This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Neuroscience High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 February 2020 and 2 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wilchuskycb.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 April 2020 and 20 July 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Spencershumate.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2020 and 25 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lharmer96.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No! It is not "obvious" that autism is a drawback. Please see autistic culture. It is important to separate autism from negative features of or associated with autism. Also, savants are a case in point of why IQ tests are unreliable. Savants tend to have lower cognitive abilities in some, sometimes many areas of aptitude, but it is important to avoid the implication that they are necessarily less intelligent, when "intelligence" is a social construct. If there is such as think as "intelligence", then we certainly aren't at a point where we can claim to quantify it. Philolexica (talk) 02:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've rephrased that to "Autistic individuals are more likely to have savant skills so, for them, the most obvious drawback could be the drawbacks they link to autism itself." Maybe not an ideal rewrite, but I think some autists do find it a drawback. I do not find having Osteogenesis imperfecta to be all that negative, but I know of OIs who very much do. So I would imagine some autists do find it frustrating or a "drawback."--T. Anthony (talk) 12:36, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Exceptional memory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090124130649/http://www.gordonresearch.com/articles_autism/SciAm-Islands_of_Genius.pdf to http://www.gordonresearch.com/articles_autism/SciAm-Islands_of_Genius.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100626002913/http://www.wisconsinmedicalsociety.org/savant_syndrome/savant_profiles/tony_deblois to http://www.wisconsinmedicalsociety.org/savant_syndrome/savant_profiles/tony_deblois
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100625235117/http://www.wisconsinmedicalsociety.org/savant_syndrome/savant_profiles/derek_paravicini to http://www.wisconsinmedicalsociety.org/savant_syndrome/savant_profiles/derek_paravicini

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would propose the following edits to this article to improve its specificity and to adhere to standard Wikipedia best practices.

• Elaboration to the introduction to provide a short summary of the entire article. Personally, I would recommend including a brief summary of each of the sections, with about a sentence for each.
• Add to hyperthymesia's drawbacks to include that affected individuals do not appear to have superior memory in other cases (and cite studies on their digit span and susceptibility to the DRM task.
• Regarding the changes made by Wilchuskycb on "S," I think the historical context for it is a valid inclusion. In the interest of parallelism, I think it is important to include S.F.'s techniques for memorization as they were used in the lab, as well as the limited scope with which these mnemonic devices were effective (negligible effects on episodic memory, etc.)

--Jangofett27 (talk) 22:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will be attempting to make some more significant changes to this article in efforts to expound and develop it a bit more. I will link my sandbox to display the changes that I am intending to make. The major change will be adding a section called "Synesthesia." This is a section that is worth adding because even though synesthesia can be considered a mnemonic device, having its own section can elaborate a bit more on how it can apply to exceptional memory altogether. My goal is to focus on exceptional memory as a whole and bring the main topic together through these sections rather than give short summaries of other articles that can easily be searched. Here is a link to my sandbox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Spencershumate/sandbox.Spencershumate (talk) 00:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]