Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Paradise Chronicle (talk | contribs)
m →‎User:Paradise Chronicle: removed a letter in my edit
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Paradise Chronicle (talk | contribs)
→‎User:Paradise Chronicle: withdraw request, thought it through
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Line 28: Line 28:


::::Hi Amanda, [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/pages/en.wikipedia.org/Paradise%20Chronicle here] the articles I have created so far. They are mostly about a topic that currently have or have had in the past a significant influence in the area of their activity and at least to my account they all meet the notability criteria mentioned at WP:Notability. And to WP:Notability I can say I agree with all what is described there.[[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]] ([[User talk:Paradise Chronicle|talk]]) 10:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
::::Hi Amanda, [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/pages/en.wikipedia.org/Paradise%20Chronicle here] the articles I have created so far. They are mostly about a topic that currently have or have had in the past a significant influence in the area of their activity and at least to my account they all meet the notability criteria mentioned at WP:Notability. And to WP:Notability I can say I agree with all what is described there.[[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]] ([[User talk:Paradise Chronicle|talk]]) 10:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

::::: It seems you have not decided yet, but you have also not disapproved me yet. And thinking it through, I might prefer to learn some more about wikipedia before becoming a reviewer. And as Amanda said, I can do all what I wanted to do as a reviewer also as a normal editor. And I don't really see me patrolling pages a lot of the time. I'd like more freedom for editing in the areas of my interests. If in the future I then see a need for reviewer rights, I come to apply again.[[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]] ([[User talk:Paradise Chronicle|talk]]) 19:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)


====[[User:Tillander]]====
====[[User:Tillander]]====

Revision as of 19:50, 25 May 2020

New page reviewer

User:SneaselxLv94

I have done many small edits in the mainspace and would appreciate the permission to review new pages. I spend a lot of time reading various articles. Whenever I see an error, I fix it while reading. I would love to change habit and read new articles and review them. SneaselxLv94 (talk) 18:08, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has 280 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 18:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, sorry you don't meet the minimum recommended edit requirements. Additionally, some of your recent articles appear to have been deleted due to a lack of reliable sources. Please make sure that you fully understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines before reapplying. signed, Rosguill talk 21:46, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:CommanderWaterford

I have done 1250 edits with a revert quote of only 1%, I am fully aware of Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol, been member of the Guild of CE, using Twinkle, Autowiki Browser, New Page Patrol, nuggle and Earwigs Copyvio Detector plus PetScan, furthermore being active (!) member of several Wikiprojects. So...being bold I ask nicely for this perm. Thanks in advance. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:32, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had an account for 15 days. MusikBot talk 21:40, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your enthusiasm is appreciated, but you have only been editing for 15 days, which is far short of the recommended 90-day minimum for this permission. Keep up the good work, and consider reapplying a few months from now. For now,  Not done. signed, Rosguill talk 21:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Paradise Chronicle

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 23:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To be transparent, I have also applied for rollback rights on the same day.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ui, apparently there was mishap with my edit. I am applying to become new page reviewer because I have edited several pages that included sections that were simply copy pasted. Like Mohammad Shtayyeh or Ali Erbaş, and some articles even had Turkish text in the English Wikipedia. So my skills are probably useful in the new page reviewing team. I have noticed a very productive and lauded reviewer Onel5969 has retired and maybe I can be of help.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for expressing an interest in the NPP team. The NPP team is meant to cover all aspects of page creation, including suitability for the article to remain on the encyclopedia. Copyright work doesn't need to be done by a new page patrolled, so can you provide anything to show you understand Wikipedia's inclusion criteria? -- Amanda (aka DQ) 06:11, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Amanda, here the articles I have created so far. They are mostly about a topic that currently have or have had in the past a significant influence in the area of their activity and at least to my account they all meet the notability criteria mentioned at WP:Notability. And to WP:Notability I can say I agree with all what is described there.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It seems you have not decided yet, but you have also not disapproved me yet. And thinking it through, I might prefer to learn some more about wikipedia before becoming a reviewer. And as Amanda said, I can do all what I wanted to do as a reviewer also as a normal editor. And I don't really see me patrolling pages a lot of the time. I'd like more freedom for editing in the areas of my interests. If in the future I then see a need for reviewer rights, I come to apply again.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tillander

I have created 56 articles (4 of which were subsequently deleted) and have almost 4,000 edits. I think I could be helpful. Tillander 01:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 01:30, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your interest in helping out with new page reviewing. Unfortunately, it looks like you've only made 20 edits since 2018, which is insufficient for establishing that you're up to date on relevant policies and guidelines. Additionally, while you've made many positive contributions to Wikipedia, several of articles that you've created lack adequate sourcing and do not suggest a full understanding of notability guidelines. For now,  Not done. signed, Rosguill talk 01:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply