Cannabis Ruderalis

Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

18 March 2023

6 March 2023

  • 04:3104:31, 6 March 2023 diff hist +10 EmotionUndid revision 1143133693 by MrOllie (talk)No consensus on banning SFNs from this article. Please reach concensus on talk page before reverting. Tags: Undo Reverted

11 January 2023

21 May 2021

  • 23:5123:51, 21 May 2021 diff hist +296 TrumpismUndid revision 1024312492 by Dswitz10734 (talk) Removal of content with unsupported claim. Citations showing the relevance is cited for the removed image. The entire collage was extensively discussed and consensus was reached on the talk page. As agreed with the active editors at the time, consensus on changes must be achieved before alterations are made to the intiial multi image collage. Ok? Tag: Undo

19 April 2021

20 March 2021

  • 19:4519:45, 20 March 2021 diff hist +221 TrumpismUndid revision 1013281633 by Binksternet (talk) This issue is under discussion on talk page and there is no consensus on which of five options is best. Concerned editors please give input on talk page. Tags: Undo Reverted

11 January 2021

  • 23:1423:14, 11 January 2021 diff hist +640 TrumpismUndid revision 999742957 by Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) The article goes into great depth about how Trumpism is about the supporters, not Trump- so masses of people taking political action based on Trumpism is starkly more representative than one of Trump in front of a crowd (which the article already has examples of). Any disagreement? Let's take it to the talk page rather than reverting each other. Tag: Undo
  • 10:0510:05, 11 January 2021 diff hist −18 TrumpismUndid revision 999654608 by OlliverWithDoubleL (talk) The diversity of views on what Trumpism is does not allow it to be reduced to a single term, least of all ideology, which most agree it is not- from Bolton to the poltical and social scientists. With agreement from the prior editor, the summary is reverted. Tag: Undo

16 December 2020

  • 21:0221:02, 16 December 2020 diff hist +455 TrumpismUndid revision 994652637 by 2604:3D08:9781:8100:9D4D:59EE:B539:7AE8 (talk) Non academic in that the supporting citation used non technical language. The source is preferred because the concept is presented in lay language in a book with wide circulation. The concepts presented in the source are supported by references to the research studies he summarizes. Tag: Undo

14 December 2020

18 November 2020

  • 22:0522:05, 18 November 2020 diff hist −15 TrumpismUndid revision 989402013 by Elijahandskip (talk) No content in the article mentioning any relationship between Trumpism and the newly coined term Bidenism. Similarly, there is no content describing a relationship with McCarthyism as so deserves no link in the see alsos. Tag: Undo

8 November 2020

  • 08:0508:05, 8 November 2020 diff hist +119 TrumpismUndid revision 987623571 by TadhgÓGealbhain (talk). Please seek consensus on the talk page regarding changes to the topic sentence. Edit removed source supported content. If phrases such as "illiberal democracy" or "mechanisms for acquiring power" are disagreeable, then please suggest alternate phrasings on the talk page so that we can reach consensus on a summary that accurately reflects the literature on Trumpism. Tag: Undo

5 November 2020

  • 22:3222:32, 5 November 2020 diff hist +17 m Trumpismarticle does not discuss governance- for that, see policies of Donald Trump. "Governance" does not connote mechanisms discussed for acquiring power. EG rhetoric, persuasion, group identity rallies. "Acquiring and keeping power" is a non pejorative, neutral term from the cited academic literature. Any disagreement? If so, let’s reach consensus on better wording on talk page before changing the phrasing. Tag: Undo

15 September 2020

Leave a Reply