An article you recently created, Premier World Capital, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 16:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Premier World Capital, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 06:30, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Premier World Capital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 00:13, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Premier World Capital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premier World Capital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 01:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Premier Capital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 19:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 22:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

3lack5tar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear admin, I would like to express my deepest regrets for my actions that have given the impression of spam and sincerely apologize for my actions. To be honest, I was disappointed that my hours of research had gone to waste when my article was deleted. I understand that this does not excuse my actions, but I sincerely hope that I could be given a chance to learn from this mistake. Once again, I deeply apologize for not being more careful with my actions and would like to humbly seek your forgiveness. I personally guarantee that this will not happen again in the future and I thank you for this timely reminder to make only productive contributions to Wikipedia. 3lack5tar (talk) 17:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

3lack5tar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I thought my apology above was clear but to make things clearer:

1. I understand that I have been blocked for spam for reposting my article twice and wording it badly like an advertisement, 2. I will not continue to cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and 3. I personally guarantee that I will make only useful contributions moving forward.

3lack5tar (talk) 21:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I thought my apology above was clear but to make things clearer: 1. I understand that I have been blocked for spam for reposting my article twice and wording it badly like an advertisement, 2. I will not continue to cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and 3. I personally guarantee that I will make only useful contributions moving forward. [[User:3lack5tar|3lack5tar]] ([[User talk:3lack5tar#top|talk]]) 21:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I thought my apology above was clear but to make things clearer: 1. I understand that I have been blocked for spam for reposting my article twice and wording it badly like an advertisement, 2. I will not continue to cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and 3. I personally guarantee that I will make only useful contributions moving forward. [[User:3lack5tar|3lack5tar]] ([[User talk:3lack5tar#top|talk]]) 21:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I thought my apology above was clear but to make things clearer: 1. I understand that I have been blocked for spam for reposting my article twice and wording it badly like an advertisement, 2. I will not continue to cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and 3. I personally guarantee that I will make only useful contributions moving forward. [[User:3lack5tar|3lack5tar]] ([[User talk:3lack5tar#top|talk]]) 21:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

What connection do you have with Premier World Capital? What contributions do you want to make? 331dot (talk) 21:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 331dot, I was hoping to create an article for them so I can show them my initiative when interviewing with them next year after I graduate. I appreciate this timely reminder from the admins that my contributions to Wikipedia should extend beyond that. I will endeavour to fix the spelling and grammar of more articles on the Community portal moving forward. Thank you so much for your consideration! 3lack5tar (talk) 10:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would you agree to not edit about Premier Capital? 331dot (talk) 20:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree. I will make other positive contributions to Wikipedia instead. Thank you! 3lack5tar (talk) 21:28, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]