This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pharmacology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Cannabis Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

needs research, time, and effort but other than that its great. its st pattys day, i need a break. cheers, --zachjones4 20:44, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed the structural image for this molecule has been removed and replaced. Just wondering the reasoning for this. The PNG image that has been placed on the site is structurally incorrect according to the BIOMOL reference. I'm now replacing this one with the higher resolution and structurally correct image on the page. If I'm just absolutely missing something here, please let me know. Ccroberts^{( t · c · g )} 18:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the image, because it is an interesting illustration to the actions of the agonist that are listed in the article (anti-inflammatory etc.) Besides it improves the connectivity, linking to the sparcely known subtype of cells. You can simplify the description to tailor it to the "simple" audience, but to me the caption seems simple: WIN "calms down" the fibroblast-like cells. Best regards, --CopperKettle 03:34, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is a beautiful image but I still think it is not too informative, even for people with a science background. I know it is kind of hard to find a common basis for what is the right kind of content for wikipedia. Panoramix303 (talk) 17:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel so bad against it, delete it. --CopperKettle 01:36, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not solely my decision. Let's wait for some more input from other users. Panoramix303 (talk) 05:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Under the Synthetic Drug portion of the Food and Drug Admin Safety and Innovation Act cannabimimetic agents of certain structures are made Schedule I. Does WIN 55,212-2 fall under on the structure types listed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlange (talk • contribs) 18:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]