@JJMC89: If you're going to create a new dated maintenance category, please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Creating a dated maintenance category to get everything set up correctly. Thanks. Anomie⚔ 10:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anomie: Just a template requester here (one of those whom JJMC89 kindly offered to help with a messed-up situation; see Template talk:Incoherent). I have a question for you: given that this maintenance category is more in the nature of a rename/move of an existing one (Category:Wikipedia articles without coherent topic) than a brand new one, does that make setting up everything simpler/different? Please see Template talk:Incoherent#Template two 2 and the discussion prior to that for details.

It would seem to me that we need to have a cutover process, in which we more or less simultaneously delete Template:Incoherent, merge Template talk:Incoherent here, and rename the old Category to the new one. Is that correct? Mathglot (talk) Mathglot (talk) 00:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This template was created from Template:Incoherent-topic, not Template:Incoherent. T:Incoherent will need to be redirected or taken to WP:TFD. The categories from T:Incoherent should be deleted (WP:G8) if the template is redirected or deleted if not populated by another template. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Incoherent now redirects to Template:Unfocused. Mathglot (talk) 04:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can we add a section parameter that will replace "article" in the tag text with "section" and thus allow its use to tag unfocused sections?

{{unfocused|section}} would render as "This section may lack focus...".

Thanks, — kashmīrī ^TALK 09:44, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

​​​​​​|section=yes works. I'm not sure either are needed for this template though. Thoughts? — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]