THC Science

Stellar dynamics is the branch of astrophysics which describes in a statistical way the collective motions of stars subject to their mutual gravity. The essential difference from celestial mechanics is that the number of body $N\gg 10.$

N-particles in quasi-periodic motion in the phase space (x, mv) of an essentially static potential

Typical galaxies have upwards of millions of macroscopic gravitating bodies and countless number of neutrinos and perhaps other dark microscopic bodies. Also each star contributes more or less equally to the total gravitational field, whereas in celestial mechanics the pull of a massive body dominates any satellite orbits.^[1]

Connection with fluid dynamics[edit]

Stellar dynamics also has connections to the field of plasma physics.^[2] The two fields underwent significant development during a similar time period in the early 20th century, and both borrow mathematical formalism originally developed in the field of fluid mechanics.

In accretion disks and stellar surfaces, the dense plasma or gas particles collide very frequently, and collisions result in equipartition and perhaps viscosity under magnetic field. We see various sizes for accretion disks and stellar atmosphere, both made of enormous number of microscopic particle mass, $(L/V,M/N)$

$\sim (10^{-8}{\text{pc}}/500{\text{km/s}},1M_{\odot }/10^{55}=m_{p})$ at stellar surfaces,
$\sim (10^{-4}{\text{pc}}/10{\text{km/s}},0.1M_{\odot }/10^{54}\sim m_{p})$ around Sun-like stars or km-sized stellar black holes,
$\sim (10^{-1}{\text{pc}}/100{\text{km/s}},10M_{\odot }/10^{56}\sim m_{p})$ around million solar mass black holes (about AU-sized) in centres of galaxies.

The system crossing time scale is long in stellar dynamics, where it is handy to note that

$1000{\text{pc}}/1{\text{km/s}}=1000{\text{Myr}}={\text{HubbleTime}}/14.$

The long timescale means that, unlike gas particles in accretion disks, stars in galaxy disks very rarely see a collision in their stellar lifetime. However, galaxies collide occasionally in galaxy clusters, and stars have close encounters occasionally in star clusters.

As a rule of thumb, the typical scales concerned (see the Upper Portion of P.C.Budassi's Logarithmic Map of the Universe) are $(L/V,M/N)$

$\sim (\mathrm {10pc/10km/s} ,1000M_{\odot }/1000)$ for M13 Star Cluster,
$\sim (\mathrm {100kpc/100km/s} ,10^{11}M_{\odot }/10^{11})$ for M31 Disk Galaxy,
$\sim (\mathrm {10Mpc/1000km/s} ,10^{14}M_{\odot }/10^{77}=m_{\nu })$ for neutrinos in the Bullet Clusters, which is a merging system of N = 1000 galaxies.

Connection with Kepler problem and 3-body problem[edit]

At a superficial level, all of stellar dynamics might be formulated as an N-body problem by Newton's second law, where the equation of motion (EOM) for internal interactions of an isolated stellar system of N members can be written down as,

m_{i}{\frac {d^{2}\mathbf {r_{i}} }{dt^{2}}}=\sum _{i=1 \atop i\neq j}^{N}{\frac {Gm_{i}m_{j}\left(\mathbf {r} _{j}-\mathbf {r} _{i}\right)}{\left\|\mathbf {r} _{j}-\mathbf {r} _{i}\right\|^{3}}}.

Here in the N-body system, any individual member,

m_{i}

is influenced by the gravitational potentials of the remaining

m_{j}

members.

In practice, except for in the highest performance computer simulations, it is not feasible to calculate rigorously the future of a large N system this way. Also this EOM gives very little intuition. Historically, the methods utilised in stellar dynamics originated from the fields of both classical mechanics and statistical mechanics. In essence, the fundamental problem of stellar dynamics is the N-body problem, where the N members refer to the members of a given stellar system. Given the large number of objects in a stellar system, stellar dynamics can address both the global, statistical properties of many orbits as well as the specific data on the positions and velocities of individual orbits.^[1]

Concept of a gravitational potential field[edit]

Stellar dynamics involves determining the gravitational potential of a substantial number of stars. The stars can be modeled as point masses whose orbits are determined by the combined interactions with each other. Typically, these point masses represent stars in a variety of clusters or galaxies, such as a Galaxy cluster, or a Globular cluster. Without getting a system's gravitational potential by adding all of the point-mass potentials in the system at every second, stellar dynamicists develop potential models that can accurately model the system while remaining computationally inexpensive.^[3] The gravitational potential, $\Phi$ , of a system is related to the acceleration and the gravitational field, $\mathbf {g}$ by:

{\frac {d^{2}\mathbf {r_{i}} }{dt^{2}}}}=\mathbf {\vec {g}} =-\nabla _{\mathbf {r_{i}} }\Phi (\mathbf {r_{i}} ),~~\Phi (\mathbf {r} _{i})=-\sum _{k=1 \atop k\neq i}^{N}{{\frac {Gm_{k}}{\left\|\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {r} _{k}\right\|}},

whereas the potential is related to a (smoothened) mass density,

\rho

, via the Poisson's equation in the integral form

\Phi (\mathbf {r} )=-\int {G\rho (\mathbf {R} )d^{3}\mathbf {R}  \over \left\|\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {R} \right\|}

or the more common differential form

\nabla ^{2}\Phi =4\pi G\rho .

An example of the Poisson Equation and escape speed in a uniform sphere[edit]

Consider an analytically smooth spherical potential

{\begin{aligned}\Phi (r)&\equiv \left(-V_{0}^{2}\right)+\left[{r^{2}-r_{0}^{2} \over 2r_{0}^{2}},~~1-{r_{0} \over r}\right]_{\max }\!\!\!\!V_{0}^{2}\equiv \Phi (r_{0})-{V_{e}^{2}(r) \over 2},~~\Phi (r_{0})=-V_{0}^{2},\\\mathbf {g} &=-\mathbf {\nabla } \Phi (r)=-\Omega ^{2}rH(r_{0}-r)-{GM_{0} \over r^{2}}H(r-r_{0}),~~\Omega ={V_{0} \over r_{0}},~~M_{0}={V_{0}^{2}r_{0} \over G},\end{aligned}}

where

V_{e}(r)

takes the meaning of the speed to "escape to the edge"

r_{0}

, and

{\sqrt {2}}V_{0}

is the speed to "escape from the edge to infinity". The gravity is like the restoring force of harmonic oscillator inside the sphere, and Keplerian outside as described by the Heaviside functions.

We can fix the normalisation $V_{0}$ by computing the corresponding density using the spherical Poisson Equation

G\rho ={d \over 4\pi r^{2}dr}{r^{2}d\Phi  \over dr}={d(GM) \over 4\pi r^{2}dr}={3V_{0}^{2} \over 4\pi r_{0}^{2}}H(r_{0}-r),

where the enclosed mass

M(r)={r^{2}d\Phi  \over Gdr}=\int _{0}^{r}dr\int _{0}^{\pi }(rd\theta )\int _{0}^{2\pi }(r\sin \theta d\varphi )\rho _{0}H(r_{0}-r)=\left.M_{0}x^{3}\right|_{x={r \over r_{0}}}.

Hence the potential model corresponds to a uniform sphere of radius $r_{0}$ , total mass $M_{0}$ with

{V_{0} \over r_{0}}\equiv {\sqrt {4\pi G\rho _{0} \over 3}}={\sqrt {GM_{0} \over r_{0}^{3}}}.

Key concepts[edit]

While both the equations of motion and Poisson Equation can also take on non-spherical forms, depending on the coordinate system and the symmetry of the physical system, the essence is the same: The motions of stars in a galaxy or in a globular cluster are principally determined by the average distribution of the other, distant stars. The infrequent stellar encounters involve processes such as relaxation, mass segregation, tidal forces, and dynamical friction that influence the trajectories of the system's members.^[4]

Relativistic Approximations[edit]

There are three related approximations made in the Newtonian EOM and Poisson Equation above.

SR and GR[edit]

Firstly above equations neglect relativistic corrections, which are of order of

(v/c)^{2}\ll 10^{-4}

as typical stellar 3-dimensional speed,

v\sim 3-3000

km/s, is much below the speed of light.

Eddington Limit[edit]

Secondly non-gravitational force is typically negligible in stellar systems. For example, in the vicinity of a typical star the ratio of radiation-to-gravity force on a hydrogen atom or ion,

Q^{\text{Eddington}}={{\sigma _{e} \over 4\pi m_{H}c}{L\odot  \over r^{2}} \over {GM_{\odot } \over r^{2}}}={1 \over 30,000},

hence radiation force is negligible in general, except perhaps around a luminous O-type star of mass

30M_{\odot }

, or around a black hole accreting gas at the Eddington limit so that its luminosity-to-mass ratio

L_{\bullet }/M_{\bullet }

is defined by

Q^{\text{Eddington}}=1

.

Loss cone[edit]

Thirdly a star can be swallowed if coming within a few Schwarzschild radii of the black hole. This radius of Loss is given by

s\leq s_{\text{Loss}}={\frac {6GM_{\bullet }}{c^{2}}}

The loss cone can be visualised by considering infalling particles aiming to the black hole within a small solid angle (a cone in velocity). These particle with small $\theta \ll 1$ have small angular momentum per unit mass

J\equiv rv\sin \theta \leq J_{\text{loss}}={\frac {4GM_{\bullet }}{c}}.

Their small angular momentum (due to ) does not make a high enough barrier near

s_{\text{Loss}}

to force the particle to turn around.

The effective potential

\Phi _{\text{eff}}(r)\equiv E-{{\dot {r}}^{2} \over 2}={J^{2} \over 2r^{2}}+\Phi (r),

is always positive infinity in Newtonian gravity. However, in GR, it nosedives to minus infinity near

{\frac {6GM_{\bullet }}{c^{2}}}

if

J\leq {\frac {4GM_{\bullet }}{c}}.

Sparing a rigorous GR treatment, one can verify this $s_{\text{loss}},J_{\text{loss}}$ by computing the last stable circular orbit, where the effective potential is at an inflection point $\Phi ''_{\text{eff}}(s_{\text{loss}})=\Phi '_{\text{eff}}(s_{\text{loss}})=0$ using an approximate classical potential of a Schwarzschild black hole

\Phi (r)=-{(4GM_{\bullet }/c)^{2} \over 2r^{2}}\left[1+{3(6GM_{\bullet }/c^{2})^{2} \over 8r^{2}}\right]-{\frac {GM_{\bullet }}{r}}\left[1-{(6GM_{\bullet }/c^{2})^{2} \over r^{2}}\right].

Tidal disruption radius[edit]

A star can be tidally torn by a heavier black hole when coming within the so-called Hill's radius of the black hole, inside which a star's surface gravity yields to the tidal force from the black hole,^[5] i.e.,

(1-1.5)\geq Q^{\text{tide}}\equiv {GM_{\odot }/R_{\odot }^{2} \over [GM_{\bullet }/s_{\text{Hill}}^{2}-GM_{\bullet }/(s_{\text{Hill}}+R_{\odot })^{2}]},~~~s_{\text{Hill}}\rightarrow R_{\odot }\left({(2-3)GM_{\bullet } \over GM_{\odot }}\right)^{1 \over 3},

For typical black holes of $M_{\bullet }=(10^{0}-10^{8.5})M_{\odot }$ the destruction radius

\max[s_{\text{Hill}},s_{\text{Loss}}]=400R_{\odot }\max \left[\left({M_{\bullet } \over 3\times 10^{7}M_{\odot }}\right)^{1/3},{M_{\bullet } \over 3\times 10^{7}M_{\odot }}\right]=(1-4000)R_{\odot }\ll 0.001\mathrm {pc} ,

where 0.001pc is the stellar spacing in the densest stellar systems (e.g., the nuclear star cluster in the Milky Way centre). Hence (main sequence) stars are generally too compact internally and too far apart spaced to be disrupted by even the strongest black hole tides in galaxy or cluster environment.

Radius of sphere of influence[edit]

A particle of mass $m$ with a relative speed V will be deflected when entering the (much larger) cross section $\pi s_{\bullet }^{2}$ of a black hole. This so-called sphere of influence is loosely defined by, up to a Q-like fudge factor ${\sqrt {\ln \Lambda }}$ ,

1\sim {\sqrt {\ln \Lambda }}\equiv {\frac {V^{2}/2}{G(M_{\bullet }+m)/s_{\bullet }}},

hence for a Sun-like star we have,

s_{\bullet }={G(M_{\bullet }+M_{\odot }){\sqrt {\ln \Lambda }} \over V^{2}/2}\approx {M_{\bullet } \over M_{\odot }}{V_{\odot }^{2} \over V^{2}}R_{\odot }>[s_{\text{Hill}},s_{\text{Loss}}]_{max}=(1-4000)R_{\odot },

i.e., stars will neither be tidally disrupted nor physically hit/swallowed in a typical encounter with the black hole thanks to the high surface escape speed

V_{\odot }={\sqrt {2GM_{\odot }/R_{\odot }}}=615\mathrm {km/s}

from any solar mass star, comparable to the internal speed between galaxies in the Bullet Cluster of galaxies, and greater than the typical internal speed

V\sim {\sqrt {2G(NM_{\odot })/R}}\ll \mathrm {300km/s}

inside all star clusters and in galaxies.

Connections between star loss cone and gravitational gas accretion physics[edit]

First consider a heavy black hole of mass $M_{\bullet }$ is moving through a dissipational gas of (rescaled) thermal sound speed ${\text{ς'}}$ and density $\rho _{\text{gas}}$ , then every gas particle of mass m will likely transfer its relative momentum $mV_{\bullet }$ to the BH when coming within a cross-section of radius

s_{\bullet }\equiv {(GM_{\bullet }+Gm){\sqrt {\ln \Lambda }} \over (V_{\bullet }^{2}+{\text{ς'}}^{2})/2},

In a time scale

t_{\text{fric}}

that the black hole loses half of its streaming velocity, its mass may double by Bondi accretion, a process of capturing most of gas particles that enter its sphere of influence

s_{\bullet }

, dissipate kinetic energy by gas collisions and fall in the black hole. The gas capture rate is

{M_{\bullet } \over t_{\text{Bondi}}^{gas}}={\sqrt {{\text{ς'}}^{2}+V_{\bullet }^{2}}}(\pi s_{\bullet }^{2})\rho _{\text{gas}}=4\pi \rho _{\text{gas}}\left[{(GM_{\bullet })^{2} \over ({\text{ς'}}^{2}+V_{\bullet }^{2})^{3 \over 2}}\right]\ln \Lambda ,~~{\text{ς'}}\equiv \sigma {\sqrt {1+\gamma ^{3} \over 2(9/8)^{2/3}}}\approx [{\text{ς}},\gamma \sigma ]_{\text{max}},

where the polytropic index

\gamma

is the sound speed in units of velocity dispersion squared, and the rescaled sound speed

{\text{ς'}}

allows us to match the Bondi spherical accretion rate,

{\dot {M}}_{\bullet }\approx \pi \rho _{\text{gas}}{\text{ς}}\left[{(GM_{\bullet }) \over {\text{ς}}^{2}}\right]^{2}

for the adiabatic gas

\gamma =5/3

, compared to

{\dot {M}}_{\bullet }\approx 4\pi \rho _{\text{gas}}{\text{ς}}\left[{(GM_{\bullet }) \over {\text{ς}}^{2}}\right]^{2}

of the isothermal case

\gamma =1

.

Coming back to star tidal disruption and star capture by a (moving) black hole, setting $\ln \Lambda =1$ , we could summarise the BH's growth rate from gas and stars, ${M_{\bullet } \over t_{\text{Bondi}}^{gas}}+{M_{\bullet } \over t_{\text{loss}}^{*}}$ with,

{\dot {M}}_{\bullet }={\sqrt {{\text{ς'}}^{2}+V_{\bullet }^{2}}}mn(\pi s_{\bullet }^{2},\pi s_{\text{Hill}}^{2},\pi s_{\text{Loss}}^{2})_{\text{max}},~~s_{\bullet }\approx {(GM_{\bullet }+Gm) \over (V_{\bullet }^{2}+{\text{ς'}}^{2})/2},

because the black hole consumes a fractional/most part of star/gas particles passing its sphere of influence.

Gravitational dynamical friction[edit]

Consider the case that a heavy black hole of mass $M_{\bullet }$ moves relative to a background of stars in random motion in a cluster of total mass $(NM_{\odot })$ with a mean number density

n\sim (N-1)/(4\pi R^{3}/3)

within a typical size

R

.

Intuition says that gravity causes the light bodies to accelerate and gain momentum and kinetic energy (see slingshot effect). By conservation of energy and momentum, we may conclude that the heavier body will be slowed by an amount to compensate. Since there is a loss of momentum and kinetic energy for the body under consideration, the effect is called dynamical friction.

After certain time of relaxations the heavy black hole's kinetic energy should be in equal partition with the less-massive background objects. The slow-down of the black hole can be described as

-{M_{\bullet }{\dot {V}}_{\bullet }}={M_{\bullet }V_{\bullet } \over t_{\text{fric}}^{\text{star}}},

where

t_{\text{fric}}^{\text{star}}

is called a dynamical friction time.

Dynamical friction time vs Crossing time in a virialised system[edit]

Consider a Mach-1 BH, which travels initially at the sound speed ${\text{ς}}=V_{0}$ , hence its Bondi radius $s_{\bullet }$ satisfies

{GM_{\bullet }{\sqrt {\ln \Lambda }} \over s_{\bullet }}=V_{0}^{2}={\text{ς}}^{2}={0.4053GM_{\odot }(N-1) \over R},

where the sound speed is

{\text{ς}}={\sqrt {4GM_{\odot }(N-1) \over \pi ^{2}R}}

with the prefactor

{4 \over \pi ^{2}}\approx {4 \over 10}=0.4

fixed by the fact that for a uniform spherical cluster of the mass density

\rho =nM_{\odot }\approx {M_{\odot }(N-1) \over 4.19R^{3}}

, half of a circular period is the time for "sound" to make a oneway crossing in its longest dimension, i.e.,

2t_{\text{ς}}\equiv 2t_{\text{cross}}\equiv {2R \over {\text{ς}}}=\pi {\sqrt {R^{3} \over GM_{\odot }(N-1)}}\approx (0.4244G\rho )^{-1/2}.

It is customary to call the "half-diameter" crossing time

t_{\text{cross}}

the dynamical time scale.

Assume the BH stops after traveling a length of $l_{\text{fric}}\equiv {\text{ς}}t_{\text{fric}}$ with its momentum $M_{\bullet }V_{0}=M_{\bullet }{\text{ς}}$ deposited to ${M_{\bullet } \over M_{\odot }}$ stars in its path over $l_{\text{fric}}/(2R)$ crossings, then the number of stars deflected by the BH's Bondi cross section per "diameter" crossing time is

N^{\text{defl}}={({M_{\bullet } \over M_{\odot }})}{2R \over l_{\text{fric}}}=N{\pi s_{\bullet }^{2} \over \pi R^{2}}=N\left({M_{\bullet } \over 0.4053M_{\odot }N}\right)^{2}\ln \Lambda .

More generally, the Equation of Motion of the BH at a general velocity $\mathbf {V} _{\bullet }$ in the potential $\Phi$ of a sea of stars can be written as

-{d \over dt}(M_{\bullet }V_{\bullet })-M_{\bullet }\nabla \Phi \equiv {(M_{\bullet }V_{\bullet }) \over t_{\text{fric}}}=\overbrace {N\pi s_{\bullet }^{2} \over \pi R^{2}} ^{N^{\text{defl}}}{(M_{\odot }V_{\bullet }) \over 2t_{\text{ς}}}={8\ln \Lambda ' \over Nt_{\text{ς}}}M_{\bullet }V_{\bullet },

{\pi ^{2} \over 8}\approx 1

and the Coulomb logarithm modifying factor

{\ln \Lambda ' \over \ln \Lambda }\equiv \left[{\pi ^{2} \over 8}\right]^{2}\left[(1+{V_{\bullet }^{2} \over {\text{ς'}}^{2}})\right]^{-2}(1+{M_{\odot } \over M_{\bullet }})\leq \left[{{\text{ς'}} \over V_{\bullet }}\right]^{4}\leq 1

discounts friction on a supersonic moving BH with mass

M_{\bullet }\geq M_{\odot }

. As a rule of thumb, it takes about a sound crossing

t_{\text{ς'}}

time to "sink" subsonic BHs, from the edge to the centre without overshooting, if they weigh more than 1/8th of the total cluster mass. Lighter and faster holes can stay afloat much longer.

More rigorous formulation of dynamical friction[edit]

The full Chandrasekhar dynamical friction formula for the change in velocity of the object involves integrating over the phase space density of the field of matter and is far from transparent.

It reads as

{M_{\bullet }d(\mathbf {V} _{\bullet }) \over dt}=-{M_{\bullet }\mathbf {V} _{\bullet } \over t_{\text{fric}}^{\text{star}}}=-{m\mathbf {V} _{\bullet }~n(\mathbf {x} )d\mathbf {x} ^{3} \over dt}\ln \Lambda _{\text{lag}},

where

~~n(\mathbf {x} )dx^{3}=dtV_{\bullet }(\pi s_{\bullet }^{2})n(\mathbf {x} )=dtn(\mathbf {x} )|V_{\bullet }|\pi \left[{G(m+M_{\bullet }) \over |V_{\bullet }|^{2}/2}\right]^{2}

is the number of particles in an infinitesimal cylindrical volume of length

|V_{\bullet }dt|

and a cross-section

\pi s_{\bullet }^{2}

within the black hole's sphere of influence.

Like the "Couloumb logarithm" $\ln \Lambda$ factors in the contribution of distant background particles, here the factor $\ln(\Lambda _{\text{lag}})$ also factors in the probability of finding a background slower-than-BH particle to contribute to the drag. The more particles are overtaken by the BH, the more particles drag the BH, and the greater is $\ln(\Lambda _{\text{beaten}})$ . Also the bigger the system, the greater is $\ln \Lambda$ .

A background of elementary (gas or dark) particles can also induce dynamical friction, which scales with the mass density of the surrounding medium, $m~n$ ; the lower particle mass m is compensated by the higher number density n. The more massive the object, the more matter will be pulled into the wake.

Summing up the gravitational drag of both collisional gas and collisionless stars, we have

M_{\bullet }{d(\mathbf {V} _{\bullet }) \over M_{\bullet }dt}=-4\pi \left[{GM_{\bullet } \over |V_{\bullet }|}\right]^{2}\mathbf {\hat {V}} _{\bullet }(\rho _{\text{gas}}\ln \Lambda _{\text{lag}}^{gas}+mn_{\text{*}}\ln \Lambda _{\text{lag}}^{*}).~~

Here the "lagging-behind" fraction for gas ^[6] and for stars are given by

{\begin{aligned}\ln \Lambda _{\text{lag}}^{gas}(u)&=\ln ~{\left[{1+u \over \lambda }\right]^{1 \over 2}\left[{|1-u| \over \lambda }\right]^{H[u-\lambda -1]-H[1-\lambda -u] \over 2} \over \exp {[u+\lambda ,1]_{\min }^{2}-[u-\lambda ,1]_{\min }^{2} \over 4\lambda }},\\&\approx \ln \left[{{\sqrt {(u^{3}-1)^{2}+\lambda ^{3}}}+u^{3}-1 \over {\sqrt {1+\lambda ^{3}}}-1}\right]^{1 \over 3},~~u\equiv {|V_{\bullet }|t \over {\text{ς'}}t},~~\lambda \equiv ({s_{\bullet } \over {\text{ς'}}t})\\{\ln \Lambda _{\text{lag}}^{*} \over \ln \Lambda }&\equiv \int _{0}^{|mV_{\bullet }|}\!\!\!\!{(4\pi p^{2}dp)e^{-{p^{2} \over 2(m\sigma )^{2}}} \over ({\sqrt {2\pi }}m\sigma )^{3}}\left.\right|_{p=m|v|}\approx {|\mathbf {V} _{\bullet }|^{3} \over |\mathbf {V} _{\bullet }|^{3}+3.45\sigma ^{3}},\\\ln \Lambda &=\int {d\mathbf {x_{1}} ^{3}~2Heaviside[{n(\mathbf {x_{1}} ) \over n(\mathbf {x} )}-1-{M_{\bullet } \over NM_{\odot }}] \over (s_{\bullet }^{2}+|\mathbf {x_{1}} -\mathbf {x} |^{2})^{3 \over 2}}\approx \ln {\sqrt {1+\left({0.123NM_{\odot } \over M_{\bullet }}\right)^{2}}},\end{aligned}}

where we have further assumed that the BH starts to move from time

t=0

; the gas is isothermal with sound speed

{\text{ς}}

; the background stars have of (mass) density

mn(\mathbf {x} )

in a Maxwell distribution of momentum

p=mv

with a Gaussian distribution velocity spread

\sigma

(called velocity dispersion, typically

\sigma \leq {\text{ς}}

).

Interestingly, the $G^{2}(m+M_{\bullet })(mn(\mathbf {x} ))$ dependence suggests that dynamical friction is from the gravitational pull of by the wake, which is induced by the gravitational focusing of the massive body in its two-body encounters with background objects.

We see the force is also proportional to the inverse square of the velocity at the high end, hence the fractional rate of energy loss drops rapidly at high velocities. Dynamical friction is, therefore, unimportant for objects that move relativistically, such as photons. This can be rationalized by realizing that the faster the object moves through the media, the less time there is for a wake to build up behind it. Friction tends to be the highest at the sound barrier, where $\ln \Lambda _{\text{lag}}^{gas}\left.\right|_{u=1}=\ln {{\text{ς'}}t \over s_{\bullet }}$ .

Gravitational encounters and relaxation[edit]

Stars in a stellar system will influence each other's trajectories due to strong and weak gravitational encounters. An encounter between two stars is defined to be strong/weak if their mutual potential energy at the closest passage is comparable/minuscule to their initial kinetic energy. Strong encounters are rare, and they are typically only considered important in dense stellar systems, e.g., a passing star can be sling-shot out by binary stars in the core of a globular cluster.^[7] This means that two stars need to come within a separation,

s_{*}={GM_{\odot }+GM_{\odot } \over V^{2}/2}={2 \over 1.5}{GM_{\odot } \over {\text{ς}}^{2}}={3.29R \over N-1},

where we used the Virial Theorem, "mutual potential energy balances twice kinetic energy on average", i.e., "the pairwise potential energy per star balances with twice kinetic energy associated with the sound speed in three directions",

1\sim Q^{\text{virial}}\equiv {\overbrace {2K} ^{(NM_{\odot })V^{2}} \over |W|}={NM_{\odot }{\text{ς}}^{2}+NM_{\odot }{\text{ς}}^{2}+NM_{\odot }{\text{ς}}^{2} \over {N(N-1) \over 2}{GM_{\odot }^{2} \over R_{pair}}},

where the factor

N(N-1)/2

is the number of handshakes between a pair of stars without double-counting, the mean pair separation

R_{\text{pair}}={\pi ^{2} \over 24}R\approx 0.411234R

is only about 40\% of the radius of the uniform sphere. Note also the similarity of the

Q^{\text{virial}}\leftarrow \rightarrow {\sqrt {\ln \Lambda }}.

Mean free path[edit]

The mean free path of strong encounters in a typically $(N-1)=4.19nR^{3}\gg 100$ stellar system is then

l_{\text{strong}}={1 \over (\pi s_{*}^{2})n}\approx {(N-1) \over 8.117}R\gg R,

i.e., it takes about

0.123N

radius crossings for a typical star to come within a cross-section

\pi s_{*}^{2}

to be deflected from its path completely. Hence the mean free time of a strong encounter is much longer than the crossing time

R/V

.

Weak encounters[edit]

Weak encounters have a more profound effect on the evolution of a stellar system over the course of many passages. The effects of gravitational encounters can be studied with the concept of relaxation time. A simple example illustrating relaxation is two-body relaxation, where a star's orbit is altered due to the gravitational interaction with another star.

Initially, the subject star travels along an orbit with initial velocity, $\mathbf {v}$ , that is perpendicular to the impact parameter, the distance of closest approach, to the field star whose gravitational field will affect the original orbit. Using Newton's laws, the change in the subject star's velocity, $\delta \mathbf {v}$ , is approximately equal to the acceleration at the impact parameter, multiplied by the time duration of the acceleration.

The relaxation time can be thought as the time it takes for $\delta \mathbf {v}$ to equal $\mathbf {v}$ , or the time it takes for the small deviations in velocity to equal the star's initial velocity. The number of "half-diameter" crossings for an average star to relax in a stellar system of $N$ objects is approximately

{t_{\text{relax}} \over t_{\text{ς}}}=N^{\text{relax}}\backsimeq {\frac {0.123(N-1)}{\ln(N-1)}}\gg 1

from a more rigorous calculation than the above mean free time estimates for strong deflection.

The answer makes sense because there is no relaxation for a single body or 2-body system. A better approximation of the ratio of timescales is $\left.{\frac {N'}{\ln {\sqrt {1+N'^{2}}}}}\right|_{N'=0.123(N-2)}$ , hence the relaxation time for 3-body, 4-body, 5-body, 7-body, 10-body, ..., 42-body, 72-body, 140-body, 210-body, 550-body are about 16, 8, 6, 4, 3, ..., 3, 4, 6, 8, 16 crossings. There is no relaxation for an isolated binary, and the relaxation is the fastest for a 16-body system; it takes about 2.5 crossings for orbits to scatter each other. A system with $N\sim 10^{2}-10^{10}$ have much smoother potential, typically takes $\sim \ln N'\approx (2-20)$ weak encounters to build a strong deflection to change orbital energy significantly.

Relation between friction and relaxation[edit]

Clearly that the dynamical friction of a black hole is much faster than the relaxation time by roughly a factor $M_{\odot }/M_{\bullet }$ , but these two are very similar for a cluster of black holes,

N^{\text{fric}}={t_{\text{fric}} \over t_{\text{ς}}}\rightarrow {t_{\text{relax}} \over t_{\text{ς}}}=N^{\text{relax}}\sim {(N-1) \over 10-100},~{\text{when}}~{M_{\bullet }\rightarrow m\leftarrow M_{\odot }}.

For a star cluster or galaxy cluster with, say, $N=10^{3},~R=\mathrm {1pc-10^{5}pc} ,~V=\mathrm {1km/s-10^{3}km/s}$ , we have $t_{\text{relax}}\sim 100t_{\text{ς}}\approx 100\mathrm {Myr} -10\mathrm {Gyr}$ . Hence encounters of members in these stellar or galaxy clusters are significant during the typical 10 Gyr lifetime.

On the other hand, typical galaxy with, say, $N=10^{6}-10^{11}$ stars, would have a crossing time $t_{\text{ς}}\sim {1\mathrm {kpc} -100\mathrm {kpc} \over 1\mathrm {km/s} -100\mathrm {km/s} }\sim 100\mathrm {Myr}$ and their relaxation time is much longer than the age of the Universe. This justifies modelling galaxy potentials with mathematically smooth functions, neglecting two-body encounters throughout the lifetime of typical galaxies. And inside such a typical galaxy the dynamical friction and accretion on stellar black holes over a 10-Gyr Hubble time change the black hole's velocity and mass by only an insignificant fraction

\Delta \sim {M_{\bullet } \over 0.1NM_{\odot }}{t \over t_{\text{ς}}}\leq {M_{\bullet } \over 0.1\%NM_{\odot }}

if the black hole makes up less than 0.1% of the total galaxy mass $NM_{\odot }\sim 10^{6-11}M_{\odot }$ . Especially when $M_{\bullet }\sim M_{\odot }$ , we see that a typical star never experiences an encounter, hence stays on its orbit in a smooth galaxy potential.

The dynamical friction or relaxation time identifies collisionless vs. collisional particle systems. Dynamics on timescales much less than the relaxation time is effectively collisionless because typical star will deviate from its initial orbit size by a tiny fraction $t/t_{\text{relax}}\ll 1$ . They are also identified as systems where subject stars interact with a smooth gravitational potential as opposed to the sum of point-mass potentials. The accumulated effects of two-body relaxation in a galaxy can lead to what is known as mass segregation, where more massive stars gather near the center of clusters, while the less massive ones are pushed towards the outer parts of the cluster.

A Spherical-Cow Summary of Continuity Eq. in Collisional and Collisionless Processes[edit]

Having gone through the details of the rather complex interactions of particles in a gravitational system, it is always helpful to zoom out and extract some generic theme, at an affordable price of rigour, so carry on with a lighter load.

First important concept is "gravity balancing motion" near the perturber and for the background as a whole

{\text{Perturber Virial}}\approx {GM_{\bullet } \over s_{\bullet }}\approx V_{\text{cir}}^{2}\approx \langle V\rangle ^{2}\approx {\overline {\langle V^{2}\rangle }}\approx \sigma ^{2}\approx \left({R \over t_{\text{ς}}}\right)^{2}\approx c_{\text{ς}}^{2}\approx {G(Nm) \over R}\approx {\text{Background Virial}},

by consistently omitting all factors of unity

4\pi

,

\pi

,

\ln {\text{Λ}}

etc for clarity, approximating the combined mass

M_{\bullet }+m\approx M_{\bullet }

and being ambiguous whether the geometry of the system is a thin/thick gas/stellar disk or a (non)-uniform stellar/dark sphere with or without a boundary, and about the subtle distinctions among the kinetic energies from the local Circular rotation speed

V_{\text{cir}}

, radial infall speed

\langle V\rangle

, globally isotropic or anisotropic random motion

\sigma

in one or three directions, or the (non)-uniform isotropic Sound speed

c_{\text{ς}}

to emphasize of the logic behind the order of magnitude of the friction time scale.

Second we can recap very loosely summarise the various processes so far of collisional and collisionless gas/star or dark matter by Spherical cow style Continuity Equation on any generic quantity Q of the system:

{dQ \over dt}\approx {\pm Q \over ({l \over c_{\text{ς}}})},~{\text{Q being mass M, energy E, momentum (M V), Phase density f, size R,  density}}{Nm \over {4\pi  \over 3}R^{3}}...,

where the

\pm

sign is generally negative except for the (accreting) mass M, and the Mean free path

l=c_{\text{ς}}t_{\text{fric}}

or the friction time

t_{\text{fric}}

can be due to direct molecular viscosity from a physical collision Cross section, or due to gravitational scattering (bending/focusing/Sling shot) of particles; generally the influenced area is the greatest of the competing processes of Bondi accretion, Tidal disruption, and Loss cone capture,

s^{2}\approx \max \left[{\text{Bondi radius}}~s_{\bullet },{\text{Tidal radius}}~s_{\text{Hill}},{\text{physical size}}~s_{\text{Loss cone}}\right]^{2}.

E.g., in case Q is the perturber's mass $Q=M_{\bullet }$ , then we can estimate the Dynamical friction time via the (gas/star) Accretion rate

{\begin{aligned}{\dot {M}}_{\bullet }=&{M_{\bullet } \over t_{\text{fric}}}\approx \int _{0}^{s^{2}}d({\text{area}})~({\text{background mean flux}})\approx s^{2}(\rho c_{\text{ς}})\\\approx &{\frac {{\text{Perturber influenced cross section}}~(s^{2})}{{\text{background system cross section}}~(R^{2})}}\times {\frac {{\text{background mass}}~(Nm)}{{\text{crossing time}}~t_{\text{ς}}\approx {R \over c_{\text{ς}}}\approx {1 \over {\sqrt {G(Nm) \over R^{3}}}\sim {\sqrt {G\rho }}\sim \kappa }}}\\\approx &{GM_{\bullet } \over Gt_{\text{ς}}}{GM_{\bullet } \over G(Nm)}\approx (\rho c_{\text{ς}})\left({GM_{\bullet } \over c_{\text{ς}}^{2}}\right)^{2},~~{\text{if consider only gravitationally focusing,}}\\\approx &{M_{\bullet } \over Nt_{\text{ς}}},~~{\text{if for a light perturber}}M_{\bullet }\rightarrow m=M_{\odot }\\\rightarrow &0,~~{\text{if practically collisionless}}~~N\rightarrow \infty ,\end{aligned}}

where we have applied the relations motion-balancing-gravity.

In the limit the perturber is just 1 of the N background particle, $M_{\bullet }\rightarrow m$ , this friction time is identified with the (gravitational) Relaxation time. Again all Coulomb logarithm etc are suppressed without changing the estimations from these qualitative equations.

For the rest of Stellar dynamics, we will consistently work on precise calculations through primarily Worked Examples, by neglecting gravitational friction and relaxation of the perturber, working in the limit $N\rightarrow \infty$ as approximated true in most galaxies on the 14Gyrs Hubble time scale, even though this is sometimes violated for some clusters of stars or clusters of galaxies.of the cluster.^[7]

A concise 1-page summary of some main equations in Stellar dynamics and Accretion disc physics are shown here, where one attempts to be more rigorous on the qualitative equations above.

Stellar dynamics Key concepts and equations

Connections to statistical mechanics and plasma physics[edit]

The statistical nature of stellar dynamics originates from the application of the kinetic theory of gases to stellar systems by physicists such as James Jeans in the early 20th century. The Jeans equations, which describe the time evolution of a system of stars in a gravitational field, are analogous to Euler's equations for an ideal fluid, and were derived from the collisionless Boltzmann equation. This was originally developed by Ludwig Boltzmann to describe the non-equilibrium behavior of a thermodynamic system. Similarly to statistical mechanics, stellar dynamics make use of distribution functions that encapsulate the information of a stellar system in a probabilistic manner. The single particle phase-space distribution function, $f(\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ,t)$ , is defined in a way such that

f(\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ,t)\,d\mathbf {x} \,d\mathbf {v} =dN

where

dN/N

represents the probability of finding a given star with position

\mathbf {x}

around a differential volume

d\mathbf {x}

and velocity

{\text{v}}

around a differential velocity space volume

d\mathbf {v}

. The distribution function is normalized (sometimes) such that integrating it over all positions and velocities will equal N, the total number of bodies of the system. For collisional systems, Liouville's theorem is applied to study the microstate of a stellar system, and is also commonly used to study the different statistical ensembles of statistical mechanics.

Convention and notation in case of a thermal distribution[edit]

In most of stellar dynamics literature, it is convenient to adopt the convention that the particle mass is unity in solar mass unit $M_{\odot }$ , hence a particle's momentum and velocity are identical, i.e.,

\mathbf {p} =m\mathbf {v} =\mathbf {v} ,~m=1,~N_{\text{total}}=M_{\text{total}},

{dM \over dx^{3}dv^{3}}=f(\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ,t)=f(\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {p} ,t)\equiv {dN \over dx^{3}dp^{3}}

For example, the thermal velocity distribution of air molecules (of typically 15 times the proton mass per molecule) in a room of constant temperature $T_{0}\sim \mathrm {300K}$ would have a Maxwell distribution

f^{\text{Max}}(x,y,z,mV_{x},mV_{y},mV_{z})={1 \over (2\pi \hbar )^{3}}{1 \over \exp \left({E(x,y,z,p_{x},p_{y},p_{z})-\mu  \over kT_{0}}\right)+1}

f^{\text{Max}}\sim {1 \over (2\pi \hbar /m)^{3}}e^{\mu  \over kT_{0}}e^{-E \over m\sigma _{1}^{2}},

where the energy per unit mass

E/m=\Phi (x,y,z)+(V_{x}^{2}+V_{y}^{2}+V_{z}^{2})/2,

where

\Phi (x,y,z)\equiv g_{0}z=0

and ${\textstyle \sigma _{1}={\sqrt {kT_{0}/m}}\sim \mathrm {0.3km/s} }$ is the width of the velocity Maxwell distribution, identical in each direction and everywhere in the room, and the normalisation constant $e^{\mu \over kT_{0}}$ (assume the chemical potential ${\textstyle \mu \sim (m\sigma _{1}^{2})\ln \left[n_{0}\left({{\sqrt {2\pi }}\hbar \over m\sigma _{1}}\right)^{3}\right]\ll 0}$ such that the Fermi-Dirac distribution reduces to a Maxwell velocity distribution) is fixed by the constant gas number density $n_{0}=n(x,y,0)$ at the floor level, where

n(x,y,0)=\!\!\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }mdV_{x}\!\!\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }mdV_{y}\!\!\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }mdV_{z}f(x,y,0,mV_{x},mV_{y},mV_{z})

n\approx {(2\pi )^{3/2}(m\sigma _{1})^{3} \over (2\pi \hbar )^{3}}e^{\mu  \over m\sigma _{1}^{2}}.

The CBE[edit]

In plasma physics, the collisionless Boltzmann equation is referred to as the Vlasov equation, which is used to study the time evolution of a plasma's distribution function.

The Boltzmann equation is often written more generally with the Liouville operator ${\mathcal {L}}$ as

{\mathcal {L}}f(t,\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {p} )={f_{\text{fit}}^{\text{Max}}-f(t,\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {p} ) \over t_{\text{relax}}},

{\mathcal {L}}\equiv {\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}+{\frac {\mathbf {p} }{m}}\cdot \nabla +\mathbf {F} \cdot {\frac {\partial }{\partial \mathbf {p} }}\,.

where

\mathbf {F} \equiv \mathbf {\dot {p}} =-m\nabla \Phi

is the gravitational force and

f_{\text{fit}}^{\text{Max}}

is the Maxwell (equipartition) distribution (to fit the same density, same mean and rms velocity as

f(t,\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {p} )

). The equation means the non-Gaussianity will decay on a (relaxation) time scale of

t_{\text{relax}}

, and the system will ultimately relaxes to a Maxwell (equipartition) distribution.

Whereas Jeans applied the collisionless Boltzmann equation, along with Poisson's equation, to a system of stars interacting via the long range force of gravity, Anatoly Vlasov applied Boltzmann's equation with Maxwell's equations to a system of particles interacting via the Coulomb Force.^[8] Both approaches separate themselves from the kinetic theory of gases by introducing long-range forces to study the long term evolution of a many particle system. In addition to the Vlasov equation, the concept of Landau damping in plasmas was applied to gravitational systems by Donald Lynden-Bell to describe the effects of damping in spherical stellar systems.^[9]

A nice property of f(t,x,v) is that many other dynamical quantities can be formed by its moments, e.g., the total mass, local density, pressure, and mean velocity. Applying the collisionless Boltzmann equation, these moments are then related by various forms of continuity equations, of which most notable are the Jeans equations and Virial theorem.

Probability-weighted moments and hydrostatic equilibrium[edit]

Jeans computed the weighted velocity of the Boltzmann Equation after integrating over velocity space

{1 \over \rho _{p}}\int \!\left\{\mathbf {v} _{p}{d[f_{p}m_{p}] \over dt}-\langle {\mathbf {v} }\rangle _{p}{d[f_{p}m_{p}] \over dt}\right\}d^{3}\mathbf {v} =0,

and obtain the Momentum (Jeans) Eqs. of a

^{p}

opulation (e.g., gas, stars, dark matter):

{\begin{aligned}\overbrace {\left({\partial  \over \partial t}+\sum _{j=1}^{3}\langle {v_{j}^{p}}\rangle {\partial  \over \partial x_{j}}\right)\langle {v_{i}^{p}}\rangle } ^{{\dot {\langle {v}\rangle }}_{i}^{p}}&\underbrace {=} _{EoM}\overbrace {-\partial \Phi (t,\mathbf {x} ) \over \partial x_{i}} ^{g_{i}\sim O(-GM/R^{2})}~~\underbrace {-} _{\text{balance}}^{\text{pressure}}~~\sum _{j=1}^{3}{\partial  \over \rho ^{p}\partial x_{j}}\overbrace {[\underbrace {\rho ^{p}(t,\mathbf {x} )} _{\int _{\infty }\!\!\!\!m_{p}f_{p}d^{3}\mathbf {v} }\underbrace {\sigma _{ji}^{p}(t,\mathbf {x} )} _{O(c_{s}^{2})}]} ^{\int \limits _{\infty }\!\!d\mathbf {v} ^{3}(\mathbf {v} _{j}-\langle {v}\rangle _{j}^{p})(\mathbf {v} _{i}-\langle {v}\rangle _{i}^{p})m_{p}f_{p}}-{\underbrace {\langle {v_{i}^{p}}\rangle \overbrace {[{\dot {m}}_{p}/m_{p}]} ^{1/t|_{{\text{visc}}~m_{p}=M_{\text{gas}}}^{\text{fric}}}} _{\text{snow.plough}}},\\0&=-{\partial \Phi (t,\mathbf {x} ) \over \partial x_{i}}-{\partial (n\sigma ^{2}) \over n\partial x_{i}},~~{\text{hydrostatic isotropic velocity, no flow and friction }}.\end{aligned}}

The general version of Jeans equation, involving (3 x 3) velocity moments is cumbersome. It only becomes useful or solvable if we could drop some of these moments, epecially drop the off-diagonal cross terms for systems of high symmetry, and also drop net rotation or net inflow speed everywhere.

The isotropic version is also called Hydrostatic equilibrium equation where balancing pressure gradient with gravity; the isotropic version works for axisymmetric disks as well, after replacing the derivative dr with vertical coordinate dz. It means that we could measure the gravity (of dark matter) by observing the gradients of the velocity dispersion and the number density of stars.

Applications and examples[edit]

Stellar dynamics is primarily used to study the mass distributions within stellar systems and galaxies. Early examples of applying stellar dynamics to clusters include Albert Einstein's 1921 paper applying the virial theorem to spherical star clusters and Fritz Zwicky's 1933 paper applying the virial theorem specifically to the Coma Cluster, which was one of the original harbingers of the idea of dark matter in the universe.^[10]^[11] The Jeans equations have been used to understand different observational data of stellar motions in the Milky Way galaxy. For example, Jan Oort utilized the Jeans equations to determine the average matter density in the vicinity of the solar neighborhood, whereas the concept of asymmetric drift came from studying the Jeans equations in cylindrical coordinates.^[12]

Stellar dynamics also provides insight into the structure of galaxy formation and evolution. Dynamical models and observations are used to study the triaxial structure of elliptical galaxies and suggest that prominent spiral galaxies are created from galaxy mergers.^[1] Stellar dynamical models are also used to study the evolution of active galactic nuclei and their black holes, as well as to estimate the mass distribution of dark matter in galaxies.

A unified thick disk potential[edit]

Consider an oblate potential in cylindrical coordinates

{\begin{aligned}\Phi (R,z)&={GM_{0} \over 2z_{0}}\left[2\sinh ^{-1}\!\!Q-\sinh ^{-1}\!\!Q_{+}-\sinh ^{-1}\!\!Q_{-}\right]\\&={GM_{0} \over 2z_{0}}\log {({\sqrt {1+Q^{2}}}+Q)^{2} \over \left[{\sqrt {1+Q_{+}^{2}}}+Q_{+}\right]\left[{\sqrt {1+Q_{-}^{2}}}+Q_{-}\right]},\\Q_{\pm }&\equiv {R_{0}+\left|~|z|\pm z_{0}~\right| \over R},\\Q&\equiv {R_{0}+[0,|z|-z_{0}]_{\max } \over R},\\\end{aligned}}

where

z_{0},R_{0}

are (positive) vertical and radial length scales. Despite its complexity, we can easily see some limiting properties of the model.

First we can see the total mass of the system is $M_{0}$ because

\Phi (R,z)\rightarrow {GM_{0} \over 2z_{0}}(2Q_{-}-Q_{-}-Q_{+})=-{GM_{0} \over R},

when we take the large radii limit

R\rightarrow \infty ,~|z|\geq z_{0},

, so that

Q=Q_{-}=Q_{+}-{2z_{0} \over R}={|z|+(R_{0}-z_{0}) \over R}\rightarrow 0.

We can also show that some special cases of this unified potential become the potential of the Kuzmin razor-thin disk, that of the Point mass $M_{0}$ , and that of a uniform-Needle mass distribution:

\Phi _{KM}(R,z)=-{GM_{0} \over {\sqrt {R^{2}+(|z|+R_{0})^{2}}}},~~z_{0}=0,

\Phi _{PT}(R,z)=-{GM_{0} \over {\sqrt {R^{2}+z^{2}}}},~~z_{0}=R_{0}=0,

\Phi _{UN}^{R_{0}=0}(R,z)={GM_{0} \over 2z_{0}}\left[2\sinh ^{-1}\!\!{(0,|z|-z_{0})_{\max } \over R}-\sinh ^{-1}\!\!{z_{0}+|z| \over R}-\sinh ^{-1}\!\!{\left|~z_{0}-|z|~\right| \over R}\right].

A worked example of gravity vector field in a thick disk[edit]

First consider the vertical gravity at the boundary,

g_{z}(R,z)=-\partial _{z}\Phi (R,z)=-{GM_{0}z \over 2z_{0}^{2}}\left[{1 \over {\sqrt {R_{0}^{2}+R^{2}}}}-{1 \over {\sqrt {(R_{0}+2z_{0})^{2}+R^{2}}}}\right],~~z=\pm z_{0},

Note that both the potential and the vertical gravity are continuous across the boundaries, hence no razor disk at the boundaries. Thanks to the fact that at the boundary, $\partial _{|z|}(2Q)-\partial _{|z|}Q_{-}=\partial _{|z|}\left(Q_{+}-{\frac {2z_{0}}{R}}\right)={1 \over R}$ is continuous. Apply Gauss's theorem by integrating the vertical force over the entire disk upper and lower boundaries, we have

2\int _{0}^{\infty }(2\pi RdR)|g_{z}(R,z_{0})|=4\pi GM_{0},

confirming that

M_{0}

takes the meaning of the total disk mass.

The vertical gravity drops with

-g_{z}\rightarrow GM_{0}z(1+R_{0}/z_{0})/R^{3}

at large radii, which is enhanced over the vertical gravity of a point mass

GM_{0}z/R^{3}

due to the self-gravity of the thick disk.

Density of a thick disk from Poisson Equation[edit]

Insert in the cylindrical Poisson eq.

\rho (R,z)={\partial _{z}\partial _{z}\Phi  \over 4\pi G}+{\partial _{R}(R\partial _{R}\Phi ) \over 4\pi GR}={M_{0}R_{0}/z_{0} \over 4\pi (R^{2}+R_{0}^{2})^{3/2}}H(z_{0}-|z|),

which drops with radius, and is zero beyond

|z|>z_{0}

and uniform along the z-direction within the boundary.

Surface density and mass of a thick disk[edit]

Integrating over the entire thick disc of uniform thickness $2z_{0}$ , we find the surface density and the total mass as

\Sigma (R)=(2z_{0})\rho (R,0),~~M_{0}=\int _{0}^{\infty }(2\pi RdR)\Sigma (R).

This confirms that the absence of extra razor thin discs at the boundaries. In the limit, $z_{0}\rightarrow 0$ , this thick disc potential reduces to that of a razor-thin Kuzmin disk, for which we can verify ${|g_{z}(R,0+)| \over 2\pi G}\rightarrow \Sigma (R)\rightarrow {M_{0}R_{0} \over 2\pi (R^{2}+R_{0}^{2})^{3/2}}$ .

Oscillation frequencies in a thick disk[edit]

To find the vertical and radial oscillation frequencies, we do a Taylor expansion of potential around the midplane.

\Phi (R_{1},z)\approx \Phi (R,0)+{\omega ^{2}R}(R_{1}-R)+{\kappa ^{2} \over 2}(R_{1}-R)^{2}+{\nu ^{2} \over 2}z^{2}

and we find the circular speed

V_{\text{cir}}

and the vertical and radial epicycle frequencies to be given by

(R\omega )^{2}\equiv V_{\text{cir}}^{2}=\left[{(1+R_{0}/z_{0})GM_{0} \over {\sqrt {R^{2}+(R_{0}+z_{0})^{2}}}}-{(R_{0}/z_{0})GM_{0} \over {\sqrt {R^{2}+R_{0}^{2}}}}\right],

\nu ^{2}={GM_{0}(R_{0}/z_{0}+1) \over (R^{2}+(R_{0}+z_{0})^{2})^{3/2}},

\kappa ^{2}+\nu ^{2}-2\omega ^{2}=4\pi G\rho (R,0)={GM_{0}R_{0}/z_{0} \over (R^{2}+R_{0}^{2})^{3/2}}.

Interestingly the rotation curve

V_{\text{cir}}

is solid-body-like near the centre

R\ll R_{0}

, and is Keplerian far away.

At large radii three frequencies satisfy ${\textstyle \left.\left[\omega ,\nu ,\kappa ,{\sqrt {4\pi G\rho }}\right]\right|_{R\to \infty }\to [1,1+R_{0}/z_{0},1,R_{0}/z_{0}]^{1 \over 2}{\sqrt {GM_{0} \over R^{3}}}}$ . E.g., in the case that $R\to \infty$ and $R_{0}/z_{0}=3$ , the oscillations $\omega :\nu :\kappa =1:2:1$ forms a resonance.

In the case that $R_{0}=0$ , the density is zero everywhere except uniform needle between $|z|\leq z_{0}$ along the z-axis.

If we further require $z_{0}=0$ , then we recover a well-known property for closed ellipse orbits in point mass potential,

\omega :\nu :\kappa =1:1:1.

A worked example for neutrinos in galaxies[edit]

For example, the phase space distribution function of non-relativistic neutrinos of mass m anywhere will not exceed the maximum value set by

f(\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ,t)={dN \over dx^{3}dv^{3}}\leq {6 \over (2\pi \hbar /m)^{3}},~~~

where the Fermi-Dirac statistics says there are at most 6 flavours of neutrinos within a volume

dx^{3}

and a velocity volume

dv^{3}=(dp/m)^{3}=[(2\pi \hbar /dx)/m]^{3},

.

Let's approximate the distribution is at maximum, i.e.,

f(x,y,z,V_{x},V_{y},V_{z})={6 \over (2\pi \hbar /m)^{3}}q^{\alpha  \over 2},~~0\leq q(E)={\Phi _{\max }-E \over V_{0}^{2}/2}\leq 1,

where

0\geq \Phi _{\max }\geq E=\Phi (x,y,z)+{V_{x}^{2}+V_{y}^{2}+V_{z}^{2} \over 2}\geq \Phi _{\min }\equiv \Phi _{\max }-{V_{0}^{2} \over 2}

such that

E_{\min },E_{\max }

, respectively, is the potential energy of at the centre or the edge of the gravitational bound system. The corresponding neutrino mass density, assume spherical, would be

\rho (r)=n(x,y,z)m=\int dV_{x}\int dV_{y}\int dV_{z}~m~f(x,y,z,V_{x},V_{y},V_{z}),

which reduces to

\rho (r)={C(\Phi _{\max }-\Phi (r))^{3+\alpha  \over 2} \over (\Phi _{\max }-\Phi _{\min })^{\alpha  \over 2}},~~~C={6m\pi 2^{5/2}B\left(1+{\alpha  \over 2},{3 \over 2}\right) \over (2\pi \hbar /m)^{3}}

Take the simple case $\alpha \to 0$ , and estimate the density at the centre $r=0$ with an escape speed $V_{0}$ , we have

\rho (r)\leq \rho (0)\rightarrow {m^{4}V_{0}^{3} \over \pi ^{2}\hbar ^{3}}\approx m_{\mathrm {eV} }^{4}V_{200}^{3}\times {\text{[Cosmic Critical Density]}}.

Clearly eV-scale neutrinos with $m_{eV}\sim 0.1-1$ is too light to make up the 100–10000 over-density in galaxies with escape velocity $V_{200}\equiv V/(\mathrm {200km/s} )\sim 0.1-3.4$ , while neutrinos in clusters with $V\sim \mathrm {2000km/s}$ could make up $100-1000$ times cosmic background density.

By the way the freeze-out cosmic neutrinos in your room have a non-thermal random momentum ${\textstyle \sim {(\mathrm {2.7K} )k \over c}\sim (1~\mathrm {eV} /c^{2})(\mathrm {70km/s} )}$ , and do not follow a Maxwell distribution, and are not in thermal equilibrium with the air molecules because of the extremely low cross-section of neutrino-baryon interactions.

A Recap on Harmonic Motions in Uniform Sphere Potential[edit]

Consider building a steady state model of the fore-mentioned uniform sphere of density $\rho _{0}$ and potential $\Phi (r)$

{\begin{aligned}\rho (|\mathbf {r} |)&=\rho _{0}\equiv M_{\odot }n_{0},~~|\mathbf {r} |^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\leq r_{0}^{2},~~\Omega \equiv {\sqrt {4\pi G\rho _{0} \over 3}}\equiv {V_{0} \over r_{0}}\\\Phi (|\mathbf {r} |)&={\Omega ^{2}(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})-3V_{0}^{2} \over 2}={V_{e}(r)^{2} \over 2}-\Phi (r_{0}),\end{aligned}}

where

V_{e}(r)=V_{0}{\sqrt {1-{r^{2} \over r_{0}^{2}}}}={\sqrt {2\Phi (r_{0})-2\Phi (r)}}

is the speed to escape to the edge

r_{0}

.

First a recap on motion "inside" the uniform sphere potential. Inside this constant density core region, individual stars go on resonant harmonic oscillations of angular frequency $\Omega$ with

{\begin{aligned}{\ddot {x}}=&-\Omega ^{2}x=-\partial _{x}\Phi ,\\{\ddot {y}}=&-\Omega ^{2}y,~~~{{\dot {y}}(t)^{2} \over 2}+{\Omega ^{2}y(t)^{2} \over 2}\equiv I_{y}(y,{\dot {y}})={{\dot {y}}(0)^{2} \over 2}+{\Omega ^{2}y(0)^{2} \over 2}\leq {(\Omega r_{0})^{2} \over 2}\\{\ddot {z}}=&-\Omega ^{2}z,\rightarrow {\dot {z}}(t)={\dot {z}}(0)\cos(\Omega t)+\Omega z(0)\sin(\Omega t).\end{aligned}}

Loosely speaking our goal is to put stars on a weighted distribution of orbits with various energies

f\left(I_{x}(x,{\dot {x}}),I_{y}(y,{\dot {y}}),I_{z}(z,{\dot {z}}\right)=DF(\mathbf {r} ,\mathbf {V} )

, i.e., the phase space density or distribution function, such that their overall stellar number density reproduces the constant core, hence their collective "steady-state" potential. Once this is reached, we call the system is a self-consistent equilibrium.

Example on Jeans theorem and CBE on Uniform Sphere Potential[edit]

Generally for a time-independent system, Jeans theorem predicts that $f(\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} )$ is an implicit function of the position and velocity through a functional dependence on "constants of motion".

For the uniform sphere, a solution for the Boltzmann Equation, written in spherical coordinates $(r,\theta ,\phi )$ and its velocity components $(V_{r},V_{\theta },V_{\phi })$ is

f(r,\theta ,\varphi ,V_{r},V_{\theta },V_{\varphi })={C_{0} \over V_{0}^{3}}{\sqrt {V_{0}^{2} \over 2Q}},

where

C_{0}=2\pi ^{-2}\rho _{0}

is a normalisation constant, which has the dimension of (mass) density. And we define a (positive enthalpy-like dimension

{\text{km}}^{2}/{\text{s}}^{2}

) Quantity

Q[\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ]\equiv \left[0,\left(-V_{0}^{2}-E\right)+{J^{2} \over 2r_{0}^{2}}\right]_{\max }\left[{J_{z} \over |J_{z}|},0\right]_{\max }.

Clearly anti-clockwise rotating stars with

J_{z}\leq 0,~~Q=0

are excluded.

It is easy to see in spherical coordinates that

$J^{2}=r^{2}V_{t}^{2}=r^{2}(V_{\theta }^{2}+V_{\varphi }^{2}),$

$J_{z}=V_{\varphi }r\sin \theta ,$

$E={V_{r}^{2}+V_{t}^{2} \over 2}+\Phi (r),~V_{t}\equiv {\sqrt {V_{\theta }^{2}+V_{\varphi }^{2}}}$

Insert the potential and these definitions of the orbital energy E and angular momentum J and its z-component Jz along every stellar orbit, we have

2Q={\text{Heaviside}}\left({V_{\varphi } \over |V_{\varphi }|}\right)\times \left[V_{0}^{2}\left(1-{r^{2} \over r_{0}^{2}}\right)-V_{r}^{2}-\left(1-{r^{2} \over r_{0}^{2}}\right){\left(V_{\theta }^{2}+V_{\varphi }^{2}\right)},0\right]_{\max },

which implies

|V_{r}|\leq V_{e}(r)

, and

|V_{\theta }|,V_{\varphi }

between zero and

V_{0}

.

To verify the above $E,~J_{z}$ being constants of motion in our spherical potential, we note

dE/dt={\partial E \over \partial t}+\mathbf {v} {\partial E \over \partial \mathbf {x} }+(\mathbf {-\nabla \Phi } ){\partial E \over \partial \mathbf {v} }

dE/dt={\partial \Phi  \over \partial t}+\mathbf {v} {\partial \Phi  \over \partial \mathbf {x} }+(\mathbf {-\nabla \Phi } )\mathbf {v} ={\partial \Phi  \over \partial t}=0

for any "steady state" potential.

dJ_{z}/dt={\partial J_{z} \over \partial t}+{\partial J_{z} \over \partial \mathbf {x} }\cdot \mathbf {v} -(\mathbf {\nabla \Phi } )\cdot {\partial J_{z} \over \partial \mathbf {v} },

which reduces to

dJ_{z}/dt=0+[(V_{y})V_{x}+(-V_{x})V_{y}]-\left[(-y){x \over R}{\partial \Phi (R,z) \over \partial R}+(x){y \over R}{\partial \Phi (R,z) \over \partial R}\right]=0

around the z-axis of any axisymmetric potential, where

{\textstyle R={\sqrt {x^{2}+y^{2}}}}

.

Likewise the x and y components of the angular momentum are also conserved for a spherical potential. Hence $dJ/dt=0$ .

So for any time-independent spherical potential (including our uniform sphere model), the orbital energy E and angular momentum J and its z-component Jz along every stellar orbit satisfy

dE[\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ]/dt=dJ[\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ]/dt=dJ_{z}[\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ]/dt=0.

Hence using the chain rule, we have

{d \over dt}Q(E[\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ],J[\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ],J_{z}[\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ])={\partial Q \over \partial E}{dE \over dt}+{\partial Q \over \partial J_{z}}{dJ_{z} \over dt}+{\partial Q \over \partial J}{dJ \over dt}=0,

i.e.,

{\textstyle {d \over dt}f=f'(Q){dQ[\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ] \over dt}=0}

, so that CBE is satisfied, i.e., our

f(\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} )=f(E[\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ],J[\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ],J_{z}[\mathbf {x} ,\mathbf {v} ])

is a solution to the Collisionless Boltzmann Equation for our static spherical potential.

A worked example on moments of distribution functions in a uniform spherical cluster[edit]

We can find out various moments of the above distribution function, reformatted as with the help of three Heaviside functions,

f(|\mathbf {r} |,V_{r},V_{\theta },V_{\varphi })={C_{0} \over V_{0}^{3}}\left.{{\text{H}}(1-x) \over \left(1-x^{2}\right)^{1 \over 2}}\right|_{x\equiv {|\mathbf {r} | \over r_{0}}}{{\text{H}}(V_{\varphi }){\text{H}}(1-q) \over (1-q)^{1 \over 2}},~~q(\mathbf {r} ,\mathbf {V} )\equiv {V_{r}^{2} \over V_{e}(|\mathbf {r} |)^{2}}+{V_{\theta }^{2} \over V_{0}^{2}}+{V_{\varphi }^{2} \over V_{0}^{2}},

once we input the expression for the earlier potential

\Phi (r)

inside

r\leq r_{0}

, or even better the speed to "escape from r to the edge"

r_{0}

of a uniform sphere

V_{e}(r)=V_{0}{\sqrt {1-{r^{2} \over r_{0}^{2}}}}.

Clearly the factor

{V_{e}(|\mathbf {r} |) \over {\sqrt {2Q}}}={\sqrt {\max[0,{1 \over 1-q}]}}

in the DF (distribution function) is well-defined only if

Q\geq 0\rightarrow q\leq 1

, which implies a narrow range on radius

0\leq |\mathbf {r} |<r_{0}

and excludes high velocity particles, e.g.,

V_{t}>V_{0}>V_{e}(r)

, from the distribution function (DF, i.e., phase space density).

In fact, the positivity carves the ( $V_{\varphi }\geq 0$ ) left-half of an ellipsoid in the $[V_{r},V_{\theta },V_{\varphi }]$ velocity space ("velocity ellipsoid"),

q(\mathbf {r} ,\mathbf {V} )\equiv {V_{r}^{2} \over V_{0}^{2}(1-r^{2}/r_{0}^{2})}+\left({V_{\theta }^{2} \over V_{0}^{2}}+{V_{\varphi }^{2} \over V_{0}^{2}}\right)\equiv u_{r}^{2}+u_{\theta }^{2}+u_{\varphi }^{2}\leq 1,

where

(u_{r},u_{\theta },u_{\varphi })

is

(V_{r},V_{\theta },V_{\varphi })

rescaled by the function

V_{e}(r)=V_{0}{\sqrt {1-r^{2}/r_{0}^{2}}}

or

V_{0}

respectively.

The velocity ellipsoid (in this case) has rotational symmetry around the r axis or $V_{r}$ axis. It is more squashed (in this case) away from the radial direction, hence more tangentially anisotropic because everywhere $V_{e}(r)<V_{0}$ , except at the origin, where the ellipsoid looks isotropic. Now we compute the moments of the phase space.

E.g., the resulting density (moment) is

{\begin{aligned}\rho (r,\theta ,\varphi )&=\int _{-V_{e}(r)}^{V_{e}(r)}dV_{r}\int _{-V_{0}}^{V_{0}}dV_{\theta }\int _{0}^{V_{0}}dV_{\varphi }{C_{0} \over V_{0}^{3}}\left({2Q \over V_{0}^{2}}\right)^{-1/2}\\&=\int _{-1}^{1}\int _{-1}^{1}\int _{0}^{1}{(V_{e}du_{r})(V_{0}du_{\theta })(V_{0}du_{\varphi })C_{0} \over V_{0}^{3}(1-r^{2}/r_{0}^{2})^{1/2}(1-q)^{1/2}}\left.\right|_{q=u_{r}^{2}+u_{\theta }^{2}+u_{\varphi }^{2}}\\&=C_{0}{\int _{0}^{1}(1-u^{2})^{-1/2}(2\pi u^{2}du)}=\rho _{0}\end{aligned}}

is indeed a spherical (angle-independent) and uniform (radius-independent) density inside the edge, where the normalisation constant

C_{0}=2\pi ^{-2}\rho _{0}

.

The streaming velocity is computed as the weighted mean of the velocity vector

{\begin{aligned}\langle \mathbf {V} \rangle (\mathbf {x} )&\equiv {\int fd\mathbf {V} ^{3}\mathbf {V}  \over \int fd\mathbf {V} ^{3}}\\&={1 \over \rho }\int fd\mathbf {V} ^{3}[V_{r},V_{\theta },V_{\varphi }]{C_{0}V_{0}^{2}(2Q)^{-1/2}}\\&=\left[{\int _{-1}^{1}\!\!u_{r}...du_{r},~~\int _{-1}^{1}\!\!u_{\theta }...du_{\theta },~~\int _{0}^{1}(2du_{r})\int _{0}^{\sqrt {1-u_{r}^{2}}}\!\!(2du_{\theta })\int _{0}^{\sqrt {1-u_{r}^{2}-u_{\theta }^{2}}}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!{du_{\varphi }u_{\varphi }V_{0} \over (1-u_{r}^{2}-u_{\theta }^{2}-u_{\varphi }^{2})^{1/2}} \over \int _{0}^{1}(2\pi UdU)\int _{0}^{\sqrt {1-U^{2}}}du_{\varphi }(1-U^{2}-u_{\varphi }^{2})^{-1/2}}\right]\\&=\left[0,0,{4V_{0} \over 3\pi }\right]={\overline {\mathbf {V} (\mathbf {x} )}},\end{aligned}}

where the global average (indicated by the overline bar) of flow implies uniform pattern of flat azimuthal rotation, but zero net streaming everywhere in the meridional

(r,\theta )

plane.

Incidentally, the angular momentum global average of this flat-rotation sphere is

{\overline {\mathbf {r} \times \langle \mathbf {V} \rangle }}=\int _{0}^{r_{0}}{(\rho 4\pi r^{2}dr) \over M_{0}}[0,0,r\langle V_{\varphi }\rangle ]=[0,0,{3r_{0} \over 4}{\overline {V_{\varphi }}}].

Note global average of centre of mass does not change, so

{\overline {\mathbf {V} _{i}(\mathbf {x} )}}=0

due to global momentum conservation in each rectangular direction

i=x,y,z

, and this does not contradict the global non-zero rotation.

Likewise thanks to the symmetry of $f(r,\theta ,\varphi ,V_{r},V_{\theta },V_{\varphi })=f(r,\theta ,\pm \varphi ,\pm V_{r},\pm V_{\theta },V_{\varphi })$ , we have $\langle \mathbf {(\pm V_{r})V_{\varphi }} \rangle =0$ , $~\langle \mathbf {(\pm V_{\theta })V_{\varphi }} \rangle =0$ , $~\langle \mathbf {(\pm V_{r})V_{\theta }} \rangle =0$ everywhere}.

Likewise the rms velocity in the rotation direction is computed by a weighted mean as follows, E.g.,

{\begin{aligned}\langle \mathbf {V} _{\varphi }^{2}\rangle (|\mathbf {x} |)&\equiv {\int fd\mathbf {V} ^{3}V_{\varphi }^{2} \over \rho (|\mathbf {r} |)}\\&={\int _{0}^{1}(2du_{r})\int _{0}^{\sqrt {1-u_{r}^{2}}}(2du_{\theta })\int _{0}^{\sqrt {1-u_{r}^{2}-u_{\theta }^{2}}}du_{\varphi }{(u_{\varphi }V_{0})^{2} \over (1-q)^{1/2}} \over \int _{0}^{1}{(2\pi u^{2}du)(1-u^{2})^{-1/2}}}\\&=0.25V_{0}^{2}=0.5\langle V_{t}^{2}\rangle \\&={\!\!\int _{0}^{1}(2du_{r})\!\!\int _{0}^{\sqrt {1-u_{r}^{2}}}(2du_{\varphi })\!\!\int _{0}^{\sqrt {1-u_{r}^{2}-u_{\varphi }^{2}}}du_{\theta }{(u_{\theta }V_{0})^{2} \over (1-q)^{1/2}} \over \int _{0}^{1}{(2\pi u^{2}du)(1-u^{2})^{-1/2}}}\\&=\langle \mathbf {V} _{\theta }^{2}\rangle (|\mathbf {x} |),\\\end{aligned}}

Here $\langle V_{t}^{2}\rangle =\langle V_{\theta }^{2}+V_{\varphi }^{2}\rangle =0.5V_{0}^{2}.$

Likewise

\langle \mathbf {V} _{r}^{2}\rangle (\mathbf {x} )={\!\!\int _{0}^{1}(du_{\varphi })\int _{0}^{\sqrt {1-u_{\varphi }^{2}}}\!\!(2du_{\theta })\!\!\int _{0}^{\sqrt {1-u_{\varphi }^{2}-u_{\theta }^{2}}}\!\!\!{(2du_{r})(u_{r}V_{e}(r))^{2} \over (1-q)^{1/2}} \over \int _{0}^{1}{(2\pi u^{2}du)(1-u^{2})^{-1/2}}}=\left({V_{0} \over 2}{\sqrt {1-{r^{2} \over r_{0}^{2}}}}\right)^{2}.

So the pressure tensor or dispersion tensor is

{\begin{aligned}\sigma _{ij}^{2}(\mathbf {r} )=&{P_{ij}(\mathbf {r} ) \over \rho (\mathbf {r} )}\\=&\langle \mathbf {V} _{i}\mathbf {V} _{j}\rangle -\langle \mathbf {V} _{i}\rangle \langle \mathbf {V} _{j}\rangle \\=&{\begin{bmatrix}\left[1-({r \over r_{0}})^{2}\right]\left({V_{0} \over 2}\right)^{2}&0&0\\0&\left({V_{0} \over 2}\right)^{2}&0\\0&0&\left[1-({8 \over 3\pi })^{2}\right]\left({V_{0} \over 2}\right)^{2}\end{bmatrix}}\end{aligned}}

with zero off-diagonal terms because of the symmetric velocity distribution. Note while there is no Dark Matter in producing the previous flat rotation curve, the price is shown by the reduction factor

{8 \over 3\pi }=0.8488

in the random velocity spread in the azimuthal direction. Among the diagonal dispersion tensor moments,

\sigma _{\theta }\equiv {\sqrt {\sigma _{\theta \theta }^{2}}}=0.5V_{0}

is the biggest among the three at all radii, and

\sigma _{\varphi }\equiv {\sqrt {\sigma _{\varphi \varphi }^{2}}}\geq \sigma _{r}\equiv {\sqrt {\sigma _{rr}^{2}}}

only near the edge between

0.8488r_{0}\leq r\leq r_{0}

.

The larger tangential kinetic energy than that of radial motion seen in the diagonal dispersions is often phrased by an anisotropy parameter

\beta (r)\equiv 1-{0.5\langle {\mathbf {V} _{t}}^{2}(|\mathbf {r} |)\rangle  \over \langle {\mathbf {V} _{r}}^{2}\rangle (|\mathbf {r} |)}=1-{\langle {\mathbf {V} _{\theta }}^{2}(|\mathbf {r} |)\rangle  \over \langle {\mathbf {V} _{r}}^{2}\rangle (|\mathbf {r} |)}=-{r^{2} \over r_{0}^{2}-r^{2}}\leq 0;

a positive anisotropy would have meant that radial motion dominated, and a negative anisotropy means that tangential motion dominates (as in this uniform sphere).

A worked example of Virial Theorem[edit]

Twice kinetic energy per unit mass of the above uniform sphere is

{\begin{aligned}{2K \over M_{0}}&={\overline {\langle V^{2}\rangle }}\equiv \langle {\overline {V^{2}}}\rangle \\&=M_{0}^{-1}\int _{0}^{M_{0}}\langle V_{\theta }^{2}+V_{\varphi }^{2}+V_{r}^{2}\rangle dM\\&=M_{0}^{-1}\int _{0}^{1}\left({V_{0}^{2} \over 4}+{V_{0}^{2} \over 4}+{(1-x^{2})V_{0}^{2} \over 4}\right)d(x^{3}M_{0})=0.6V_{0}^{2},~~x\equiv {r \over r_{0}}=\left({M \over M_{0}}\right)^{1 \over 3},\end{aligned}}

which balances the potential energy per unit mass of the uniform sphere, inside which

M\propto r^{3}\propto x^{3}

.

The average Virial per unit mass can be computed from averaging its local value $\mathbf {r} \cdot (-\mathbf {\nabla } \Phi )$ , which yields

{\begin{aligned}{W \over M_{0}}&={\overline {\mathbf {r} \cdot (-\mathbf {\nabla } \Phi )}}\\&=M_{0}^{-1}\int _{0}^{r_{0}}\mathbf {r} \cdot {-GM\mathbf {r}  \over |\mathbf {r} |^{3}}(\rho d\mathbf {r} ^{3})=-M_{0}^{-1}\int _{0}^{M_{0}}{GM \over |\mathbf {r} |}dM\\&=-M_{0}^{-1}\int _{0}^{M_{0}}{GM~dM \over r_{0}~(M/M_{0})^{1 \over 3}}=-{3GM_{0} \over 5r_{0}}=-0.6V_{0}^{2},\end{aligned}}

as required by the Virial Theorem. For this self-gravitating sphere, we can also verify that the virial per unit mass equals the averages of half of the potential

{\begin{aligned}{E_{\text{pot}} \over M_{0}}&={\overline {\langle {\Phi  \over 2}\rangle }}\\&=M_{0}^{-1}\int _{x>0}^{x<1}{\Phi (r_{0}x) \over 2}d(M_{0}x^{3})\\&={W \over M_{0}}={-2K \over M_{0}}.\end{aligned}}

Hence we have verified the validity of Virial Theorem for a uniform sphere under self-gravity, i.e., the gravity due to the mass density of the stars is also the gravity that stars move in self-consistently; no additional dark matter halo contributes to its potential, for example.

A worked example of Jeans Equation in a uniform sphere[edit]

Jeans Equation is a relation on how the pressure gradient of a system should be balancing the potential gradient for an equilibrium galaxy. In our uniform sphere, the potential gradient or gravity is

\nabla \Phi ={d\Phi  \over dr}={\Omega ^{2}r}\geq 0,~~\Omega ={V_{0} \over r_{0}}.

The radial pressure gradient

-{d(\rho \sigma _{r}^{2}) \over \rho dr}=-{d\sigma _{r}^{2} \over dr}-{\sigma _{r}^{2} \over r}{d\log \rho  \over d\log r}={\Omega ^{2}r \over 2}+0\geq 0.

The reason for the discrepancy is partly due to centrifugal force

{{\bar {V}}_{\varphi }^{2} \over r}={(0.8488V_{0})^{2} \over r}>0,

and partly due to anisotropic pressure

{\begin{aligned}{(\sigma _{\theta }^{2}-\sigma _{r}^{2}) \over r}&=0.25\Omega ^{2}r\geq 0\\{(\sigma _{\varphi }^{2}-\sigma _{r}^{2}) \over r}&=0.25\Omega ^{2}r-{0.1801V_{0}^{2} \over r}=\pm ,\end{aligned}}

so

0.2643V_{0}=\sigma _{\varphi }<\sigma _{r}=0.5V_{0}

at the very centre, but the two balance at radius

r=0.8488r_{0}

, and then reverse to

0.2643V_{0}=\sigma _{\varphi }>\sigma _{r}=0

at the very edge.

Now we can verify that

{\begin{aligned}{\partial \langle V_{r}\rangle  \over \partial t}&=(-\sum _{i=x,y,z}V_{i}\partial _{i}\langle V_{r}\rangle )-{\cancel {\langle V_{r}\rangle  \over t_{\text{fric}}}}-\nabla _{r}\Phi +\sum _{i=x,y,z}{-\partial _{i}(n\sigma _{ir}^{2}) \over n}\\&={{\bar {V}}_{\theta }^{2}+{\bar {V}}_{\varphi }^{2}-2{\bar {V}}_{r}^{2} \over r}-0-{\partial \Phi  \over \partial r}+\left[-{d(\rho \sigma _{r}^{2}) \over \rho dr}+{\sigma _{\theta }^{2}+\sigma _{\varphi }^{2}-2\sigma _{r}^{2} \over r}\right]\\&={0+(0.4244V_{0})^{2}-2\times 0 \over r}-(\Omega ^{2}r)+\\&\left[{\Omega ^{2}r \over 2}+{(0.5V_{0})^{2}+(0.2643V_{0})^{2}-2\times 0.25\Omega ^{2}(r_{0}^{2}-r^{2}) \over r}\right]\\&=0.\end{aligned}}

Here the 1st line above is essentially the Jeans equation in the r-direction, which reduces to the 2nd line, the Jeans equation in an anisotropic (aka

\beta \neq 0

) rotational (aka

\langle V_{\varphi }\rangle \neq 0

) axisymmetric (

\partial _{\varphi }\Phi (\mathbf {x} ,t)=0

) sphere (aka

\partial _{\theta }n(\mathbf {x} ,t)=0

) after much coordinate manipulations of the dispersion tensor; similar equation of motion can be obtained for the two tangential direction, e.g.,

{\partial \langle V_{\varphi }\rangle  \over \partial t}

, which are useful in modelling ocean currents on the rotating earth surface or angular momentum transfer in accretion disks, where the frictional term

-{\langle V_{\varphi }\rangle  \over t_{\text{fric}}}

is important. The fact that the l.h.s.

{\partial V_{r} \over \partial t}=0

means that the force is balanced on the r.h.s. for this uniform (aka

\nabla _{\mathbf {x} }mn(\mathbf {x} ,t)=0

) spherical model of a galaxy (cluster) to stay in a steady state (aka time-independent equilibrium

{\partial n(\mathbf {x} ,t) \over \partial t}=0

everywhere) statically (aka with zero flow

\langle \mathbf {V} (\mathbf {x} ,t)\rangle =0

everywhere). Note systems like accretion disk can have a steady net radial inflow

\langle \mathbf {V} (\mathbf {x} )\rangle <0

everywhere at all time.

A worked example of Jeans equation in a thick disk[edit]

Consider again the thick disk potential in the above example. If the density is that of a gas fluid, then the pressure would be zero at the boundary $z=\pm z_{0}$ . To find the peak of the pressure, we note that

P(R,z)=\int _{z}^{z_{0}}\partial _{z}\Phi \rho (R)dz=\rho (R)[\Phi (R,z_{0})-\Phi (R,z)].

So the fluid temperature per unit mass, i.e., the 1-dimensional velocity dispersion squared would be

\sigma ^{2}(R,z)={P(R,z) \over \rho (R)},~~|z|\leq z_{0}

\sigma ^{2}={GM_{0} \over 2z_{0}}\log {Q(z)Q(-z) \over Q(z_{0})Q(-z_{0})},~~Q(z)\equiv R_{0}+z_{0}+z+{\sqrt {R^{2}+(R_{0}+z_{0}+z)^{2}}}.

Along the rotational z-axis,

\sigma ^{2}(0,z)={GM_{0} \over 2z_{0}}\log {4(R_{0}+z_{0}+z)(R_{0}+z_{0}-z) \over 4R_{0}(R_{0}+2z_{0})}

\sigma (0,z)={\sqrt {GM_{0} \over 2z_{0}}}{\sqrt {\log {(R_{0}+z_{0})^{2}-z^{2} \over (R_{0}+z_{0})^{2}-z_{0}^{2}}}},

which is clearly the highest at the centre and zero at the boundaries

z=\pm z_{0}

. Both the pressure and the dispersion peak at the midplane

z=0

. In fact the hottest and densest point is the centre, where

P(0,0)={M_{0} \over 4\pi R_{0}^{2}z_{0}}{-GM_{0}\log[1-(1+R_{0}/z_{0})^{-2}] \over 2z_{0}}.

A recap on worked examples on Jeans Eq., Virial and Phase space density[edit]

Having looking at the a few applications of Poisson Eq. and Phase space density and especially the Jeans equation, we can extract a general theme, again using the Spherical cow approach.

Jeans equation links gravity with pressure gradient, it is a generalisation of the Eq. of Motion for single particles. While Jeans equation can be solved in disk systems, the most user-friendly version of the Jeans eq. is the spherical anisotropic version for a static $\langle {v_{j}}\rangle =0$ frictionless system $t_{\text{fric}}\rightarrow \infty$ , hence the local velocity speed $\sigma _{j}^{2}(r)=\langle {v_{j}^{2}}\rangle (r)-\underbrace {\langle {v_{j}}\rangle ^{2}(r)} _{=0}={\int \limits _{\infty }\!\!dv_{r}dv_{\theta }dv_{\varphi }({v}_{j}-\overbrace {\langle {v}\rangle _{j}^{p}} ^{=0})^{2}f_{p} \over \int \limits _{\infty }\!\!dv_{r}dv_{\theta }dv_{\varphi }f_{p}},$ everywhere for each of the three directions $~_{j}=~_{r},~_{\theta },~_{\varphi }$ . One can project the phase space into these moments, which is easily if in a highly spherical system, which admits conservations of energy $E=$ and angular momentum J. The boundary of the system sets the integration range of the velocity bound in the system.

In summary, in the spherical Jeans eq.,

{\begin{aligned}{d\Phi  \over dr}=&{GM(r) \over r^{2}}\\=&-{d(n\langle {v_{r}^{2}}\rangle ) \over n(r)dr}+{\langle {v_{\theta }^{2}}\rangle +\langle {v_{\phi }^{2}}\rangle -2\langle {v_{r}^{2}}\rangle  \over r},\\=&-{d(n\langle {v_{r}^{2}}\rangle ) \over n(r)dr},~~{\text{hydrostatic equilibrium if isotropic velocity }}\\=&{\langle v_{t}^{2}\rangle  \over r},~~{\text{if purely centrifugal balancing of gravity with no radial motion}},\langle v_{t}^{2}\rangle \equiv \langle {v_{\theta }^{2}}\rangle +\langle {v_{\phi }^{2}}\rangle \end{aligned}}

which matches the expectation from the Virial theorem

{\overline {r\partial _{r}\Phi }}={\overline {v_{\text{cir}}^{2}}}={\overline {GM \over r}}={\overline {\langle v_{t}^{2}\rangle }}

, or in other words, the

{\overline {\text{global average}}}

kinetic energy of an equilibrium equals the average kinetic energy on circular orbits with purely transverse motion.

References[edit]

^ ^a ^b ^c Murdin, Paul (2001). "Stellar Dynamics". Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics. Nature Publishing Group. p. 1. ISBN 978-0750304405.
^ https://cds.cern.ch/record/1053485/files/p37.pdf ^{[bare URL PDF]}
^ Binney, James; Tremaine, Scott (2008). Galactic Dynamics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 35, 63, 65, 698. ISBN 978-0-691-13027-9.
^ de Vita, Ruggero; Trenti, Michele; MacLeod, Morgan (2019-06-01). "Correlation between mass segregation and structural concentration in relaxed stellar clusters". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 485 (4): 5752–5760. arXiv:1903.07619. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz815. ISSN 0035-8711.
^ Binney, James. "Galaxy Dynamics" (PDF). Princeton University Press. Retrieved 4 January 2022.
^ Ostriker, Eva (1999). "Dynamical Friction in a Gaseous Medium". The Astrophysical Journal. 513 (1): 252. arXiv:astro-ph/9810324. Bibcode:1999ApJ...513..252O. doi:10.1086/306858. S2CID 16138105.
^ ^a ^b Sparke, Linda; Gallagher, John (2007). Galaxies in the Universe. New York: Cambridge. p. 131. ISBN 978-0521855938.
^ Henon, M (June 21, 1982). "Vlasov Equation?". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 114 (1): 211–212. Bibcode:1982A&A...114..211H.
^ Lynden-Bell, Donald (1962). "The stability and vibrations of a gas of stars". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 124 (4): 279–296. Bibcode:1962MNRAS.124..279L. doi:10.1093/mnras/124.4.279.
^ Einstein, Albert (2002). "A Simple Application of the Newtonian Law of Gravitation to Star Clusters" (PDF). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. 7: 230–233 – via Princeton University Press.
^ Zwicky, Fritz (2009). "Republication of: The redshift of extragalactic nebulae". General Relativity and Gravitation. 41 (1): 207–224. Bibcode:2009GReGr..41..207Z. doi:10.1007/s10714-008-0707-4. S2CID 119979381.
^ Choudhuri, Arnab Rai (2010). Astrophysics for Physicists. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 213–214. ISBN 978-0-521-81553-6.

[:0-1] Murdin, Paul (2001). "Stellar Dynamics". Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics. Nature Publishing Group. p. 1. ISBN 978-0750304405.

[2] ttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1053485/files/p37.pdf ^{[bare URL PDF]}

[:12-3] Binney, James; Tremaine, Scott (2008). Galactic Dynamics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 35, 63, 65, 698. ISBN 978-0-691-13027-9.

[4] Vita, Ruggero; Trenti, Michele; MacLeod, Morgan (2019-06-01). "Correlation between mass segregation and structural concentration in relaxed stellar clusters". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 485 (4): 5752–5760. arXiv:1903.07619. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz815. ISSN 0035-8711.

[Galaxy_Dynamics-5] Binney, James. "Galaxy Dynamics" (PDF). Princeton University Press. Retrieved 4 January 2022.

[6] Ostriker, Eva (1999). "Dynamical Friction in a Gaseous Medium". The Astrophysical Journal. 513 (1): 252. arXiv:astro-ph/9810324. Bibcode:1999ApJ...513..252O. doi:10.1086/306858. S2CID 16138105.

[:2-7] Sparke, Linda; Gallagher, John (2007). Galaxies in the Universe. New York: Cambridge. p. 131. ISBN 978-0521855938.

[8] Henon, M (June 21, 1982). "Vlasov Equation?". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 114 (1): 211–212. Bibcode:1982A&A...114..211H.

[9] Lynden-Bell, Donald (1962). "The stability and vibrations of a gas of stars". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 124 (4): 279–296. Bibcode:1962MNRAS.124..279L. doi:10.1093/mnras/124.4.279.

[10] Einstein, Albert (2002). "A Simple Application of the Newtonian Law of Gravitation to Star Clusters" (PDF). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. 7: 230–233 – via Princeton University Press.

[11] Zwicky, Fritz (2009). "Republication of: The redshift of extragalactic nebulae". General Relativity and Gravitation. 41 (1): 207–224. Bibcode:2009GReGr..41..207Z. doi:10.1007/s10714-008-0707-4. S2CID 119979381.

[12] Choudhuri, Arnab Rai (2010). Astrophysics for Physicists. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 213–214. ISBN 978-0-521-81553-6.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

Connection with fluid dynamics[edit]

Connection with Kepler problem and 3-body problem[edit]

Concept of a gravitational potential field[edit]

An example of the Poisson Equation and escape speed in a uniform sphere[edit]

Key concepts[edit]

Relativistic Approximations[edit]

SR and GR[edit]

Eddington Limit[edit]

Loss cone[edit]

Tidal disruption radius[edit]

Radius of sphere of influence[edit]

Connections between star loss cone and gravitational gas accretion physics[edit]

Gravitational dynamical friction[edit]

Dynamical friction time vs Crossing time in a virialised system[edit]

More rigorous formulation of dynamical friction[edit]

Gravitational encounters and relaxation[edit]

Mean free path[edit]

Weak encounters[edit]

Relation between friction and relaxation[edit]

A Spherical-Cow Summary of Continuity Eq. in Collisional and Collisionless Processes[edit]

Connections to statistical mechanics and plasma physics[edit]

Convention and notation in case of a thermal distribution[edit]

The CBE[edit]

Probability-weighted moments and hydrostatic equilibrium[edit]

Applications and examples[edit]

A unified thick disk potential[edit]

A worked example of gravity vector field in a thick disk[edit]

Density of a thick disk from Poisson Equation[edit]

Surface density and mass of a thick disk[edit]

Oscillation frequencies in a thick disk[edit]

A worked example for neutrinos in galaxies[edit]

A Recap on Harmonic Motions in Uniform Sphere Potential[edit]

Example on Jeans theorem and CBE on Uniform Sphere Potential[edit]

A worked example on moments of distribution functions in a uniform spherical cluster[edit]

A worked example of Virial Theorem[edit]

A worked example of Jeans Equation in a uniform sphere[edit]

A worked example of Jeans equation in a thick disk[edit]

A recap on worked examples on Jeans Eq., Virial and Phase space density[edit]

See also[edit]

Further reading[edit]

References[edit]

Leave a Reply