Cannabis Ruderalis

A flintlock blunderbuss, built for Tipu Sultan[1]

The blunderbuss is a 17th- to mid-19th-century firearm with a short, large caliber barrel which is commonly flared at the muzzle, to help aid in the loading of shot and other projectiles of relevant quantity or caliber. The blunderbuss is commonly considered to be an early predecessor of the modern shotgun, with similar military usage.[2] It was effective only at short range, lacking accuracy at long distances. A blunderbuss in handgun form was called a dragon, and it is from this that the term dragoon evolved.[3][4]

Etymology[edit]

An English flintlock blunderbuss

The term "blunderbuss" is of Dutch origin, from the Dutch word donderbus, which is a combination of donder, meaning "thunder", and bus, meaning "container, tin" (Middle Dutch: busse, box, jar, from Latin buxus, box tree).[2]

The transition from donder to blunder is thought by some to be deliberate; the term blunder was originally used in a transitive sense, synonymous with to confuse, and this is thought to describe the stunningly loud report of the large-bore, short-barreled blunderbuss.[3][failed verification] The term dragon is taken from the fact that early versions were decorated with a carving in the form of a mythic dragon's head around the muzzle; the muzzle blast would then give the impression of a fire-breathing dragon.[4]

Design and use[edit]

A French blunderbuss, called an espingole, 1760, France
Musketoon, blunderbuss and coach gun from the American Civil War era

The flared muzzle is the defining feature of the blunderbuss, differentiating it from large caliber carbines; the distinction between the blunderbuss and the musketoon is less distinct, as musketoons were also used to fire shot, and some had flared barrels.[5][6][7] The muzzle (and often the bore) was flared with the intent not only to increase the spread of the shot, but also to funnel powder and shot into the weapon, making it easier to reload on horseback or on a moving carriage; modern experiments corroborated the dramatic improvement in shot spread, going from a 530-millimetre-spread (21-inch) diameter from a straight barrel to an average of 970 mm (38 in) spread at 9 metres (10 yards).[8]

Blunderbusses were typically short, with barrels under 60 centimetres (2 ft) in length, at a time when a typical musket barrel was over 90 cm (3 ft) long.[9][10] One source, describing arms from the early to middle 17th century, lists the barrel length of a wheel lock dragon at around 28 cm (11 in), compared to a 41 cm (16 in) length for a blunderbuss.[3]

The blunderbuss could be considered an early type of shotgun and served in many similar roles. Though some old accounts may list the blunderbuss as being loaded with various scrap iron, rocks, or wood, which might well result in damage to the bore of the gun, it was typically loaded with a number of lead balls smaller than the bore diameter. Barrels were made of steel or brass.

A blunderbuss pistol, or dragon, found at a battlefield in Cerro Gordo, Veracruz, Mexico
An 1808 Harper's Ferry blunderbuss, of the type carried on the Lewis and Clark Expedition
A pair of early blunderbuss pistols from Poland fitted with the miquelet lock
A recreation of one of Lewis and Clark's pirogues with a blunderbuss mounted to the bow with a pintle

The blunderbuss, and especially the dragon, was typically issued to troops such as cavalry, who needed a lightweight, easily handled firearm.[10] The dragon became so associated with cavalry and mounted infantry that the term dragoon became synonymous with mounted infantry. In addition to the cavalry, the blunderbuss found a use for other duties in which the shotgun-like qualities were desirable, such as for guarding prisoners or defending a mail coach, and its use for urban combat was also recognized.[4][11] Blunderbusses were also commonly carried by officers on naval warships, by privateers and by pirates for use in close-quarters boarding actions.[12] The Portuguese Marines used it widely in the 17th century. Many types of ammunition, including gravel and sand, could be shot in a pinch, but most of the time they were shot using traditional lead balls.

The blunderbuss used by the British Royal Mail during the period of 1788–1816 was a flintlock with a 36 cm (14 in) long flared brass barrel, brass trigger guard, and an iron trigger and lock. A typical British mail coach would have a single postal employee on board, armed with a blunderbuss and a pair of pistols to guard the mail from highwaymen.[13] One 18th century coaching blunderbuss in another British collection had a brass barrel 43 cm (17 in) long, flaring to 51 mm (2 in) at the muzzle; it was also provided with a spring-loaded bayonet, which was held along the barrel by a catch and would spring forward into place when released.[7] Spring-loaded bayonet blunderbusses were also used by the Nottingham City Police after its formation around 1840.[14]

While the blunderbuss is often associated with the Plymouth Colony Pilgrims of 1620,[15] evidence suggests that the blunderbuss was relatively scarce in the American colonies. After the Battle of Lexington in 1775, British General Thomas Gage occupied Boston, Massachusetts, and upon negotiating with the town committee, Gage agreed to let the inhabitants of Boston leave town with their families and effects if they surrendered all arms. While most of the residents of Boston stayed, those who left under the agreement surrendered 1,778 long arms, 634 pistols, 273 bayonets, and only 38 blunderbusses.[16] The blunderbuss did still have its civilian applications, however; the Lewis and Clark Expedition carried a number of blunderbusses, some of which were mounted and used as small swivel guns on the pirogues.[6]

Crude tripwire activated blunderbusses, known as alarm guns, spring guns and cemetery guns,[17] were set up in graveyards and country estates to scare away poachers and resurrection men, and to alert the gamekeeper or sexton to their presence.[18][19]

By the middle of the 19th century, the blunderbuss was replaced for military use by the carbine, but still found use by civilians as a defensive firearm.[20][21]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, your New York.
  2. ^ a b Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Blunderbuss" . Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  3. ^ a b c Sibbald Mike Lier (1868). The British Army: Its Origin, Progress, and Equipment. Cassell, Petter, Galpin. pp. 33, 302–304.
  4. ^ a b c George Elliot Voyle, G. de Saint-Clair-Stevenson (1876). A Military Dictionary. W. Clowes & Sons. pp. 43, 114.
  5. ^ "Musketoon (AAA2517)". National Maritime Museum. Archived from the original on 2009-02-01.
  6. ^ a b Carrick, Michael (2005). "Thunder Gun". Discovering Lewis & Clark (published May 2005). Archived from the original on 2010-06-13. Retrieved 2017-04-28.
  7. ^ a b Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle upon Tyne (1905). Proceedings. Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle-upon-Tyne. p. 251.
  8. ^ "Myths of the Blunderbuss" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 20, 2023.
  9. ^ See Brown Bess.
  10. ^ a b Charles Francis Hoban (1853). Pennsylvania Archives., page 324, from a letter dated March 7, 1778
  11. ^ George Otto Trevelyan (1905). The American Revolution. Longmans, Green and co.
  12. ^ "Pirate Blunderbuss; A Blunt and Intimidating Weapon". www.gunclassics.com. Retrieved 6 April 2018.
  13. ^ The British Postal Museum and Archive. "Weapons". Archived from the original on 2008-08-07. Retrieved 2008-07-07.[dead link], see items OB1995.338 and OB1995.344
  14. ^ Mike Waldren. "Arming the police"., see section "1836 – Protection of Royal Palaces"
  15. ^ Archie Frederick Collins (1917). Shooting: For Boys. Moffat, Yard and company. pp. 33–34.
  16. ^ Abiel Holmes (1829). The Annals of America, Volume II. Hillard and Brown. p. 242.
  17. ^ Market Lavington museum
  18. ^ Royal armories
  19. ^ Craven museum
  20. ^ Edward Henry Knight (1876). Knight's American Mechanical Dictionary. Hurd and Houghton.
  21. ^ Henry Mayhew (1855). "Away with the Blunderbuss". Punch. Vol. XXVIII, no. 704. p. 2.

Leave a Reply