Please say exactly what other account or accounts have you have used. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 11:46, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NahalAhmed was:

The text of this submission has been removed from Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning biographies of living persons; we cannot accept such articles if they are unsourced, or contain unverifiable information which is potentially defamatory. All articles about living persons must conform to our biographies of living persons policy. In order to permit the author of this submission to provide sources that may satisfy the policy, the text of the page is available in the history.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Maybe it's WP:TOOSOON, Need more WP:RS and try to include more reference, make complete this article and again submit. i didn't find any good source Biography living person related.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nupur Sanon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nupur Sanon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Nahal^(T) 18:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shubhi89! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Nahal(T) 18:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Umesh Gautam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-Nahal^(T) 19:36, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NahalAhmed was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kavish Seth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kavish Seth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Nahal^(T) 20:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jitendra Tiwari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jitendra Tiwari (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 03:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ravana Samhita, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GirthSummit _(blether) 19:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I wanted to give you a bit more of a personal explanation of why I did this, in addition to the automated message above. There are a couple of problems with the article. First of all, the sources are problematic, since I'm not clear that any of them would be considered reliable sources. Ideally, we'd be looking for academic books by scholars discussing Ravana Samhita, explaining its significance within Hindu religion etc; the sources in the article appeared to be random blogs and websites discussing it, without any serious academic weight behind them. Another problem is that the article didn't really make it clear what the subject was - is this a real book, does it actually exist, or is it part of Hindu mythology? Please find some reliable sources discussing this subject, and use them to expand your draft before submitting via AfC. Please feel free to drop me a note on my talk page if you have any questions, or, if you prefer to reply here, please WP:PING me in your reply, and be sure to sign your post, so that I will receive a notification. Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 19:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Girth Summit: Hi there Mr Girth, I would like to Thank You for letting me work a bit more on the page Draft:Ravana Samhita, since i have added more wp:rs and have made the article more clear , i was wondering how to submit it for afc review as i was not getting any option to submit it, thus i request you to have a look at it and help me in submitting it for the review Thanks Again. Shubhi89 (talk) 13:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Shubhi89, you removed the AfC template from the top of the page - I've reinstated it, you should see the button again. If I'm honest with you though, I think you still need to be looking for better sourcing that that - some academic books written by recognised scholars would be good. I can't see 'Vimana: Flying Machines of the Ancients', for example, being taken very seriously as a WP:RS. GirthSummit _(blether) 13:24, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Girth Summit: oh really sorry , just realised i did that by mistake, THANKYOU for adding it back, as of now the sources which i have added are reliable one in Hindi language since they areone of the oldest Newspapers in india which includes Amrita Bazar Patrika, Navbharat Times and others,although I understand wp:rs,i would try to add more links into it. Thank You Shubhi89 (talk) 13:31, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Shubhi89, no worries. Regarding the sources, newspapers aren't ideal for this sort of subject - they're good for current events, but for a subject like this I'd be looking for academic, scholarly writing discussing the subject. GirthSummit _(blether) 13:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Girth Summit, Oops, i was not aware of this, and unkowingly i resubmitted the article a couple of minute back for the review, SORRY for the mess, will search for more academic, scholarly writing discussing the subject. Shubhi89 (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there I would like to ask you about the reason why you nominated Ahmad Irandoost article for deletion. Please provide some ways to improve it and eliminate errors. Thanks.  MrInfo2012  Talk  06:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#A3 "Don't tag under this criterion in the first few minutes after a new article is created" Leutha (talk) 14:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Leutha: Hello and sorry for placing the csd tag on the page Robert de Tiptoft, as i checked it and found that now (after you have edited) it does not meets the csd criteria under A3, so i have undid the tag placement, apologies :). Shubhi89 (talk) 14:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Akshay Bector, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 14:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Tukde Tukde Gang, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 14:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Cremica, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 14:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ravana Samhita and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ravana Samhita, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Garima Goel, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 16:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Puuung, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 14:03, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For your contribution on english wikipedia.

Rs7j (talk) 15:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Exam Warriors, does not have enough substantial sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 11:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you plan to work on this more - Draft:Tukde Tukde Gang? DTM (talk) 12:36, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @DiplomatTesterMan: yes Shubhi89 (talk) 08:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The basic requirement of WP:NFF is that you have to demonstrate a film has begun principal photography (filming) before you create an article about it. If it hasn't begun filming, we don't want an article. I have redirected Kabhi Eid Kabhi Diwali. Feel free to reinstate it when you can prove that shooting has begun. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tukde Tukde Gang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Page already exists in mainspace - "Tukde Tukde Gang"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DTM (talk) 07:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yuga Shahstra Yojana Par Bhanu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuga Shahstra Yojana Par Bhanu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 08:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kabhi Eid Kabhi Diwali, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

plz give me ur contact number i want talk with u about wikipedia whatsapp 9876243067

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rangoli Chandel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rangoli Chandel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brihaspati (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dj Dharak, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ravana Samhita, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shubhi89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Akshay Bector".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shubhi89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ravana Samhita".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shubhi89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cremica".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 18:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shubhi89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Puuung".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shubhi89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Exam Warriors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:40, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Exam Warriors, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 18:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shubhi89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dolly Parton Meme Challenge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:37, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shubhi89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Garima Goel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:41, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nirmika Singh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shubhi89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dj Dharak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shubhi89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kabhi Eid Kabhi Diwali".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:42, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agastya Jaiswal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agastya Jaiswal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--Smerus (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kavish Seth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject doesn't pass WP:MUSIC or GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SAMsohot (talk) 08:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Janhavi Panwar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject doesn't pass WP:GNG, WP:Academic, or WP:Entertainer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SAMsohot (talk) 08:42, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeeveshu Ahluwalia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeeveshu Ahluwalia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RPSkokie (talk) 07:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]