Cannabis Indica

thcscience_admin
Inline Templates
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Inline Templates, a collaborative effort to improve and manage Wikipedia's inline footnote, cleanup and dispute templates. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Some discussion of this template may take place at the project's talk page, rather than here.Inline TemplatesWikipedia:WikiProject Inline TemplatesTemplate:WikiProject Inline TemplatesInline Templates articles

Style[edit]

Resolved
 – All inline templates now have a consistent style and are based on a meta-template.

I think it is a bit too small and the brackets are too close to the text -- Snailwalker | talk 13:29, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at my original version, in the history, you may wish to adapt it. Computerjoe's talk 19:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I like that one better, but it would be nice to have someone else comment on this -- Snailwalker | talk 19:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It was edited by User:HereToHelp as it was too lengthy. Perhaps a change to 'neutrality disputed. see talk.'? Computerjoe's talk 20:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bracket spacing can be adjusted with   (thin space). For example, [ neutrality disputed ]. Thin spaces are sometimes used around em dashes. I don't know how compatible they are across browsers. Experiment and see. — mjb 22:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
They're not supported by all browsers and display inconsistently across those that do recognise them. — Saxifrage ✎ 05:36, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page[edit]

Since this is of line-item use, maybe it should take a parameter to point to a talk page section, rather than just pointing to the whole talk page?

I know it's hard to maintain the section links, if the sections of the talk page change, but I'd think if someone was taking the time to archive a talk page, that these would either be gone, replaced by a page dispute/pov, or be archived along with it.


If my suggestion comes to fruition, here is some language for the usage section:

To specify a section of the discussion on the talk page, use {{POV-statement|talk page section name}}.


— <TALKJNDRLINETALK>    

Wikiproject Inline templates proposed[edit]

Resolved
 – Project exists and is active.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Inline templates. I've been meaning to do this for a while. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 16:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category[edit]

Any objection changing the category here to Category:Articles with minor POV problems like the other inline neutrality templates?--BirgitteSB 17:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Linebreak.[edit]

Still causing linebreaks and therefor spaced boxes after template: [1]. -- Jeandré, 2008-12-19t13:52z

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:POV_statement

Leave a Reply