Cannabis Indica

thcscience_admin

Top: Cocaine in the chair conformation of the tropane-ring, with only its tropane locants given.

Middle: Cocaine with its numerical substitution position locants.
2′ (6′) = ortho, 3′ (5′) = meta & 4′ = para

Bottom: Alternate two-dimensional molecular diagram of cocaine; shown specifically as a protonated, NH+, hydrochloride, and disregarding 3D stereochemistry

This is a list of cocaine analogues. A cocaine analogue is an (usually) artificial construct of a novel chemical compound from (often the starting point of natural) cocaine's molecular structure, with the result product sufficiently similar to cocaine to display similarity in, but alteration to, its chemical function. Within the scope of analogous compounds created from the structure of cocaine, so named "cocaine analogues" retain 3β-benzoyloxy or similar functionality (the term specifically used usually distinguishes from phenyltropanes, but in the broad sense generally, as a category, includes them) on a tropane skeleton, as compared to other stimulants of the kind. Many of the semi-synthetic cocaine analogues proper which have been made & studied have consisted of among the nine following classes of compounds:[a]

  • stereoisomers of cocaine
  • 3β-phenyl ring substituted analogues
  • 2β-substituted analogues
  • N-modified analogues of cocaine
  • 3β-carbamoyl analogues
  • 3β-alkyl-3-benzyl tropanes
  • 6/7-substituted cocaines
  • 6-alkyl-3-benzyl tropanes
  • piperidine homologues of cocaine

However strict analogues of cocaine would also include such other potential combinations as phenacyltropanes & other carbon branched replacements not listed above. The term may also be loosely used to refer to drugs manufactured from cocaine or having their basis as a total synthesis of cocaine, but modified to alter their effect & QSAR. These include both intracellular sodium channel blocker anaesthetics and stimulant dopamine reuptake inhibitor ligands (such as certain, namely tropane-bridged-excised, piperidines). Additionally, researchers have supported combinatorial approaches for taking the most promising analogues currently elucidated and mixing them to the end of discovering novel & efficacious compounds to optimize their utilization for differing distinct specified purposes.[b]

Analogs sensu stricto[edit]

Cocaine Stereoisomers[edit]

Structure Stereoisomer S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation 		IC50 (nM)
[3H]WIN 3542 inhibition to
rat striatal membranes
Mean error standard ≤5% in all cases 		IUPAC
nomenclature
R-cocaine
(Erythroxyline) 		102 methyl(1R,2R,3S,5S)-3-(benzoyloxy)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxylate
R-pseudococaine
(Delcaine, Depsococaine, Dextrocaine, Isococaine, Psicaine.[2]) 		172 15800 methyl(1R,2S,3S,5S)-3-(benzoyloxy)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxylate
R-allococaine 173 6160 methyl(1R,2R,3R,5S)-3-(benzoyloxy)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxylate
R-allopseudococaine 174 28500 methyl(1R,2S,3R,5S)-3-(benzoyloxy)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxylate
S-cocaine 175 15800 methyl(1S,3R,4R,5R)-3-(benzoyl)oxy-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-4-carboxylate
S-pseudococaine 176 22500 methyl(1S,3R,4S,5R)-3-(benzoyl)oxy-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-4-carboxylate
S-allococaine 177 9820 methyl(1S,3S,4R,5R)-3-(benzoyl)oxy-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-4-carboxylate
S-allopseudococaine 178 67700 methyl(1S,3S,4S,5R)-3-(benzoyl)oxy-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-4-carboxylate
The structure of cocaine with relevant structural motifs for activity at the dopamine transporter highlighted.

While it was originally thought that the 2β-carbomethoxy moiety interacted with the DAT through hydrogen bonding, subsequent research has indicated that electrostatic (ionic) interactions are the primary means of interactions with the DAT.[c]

There are eight stereoisomers of cocaine (excluding mesomers and modifications to the internal portion of the tropane ring).[d] Due to the presence of four asymmetric carbon atoms in the 1- & 5- to 8 (N) position bond bridge that could adopt R- & S- configurations, cocaine can be considered to have as many as sixteen stereoisomers. However, geometric constraints imparted by the bridgehead amine allow only eight to be created.

The natural isomerism of cocaine is unstable and prone to epimerization. For example, the end product of cocaine biosynthesis contains an axial C2-carbomethoxy moiety which readily undergoes epimerization to the equatorial position via saponification.

For any 2D structural diagrams where stereochemistry is not indicated, it should be assumed the analogue depicted shares the stereochemical conformation of R-cocaine unless noted otherwise.

Arene benzene-ring 2′, 3′, 4′ (5′ & 6′) position (aryl) substitutions[edit]

para-substituted benzoylmethylecgonines[edit]

Carbon 4′-hydrogen Substitutions (benzene-4′ "para" substituted benzoyloxytropanes)[e]
Data-set congruent to, and aggregate with, following tables
IC50 values
Structure S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		4′=R DAT

[3H]WIN 35428

5-HTT

[3H]Paroxetine

NET

[3H]Nisoxetine

Selectivity

5-HTT/DAT

Selectivity

NET/DAT

Cocaine H 249 ± 37 615 ± 120 2500 ± 70 2.5 10.0
non-benzoyloxy analogue
comparative ligands
non-tropane analogue
comparative ligands		 11b (WIN 35428)
(nisoxetine)
(fluoxetine)		 F
—
—		 24 ± 4
775 ± 20
5200 ± 1270		 690 ± 14
762 ± 90
15 ± 3		 258 ± 40
135 ± 21
963 ± 158		 28.7
1.0
0.003		 10.7
0.2
0.2
Satendra Singh Rev
183a I 2522 ± 4 1052 ± 23 18458 ± 1073 0.4 7.3
183b Ph 486 ± 63 - - - -
183c OAc 144 ± 2 - - - -
183d OH 158 ± 8 3104 ± 148 601 ± 11 19.6 3.8
(4′-Fluorococaine)[3] F - - - - -
(para-Isothiocyanatobenzoylecgonine
methyl ester)[4]
(p-Isococ)		 NCS - - - - -

The MAT binding pocket analogous to the lipophilic place on cocaine-like compounds, inclusive of the benzene ring, is approximate to 9 Å in length. Which is only slightly larger than a phenyl ring by itself.[f]

meta-substituted benzoylmethylecgonines[edit]

Carbon 3′-hydrogen Substitutions (benzene-3′ "meta" substituted benzoyloxytropanes)[g]
Data-set congruent to, and aggregate with, preceding and following tables
IC50 values
Structure S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		3′=R DAT

[3H]WIN 35428

5-HTT

[3H]Paroxetine

NET

[3H]Nisoxetine

Selectivity

5-HTT/DAT

Selectivity

NET/DAT

(cocaine) H 249 ± 37 615 ± 120 2500 ± 70 2.5 10.0
Satendra Singh Rev
184a I 325ɑ - - - -
184b OH 1183 ± 115 793 ± 33 3760 ± 589 0.7 3.2
191 OBn - - - - -
(m-Isococ) NCS - - - - -
  • ɑIC50 value for displacement of [3H]cocaine

ortho-substituted benzoylmethylecgonines[edit]

Carbon 2′-hydrogen Substitutions (benzene-2′ "ortho" substituted benzoyloxytropanes)[h]
Data-set congruent to, and aggregate with, preceding and following tables
IC50 values
Structure S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		2′=R DAT

[3H]WIN 35428

5-HTT

[3H]Paroxetine

NET

[3H]Nisoxetine

Selectivity

5-HTT/DAT

Selectivity

NET/DAT

Cocaine H 249 ± 37 615 ± 120 2500 ± 70 2.5 10.0
Satendra Singh Rev
185a I 350ɑ - - - -
185b F 604 ± 67 1770 ± 309 1392 ± 173 2.9 2.3
185c
(2′-Acetoxycocaine)[5]		 OAc 70 ± 1 219 ± 20 72 ± 9 3.1 1.0
185d
(2′-Hydroxycocaine)[6]		 OH 25 ± 4 143 ± 21 48 ± 2 5.7 1.9
  • ɑIC50 value for displacement of [3H]cocaine

The hydroxylated 2′-OH analogue exhibited a tenfold increase in potency over cocaine.[i]

Manifold and termination benzoyloxy phenyl-substitutions[edit]

Vanillylmethylecgonine 186b

Multi-substitutions (substitutions of substitutions; e.g. meta- & para-) or manifold ("many-fold") substituted analogues are analogues where more than one modification from the parent molecule takes place (having numerous intermediary constituents). These are created with often surprising structure–activity relationship results extrapolated therefrom. It is even a common case where two separate substitutions can each yield a weaker, lower affinity or even wholly non-efficacious compound respectively; but due to findings that oftentimes, when used together, such two mutually inferior changes being added in tandem to one analogue has the potential to make the resultant derivative display much greater efficacy, affinity, selectivity &/or strength than even the parent compound; which otherwise was compromised by either of those two alternations when made alone.

Manifold Compositions of Terminating Phenyl Ring Substitutions (Multiple benzene-2′,3′ & 4′ combined substituted benzoyloxytropanes)[j]
Data-set (excepting instanced references inside table) congruent to, and aggregate with, preceding and following tables
IC50 values
Structure S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		ortho-2′=R meta-3′=R para-4′=R DAT

[3H]WIN 35428

5-HTT

[3H]Paroxetine

NET

[3H]Nisoxetine

Selectivity

5-HTT/DAT

Selectivity

NET/DAT

186 HO H I 215 ± 19 195 ± 10 1021 ± 75 0.9 4.7
(Vanillylmethylecgonine)[7] H OCH3 OH - - - - -
Terminating Phenyl Carbon Ring Fusions & Alterations[k]
Data-set congruent to, and aggregate with, preceding table
IC50 values
Structure S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		C=R DAT

[3H]Cocaine (IC50)

187 1-naphthalene 742 ± 48
188 2-naphthalene 327 ± 63

Benzoyl and carbomethoxy branch modifications[edit]

Spirocyclic benzoyl branch modification that fits criteria as a cocaine analog and a phenyltropane both (tropane 2nd locant ester rendered in given depiction shows, as has been attested, to only having been successfully alpha configured)[8]


A sulfur in place of the oxygen at the benzoyl ester single bond results in a lower electronegativity than that of cocaine.


REC is a cocaine analogue which contains a "reversed" C2 carbomethoxy moiety. In animal studies, REC lacked cocaine-like stimulant effects.

C1-tropane-ring hydrogen—substitutions[edit]

C1 substitutions[11]
Ki values for uptake inhibition obtained on HEK-293 heterologously expressed human monoamine transporter cells.[12]
Structure Trivial name R
(C1 moiety) 		Ki (nM) @ DAT Ki (nM) @ SERT Ki (nM) @ NET σ1 affinity
Ki 		σ2 affinity
Ki 		IC50 (μM) Na+ inhibition
(Vertridine-Stimulated
influx of sodium channels
in Neocortical neurons)c 		LogP
(XLogP3 algorithm, Cheng et al., 2007)
(—)-Cocaine H 326 ± 106 513 ± 143 358 ± 69 6.7 ± 0.3 μMd[13] "significant"[14] 6.99 ± 2.43 2.30
(—)-1-methyl-cocaine Me 163 ± 23 435 ± 77 488 ± 101 "unappreciable" 1.13 μM 16.01 ± 1.90 2.67
(—)-1-ethyl-cocaine Et 95.1 ± 17.0ɑ 1,106 ± 112 598 ± 179 — — — 3.20
(—)-1-n-propyl-cocaine n-Pr 871 ± 205ɑ 2,949 ± 462b 796 ± 195 — — — 3.56
(—)-1-n-pentyl-cocaine n-C5H11 1,272 ± 199b 1,866 ± 400ɑ 1,596 ± 21b — — — 4.64
(—)-1-phenyl-cocaine Ph 32.3 ± 5.7b 974 ± 308 1,980 ± 99b 524 nM 198 nM 0.29 ± 0.07 3.77
  • ɑ, P < 0.05 compared with (—)-cocaine (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test)
  • b, P < 0.01 compared with (—)-cocaine (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test)
  • cLidocaine was found to have a value of 39.6 ± 2.4, the weakest of all tested.
  • dSame reference gives 25.9 ± 2.4 μM for (+)-cocaine and 13.6 ± 1.3 μM for norcocaine. Comparably it gives 12.7 ± 1.5 μM for the sigmaergic affinity of (+)-amphetamine. Another reference gives 1.7-6.7 μM for (—)-cocaine. All values Ki.[15]
  • Using same data-set as above table, the following compounds were found to compare as:
    • CFT @ DAT = 39.2 ± 7.1 (n = 5)
    • fluoxetine @ SERT = 27.3 ± 9.2 (n = 3)
    • desipramine @ NET = 2.74 ± 0.59 (n = 3)

Cocaine analogs substituting the C1-tropane ring position, requiring sulfinimine (N-sulfinyl-imine) chemistry (before the innovation of which were untenable) which bind unlike the typical configuration at DAT (open to out) as cocaine (with its terminal D79-Y156 distance of 6.03 Å), or in the atypical (closed to out) conformation of the benztropines (3.29 Å). Though closer to the open to out: (—)-1-methyl-cocaine = 4.40 Å & (—)-1-phenyl-cocaine = 4.89 Å, and exhibiting preferential interaction with outward facing DAT conformation, they appear to have the lack of behavioral stimulation as-like the closed to out type. Despite having non-stimulant behavior profiles, they still seem to have anti-depressant behavioral profiles.[12]

The C1 phenyl analog is ten times stronger than cocaine as a dopamine reuptake pump ligand, and twenty four times stronger as a local anesthetic (voltage-dependent Na+ channel blocker), whereas the C1 methyl analog is 2.3 times less potent as a local anesthetic.[12]

cf. hydroxytropacocaine for a natural alkaloid (lacking however, the 2-position carbmethoxy) that is a C1 substituent with a hydroxy group.

2β-substitutions[edit]

Direct 2β Substitutions[l]
(IC50 nM values)
Structure S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		R DAT

[3H]WIN 35428

5-HTT

[3H]Paroxetine

NET

[3H]Nisoxetine

Selectivity

5-HTT/DAT

Selectivity

NET/DAT

Satendra Singh Rev
(Cocaine) Me 89 ± 4.8 1045 ± 89 3298 ± 293 11.7 37.0
196a
(Cocaethylene)		 Et 195 ± 45 5801 ± 493 10000 ± 751 29.7 51.3
196b n-Pr 196 ± 46 4517 ± 430 6124 ± 262 23.3 31.2
196c i-Pr 219 ± 48 25224 ± 1498 30384 ± 1685 115 139
196d Ph 112 ± 31 33666 ± 3330 31024 ± 1909 300 277
196e Bn 257 ± 14 302 ± 23 20794 ± 950 1.2 80.9
196f β-phenethyl 181 ± 10 615 ± 52 19944 ± 1026 3.4 110
196g γ-phenylpropyl 147 ± 19 374 ± 15 4893 ± 344 2.5 33.3
196h cinnamyl 371 ± 15 368 ± 6.3 68931 ± 3476 1.0 186
196i p-NO2-β-phenethyl 601 ± 28 - - - -
196j p-Cl-β-phenethyl 271 ± 12 - - - -
196k p-NH2-β-phenethyl 72 ± 7 - - - -
196l p-NCS-β-phenethyl 196 ± 14 - - - -
196m p-azido-β-phenethyl 227 ± 19 - - - -
196n (p-NHCOCH2Br)β-phenethyl 61 ± 6 - - - -
196o (p-NHCO(CH2)2CO2Et)β-phenethyl 86 ± 4 - - - -
Satendra Singh Rev 197a NH2 753 ± 41.3 13725 ± 1256 3981 ± 229 18.2 5.3
197b -NMe2 127 ± 6.36 143713 ± 8854 7329 ± 158 1131 57.7
197c -N(OMe)Me 60 ± 6.4 28162 ± 2565 3935 ± 266 469 65.6
197d -NHMe 2424 ± 118 44798 ± 2105 4213 ± 206 18.5 1.7
197e
(Benzoylecgonine)		 -OH 195000 - - - -
Satendra Singh Rev 197f HOCH2- 561 ± 149 - - - -
197g
(Tropacocaine)		 H 5180 ± 1160 - - - -

Compounds 196e-h possess greater SERT affinity than cocaine, but possess weaker NET/DAT affinities (with the exception of 196g at NET). Compounds 196k, 196n, 196o, and 197c all possess greater DAT affinity than cocaine. Compound 197b (dimethyl amide) displayed a 1,131-fold increased selectivity in affinity over the serotonin transporter, with only slight reductions in potency for the dopamine & norepinephrine transporters.[m] Whereas 197c (Weinreb amide, N-methoxy-N-methyl amide) had a 469× increase at SERT, with greater affinity for DAT than cocaine and an equal NET affinity.[n] 197b was 137×, and 196c 27× less potent at binding to the serotonin transporter, but both had a NET / DAT ratio that made for a better dopaminergic than cocaine.[o] The consideration that large, bulky C2 substituents would alter the spatial conformation of the tropane ring system by distorting the piperidine portion of the system and thus hamper binding[p] appears to be unfounded.[q]

Benzoylecgonine (197e) is the inactive primary metabolite of cocaine generated through hydrolysis of the C2 methyl ester. In vitro binding studies indicate that benzoylecgonine is ~2,200x less potent than cocaine at the dopamine transporter, possibly due to zwitterion formation preventing strong DAT binding. In contrast to in vitro studies, the lack of activity observed in in vivo studies is likely the result of reduced blood–brain barrier penetration than formation of a zwitterion.[r]

Bioisostere 2-position carbmethoxy-ester functional replacements[edit]

2β-isoxazole and isoxazoline ring containing analogues[s][t][u]
IC50 nM values
Structure S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		R [3H]Mazindol [3H]DA Selectivity

Uptake/Binding

(Cocaine) (H) 580 ± 70 570 ± 180 1.0
Satendra Singh Rev
198a H 520 ± 40 260 ± 70 0.5
198b CO2Et (5′-carboethoxy-) 120 ± 10 290 ± 40 2.4
198c BOC 2230 ± 220 1820 ± 810 0.8
198d Ph 2000 ± 640 2920 ± 1620 1.5
198e CH=CHCO2Me 3600 ± 400 3590 ± 1180 1.0
199a β(or R)CO2Et 710 ± 150 1060 ± 340 1.5
199b α(or S)CO2Et 5830 ± 630 8460 ± 620 1.4
200 880 ± 350 400 ± 140 0.4

Vinylogous 2β-position carbmethoxy-ester functional replacements[edit]

vinylogous 2β analogues[v]
Data-set congruent to, and aggregate with, preceding table
IC50 nM values
Structure S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation 		R [3H]Mazindol [3H]DA Selectivity

Uptake/Binding

Cocaine 580 ± 70 570 ± 180 1
201a H 1730 ± 550 1120 ± 390 0.6
201b Cl 222 ± 49 368 ± 190 1.6
201c CO2Et 50 ± 10 130 ± 10 2.6
201d CH=CHCO2Et 1220 ± 100 870 ± 50 0.7
201e PO(OEt)2 4850 ± 470 5500 ± 70 1.1

Compounds 201b & 201c were significantly more potent than cocaine while compounds 201a, 201d & 201e were significantly less potent. This finding indicates that the presence of a hydrogen bond acceptor (i.e. carbomethoxy) at the 2β position is not absolutely necessary for the creation of high affinity cocaine analogues.[w]

N-modifications[edit]

Nitrogen Substitutions
Mazindol comparison table
(ɑβ-CFT comparison notation)[x]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		N8-R [3H]Mazindol
binding 		[3H]DA
uptake 		Selectivity

Uptake/Binding

217
(Cocaine methiodide)		 - 10700 ± 1530ɑ - -
Satendra Singh Rev (Cocaine) CH3 280 ± 60
102ɑ		 320 ± 10 1.1
218
(Norcocaine)		 H 303 ± 59ɑ - -
219a Bn 668 ± 67ɑ - -
219b Ac 3370 ± 1080ɑ - -
219c CH2CH2OH 700 ± 100 1600 ± 200 2.3
219d CH2CO2CH3 480 ± 40 1600 ± 100 3.3
219e CH2CO2H 380 ± 20 2100 ± 400 5.5
220a SO2CH3 (Ms) 1290 ± 80 1970 ± 70 1.5
220b SO2CF3 (Tf) 330 ± 30 760 ± 20 2.3
220c SO2NCO 120 ± 10 160 ± 10 1.3
220d SO2Ph 20800 ± 3500 61000 2.9
220e SO2C6H4-4-NO2 (nosyl) 5720 ± 1140 18800 ± 90 3.3
220f SO2C6H4-4-OCH3 6820 ± 580 16400 ± 1400 2.4
221a NO 99500 ± 12300 231700 ± 39500 2.3
221b NO2 7500 ± 900 21200 ± 600 2.8
221c NHCOCH3 >1000000 >1000000 -
221d NH2 - - -
  • ɑIC50 (nM) for displacement of [3H]WIN 35428

Tricyclic cocaine analogues[edit]

8 to 2 tethered analogues[edit]

Activity at monoamine transporters: Binding Affinities & MAT Inhibition of Bridged Phenyltropanes Ki (nM) [y]
Compound
(S. Singh's #) 		Structure [3H]Mazindol binding [3H]DA uptake [3H]5-HT uptake [3H]NE uptake selectivity
[3H]5-HT/[3H]DA
cocaine 375 ± 68 423 ± 147 155 ± 40 83.3 ± 1.5 0.4
(–)-128 54.3 ± 10.2 60.3 ± 0.4 1.76 ± 0.23 5.24 ± 0.07 0.03
(+)-128 79 ± 19 114 ± 28 1.48 ± 0.07 4.62 ± 0.31 0.01
(±)-128 61.7 ± 8.5 60.3 ± 0.4 2.32 ± 0.23 2.69 ± 0.12 0.04
129 6.86 ± 0.43 24.0 ± 1.3 1.77 ± 0.04 1.06 ± 0.03 0.07
130a 17.2 ± 1.13 10.2 ± 1.4 78.9 ± 0.9 15.0 ± 0.4 7.8
131a 4.00 ± 0.07 2.23 ± 0.12 14.0 ± 0.6 2.99 ± 0.17 6.3
131b 3.61 ± 0.43 11.3 ± 1.1 25.7 ± 4.3 4.43 ± 0.01 2.3
132a 13.7 ± 0.8 14.2 ± 0.1 618 ± 87 3.84 ± 0.35 43.5
133a 149 ± 6 149 ± 2 810 ± 80 51.7 ± 12 5.4

See N-front & back bridged phenyltropanes.

Derivations upon fusions of the tropane's nitrogen bridge[z]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation 		[3H]Mazindol [3H]DA Selectivity

Uptake/Binding

222 44900 ± 6200 115000 ± 15700 2.6

Back-bridged cocaine analogues are considered more akin to untethered cocaine analogs & phenyltropane derivatives (where the nitrogen lone pair is not fixed or constrained) and better mimics their affinities. This is due to when the eighth carbon tropane position is freely rotatable and unbound it preferably occupies the axial position as defining its least energy & most unhindered state. In front-bridged analogs the nitrogen lone pairings rigid fixity makes it reside in an equatorial placing for the piperidine ring-part of the tropane nucleus, pointing to the two-carbon & three methylene unit bridgehead; giving the attested front-bridged cocaine analogues preference for SERT over DAT.[aa]

8 to 3 tethered analogues[edit]

Thiophene tricyclic tropane analogues[19]
Structure Compound R X [3H]DA Uptake [3H]5-HT Uptake [3H]NE Uptake 5-HT/DA Selectivity NE/DA Selectivity
Cocaine 259 ± 19.9 155 ± 0.4 108 ± 3.5 0.60 0.42
5a H CO2Me 268 ± 16.6 2046 ± 42 26.4 ± 1.9 7.63 0.10
5b Me CO2Me 403 ± 20 179 ± 38 4.9 ± 0.2 0.44 0.01
5c I CO2Me 368 ± 1.6 29 ± 1.6 5 ± 1.3 0.08 0.01
7 H CO2iPr 428 ± 45.7 1150 ± 1.6 52.3 ± 12.0 2.69 0.12
8 H CH2OH ~3000 ~1000 ~300 ~0.33 ~ 0.1
9 H CH2OAc 610 ± 53 1530 ± 150 283 ± 16 2.51 0.46
10 H CH2OCOC(CH3)3 1020 ± 70 168 ± 53.5 1180 ± 130 0.16 1.16
11 H CH2OCOPh 1750 ± 140 1.53 ± 0.19 894 ± 126 0.0009 0.51
12 H CH2OCO-2-naphthyl 1678 ± 124 169 ± 16 1234 ± 166 0.10 0.74
13 H CH2NHCOCH3 6140 ± 50 13330 ± 3150 2430 ± 340 2.17 0.39
14 H CH2NHCO2C(CH3)3 2300 ± 380 2360 ± 30 1700 ± 60 1.03 0.74
Conformationally constrained tricyclic tropane analogues[20]
Structure Compound R X [3H]DA Uptake [3H]5-HT Uptake [3H]NE Uptake DA/5-HT Selectivity NE/DA Selectivity
Cocaine 423 ± 147 155 ± 0.4 108 ± 3.5 2.7 0.26
8a 4-F CO2Me 6620 ± 460 335 ± 45 584 ± 163 2.7 0.26
8b 4-Cl CO2Me 853 ± 58 34.3 ± 2.9 208 ± 111 24.8 0.24
8c 3-Cl CO2Me 7780 ± 1580 53.6 ± 17.2 231 ± 44 145 0.03
8d 4-Br CO2Me 495 ± 13 11 ± 3 178 ± 9 45 0.36
8e 4-I CO2Me 764 ± 11 21.9 ± 0.3 213 ± 31 34.9 0.28
8f 4-CF3 CO2Me N/T 12.6 ± 0.5 1830 ± 211 N/T N/T
8g H CO2Me 481 ± 11 1140 ± 70 53 ± 16 0.42 0.11
8h 4-Me CO2Me 649 ± 2 15 ± 0.4 146 ± 28 43.3 0.22
8i 4-OCH3 CO2Me 3130 ± 160 56 ± 4 187 ± 5 55.9 0.06
8j 4-iPr CO2Me N/T 10.2 ± 0.4 1110 ± 200 N/T N/T
8k 3,4-Cl2 CO2Me 1920 ± 260 20 ± 1 1000 ± 280 96 0.52
8l 2,3-Cl2 CO2Me 950 ± 107 354 ± 188 1210 ± 358 2.4 1.42
8m 3,5-Cl2 CO2Me 5600 ± 400 437 ± 0.3 4100 ± 500 12.8 0.73
8n 3,4-F2 CO2Me 7440 ± 19 101 ± 8.7 394 ± 98 73.7 0.05
8o 4-Br-3-Cl CO2Me 5420 ± 940 2.3 ± 0.1 459 ± 80 2360 0.08
8p 3-Cl-4-I CO2Me 3140 ± 450 1.8 ± 0.3 272 ± 55 1740 0.09
8q 2-Cl-4-I CO2Me 6640 ± 2080 74 ± 12.2 508 ± 21 89.7 0.08
8r 3-Cl-4-Me CO2Me >10000 6.4 ± 1.3 198 ± 10 >1560 <0.02
8s 3,4-Me2 CO2Me N/T 10.1 ± 1.1 659 ± 128 N/T N/T
8t 1-Naphthyl CO2Me 9720 ± 700 121 ± 3 5370 ± 580 80.3 0.55
8u 2-Naphthyl CO2Me 735 ± 235 21 ± 9.9 157 ± 13 35 0.21
8v 1-Pyrenyl CO2Me 9920 ± 906 860 ± 20.6 N/T 11.5 N/T
8w 9-Phenanthryl CO2Me 1640 ± 30 233 ± 44 13000 ± 1300 39.2 0.86
  • "N/T" = "not tested"

Tropane ring contraction (azabornane) analogues[edit]

Comparison of tropane ring versus the norbornane in overlay emphasizing the conformational differences of the benzoyl branch between the tropane ring system (dark blue on right) and norbornane ring sustem (light blue on right).
7-Azabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane Derivatives[ab]
Structure S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		DAT
[3H]WIN 35428
Ki (nM)
(Cocaine) 89 ± 4.8
155a 60400 ± 4800
155b 96500 ± 42
155c 5620 ± 390
155d 18900 ± 1700

6/7 tropane position methoxycocaine & methoxypseudococaine analogues[edit]

Phenylsulfanyl, C2-C3 unsaturated nonisomeric (C2 inclusive) C4 chloro analog.[17]
Substitutions upon the 6 & 7 positions of the tropane[ac]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		X Ki (nM)
[3H]Mazindol binding 		Ki (nM)
[3H]DA uptake 		Selectivity

Uptake/Binding

(Cocaine) 280 ± 60 320 ± 10 1.1
(Pseudococaine) 10400 ± 300 13800 ± 1500 1.3
225a 2β, 6β-OCH3 98000 ± 12000 68000 ± 5000 0.7
225b 2α, 6β-OCH3 190000 ± 11000 510000 ± 110000 2.7
225c 2β, 7β-OCH3 4200 ± 100 6100 ± 200 1.4
225d 2α, 7β-OCH3 45000 ± 5000 110000 ± 4000 2.4
225e 2α, 7α-OCH3 54000 ± 3000 200000 ± 70000 3.7

3β-position 2′—(6′) & 2β-substitution combination analogues[edit]

4′-Iodococaine-2β-substituted analogues[ad]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation 		2β-R C2′-R IC50 (nM)
(displacement of [3H]WIN 35428)
211a CH2OH H 6214 ± 1269
211b CH2OCOCH3 H 2995 ± 223
211c CONHCH3 H >100000
211d CO2Et H 2031 ± 190
211e CO2-i-Pr H 1377 ± 10
211f CO2Ph H 2019 ± 253
211g CO2CH2Ph H 4602 ± 325
211h 3-phenyl-1,2,4-oxadiazole H 3459 ± 60
211i CH=CH2 H 2165 ± 253
211j CH2CH3 H 2692 ± 486
212 CO2-i-Pr HO 663 ± 70
4507 ± 13ɑ
34838 ± 796b
  • ɑFor displacement of [3H]paroxetine (5-HTT & NET)
  • bFor displacement of [3H]nisoxetine (5-HTT & NET)

3β-Carbamoyl analogues[edit]

3-position carbamoyl linkage substituting benzoyloxy analogues[ae]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		X IC50 (nM)
inhibition of [3H]Cocaine binding
(Rat Striatal Tissue) 		IC50 (nM)
inhibition of [3H]DA uptake
(Rat Striatal Tissue) 		Selectivity
uptake/binding
(Cocaine) (H) 70 ± 10 210 ± 70 3.0
223a H 5600 ± 700 52600 ± 3000 9.4
223b 4-NO2 1090 ± 250 5700 ± 1200 5.2
223c 4-NH2 63300 ± 12200 >100000 -
223d 4-N3 1000 ± 240 1180 ± 360 1.2
223e 4-NCS 260 ± 60 490 ± 80 1.9
223f 3-NO2 37 ± 10 178 ± 23 4.8
223g 3-NH2 2070 ± 340 23100 ± 900 11.1
223h 3-N3 630 ± 150 3900 ± 1590 6.2
223i 3-NCS 960 ± 210 4900 ± 420 5.1

Phenyl 3-position linkage substitutions[edit]

A 3-Dimensional (stick-&-ball) rendering of Troparil: A structural analogue of cocaine with omitted -COO- linkage – a parent compound of many MAT ligands; those of the phenyltropane class. (Here it is depicted in an unfavourable conformation of the O-Me; The methyl has to be at the other oxygen and trans to optimize its functional stimulation.)
The top image above is a 2-Dimensional emulation of the orientation for the animated 3D image to the far right, with a methoxy that is distal from the phenyl group and cis. While the alternate image below that to its bottom shown above is one with the carboxyl methyl group proximal to the phenyl, in its optimum conformation, with a likewise optimum trans configuration.

See: List of phenyltropanes (Many phenyltropanes are derived from cocaine metabolites, such as methylecgonidine, as precursors. Whereas fully synthetic methods have been devised from the starting material of vinylcarbenoids & pyrroles.)[21]

The difference in the length of the benzoyloxy and the phenyl linkage contrasted between cocaine and phenyltropanes makes for a shorter distance between the centroid of the aromatic benzene and the bridge nitrogen of the tropane in the latter PTs. This distance being on a scale of 5.6 Å for phenyltropanes and 7.7 Å for cocaine or analogs with the benzoyloxy intact.[af] This may account for PTs increased behavioral stimulation profile over cocaine.[ag] Differences in binding potency have also been explained considering solvation effects; cocaine containing 2β,3β-ester groups being calculated as more solvated than the WIN-type compounds (i.e. troparil). Higher pKɑs of the tropane nitrogen (8.65 for cocaine, 9.55 for troparil & 11.95 for vinyl analogue 43a), decreased aqueous solvation & decreased conformational flexibility added to increased binding affinity.[ah]

Despite the observation of increased stimulation, phenyltropanes lack the local anesthetic sodium channel blocking effect that the benzoyloxy imparts to cocaine. Beside topical affect, this gives cocaine an affinity for binding to sites on the dopamine and serotonin sodium dependent transport areas that are distinct & specific to MAT in contrast to the general sodium channels; creating a separate mechanism of relational affinity to the transporters in addition to its inhibition of the reuptake for those transporters; this is unique to the local anesthetic value in cocaine & analogues with a similar substitute for the benzoyloxy that leaves the sodium channel blockage ability intact. Rendering such compounds as different functionally in their relation to MAT contrasted to phenyltropane analogues which have the local anesthetic bridge removed.[22] (Requiring some of the sodium ions to be pumped from the axon via Na+/K+-ATPase). In addition, it even has been postulated that a crucial role regarding the electron energy imparted via voltage sensitization (and thus action potential blockage with a molecule capable of intersecting its specific channel, in the case of cocaine a sodium channel, that potentially serves in re-quantifying its charge) upon a receptor binding site may attenuate the mediating influence of the inhibitory regulation that autoreceptors play by their slowing neurotransmitter release when an efflux is created through an instance of agonism by a compound; allowing said efflux to be continued without the body's attempt to maintain homeostasis enacting in as readily responsive a manner to its conformational change.[23]

Various phenyltropane examples


3β-Alkylphenyltropane & 3β-Alkenyl analogues[edit]

3-position alkylphenyl linkage substituting benzoyloxy analogues[ai]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		n IC50 (nM)
[3H]Cocaine binding 		IC50 (nM)
[3H]DA uptake 		Selectivity
uptake/binding
(Cocaine) 101 ± 26 209 ± 20 2.1
224a 1 885 ± 18 1020 ± 52 1.1
224b 2 9.9 ± 0.33 70.5 ± 1.0 7.1
224c 3 344 ± 12 2680 ± 190 7.8
224d 71.6 ± 0.7 138 ± 9 1.9
224e 2.10 ± 0.04 5.88 ± 0.09 2.8

The compound 224e, the 3β-styrene analogue, had the highest potency in its group. While 224b & 224c showed the most selectivity, with 224b having a ten-fold greater potency for the dopamine transporter than cocaine.[aj]

6-Alkyl-3-benzyltropane analogues[edit]

6-Alkyl-3-benzyl-2[(methoxycarbonyl)methyl]tropane analogues[ak]
Sub-category
(S. Singh compound #) 		a
R=H 		b
R=Me 		c
R=Et 		d
R=n-Pr 		e
R=n-Bu 		f
R=Bn
2β,6α-isomers:
(229a—f)
2α,6α-isomers:
(230a—f)
2β,6β-isomers:
(231a—f)
2α,6β-isomers:
(232a—f)
6-Alkyl-3-benzyl-2[(methoxycarbonyl)methyl]tropane analogues[al]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name/WIN number) 		R Ki (nM)
[3H]WIN 35428 binding 		IC50 (nM)
[3H]DA uptake 		Selectivity

uptake/binding

Cocaine 32 ± 5
338 ± 221		 405 ± 91
405 ± 91		 12.6
1.2
WIN 35065-2 33 ± 17
314 ± 222		 373 ± 10 11.3
(−)-229a H 33 ± 5 161 ± 100 4.9
229a H 91 ± 10 94 ± 26 1.0
229b Me 211 ± 23 - -
229c Et 307 ± 28 - -
229d n-Pr 4180 ± 418 - -
229e n-Bu 8580 ± 249 - -
229f Bn 3080 ± 277 - -
(+)-230a H 60 ± 6 208 ± 63 3.5
230a H 108 ± 14 457 ± 104 4.2
230b Me 561 ± 64 - -
230c Et 1150 ± 135 - -
230d n-Pr 7240 ± 376 - -
230e n-Bu 19700 ± 350 - -
230f Bn 7590 ± 53 - -
231b Me 57 ± 5 107 ± 36 1.9
231c Et 3110 ± 187 - -
231d n-Pr 5850 ± 702 - -
231f Bn 1560 ± 63 - -
232b Me 294 ± 29 532 ± 136 1.8
232c Et 6210 ± 435 - -
232d n-Pr 57300 ± 3440 - -
232f Bn 3080 ± 277 - -
241 Bn 4830 ± 434 - -
Benzylidene derivatives of 6-alkyl-3-benzyltropanes[am]
Sub-category
(S. Singh compound #) 		a
R=H 		b
R=Me 		c
R=Et 		d
R=n-Pr 		e
R=n-Bu 		f
R=Bn
6α-isomers:
(237a—f)
6β-isomers (exo):
(238a—f)

3β-benzyl derivatives:
(239a—f)
intermediate
alkylidene esters:
(240a—f)

N.B. The benzylidene derivatives serve as synthetic intermediates for 6-Alkyl-3-benzyltropanes and have not been assayed for biological activity. Compounds 237a and 238a are the same compound as both are the parent for either series with a hydrogen saturated in their respective substitution place.

Direct 2,3-pyrimidino fused[edit]

above: Strobamine, a DARI functional cocaine analog with structural semblance.[24] Compare the phenyltropane length tropane C2 & C3 functional group fusion variant.[25]

below: Chalcostrobamine

cf. strobamine (at right) for a more efficacious compound as like the below.

2,3-direct fused "di-hetero-benzene" rigidified cocaine analogs.[26]
(Binding values @ biogenic amine transporters (BATs) for rigid and semi-rigid analogs)
Structure alphanumeric
assignation 		R1 R2 hDAT
IC50 (nM) 		hSERT
IC50 (nM) 		hNET
IC50 (nM)
(—)-3a H C6H5 58,300 (20,200) 6140 (3350) NA
(+)-3a H C6H5 48,700 (20,100) 6030 (3400) NA
(—)-3b H NH2 NA NA NA
(+)-3b H NH2 NA NA NA
(—)-3c H CH3 NA NA NA
(+)-3c H CH3 NA NA NA
(—)-3d H H NA NA NA
(+)-3d H H NA NA NA
(+/—)-3e C6H5 C6H5 30,000 (11,200) 3650 (1700) NA
  • "NA" = "no affinity", e.g. unquantifiable.

Direct di-hetero-benzene (pyrimidino) 2,3-fused and thus rigidified cocaine analogs.[26]

Piperidine cocaine-homologues[edit]

Tricyclo benzoyloxy dibenzene cocaine analogue. cf. benztropine compound #277, tropatepine, etc.[17]
Binding potency of piperidine homologues for displacement of [3H]WIN 35428[an]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		2β-R IC50 (nM)
(Cocaine) CO2CH3
(i.e. CO2Me)		 249 ± 37
183a CO2CH3 2522 ± 4
242 H 11589 ± 4
243 CO2CH3 8064 ± 4

cf. phenyltropane piperidine-homologues for compounds with a more optimized conformation that yield higher affinities when binding to MAT.

Cocaine hapten analogues[edit]

"GNC", a cocaine analog designed to minimize the formation of noncocaine-like structures through its chemical coupling to the Ad proteins; all while maintaining the element of its antigenic determinant from the moiety of cocaine.[27]
Cocaine analogs which elicit noncatalytic antibodies[ao]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		2β-R
394
(GNC)ɑ		 CO2(CH2)5CO2H
395
(Succinyl Norcocaine)[28]		 CO2CH3
GNEb[29]
including carrier proteins:
GNE-FLiC
GNE-KLH
GNE-BSA
396 CONH(CH2)5CO2H
  • ɑ6-(2R,3S)-3-(benzoyloxy)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo [3.2.1] octane-2-carbonyloxy-hexanoic acid
  • b6-(2R,3S)-3-(benzoyloxy)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo [3.2.1] octane-2-carboxamido-hexanoic acid
Tetrahedral-intermediate cocaine-hapten compound #400
Cocaine transition state analogues (TSAs) which generate catalytic antibodies[ap]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		R
401a CH3
401b (CH2)5CO2H
401c CH2CO2H
401d COCH2CH2CO2H
401e H
401f CH2CH2Br
385g (CH2)2NHCO(CH2)2CONH2
402a O(CH2)4NHCO(CH2)2CO2N(CO2)2C6H4
402b OH
402c O(CH2)2(p-NH2C6H4)
402d NH(CH2)5CO2H
402e O(CH2)4NHCO(CH2)2CONH2
403a NH2
403b NHCOCH2Br
403c NHCO(CH2)3CO2H
403d (CH2)3NHCO(CH2)2CONH2

Cocaine haptens that create catalytic anti-bodies require transitional states as affected in vivo. Monoclonal antibodies generated against BSA-coupled 402e accelerated the rate of cocaine hydrolysis by ~23,000x and eliminated the reinforcing effects of cocaine administration in rats.[30][31][32][33]

Anti-idiotypic & butyl-cholinesterase mediated immunopharmacotherapy cocaine analogs[34]
K1-KLH/BSA[35] K2-KLH/BSA

Structural/Functional intermediate analogues[edit]

Piperidine Analogues[edit]

A somewhat recent occurrence among tentative modern folklore which has traversed the circling of rumors mostly confined to the likes of universities and popular culture trivia has been that cocaine is one element, or molecule increment of weight or charge etc., away from the molecular structure of sugar.[37] Though such a statement is false as a general pretense, there is a dextrose based super-structure that has a vaguely similar overlay with cocaine which is "benzoyl-beta-D-glucoside."

Benztropine (3α-Diphenylmethoxy Tropane) Analogues[edit]

3α-Diphenylmethoxy tropanes
(Benztropine analog affinities binding to DAT & DA uptake)[aq]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		R R′ Ki (nM)
[3H]WIN 35428 binding 		IC50 (nM)
[3H]DA

uptake

Selectivity

uptake/binding

(Cocaine) 388 ± 47 - -
(GBR 12909) 11.6 ± 31 - -
(Benztropine) H H 118 ± 9 403 ± 115 3.4
249a 4′-F H 32.2 ± 10 48 1.5
249b
(AHN 1-055)		 4′-F 4′-F 11.8 ± 1 71 6.0
249c 3′,4′-di-F H 27.9 ± 11 181 ± 45.7 6.5
249d 4′-Cl H 30.0 ± 12 115 3.8
249e 4′-Cl 4′-Cl 20.0 ± 14 75 3.8
249f 3′,4′-di-Cl H 21.1 ± 19 47 2.2
249g 3′,4′-di-Cl F 18.9 ± 14 24 1.3
249h 4′-Br H 37.9 ± 7 29 0.8
249i 4′-Br 4′-Br 91.6 34 0.4
249j 4′-NO2 H 197 ± 8 219 1.1
249k 4′-CN H 196 ± 9 222 1.1
249l 4′-CF3 H 635 ± 10 2155 3.4
249m 4′-OH H 297 ± 13 677 2.3
249n 4′-OMe H 78.4 ± 8 468 6.0
249o 4′-OMe 4′-OMe 2000 ± 7 2876 1.4
249p 4′-Me H 187 ± 5 512 2.7
249q 4′-Me 4′-Me 420 ± 7 2536 6.0
249r 4′-Et H 520 ± 8 984 1.9
249s 4′-t-Bu H 1918 4456 2.3
250a 3′-F H 68.5 ± 12 250 ± 64.7 3.6
250b 3′-F 3′-F 47.4 ± 1 407 ± 63.9 8.6
250c 3′-Cl H 21.6 ± 7 228 ± 77.1 10.5
250d 3′-CF3 H 187 ± 5 457 ± 72.0 2.4
251a 2′-F H 50.0 ± 12 140 ± 17.2 2.8
251b 2′-Cl H 228 ± 9 997 ± 109 4.4
251c 2′-Me H 309 ± 6 1200 ± 1.64 3.9
251d 2′-NH2 H 840 ± 8 373 ± 117 0.4
3α-Diphenylmethoxy-2β-carbomethoxybenztropine
(Benztropine affinities to DAT & 5-HTT in cynomologous monkey caudate-putamen)[ar]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		R R′ IC50 (nM)
DAT
(Binding of [3H]WIN 35428) 		IC50 (nM)
5-HTT
(Binding of [3H]Citalopram) 		Selectivity
5-HTT/DAT
(benztropine) 312 ± 1.1 24100 ± 14800 77.2
(WIN 35428) 12.9 ± 1.1 160 ± 20 12.4
R-256 2040 ± 283 1460 ± 255 0.7
S-257a H H 33.5 ± 4.5 10100 ± 1740 301
S-257b H F 13.2 ± 1.9 4930 ± 1200 373
S-257c
(difluoropine)		 F F 10.9 ± 1.2 3530 ± 1480 324
S-257d H Cl 15.8 ± 0.95 5960 ± 467 377
S-257e Cl Cl 91.4 ± 0.85 3360 ± 1480 36.8
S-257f H Br 24.0 ± 4.6 5770 ± 493 240
S-257g Br Br 72.0 ± 3.65 2430 ± 339 33.7
S-257h H I 55.9 ± 10.3 9280 ± 1640 166
S-257i Br I 389 ± 29.4 4930 ± 82 12.7
S-257j I I 909 ± 79 8550 ± 442 9.4
S-257k H Me 49.5 ± 6.0 13200 266
S-257l Me Me 240 ± 18.4 9800 ± 2680 40.8
N-Modified 2-carbomethoxybenztropines
(Benztropine affinities to DAT & 5-HTT in cynomologous monkey caudate-putamen)[as]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		R n IC50 (nM)
DAT
(Binding of [3H]WIN 35428) 		IC50 (nM)
5-HTT
(Binding of [3H]Citalopram) 		Selectivity
5-HTT/DAT
258a 20.3 ± 3.5 - -
258b H 1 223 ± 53 4970 ± 700 22.3
258c H 3 22.0 ± 11.9 19.7 ± 3 0.9
258d Br 3 80.2 ± 8.8 234 ± 0.5 2.9
258e I 3 119 ± 11 2200 ± 1250 18.5
258f H 5 99.0 ± 28 550 ± 63 5.5
259 616 ± 88 55200 ± 20000 89.3
N-substituted 3α[bis(4′-fluorophenyl)methoxy]tropanes
(Benztropine affinities to DAT & 5-HTT)[at]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		R Ki (nM)
DAT
(Binding of [3H]WIN 35428) 		IC50 (nM)
5-HTT
(Uptake of [3H]DA) 		Selectivity
uptake/binding
260
(AHN 2-003)		 H 11.2 ± 11 9.7 0.9
261a 3-phenylpropyl 41.9 ± 11 230 5.5
261b indole-3-ethyl 44.6 ± 11 1200 26.9
261c 4-phenylbutyl 8.51 ± 14 39 4.6
261d 4-(4′-nitrophenyl)butyl 20.2 ± 11 650 32.2
261e 3-(4′-fluorophenyl)propyl 60.7 ± 12 - -
262a n-butyl 24.6 ± 8 370 15.0
262b cyclopropylmethyl 32.4 ± 9 180 5.5
262c allyl 29.9 ± 10 14 0.5
262d benzyl 82.2 ± 15 290 3.5
262e 4-fluorobenzyl 95.6 ± 10 200 2.1
262f cinnanyl 86.4 ± 12 180 2.1
262g [bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl 634 ± 23 - -
262h [(4-nitrophenyl)phenylmethoxy]ethyl 57.0 ± 17 - -
263 acetyl 2340 4600 2.0
264 formyl 2020 ± 13 5400 2.7
265a tosyl 0%ɑ - -
265b mesyl 18%ɑ - -
(AHN 2-005)[38] CH2CH=CH2 - - -
(JHW 007)[38] CH2CH2CH2CH3 - - -
(GA 2-99)[38] CH2CH2NH2 - - -
(GA 103)[38] CH2CH2CH2CH2Ph - - -
266 108 ± 12 130 1.2

ɑInhibition at 10 μM

8-Oxa-2-carbomethoxy norbenztropines
(8-Oxanortropane benztropine analog affinities to DAT & 5-HTT)[au]
Compound S. Singh's
alphanumeric
assignation
(name) 		IC50 (nM)
DAT
(Binding of [3H]WIN 35428) 		IC50 (nM)
5-HTT
(Binding of [3H]Citalopram)
R/S-268 2β,3β >10000 >1660
R/S-269 2α,3β 20300 >1660
R/S-270 2α,3α 22300 >1660
R/S-271 2β,3α 520 >1660

The binding of benztropine analogues to the DAT differs significantly from that of cocaine and the phenyltropanes. Benztropines are considered to be "atypical" DAT ligands because they stabilize the DAT in an inward-facing (closed-to-out) conformation, whereas cocaine and the phenyltropanes stabilize the DAT in an outward-facing (open-to-out) conformation. This difference in DAT binding may be responsible for the lack of cocaine-like behavioral effects observed in animal and human studies of the benztropine analogues and other “atypical” DAT inhibitors. [40] Studies of the structure-activity relationships of benztropine have shown that DAT affinity and selectivity over other monoamine transporters is enhanced by 4′,4′-difluorination. Modification of the tropane n-substituent was found to mitigate the anticholinergic effects of benztropine analogues by reducing M1 affinity.[41][42]

Tropanyl Isoxazoline Analogues[edit]

Compound 7a (3′-methoxy-8-methyl-spiro(8-azabicyclo(3.2.1)octane-3,5′(4′H)-isoxazole) allosterically enhances SERT binding of other reuptake ligands. Compound 7a construed as a potentiating allosteric effect (by unveiling occluded configured serotonin uptake-area ligand-site on surface of transporter that allows for binding by exogenous ligand, when SERT is otherwise conformed in a transitional manner where a SERT ligand cannot bind, this effect with compound in question occurs) at concentrations of 10μM—30μM (wherein it acts by interconverting the conformational state of unexposed SERTs to ones exposing the SSRI binding site via a shift to the equilibrium of the MAT) while exerting an inhibitory orthosteric effect when concentrations reach >30μM and above.

7a is the only known compound to allosterically modulate SERT in such a way within in vitro conditions (tianeptine has been shown to do similar, but has only shown efficacy doing so in living in vivo tissue samples). Considering its noncompetitive inhibition of 5-HT transporters decreasing Vmax with small change in the Km for serotonin, putatively stabilizing the cytoplasm-facing conformation of SERT: in such respect it is considered to have the opposite effect profile of the anti-addiction drug ibogaine (save for the function by which its anti-addictive properties are thought to be mediated, i.e. α3β4 nicotinic channel blockage. cf. 18-Methoxycornaridine for such nicotinergic activity without the likewise SERT affinity).[44]

Compound 11a possesses similar effects, but acts on the DAT. Similarly, such peripheral DAT considerations (when, as often is, considered conformational rather than otherwise explained as being electrostatic) may constitute the difference in affinity, through allosertic occulsion, between cyclopentyl-ruthenium phenyltropane in its difference from the tricarbonyl-chromium

Alicyclic Amine Analogues[edit]

EXP-561 Butyltolylquinuclidine

Dihydroimidazoles[edit]

Possible substitutions of the Mazindol molecular structure.

See: List of Mazindol analogues

Mazindol is usually considered a non-habituating (in humans, and some other mammals, but is habituating for e.g. Beagles[av]) tetracyclic dopamine reuptake inhibitor (of somewhat spurious classification in the former).

It is a loosely functional analog used in cocaine research; due in large part to N-Ethylmaleimide being able to inhibit approximately 95% of the specific binding of [3H]Mazindol to the residues of the MAT binding site(s), however said effect of 10 mM N-Ethylmaleimide was prevented in its entirety by just 10 μM cocaine. Whereas neither 300 μM dopamine or D-amphetamine afforded sufficient protection to contrast the efficacy of cocaine.[aw]

Local anesthetics (not usually CNS stimulants)[edit]

Amylocaine, or Stovaine (above), the first synthetically constructed local anesthetic. Compare structure to dimethylaminopivalophenone (below), an analgesic (opioid). Cocaine's classification as a narcotic under U.S. legal code, as has been stretched to be medicinally rationalized such when defining terms very broadly (due to its topical numbing affect, hindering pain signals from CNS recognition via local anesthesia) usually considered an exaggeration of traditional medicine naming convention, in this instance between the first synthetic sodium channel blocker and one of the very simplest opioids there remains a measure of apparent structural similarity between the former anesthetic and latter analgesic "narcotic"; despite the highly differing methods of action for the respective 'pain-killing' properties of either.[45]

In animal studies, certain of the local anesthetics have displayed residual dopamine reuptake inhibitor properties,[46] although not normally ones that are easily available. These are expected to be more cardiotoxic than phenyltropanes. For example, dimethocaine has behavioral stimulant effects (and therefore not here listed below) if a dose of it is taken that is 10 times the amount of cocaine. Dimethocaine is equipotent to cocaine in terms of its anesthetic equivalency.[46] Intralipid "rescue" has been shown to reverse the cardiotoxic effects of sodium channel blockers and presumably those effects when from cocaine administered intravenously as well.

List of local anesthetics
Name Other common names
Amylocaine Stovaine
Articaine Astracaine, Carticaine, Septanest, Septocaine, Ultracaine, Zorcaine
Benzocaine Anbesol, Lanacane, Orajel
Bupivacaine Marcaine, Sensorcaine, Vivacaine
Butacaine Butyn
Chloroprocaine Nesacaine
Cinchocaine/Dibucaine Cincain, Cinchocaine, Nupercainal, Nupercaine, Sovcaine
Cyclomethycaine Surfacaine, Topocaine
Etidocaine Duranest
Eucaine α-eucaine, β-eucaine
Fomocaine[47]
Fotocaine[47]
Hexylcaine Cyclaine, Osmocaine
Levobupivacaine Chirocaine
Lidocaine/Lignocaine Xylocaine, Betacaine
Mepivacaine Carbocaine, Polocaine
Meprylcaine/Oracaine Epirocain
Metabutoxycaine Primacaine
Phenacaine/Holocaine Holocaine
Piperocaine Metycaine
Pramocaine/Pramoxine Pramoxine
Prilocaine Citanest
Propoxycaine/Ravocaine Pravocaine, Ranocaine, Blockain
Procaine/Novocaine Borocaine (Procaine Borate), Ethocaine
Proparacaine/Alcaine Alcaine
Quinisocaine Dimethisoquin
Risocaine Propaesin, Propazyl, Propylcain
Ropivacaine Naropin
Tetracaine/Amethocaine Pontocaine, Dicaine
Trimecaine Mesdicain, Mesocain, Mesokain

See also[edit]

Methylecgonine cinnamate, an alkaloid widely considered inactive in its own right, but postulated to be active under pyrolysis. (cf. alkylphenyltropane analogue "224e") It is, however, found in patents of active cocaine analogue structures.[48][49]

Common analogues to prototypical D-RAs:

Notes (inclu. specific locations of citations from within references used)[edit]

  1. ^ [1] ←Page #969 (45th page of article) §III. ¶1. Final line. Last sentence.
  2. ^ [1] ←Page #1,018 (94th page of article) 2nd column, 2nd paragraph.
  3. ^ [1] ←Page #940 (16th page of article) underneath Table 8., above §4
  4. ^ [1] ←Page #970 (46th page of article) Table 27. Figure 29.
  5. ^ [1] ←Page #971 (47th page of article) Figure 30. & Page #973 (49th page of article) Table 28.
  6. ^ [1] ←Page #982 (58th page of article)
  7. ^ [1] ←Page #971 (47th page of article) Figure 30 & Page #971 (47th page of article) Figure 30 & Page #973 (49th page of article) Table 28
  8. ^ [1] ←Page #971 (47th page of article) Figure 30 & Page #971 (47th page of article) Figure 30 & Page #973 (49th page of article) Table 28
  9. ^ [1] ←Page #972 (48th page of article) ¶2, Line 10.
  10. ^ [1] ←Page #971 (47th page of article) Figure 30 & Page #971 (47th page of article) Figure 30 & Page #973 (49th page of article) Table 28
  11. ^ [1] ←Page #971 (47th page of article) Figure 30 & Page #971 (47th page of article) Figure 30 & Page #973 (49th page of article) Table 28
  12. ^ [1] ←Page #973 (49th page of article) §C. & Page #974 (50th page of article) Figure 31 & Page #976 (52nd page of article) Table 29.
  13. ^ [1] ←Page #974 (50th page of article) Final ¶ (5th), Second line.
  14. ^ [1] ←Page #975 (51st page of article) First ¶, first line.
  15. ^ [1] ←Page #975 (51st page of article) First ¶, 4th line.
  16. ^ [1] ←Page #974 (50st page of article) First (left) column, third ¶
  17. ^ [1] ←Page #937 (13th page of article) Second (right) column, first ¶. Above/before §2
  18. ^ [1] ←Page #974 (50st page of article) First (left) column, fourth ¶
  19. ^ [1] ←Page #974 (50th page of article) Figure 31 & Page #977 (53rd page of article) Table 30.
  20. ^ [1] ←Page #974 (50th page of article) Figure 31 & Page #977 (53rd page of article) Table 30.
  21. ^ [1] ←Page #974 (50th page of article) Figure 31 & Page #977 (53rd page of article) Table 30.
  22. ^ [1] ←Page #974 (50th page of article) Figure 31 & Page #977 (53rd page of article) Table 30.
  23. ^ [1] ←Page #976 (52nd page of article)
  24. ^ [1] ←Page #978 (54th page of article) §D & Page #980 (56th page of article) Figure 33 & Page #981 (57th page of article) Table 32.
  25. ^ [1] ←Page #964 (39th page of article) Table 23.
  26. ^ [1] ←Page #980 (56th page of article) Scheme 52.
  27. ^ [1] ←Page #963 (39th page of article) 2nd (right side) column, 2nd paragraph.
  28. ^ [1] ←Page #967 (43rd page of article) §C. & Page #967 (43rd page of article) Table 25
  29. ^ [1] ←Page #982 (58th page of article) §G & Page #983 (59th page of article) Figure 36 & Page #984 (60th page of article) Table 35.
  30. ^ [1] ←Page #979 (55th page of article) Table 31.
  31. ^ [1] ←Page #981 (57th page of article) §E & Page #982 (58th page of article) Table 33.
  32. ^ [1] ←Page #970 (46th page of article) §B, 10th line
  33. ^ [1] ←Page #971 (47th page of article) 1st ¶, 10th line
  34. ^ [1] ←Page #949 (25th page of article) 3rd ¶, 20th line
  35. ^ [1] ←Page #982 (58th page of article) §F, Table 34 & Figure 35.
  36. ^ [1] ←Page #982 (58th page of article) 3rd ¶, lines 2, 5 & 6.
  37. ^ [1] ←Page #984 (60th page of article) Figure 37.
  38. ^ [1] ←Page #984 (60th page of article) §H, Figure 37 & Page #985 (61st page of article) Table 36.
  39. ^ [1] ←Page #984 (60th page of article) Scheme 56.
  40. ^ [1] ←Page #986 (62nd page of article) §I, Table 37 & Scheme 58
  41. ^ [1] ←Page #1,014 (90th page of article) §VIII, A. Figure 59.
  42. ^ [1] ←Page #1,016 (92nd page of article) Figure 60.
  43. ^ [1] ←Page #987 (63rd page of article) §IV, Figure 39 & Page #988 (64th page of article) Table 38.
  44. ^ [1] ←Page #987 (63rd page of article) Figure 40, Page #988 (64th page of article) §B & Page #989 (65th page of article) Table 39.
  45. ^ [1] ←Page #987 (63rd page of article) Figure 41, Page #989 (65th page of article) §C & Page #990 (66th page of article) Table 40.
  46. ^ [1] ←Page #988 (64th page of article) Figure 42, Page #990 (66th page of article) §2 & Page #992 (68th page of article) Table 41.
  47. ^ [1] ←Page #988 (64th page of article) Figure 43, Page #992 (68th page of article) §3 & Table 42.
  48. ^ [1] ←Page #1,011 (87th page of article) §VII (7) 1st ¶.
  49. ^ [1] ←Page #969 (45th page of article) 2nd (right-side) column 2nd .

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw Singh, Satendra; et al. (2000). "Chemistry, Design, and Structure-Activity Relationship of Cocaine Antagonists" (PDF). Chem. Rev. 100 (3): 925–1024. doi:10.1021/cr9700538. PMID 11749256.
  2. ^ Watson-Williams, E (1925). "Psicaine: An Artificial Cocaine". Br Med J. 1 (3340): 11. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.3340.11. PMC 2196615. PMID 20771843.
  3. ^ Gatley SJ, Yu DW, Fowler JS, MacGregor RR, Schlyer DJ, Dewey SL, Wolf AP, Martin T, Shea CE, Volkow ND (March 1994). "Studies with differentially labeled [11C]cocaine, [11C]norcocaine, [11C]benzoylecgonine, and [11C]- and 4′-[18F]fluorococaine to probe the extent to which [11C]cocaine metabolites contribute to PET images of the baboon brain". Journal of Neurochemistry. 62 (3): 1154–62. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.1994.62031154.x. PMID 8113802. S2CID 25854431.
  4. ^ Carroll, F. I.; Lewin, A. H.; Boja, J. W.; Kuhar, M. J. (1992). "Cocaine Receptor: Biochemical Characterization and Structure-Activity Relationships of Cocaine Analogues at Dopamine Transporter". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 35 (6): 969–981. doi:10.1021/jm00084a001. PMID 1552510.
  5. ^ Seale, TW; Avor, K; Singh, S; Hall, N; Chan, HM; Basmadjian, GP (1997). "2′-Substitution of cocaine selectively enhances dopamine and norepinephrine transporter binding". NeuroReport. 8 (16): 3571–5. doi:10.1097/00001756-199711100-00030. PMID 9427328. S2CID 24348794.
  6. ^ Singh, S; Basmadjian, GP; Avor, K; Pouw, B; Seale, TW (1997). "A convenient synthesis of 2?- or 4?-hydroxycocaine". Synthetic Communications. 27 (22): 4003–4012. doi:10.1080/00397919708005923.
    et. el-Moselhy, TF; Avor, KS; Basmadjian, GP (Sep 2001). "2?-substituted analogs of cocaine: synthesis and dopamine transporter binding potencies". Archiv der Pharmazie. 334 (8–9): 275–8. doi:10.1002/1521-4184(200109)334:8/9<275::aid-ardp275>3.0.co;2-b. PMID 11688137. S2CID 41556606.
    et. Seale, TW; Avor, K; Singh, S; Hall, N; Chan, HM; Basmadjian, GP (1997). "2?-Substitution of cocaine selectively enhances dopamine and norepinephrine transporter binding". NeuroReport. 8 (16): 3571–5. doi:10.1097/00001756-199711100-00030. PMID 9427328. S2CID 24348794.
  7. ^ Smith, RM; Poquette, MA; Smith, PJ (1984). "Hydroxymethoxybenzoylmethylecgonines: New metabolites of cocaine from human urine". Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 8 (1): 29–34. doi:10.1093/jat/8.1.29. PMID 6708474.
  8. ^ Sakamuri, Sukumar; et al. (2000). "Synthesis of novel spirocyclic cocaine analogs using the Suzuki coupling". Tetrahedron Letters. 41 (13): 2055–2058. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)00113-1.
  9. ^ Isomura, Shigeki; Hoffman, Timothy Z.; Wirsching, Peter; Janda, Kim D. (2002). "Benzoylthio-. cocaine, analogue substitution. Synthesis, Properties, and Reactivity of Cocaine Benzoylthio Ester Possessing the Cocaine Absolute Configuration". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (14): 3661–3668. doi:10.1021/ja012376y. PMID 11929256.
  10. ^ Daum SJ, Martini CM, Kullnig RK, Clarke RL (May 1972). "Compounds affecting the central nervous system. I. Tropane-2 ,3 -diol derivatives. A reverse ester of cocaine". The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 37 (10): 1665–9. doi:10.1021/jo00975a045. PMID 5031343.
  11. ^ Davis, Franklin A.; Gaddiraju, Narendra V.; Theddu, Naresh; Hummel, Joshua R.; Kondaveeti, Sandeep K.; Zdilla, Michael J. (2012). "Enantioselective Synthesis of Cocaine C-1 Analogues using Sulfinimines (N-Sulfinyl Imines)". The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 77 (5): 2345–2359. doi:10.1021/jo202652f. ISSN 0022-3263. PMID 22300308.
  12. ^ a b c Reith, M. E. A.; Ali, S.; Hashim, A.; Sheikh, I. S.; Theddu, N.; Gaddiraju, N. V.; Mehrotra, S.; Schmitt, K. C.; Murray, T. F.; Sershen, H.; Unterwald, E. M.; Davis, F. A. (2012). "Novel C-1 Substituted Cocaine Analogs Unlike Cocaine or Benztropine". Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 343 (2): 413–425. doi:10.1124/jpet.112.193771. ISSN 1521-0103. PMC 3477221. PMID 22895898. Full article
  13. ^ Sharkey, J; Glen, KA; Wolfe, S; Kuhar, MJ (1988). "Cocaine binding at sigma receptors". Eur J Pharmacol. 149 (1–2): 171–4. doi:10.1016/0014-2999(88)90058-1. PMID 2840298.
  14. ^ Nuwayhid, Samer J.; Werling, Linda L. (2006). "Sigma2 (σ2) receptors as a target for cocaine action in the rat striatum". European Journal of Pharmacology. 535 (1–3): 98–103. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.12.077. ISSN 0014-2999. PMID 16480713.
  15. ^ Involvement of the Sigma1 Receptor in Cocaine-induced Conditioned Place Preference: Possible Dependence on Dopamine Uptake Blockade Pascal Romieu et al. Neuropsychopharmacology (2002) 26 444-455.10.1038/S0893-133X(01)00391-8
  16. ^ Yoshihiro Hamaya, Hesham Abdelrazek, Gary R. Strichartz (2002). "Comparative Potency for Impulse-Blockade and for Cutaneous Analgesia of Traditional and Novel Local Anesthetics". Abstracts of American Society of Anesthesiologists Annual Meeting. Hydroxypropylbenzoylecgonine (HPBE) is the only effective analgesic compound in [Esterom].{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)[permanent dead link]
  17. ^ a b c d e U.S. patent 6,479,509
  18. ^ Kozikowski, A. P.; Simoni, D.; Roberti, M.; Rondanin, R.; Wang, S.; Du, P.; Johnson, K. M. (1999). "Synthesis of 8-oxa analogues of norcocaine endowed with interesting cocaine-like activity". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 9 (13): 1831–1836. doi:10.1016/S0960-894X(99)00273-5. PMID 10406650.
  19. ^ Zhang, A; Zhou, G; Rong, SB; Johnson, KM; Zhang, M; Kozikowski, AP (8 April 2002). "Thiophene derivatives: a new series of potent norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitors". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 12 (7): 993–5. doi:10.1016/s0960-894x(02)00103-8. PMID 11909701.
  20. ^ Zhang, Ao; Zhou, Guochun; Hoepping, Alexander; Mukhopadhyaya, Jayanta; Johnson, Kenneth M.; Zhang, Mei; Kozikowski, Alan P. (April 2002). "Further Studies on Conformationally Constrained Tricyclic Tropane Analogues and Their Uptake Inhibition at Monoamine Transporter Sites: Synthesis of ( Z )-9-(Substituted arylmethylene)-7-azatricyclo[4.3.1.0 3,7 ]decanes as a Novel Class of Serotonin Transporter Inhibitors". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 45 (9): 1930–1941. doi:10.1021/jm0105373. PMID 11960503.
  21. ^ Davies, HM; Saikali, E; Sexton, T; Childers, SR (1993). "Novel 2-substituted cocaine analogs: binding properties at dopamine transport sites in rat striatum". Eur. J. Pharmacol. 244 (1): 93–7. doi:10.1016/0922-4106(93)90063-f. PMID 8420793.
  22. ^ "Drugbank website "drug card", "(DB00907)" for Cocaine: Giving ten targets of the molecule in vivo, including dopamine/serotonin sodium channel affinity & K-opioid affinity". Drugbank.ca. Retrieved 9 March 2010.
  23. ^ Sahlholm, Kristoffer; Nilsson, Johanna; Marcellino, Daniel; Fuxe, Kjell; Århem, Peter (2012). "Voltage sensitivities and deactivation kinetics of histamine H3 and H4 receptors". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 1818 (12): 3081–3089. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.07.027. PMID 22885137. ...Agonist potency at some neurotransmitter receptors has been shown to be regulated by voltage, a mechanism which has been suggested to play a crucial role in the regulation of neurotransmitter release by inhibitory autoreceptors...
  24. ^ Enantioselective synthesis of strobamine and its analogues Xing Zhang et al. Center for Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, Research Triangle Institute. Issue in Honor of Prof. James M.Cook ARKIVOC 2010 (iv)96-103
  25. ^ The Alkaloids; Vol. 44, Geoffrey Cordell
  26. ^ a b Appell, Michael; Dunn, William J.; Reith, Maarten E.A.; Miller, Larry; Flippen-Anderson, Judith L. (2002). "An Analysis of the Binding of Cocaine Analogues to the Monoamine Transporters Using Tensor Decomposition 3-D QSAR". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 10 (5): 1197–1206. doi:10.1016/S0968-0896(01)00389-3. ISSN 0968-0896. PMID 11886784.
  27. ^ Hicks, MJ; De, BP; Rosenberg, JB; Davidson, JT; Moreno, AY; Janda, KD; Wee, S; Koob, GF; Hackett, NR; Kaminsky, SM; Worgall, S; Toth, M; Mezey, JG; Crystal, RG (2011). "Cocaine analog coupled to disrupted adenovirus: a vaccine strategy to evoke high-titer immunity against addictive drugs". Mol Ther. 19 (3): 612–9. doi:10.1038/mt.2010.280. PMC 3048190. PMID 21206484.
  28. ^ Kinsey, BM; Kosten, TR; Orson, FM (2010). "Active immunotherapy for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence". Drugs of the Future. 35 (4): 301–306. doi:10.1358/dof.2010.035.04.1474292. PMC 3142961. PMID 21796226.
  29. ^ Wee, S; Hicks, MJ; De, BP; Rosenberg, JB; Moreno, AY; Kaminsky, SM; Janda, KD; Crystal, RG; Koob, GF (2011). "Novel cocaine vaccine linked to a disrupted adenovirus gene transfer vector blocks cocaine psychostimulant and reinforcing effects". Neuropsychopharmacology. 37 (5): 1083–91. doi:10.1038/npp.2011.200. PMC 3306868. PMID 21918504.
  30. ^ Catalytic antibodies against cocaine and methods of using and producing same Google patents US 6566084 B1
  31. ^ Deng, Shixian; Bharat, Narine; de Prada, Paloma; Landry, Donald W. (2004). "Substrate-assisted antibody catalysis". Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2 (3): 288–90. doi:10.1039/b314264g. ISSN 1477-0520. PMID 14747854.
  32. ^ Yang, G.; Chun, J.; Arakawa-Uramoto, H.; Wang, X.; Gawinowicz, M. A.; Zhao, K.; Landry, D. W. (1 January 1996). "Anti-Cocaine Catalytic Antibodies: A Synthetic Approach to Improved Antibody Diversity". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 118 (25): 5881–5890. doi:10.1021/ja953077.
  33. ^ Mets, B.; Winger, G.; Cabrera, C.; Seo, S.; Jamdar, S.; Yang, G.; Zhao, K.; Briscoe, R. J.; Almonte, R.; Woods, J. H.; Landry, D. W. (18 August 1998). "A catalytic antibody against cocaine prevents cocaine's reinforcing and toxic effects in rats". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 95 (17): 10176–10181. Bibcode:1998PNAS...9510176M. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.17.10176. PMC 21481. PMID 9707620.
  34. ^ Ho, M; Segre, M (2003). "Inhibition of cocaine binding to the human dopamine transporter by a single chain anti-idiotypic antibody: its cloning, expression, and functional properties". Biochim Biophys Acta. 1638 (3): 257–66. doi:10.1016/s0925-4439(03)00091-7. PMC 3295240. PMID 12878327.
  35. ^ Schabacker, DS; Kirschbaum, KS; Segre, M (2000). "Exploring the feasibility of an anti-idiotypic cocaine vaccine: analysis of the specificity of anticocaine antibodies (Ab1) capable of inducing Ab2beta anti-idiotypic antibodies". Immunology. 100 (1): 48–56. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00004.x. PMC 2326984. PMID 10809958.
  36. ^ Zhou, Jia; He, Rong; Johnson, Kenneth M.; Ye, Yanping; Kozikowski, Alan P. (2004). "Piperidine-Based Nocaine/Modafinil Hybrid Ligands as Highly Potent Monoamine Transporter Inhibitors: Efficient Drug Discovery by Rational Lead Hybridization". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 47 (24): 5821–5824. doi:10.1021/jm040117o. ISSN 0022-2623. PMC 1395211. PMID 15537337.
  37. ^ Skeptics Stack Exchange: Is sugar one element away from cocaine (or any other drug?)
  38. ^ a b c d Loland, C. J.; Desai, R. I.; Zou, M.-F.; Cao, J.; Grundt, P.; Gerstbrein, K.; Sitte, H. H.; Newman, A. H.; Katz, J. L.; Gether, U. (2007). "Relationship between Conformational Changes in the Dopamine Transporter and Cocaine-Like Subjective Effects of Uptake Inhibitors". Molecular Pharmacology. 73 (3): 813–823. doi:10.1124/mol.107.039800. ISSN 0026-895X. PMID 17978168. S2CID 5061034.
  39. ^ Tanda, Gianluigi; Newman, Amy Hauck; Ebbs, Aaron L.; Tronci, Valeria; Green, Jennifer L.; Tallarida, Ronald J.; Katz, Jonathan L. (September 2009). "Combinations of Cocaine with Other Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors: Assessment of Additivity". Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 330 (3): 802–809. doi:10.1124/jpet.109.154302. PMC 2729796. PMID 19483071.
  40. ^ Schmitt, KC; Rothman, RB; Reith, ME (2013). "Nonclassical pharmacology of the dopamine transporter: atypical inhibitors, allosteric modulators, and partial substrates". J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 346 (1): 2–10. doi:10.1124/jpet.111.191056. PMC 3684841. PMID 23568856.
  41. ^ Rothman, RB; Baumann, MH; Prisinzano, TE; Newman, AH (2008). "Dopamine transport inhibitors based on GBR12909 and benztropine as potential medications to treat cocaine addiction". Biochem Pharmacol. 75 (1): 2–16. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2007.08.007. PMC 2225585. PMID 17897630.
  42. ^ Runyon, SP; Carroll, FI (2006). "Dopamine transporter ligands: recent developments and therapeutic potential". Curr Top Med Chem. 6 (17): 1825–43. doi:10.2174/156802606778249775. PMID 17017960.
  43. ^ C. Dallanoce et al. - Bioorg. Med. Chem. 20 (2012) 6344-6355
  44. ^ Dallanoce, Clelia; Canovi, Mara; Matera, Carlo; Mennini, Tiziana; De Amici, Marco; Gobbi, Marco; De Micheli, Carlo (2012). "A novel spirocyclic tropanyl-Δ2-isoxazoline derivative enhances citalopram and paroxetine binding to serotonin transporters as well as serotonin uptake". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 20 (21): 6344–6355. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2012.09.004. ISSN 0968-0896. PMID 23022052.
  45. ^ Ruetsch, YA; Böni, T; Borgeat, A (Aug 2001). "From cocaine to ropivacaine: the history of local anesthetic drugs". Curr Top Med Chem. 1 (3): 175–82. doi:10.2174/1568026013395335. PMID 11895133.
  46. ^ a b Wilcox, K.M.; Kimmel, H.L.; Lindsey, K.P.; Votaw, J.R.; Goodman, M.M.; Howell, L.L. (2005). "In vivo comparison of the reinforcing and dopamine transporter effects of local anesthetics in rhesus monkeys" (PDF). Synapse. 58 (4): 220–228. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.327.1264. doi:10.1002/syn.20199. PMID 16206183. S2CID 15631376. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-06-11.
  47. ^ a b Schoenberger, Matthias; Damijonaitis, Arunas; Zhang, Zinan; Nagel, Daniel; Trauner, Dirk (2014). "Development of a New Photochromic Ion Channel Blocker via Azologization of Fomocaine". ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 5 (7): 514–518. doi:10.1021/cn500070w. ISSN 1948-7193. PMC 4102962. PMID 24856540. nih.gov article
  48. ^ U.S. patent 6,479,509 Patent inventor Frank Ivy Carroll, Assignee: Research Triangle Institute
  49. ^ U.S. patent US6479509 B1 structures given for submission, 5th compound down in image.

External links[edit]

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocaine_analog

Leave a Reply