value). The conversion is achieved by treating ethoxylated alcohols with sulfur trioxide.[10] Laboratory scale synthesis may be performed using chlorosulfuric acid:

The resulting sulfate esters are neutralized to give the salt:

Small volumes are neutralized with alkanolamines such as triethanolamine (TEA).[11][page needed]

In 2008, 381,000 metric tons of alcohol ethoxysulfates were consumed in North America.[12]

Other materials[edit]

Although alcohols are by far the major substrate for ethoxylation, many nucleophiles are reactive toward ethylene oxide. Primary amines will react to give di-chain materials such as polyethoxylated tallow amine. The reaction of ammonia produces important bulk chemicals such as ethanolamine, diethanolamine, and triethanolamine.

Applications of ethoxylated products[edit]

Alcohol ethoxylates (AE) and alcohol ethoxysulfates (AES) are surfactants found in products such as laundry detergents, surface cleaners, cosmetics, agricultural products, textiles, and paint.[13][non-primary source needed]

Alcohol ethoxylates[edit]

As alcohol ethoxylate based surfactants are non-ionic they typically require longer ethoxylate chains than their sulfonated analogues in order to be water-soluble.[14] Examples synthesized on an industrial scale include octyl phenol ethoxylate, polysorbate 80 and poloxamers. Ethoxylation is commonly practiced, albeit on a much smaller scale, in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries to increase water solubility and, in the case of pharmaceuticals, circulatory half-life of non-polar organic compounds. In this application, ethoxylation is known as "PEGylation" (polyethylene oxide is synonymous with polyethylene glycol, abbreviated as PEG). Carbon chain length is 8-18 while the ethoxylated chain is usually 3 to 12 ethylene oxides long in home products.[15][page needed] They feature both lipophilic tails, indicated by the alkyl group abbreviation, R, and relatively polar headgroups, represented by the formula R(OC2H4)nOH.

Alcohol ethoxysulfates[edit]

AES found in consumer products generally are linear alcohols, which could be mixtures of entirely linear alkyl chains or of both linear and mono-branched alkyl chains.[16][page needed] A high-volume example of these is sodium laureth sulfate a foaming agent in shampoos and liquid soaps, as well as industrial detergents.[citation needed]

Environmental and safety[edit]

Alcohol ethoxylates (AEs)[edit]

Human health[edit]

Alcohol ethoxylates are not observed to be mutagenic, carcinogenic, or skin sensitizers, nor cause reproductive or developmental effects.[17] One byproduct of ethoxylation is 1,4-dioxane, a possible human carcinogen.[18] Undiluted AEs can cause dermal or eye irritation. In aqueous solution, the level of irritation is dependent on the concentration. AEs are considered to have low to moderate toxicity for acute oral exposure, low acute dermal toxicity, and have mild irritation potential for skin and eyes at concentrations found in consumer products.[15] Recent studies have found dried AE residues similar to what would be found on restaurant dishes (as effective concentrations from 1:10,000 to 1:40,000) killed epithelial intestinal cells at high concentrations. Lower concentrations made cells more permeable and prone to inflammatory response [2].

Aquatic and environmental aspects[edit]

AEs are usually released down the drain, where they may be adsorbed into solids and biodegrade through anaerobic processes, with ~28–58% degraded in the sewer.[19][non-primary source needed] The remaining AEs are treated at waste water treatment plants and biodegraded via aerobic processes with less than 0.8% of AEs released in effluent.[19] If released into surface waters, sediment or soil, AEs will degrade through aerobic and anaerobic processes or be taken up by plants and animals.

Toxicity to certain invertebrates has a range of EC50 values for linear AE from 0.1 mg/L to greater than 100 mg/L. For branched alcohol exthoxylates, toxicity ranges from 0.5 mg/L to 50 mg/L.[15] The EC50 toxicity for algae from linear and branched AEs was 0.05 mg/L to 50 mg/L. Acute toxicity to fish ranges from LC50 values for linear AE of 0.4 mg/L to 100 mg/L, and branched is 0.25 mg/L to 40 mg/L. For invertebrates, algae and fish the essentially linear and branched AEs are considered to not have greater toxicity than Linear AE.[15]

Alcohol ethoxysulfates (AESs)[edit]

Biodegradation[edit]

The degradation of AES proceeds by ω- or β-oxidation of the alkyl chain, enzymatic hydrolysis of the sulfate ester, and by cleavage of an ether bond in the AES producing alcohol or alcohol ethoxylate and an ethylene glycol sulfate. Studies of aerobic processes also found AES to be readily biodegradable.[11] The half-life of both AE and AES in surface water is estimated to be less than 12 hours.[20][non-primary source needed] The removal of AES due to degradation via anaerobic processes is estimated to be between 75 and 87%.

In water[edit]

Flow-through laboratory tests in a terminal pool of AES with mollusks found the NOEC of a snail, Goniobasis and the Asian clam, Corbicula to be greater than 730 ug/L. Corbicula growth was measured to be affected at a concentration of 75 ug/L.[21][non-primary source needed] The mayfly, genus Tricorythodes has a normalized density NOEC value of 190 ug/L.[22][non-primary source needed]

Human safety[edit]

AES has not been found to be genotoxic, mutagenic, or carcinogenic.[16] A 2022 study revealed the expression of genes involved in cell survival, epithelial barrier, cytokine signaling, and metabolism were altered by rinse aid in concentrations used in professional dishwashers. The alcohol ethoxylates present in the rinse aid were identified as the culprit component causing the epithelial inflammation and barrier damage.[23]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Smulders, E.; von Rybinski, W.; Sung, E.; Rähse, W.; Steber, J.; Wiebel, F.; Nordskog, A. (2011). "Laundry Detergents, 1. Introduction". In Elvers, Barbara; et al. (eds.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Weinheim, GER: Wiley-VCH. doi:10.1002/14356007.a08_315.pub3. ISBN 978-3527306732.
  2. ^ Arno Cahn (30 January 1994). Proceedings of the 3rd World Conference on Detergents: Global Perspectives. The American Oil Chemists Society. p. 141. ISBN 978-0-935315-52-3.
  3. ^ Jelinek, Charles F.; Mayhew, Raymond L. (September 1954). "Nonionic Detergents". Industrial & Engineering Chemistry. 46 (9): 1930–1934. doi:10.1021/ie50537a045.
  4. ^ A US patent 1970578 A, Schoeller, Conrad & Wittwer, Max, "Assistants for the textile and related industries", issued 1934-08-21, assigned to IG Farbenindustrie AG 
  5. ^ a b c Di Serio, Martino; Tesser, Riccardo; Santacesaria, Elio (December 2005). "Comparison of Different Reactor Types Used in the Manufacture of Ethoxylated, Propoxylated Products". Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 44 (25): 9482–9489. doi:10.1021/ie0502234.
  6. ^ Di Serio, M.; Vairo, G.; Iengo, P.; Felippone, F.; Santacesaria, E. (January 1996). "Kinetics of Ethoxylation and Propoxylation of 1- and 2-Octanol Catalyzed by KOH". Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 35 (11): 3848–3853. doi:10.1021/ie960200c.
  7. ^ Kosswig, Kurt (2002). "Surfactants". In Elvers, Barbara; et al. (eds.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Weinheim, GER: Wiley-VCH. doi:10.1002/14356007.a25_747. ISBN 978-3527306732.
  8. ^ Cox, Michael F. (September 1990). "The effect of "peaking" the ethylene oxide distribution on the performance of alcohol ethoxylates and ether sulfates". Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 67 (9): 599–604. doi:10.1007/BF02540775. S2CID 85521585.
  9. ^ US EPA (July 2006). "High production volume (HPV) challenge program". Archived from the original on 2011-11-17.
  10. ^ Roberts, David W. (May 1998). "Sulfonation Technology for Anionic Surfactant Manufacture". Organic Process Research & Development. 2 (3): 194–202. doi:10.1021/op9700439.
  11. ^ a b Anon. [HERA Substance Team] (2004-06-15). Alcohol Ethoxysulphates (AES) Environmental Risk Assessment (PDF). Brussels, BEL: Human and Environmental Risk Assessment (HERA) Project. The HERA (Human and Environmental Risk Assessment) project is a European voluntary initiative launched in 1999 by the following organizations: A.I.S.E. representing the formulators and manufacturers of household and maintenance cleaning products. Cefic representing the suppliers and manufacturers of the raw materials.[page needed] This 36 page report is an HERA document on this ingredient in European household cleaning products.
  12. ^ Sanderson, Hans; Van Compernolle, Remi; Dyer, Scott D.; Price, Bradford B.; Nielsen, Allen M.; Selby, Martin; Ferrer, Darci; Stanton, Kathleen (2013). "Occurrence and risk screening of alcohol ethoxylate surfactants in three U.S. River sediments associated with wastewater treatment plants". Science of the Total Environment. 463–464: 600–610. Bibcode:2013ScTEn.463..600S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.047. PMID 23835070.
  13. ^ Federle, Thomas W; Nina R. Itrich (2004). "Effect of Ethoxylate Number and Alkyl Chain Length on the Pathway and Kinetics of Linear Alcohol Ethoxylate Biodegradation in Activated Sludge". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 23 (12): 2790–2798. doi:10.1897/04-053.1. PMID 15648751. S2CID 37587650.
  14. ^ Varadaraj, Ramesh; Bock, Jan; Brons, Neil; Zushma, Steve (1994). "Influence of Surfactant Structure on Wettability Modification of Hydrophobic Granular Surfaces". Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 167 (1): 207–210. Bibcode:1994JCIS..167..207V. doi:10.1006/jcis.1994.1350. ISSN 0021-9797.
  15. ^ a b c d Anon. [HERA Substance Team] (2009-09-01). Alcohol Ethoxylates, Version 2.0 (PDF). Brussels, BEL: Human and Environmental Risk Assessment (HERA) Project.[page needed] See preceding HERA reference for explanation of the publishing organisation. This 244 page book is the latest HERA document on ingredients of European household cleaning products.
  16. ^ a b Anon. [HERA Substance Team] (2003-12-02). Alcohol Ethoxysulphates Human Health Risk Assessment, Draft (PDF). Brussels, BEL: Human and Environmental Risk Assessment (HERA) Project. Retrieved 14 March 2016.[page needed] See preceding HERA reference for explanation of the publishing organisation. This 57 page report is the latest HERA document on this ingredient of European household cleaning products. Note, the HERA web site, [1], access date as above, bears the December date; the document bears a date of January 2003.
  17. ^ Fruijtier-Pölloth, Claudia (2005). "Safety assessment on polyethylene glycols (PEGs) and their derivatives as used in cosmetic products". Toxicology. 214 (1–2): 1–38. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2005.06.001. ISSN 0300-483X. PMID 16011869.
  18. ^ Stickney, Julie A; Sager, Shawn L; Clarkson, Jacquelyn R; Smith, Lee Ann; Locey, Betty J; Bock, Michael J; Hartung, Rolf; Olp, Steven F (2003). "An updated evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of 1,4-dioxane". Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 38 (2): 183–195. doi:10.1016/S0273-2300(03)00090-4. ISSN 0273-2300. PMID 14550759.
  19. ^ a b Prats, Daniel; Carmen Lopez; Diana Vallejo; Pedro Varo; Victor M. Leon (2006). "Effect of Temperature on the Biodegradation of Linear Alkylbenzene Sulfonate and Alcohol Ethoxylate". Journal of Surfactants and Detergents. 9 (1): 69–75. doi:10.1007/s11743-006-0377-8. S2CID 94398901.
  20. ^ Guckert, J.B.; Walker, D.D.; Belanger, S.E (1996). "Environmental chemistry for a surfactant exotoxicology study supports rapid degradation of C12 alkyl sulfate in a continuous-flow stream mesocosm". Environ. Chem. Toxicol. 15 (3): 262–269. doi:10.1002/etc.5620150306.
  21. ^ Belanger, SE; KL Rupe; RG Bausch (1995). "Responses of Invertebrates and Fish to Alkyl Sulfate and Alkyl Ethoxylate Sulfate Anionic Surfactants During Chronic Exposure". Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 55 (5): 751–758. doi:10.1007/BF00203763. PMID 8563210. S2CID 27669051.
  22. ^ van de Plassche, Erik J.; de Bruijn, Jack H. M.; Stephenson, Richard R.; Marshall, Stuart J.; Feijtel, Tom C. J.; Belanger, Scott E. (1999). "Predicted no-effect concentrations and risk characterization of four surfactants: Linear alkyl benzene sulfonate, alcohol ethoxylates, alcohol ethoxylated sulfates, and soap". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 18 (11): 2653–2663. doi:10.1002/etc.5620181135. ISSN 0730-7268. S2CID 34750467.
  23. ^ Ogulur, Ismail; Pat, Yagiz; Aydin, Tamer; Yazici, Duygu; Rückert, Beate; Peng, Yaqi; Kim, Juno; Radzikowska, Urszula; Westermann, Patrick (2022-12-01). "Gut epithelial barrier damage caused by dishwasher detergents and rinse aids". The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 151 (2): 469–484. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.10.020. PMID 36464527. S2CID 254244862.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethoxylated

Leave a Reply