|Part of a series on|
|Part of a series on|
“Aryan” (//) is a term that was used as a self-designation by Indo-Iranian people.[note 1] The word was used by the Indic people of the Vedic period in India as an ethnic label for themselves and to refer to the noble class as well as the geographic region known as Āryāvarta, where Indo-Aryan culture is based. The closely related Iranian people also used the term as an ethnic label for themselves in the Avesta scriptures, and the word forms the etymological source of the country name Iran. It was believed in the 19th century that Aryan was also a self-designation used by all Proto-Indo-Europeans, a theory that has now been abandoned. Scholars point out that, even in ancient times, the idea of being an “Aryan” was religious, cultural and linguistic, not racial.
Drawing on misinterpreted references in the Rig Veda by Western scholars in the 19th century, the term “Aryan” was adopted as a racial category through the works of Arthur de Gobineau, whose ideology of race was based on an idea of blonde northern European “Aryans” who had migrated across the world and founded all major civilizations, before being diluted through racial mixing with local populations. Through the works of Houston Stewart Chamberlain, Gobineau’s ideas later influenced the Nazi racial ideology which saw “Aryan peoples” as innately superior to other putative racial groups.
The atrocities committed in the name of this racial ideology have led academics to avoid the term “Aryan”, which has been replaced, in most cases, by “Indo-Iranian“.
- 1 Etymology
- 2 Usage and adaptation in other languages
- 3 History
- 4 See also
- 5 Notes
- 6 References
The English word “Aryan” (originally spelt “Arian”) was borrowed from the Sanskrit word ārya, आर्य, in the 18th century  and thought to be the self-designation used by all Indo-European people.
Philologist J.P. Mallory argues that “As an ethnic designation, the word [Aryan] is most properly limited to the Indo-Iranians, and most justly to the latter where it still gives its name to the country Iran.
In early Vedic literature, the term Āryāvarta (Sanskrit: आर्यावर्त, abode of the Aryans) was the name given to northern India, where the Indo-Aryan culture was based. The Manusmṛti (2.22) gives the name Āryāvarta to “the tract between the Himalaya and the Vindhya ranges, from the Eastern (Bay of Bengal) to the Western Sea (Arabian Sea)”.
The Sanskrit term comes from proto-Indo-Iranian *arya-[note 1]  or *aryo-,[note 2] the name used by the Indo-Iranians to designate themselves.[note 3] The Zend airya ‘venerable’ and Old Persian ariya are also derivates of *aryo-, and are also self-designations.[note 4]
It has been postulated the Proto-Indo-European root word is *haerós with the meanings “members of one’s own (ethnic) group, peer, freeman” as well as the Indo-Iranian meaning of Aryan. Derived from it were words like
- the Hittite prefix arā- meaning member of one’s own group, peer, companion and friend;
- Old Irish aire, meaning “freeman” and “noble”
- Gaulish personal names with Ario-
- Avestan airya- meaning Aryan, Iranian in the larger sense
- Old Indic ari- meaning attached to, faithful, devoted person and kinsman
- Old Indic aryá- meaning kind, favourable, attached to and devoted
- Old Indic árya- meaning Aryan, faithful to the Vedic religion.
The word *haerós itself is believed to have come from the root *haer- meaning “put together”. The original meaning in Proto-Indo-European had a clear emphasis on the “in-group status” as distinguished from that of outsiders, particularly those captured and incorporated into the group as slaves. While in Anatolia, the base word has come to emphasize personal relationship, in Indo-Iranian the word has taken a more ethnic meaning.
- Proto-Indo-Europeans: during the 19th century, it was proposed that “Aryan” was also the self-designation of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, a hypothesis that has been abandoned.
- “Aryan language family”: the Indo-Aryan languages (including the Dardic), Iranian languages and Nuristani languages,
- Indo-Aryan languages specifically, also called Indic.
Indian and Iranian nationalism
Nazism and white supremacy
During the 19th century it was proposed that “Aryan” was also the self-designation of the Proto-Indo-Europeans. Based on speculations that the Proto-Indo-European homeland was located in northern Europe, a 19th-century hypothesis which is now abandoned, the word developed a racialist meaning.
The Nazis used the word “Aryan” to describe people in a racial sense. The Nazi official Alfred Rosenberg believed that the Nordic race was descended from Proto-Aryans, who he believed had prehistorically dwelt on the North German Plain and who had ultimately originated from the lost continent of Atlantis. According to Nazi racial theory, the term “Aryan” described the Germanic peoples. However, a satisfactory definition of “Aryan” remained problematic during Nazi Germany.
The Nazis considered the purest Aryans to be those that belonged to the “Nordic race” physical ideal, known as the “master race” during Nazi Germany.[note 5] Although the physical ideal of the Nazi racial theorists was typically the tall, fair-haired and light-eyed Nordic individual, such theorists accepted the fact that a considerable variety of hair and eye colour existed within the racial categories they recognised. For example, Adolf Hitler and many Nazi officials had dark hair and were still considered members of the Aryan race under Nazi racial doctrine, because the determination of an individual’s racial type depended on a preponderance of many characteristics in an individual rather than on just one defining feature.
In September 1935, the Nazis passed the Nuremberg Laws. All Aryan Reich citizens were required to prove their Aryan ancestry, one way was to obtain an Ahnenpass by providing proof through baptismal certificates that all four grandparents were of Aryan descent.
Usage and adaptation in other languages
In Indian/Sanskrit literature
In Sanskrit and related Indic languages, ārya means “one who does noble deeds; a noble one”. Āryāvarta “abode of the āryas” is a common name for North India in Sanskrit literature. Manusmṛti (2.22) gives the name to “the tract between the Himalaya and the Vindhya ranges, from the Eastern Sea to the Western Sea”. The title ārya was used with various modifications throughout the Indian Subcontinent. Kharavela, the Emperor of Kalinga in second century BCE, is referred to as an ārya in the Hathigumpha inscriptions of the Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves in Bhubaneswar, Odisha. The Gurjara-Pratihara rulers in the 10th century were titled “Maharajadhiraja of Āryāvarta”. Various Indian religions, chiefly Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism, use the term ārya as an epithet of honour; a similar usage is found in the name of Arya Samaj.
In Iranian literature
Unlike the several meanings connected with ārya- in Old Indo-Aryan, the Old Persian term only has an ethnic meaning. That is in contrast to Indian usage, in which several secondary meanings evolved, the meaning of ar- as a self-identifier is preserved in Iranian usage, hence the word “Iran”. The airya meant “Iranian”, and Iranian anairya  meant and means “non-Iranian”. Arya may also be found as an ethnonym in Iranian languages, e.g., Alan and Persian Iran and Ossetian Ir/Iron The name is itself equivalent to Aryan, where Iran means “land of the Aryans,” and has been in use since Sassanid times.
The Avesta clearly uses airya/airyan as an ethnic name (Vd. 1; Yt. 13.143-44, etc.), where it appears in expressions such as airyāfi; daiŋˊhāvō “Iranian lands, peoples”, airyō.šayanəm “land inhabited by Iranians”, and airyanəm vaējō vaŋhuyāfi; dāityayāfi; “Iranian stretch of the good Dāityā”, the river Oxus, the modern Āmū Daryā. Old Persian sources also use this term for Iranians. Old Persian which is a testament to the antiquity of the Persian language and which is related to most of the languages/dialects spoken in Iran including modern Persian, the Kurdish languages, Balochi, and Gilaki makes it clear that Iranians referred to themselves as Arya.
The term “Airya/Airyan” appears in the royal Old Persian inscriptions in three different contexts:
- As the name of the language of the Old Persian version of the inscription of Darius I in Behistun
- As the ethnic background of Darius I in inscriptions at Naqsh-e-Rostam and Susa (Dna, Dse) and Xerxes I in the inscription from Persepolis (Xph)
- As the definition of the God of the Aryans, Ahura Mazdā, in the Elamite language version of the Behistun inscription.
For example in the Dna and Dse Darius and Xerxes describe themselves as “An Achaemenian, A Persian son of a Persian and an Aryan, of Aryan stock”. Although Darius the Great called his language the Aryan language, modern scholars refer to it as Old Persian because it is the ancestor of modern Persian language.
The Old Persian and Avestan evidence is confirmed by the Greek sources. Herodotus in his Histories remarks about the Iranian Medes that: “These Medes were called anciently by all people Arians; ” (7.62). In Armenian sources, the Parthians, Medes and Persians are collectively referred to as Aryans. Eudemus of Rhodes apud Damascius (Dubitationes et solutiones in Platonis Parmenidem 125 bis) refers to “the Magi and all those of Iranian (áreion) lineage”; Diodorus Siculus (1.94.2) considers Zoroaster (Zathraustēs) as one of the Arianoi.
The name of Ariana is further extended to a part of Persia and of Media, as also to the Bactrians and Sogdians on the north; for these speak approximately the same language, with but slight variations.— Geography, 15.8
The trilingual inscription erected by Shapur’s command gives us a more clear description. The languages used are Parthian, Middle Persian and Greek. In Greek the inscription says: “ego … tou Arianon ethnous despotes eimi” which translates to “I am the king of the Aryans”. In the Middle Persian Shapour says: “I am the Lord of the EranShahr” and in Parthian he says: “I am the Lord of AryanShahr”.
The Bactrian language (a Middle Iranian language) inscription of Kanishka the Great, the founder of the Kushan Empire at Rabatak, which was discovered in 1993 in an unexcavated site in the Afghanistan province of Baghlan, clearly refers to this Eastern Iranian language as Arya.
In the post-Islamic era one can still see a clear usage of the term Aryan (Iran) in the work of the 10th-century historian Hamzah al-Isfahani. In his famous book “The History of Prophets and Kings”, al-Isfahani writes, “Aryan which is also called Pars is in the middle of these countries and these six countries surround it because the South East is in the hands China, the North of the Turks, the middle South is India, the middle North is Rome, and the South West and the North West is the Sudan and Berber lands”. All this evidence shows that the name arya “Iranian” was a collective definition, denoting peoples (Geiger, pp. 167 f.; Schmitt, 1978, p. 31) who were aware of belonging to the one ethnic stock, speaking a common language, and having a religious tradition that centered on the cult of Ahura Mazdā.
In Latin literature
The word Arianus was used to designate Ariana, the area comprising North-western India, Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan. In 1601, Philemon Holland used ‘Arianes’ in his translation of the Latin Arianus to designate the inhabitants of Ariana. This was the first use of the form Arian verbatim in the English language. In 1844 James Cowles Prichard first designated both the Indians and the Iranians “Arians” under the false assumption that the Iranians as well as the Indians self-designated themselves Aria. The Iranians did use the form Airya as a designation for the “Aryans,” but Prichard had mistaken Aria (deriving from OPer. Haravia) as a designation of the “Aryans” and associated the Aria with the place-name Ariana (Av. Airyana), the homeland of the Aryans. The form Aria as a designation of the “Aryans” was, however, only preserved in the language of the Indo-Aryans.
In European languages
The term “Aryan” came to be used as the term for the newly discovered Indo-European languages, and, by extension, the original speakers of those languages. In the 19th century, “language” was considered a property of “ethnicity”, and thus the speakers of the Indo-Iranian or Indo-European languages came to be called the “Aryan race“, as contradistinguished from what came to be called the “Semitic race“. By the late 19th century, among some people, the notions of an “Aryan race” became closely linked to Nordicism, which posited Northern European racial superiority over all other peoples. This “master race” ideal engendered both the “Aryanization” programs of Nazi Germany, in which the classification of people as “Aryan” and “non-Aryan” was most emphatically directed towards the exclusion of Jews.[note 6] By the end of World War II, the word ‘Aryan’ had become associated by many with the racial ideologies and atrocities committed by the Nazis.
Western notions of an “Aryan race” rose to prominence in late-19th- and early-20th-century racialism, an idea most notably embraced by Nazism. The Nazis believed that the “Nordic peoples” (who were also referred to as the “Germanic peoples“) represent an ideal and “pure race” that was the purest representation of the original racial stock of those who were then called the Proto-Aryans. The Nazi Party declared that the “Nordics” were the true Aryans because they claimed that they were more “pure” (less racially mixed) than other people of what were then called the “Aryan people”.
Before the 19th century
While the original meaning of Indo-Iranian *arya as a self-designator is uncontested, the origin of the word (and thus also its original meaning) remains uncertain.[note 7] Indo-Iranian ar- is a syllable ambiguous in origin, from Indo-European ar-, er-, or or-. No evidence for a Proto-Indo-European (as opposed to Indo-Iranian) ethnic name like “Aryan” has been found. The word was used by Herodotus in reference to the Iranian Medes whom he describes as the people who “were once universally known as Aryans”.
The meaning of ‘Aryan’ that was adopted into the English language in the late 18th century was the one associated with the technical term used in comparative philology, which in turn had the same meaning as that evident in the very oldest Old Indic usage, i.e. as a (self-) identifier of “(speakers of) North Indian languages“.[note 8] This usage was simultaneously influenced by a word that appeared in classical sources (Latin and Greek Ἀριάνης Arianes, e.g. in Pliny 1.133 and Strabo 15.2.1–8), and recognized to be the same as that which appeared in living Iranian languages, where it was a (self-)identifier of the “(speakers of) Iranian languages“. Accordingly, ‘Aryan’ came to refer to the languages of the Indo-Iranian language group, and by extension, native speakers of those languages.
The term Arya is used in ancient Persian language texts, for example in the Behistun inscription from the 5th century BCE, in which the Persian kings Darius the Great and Xerxes are described as “Aryans of Aryan stock” (arya arya chiça). The inscription also refers to the deity Ahura Mazda as “the god of the Aryans”, and to the ancient Persian language as “Aryan”. In this sense the word seems to have referred to the elite culture of the ancient Iranians, including both linguistic, cultural and religious aspects.  The word also has a central place in the Zoroastrian religion in which the “Aryan expanse” (Airyana Vaejah) is described as the mythical homeland of the Iranian people’s and as the center of the world.
The term Arya is used 36 times in 34 hymns in the Rigveda.
According to Talageri (2000, The Rig Veda. A Historical Analysis)
“the particular Vedic Aryans of the Rigveda were one section among these Purus, who called themselves Bharatas.” Thus it is possible, according to Talageri, that at one point Arya did refer to a specific tribe.
While the word may ultimately derive from a tribal name, already in the Rigveda it appears as a religious distinction, separating those who sacrifice “properly” from those who do not belong to the historical Vedic religion, presaging the usage in later Hinduism where the term comes to denote religious righteousness or piety. In RV 9.63.5, ârya “noble, pious, righteous” is used as contrasting with árāvan “not liberal, envious, hostile”:
- índraṃ várdhanto aptúraḥ kṛṇvánto víśvam âryam apaghnánto árāvṇaḥ
- “[the Soma-drops], performing every noble work, active, augmenting Indra’s strength, driving away the godless ones.” (trans. Griffith)
Arya and Anarya are primarily used in the moral sense in the Hindu Epics. People are usually called Arya or Anarya based on their behaviour. Arya is typically one who follows the Dharma. This is historically applicable for any person living anywhere in Bharata Varsha or vast India.
According to the Mahabharata, a person’s behaviour (not wealth or learning) determines if he can be called an Arya.
The word ārya is often found in Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain texts. In the Indian spiritual context, it can be applied to Rishis or to someone who has mastered the four noble truths and entered upon the spiritual path. According to Nehru, the religions of India may be called collectively ārya dharma, a term that includes the religions that originated in India (e.g. Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and possibly Sikhism).
“O my Lord, a person who is chanting Your holy name, although born of a low family like that of a Chandala, is situated on the highest platform of self-realization. Such a person must have performed all kinds of penances and sacrifices according to Vedic literatures many, many times after taking bath in all the holy places of pilgrimage. Such a person is considered to be the best of the Arya family” (Bhagavata Purana 3.33.7).
“My dear Lord, one’s occupational duty is instructed in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam and Bhagavad-gītā according to Your point of view, which never deviates from the highest goal of life. Those who follow their occupational duties under Your supervision, being equal to all living entities, moving and nonmoving, and not considering high and low, are called Āryans. Such Āryans worship You, the Supreme Personality of Godhead.” (Bhagavata Purana 6.16.43).
According to Swami Vivekananda, “A child materially born is not an Arya; the child born in spirituality is an Arya.” He further elaborated, referring to the Manu Smriti: “Says our great law-giver, Manu, giving the definition of an Arya, ‘He is the Arya, who is born through prayer.’ Every child not born through prayer is illegitimate, according to the great law-giver: The child must be prayed for. Those children that come with curses, that slip into the world, just in a moment of inadvertence, because that could not be prevented – what can we expect of such progeny?…“(Swami Vivekananda, Complete Works vol.8)
The word ārya (Pāli: ariya), in the sense of “noble” or “exalted”, is very frequently used in Buddhist texts to designate a spiritual warrior or hero, which use this term much more often than Hindu or Jain texts. Buddha’s Dharma and Vinaya are the ariyassa dhammavinayo. The Four Noble Truths are called the catvāry āryasatyāni (Sanskrit) or cattāri ariyasaccāni (Pali). The Noble Eightfold Path is called the āryamārga (Sanskrit, also āryāṣṭāṅgikamārga) or ariyamagga (Pāli). Buddhists themselves are called ariyapuggalas (Arya persons). In Buddhist texts, the āryas are those who have the Buddhist śīla (Pāli sīla, meaning “virtue”) and follow the Buddhist path. Those who despise Buddhism are often called “anāryas”.
The word Arya is also often used in Jainism, in Jain texts such as the Pannavanasutta.
In the 19th century, linguists still supposed that the age of a language determined its “superiority” (because it was assumed to have genealogical purity). Then, based on the assumption that Sanskrit was the oldest Indo-European language, and the (now known to be untenable) position that Irish Éire was etymologically related to “Aryan”, in 1837 Adolphe Pictet popularized the idea that the term “Aryan” could also be applied to the entire Indo-European language family as well. The groundwork for this thought had been laid by Abraham Hyacinthe Anquetil-Duperron. 
In particular, German scholar Karl Wilhelm Friedrich Schlegel published in 1819 the first theory linking the Indo-Iranian and the German languages under the Aryan group. In 1830 Karl Otfried Müller used “Arier” in his publications.
Theories of Aryan invasion
Translating the sacred Indian texts of the Rig Veda in the 1840s, German linguist Friedrich Max Muller found what he believed to be evidence of an ancient invasion of India by Hindu Brahmins, a group he described as “the Arya”. Muller was careful to note in his later work that he thought Aryan was a linguistic category rather than a racial one. Nevertheless, scholars used Muller’s invasion theory to propose their own visions of racial conquest through South Asia and the Indian Ocean. In 1885, the New Zealand polymath Edward Tregear argued that an “Aryan tidal-wave” had washed over India and continued to push south, through the islands of the East Indian archipelago, reaching the distant shores of New Zealand. Scholars such as John Batchelor, Armand de Quatrefages, and Daniel Brinton extended this invasion theory to the Philippines, Hawaii, and Japan, identifying indigenous peoples who they believed were the descendants of early Aryan conquerors.
In the 1850s Arthur de Gobineau supposed that “Aryan” corresponded to the suggested prehistoric Indo-European culture (1853–1855, Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races). Further, de Gobineau believed that there were three basic races – white, yellow and black – and that everything else was caused by race miscegenation, which de Gobineau argued was the cause of chaos. The “master race“, according to de Gobineau, were the Northern European “Aryans”, who had remained “racially pure”. Southern Europeans (to include Spaniards and Southern Frenchmen), Eastern Europeans, North Africans, Middle Easterners, Iranians, Central Asians, Indians, he all considered racially mixed, degenerated through the miscegenation, and thus less than ideal.
By the 1880s a number of linguists and anthropologists argued that the “Aryans” themselves had originated somewhere in northern Europe. A specific region began to crystallize when the linguist Karl Penka (Die Herkunft der Arier. Neue Beiträge zur historischen Anthropologie der europäischen Völker, 1886) popularized the idea that the “Aryans” had emerged in Scandinavia and could be identified by the distinctive Nordic characteristics of blond hair and blue eyes. The distinguished biologist Thomas Henry Huxley agreed with him, coining the term “Xanthochroi” to refer to fair-skinned Europeans (as opposed to darker Mediterranean peoples, who Huxley called “Melanochroi”).
This “Nordic race” theory gained traction following the publication of Charles Morris‘s The Aryan Race (1888), which touches racist ideology. A similar rationale was followed by Georges Vacher de Lapouge in his book L’Aryen et son rôle social (1899, “The Aryan and his Social Role”). To this idea of “races”, Vacher de Lapouge espoused what he termed selectionism, and which had two aims: first, achieving the annihilation of trade unionists, considered “degenerate”; second, the prevention of labour dissatisfaction through the creation of “types” of man, each “designed” for one specific task (See the novel Brave New World for a fictional treatment of this idea).
Meanwhile, in India, the British colonial government had followed de Gobineau’s arguments along another line, and had fostered the idea of a superior “Aryan race” that co-opted the Indian caste system in favor of imperial interests. In its fully developed form, the British-mediated interpretation foresaw a segregation of Aryan and non-Aryan along the lines of caste, with the upper castes being “Aryan” and the lower ones being “non-Aryan”. The European developments not only allowed the British to identify themselves as high-caste, but also allowed the Brahmans to view themselves as on-par with the British. Further, it provoked the reinterpretation of Indian history in racialist and, in opposition, Indian Nationalist terms, and – in following a special interpretation of Max Müller‘s identification of “Aryan” as a national name – this gave rise recently among Hindu nationalists (the “Saffron Brigade“) to the “indigenous Aryans” or so-called “Out of India” theory, disputed by many scholars in academia, which seeks an Indian origin of the Indo-European “Aryans”.
In The Secret Doctrine (1888), Helena Petrovna Blavatsky described the “Aryan root race” as the fifth of seven “Root races“, dating their souls as having begun to incarnate about a million years ago in Atlantis. The Semites were a subdivision of the Aryan root race. “The occult doctrine admits of no such divisions as the Aryan and the Semite, … The Semites, especially the Arabs, are later Aryans — degenerate in spirituality and perfected in materiality. To these belong all the Jews and the Arabs.” The Jews, according to Blavatsky, were a “tribe descended from the Tchandalas of India,” as they were born of Abraham, which she believed to be a corruption of a word meaning “No Brahmin“. Other sources suggest the origin Avram or Aavram.
The name for the Sassanian Empire in Middle Persian is Eran Shahr which means Aryan Empire. In the aftermath of the Islamic conquest in Iran, racialist rhetoric became a literary idiom during the 7th century, i.e., when the Arabs became the primary “Other” – the anaryas – and the antithesis of everything Iranian (i.e. Aryan) and Zoroastrian. But “the antecedents of [present-day] Iranian ultra-nationalism can be traced back to the writings of late nineteenth-century figures such as Mirza Fatali Akhundov and Mirza Aqa Khan Kermani. Demonstrating affinity with Orientalist views of the supremacy of the Aryan peoples and the mediocrity of the Semitic peoples, Iranian nationalist discourse idealized pre-Islamic [Achaemenid and Sassanid] empires, whilst negating the ‘Islamization’ of Persia by Muslim forces.” In the 20th century, different aspects of this idealization of a distant past would be instrumentalized by both the Pahlavi monarchy (In 1967, Iran’s Pahlavi dynasty [overthrown in the 1979 Iranian Revolution] added the title Āryāmehr Light of the Aryans to the other styles of the Iranian monarch, the Shah of Iran being already known at that time as the Shahanshah (King of Kings)), and by the Islamic republic that followed it; the Pahlavis used it as a foundation for anticlerical monarchism, and the clerics used it to exalt Iranian values vis-á-vis westernization.
In the United States, the best-selling 1907 book Race Life of the Aryan Peoples by Joseph Pomeroy Widney consolidated in the popular mind the idea that the word “Aryan” is the proper identification for “all Indo-Europeans”, and that “Aryan Americans” of the “Aryan race” are destined to fulfill America’s manifest destiny to form an American Empire.
Gordon Childe would later regret it, but the depiction of Aryans as possessors of a “superior language” became a matter of national pride in learned circles of Germany (portrayed against the background that World War I was lost because Germany had been betrayed from within by miscegenation and the “corruption” of socialist trade unionists and other “degenerates”).
Alfred Rosenberg—one of the principal architects of Nazi ideological creed—argued for a new “religion of the blood“, based on the supposed innate promptings of the Nordic soul to defend its “noble” character against racial and cultural degeneration. Under Rosenberg, the theories of Arthur de Gobineau, Georges Vacher de Lapouge, Blavatsky, Houston Stewart Chamberlain, Madison Grant, and those of Hitler, all culminated in Nazi Germany’s race policies and the “Aryanization” decrees of the 1920s, 1930s, and early 1940s. In its “appalling medical model”, the annihilation of the “racially inferior” Untermenschen was sanctified as the excision of a diseased organ in an otherwise healthy body, which led to the Holocaust.
By the end of World War II, the word “Aryan” among a number of people had lost its Romantic or idealist connotations and was associated by many with Nazi racism instead.
By then, the term “Indo-Iranian” and “Indo-European” had made most uses of the term “Aryan” superfluous in the eyes of a number of scholars, and “Aryan” now survives in most scholarly usage only in the term “Indo-Aryan” to indicate (speakers of) North Indian languages. It has been asserted by one scholar that Indo-Aryan and Aryan may not be equated and that such an equation is not supported by the historical evidence, though this extreme viewpoint is not widespread.
The use of the term to designate speakers of all Indo-European languages in scholarly usage is now regarded by some scholars as an “aberration to be avoided.” However, some authors writing for popular consumption have continued using the word “Aryan” for “all Indo-Europeans” in the tradition of H. G. Wells, such as the science fiction author Poul Anderson, and scientists writing for the popular media, such as Colin Renfrew. Notions of the “Aryan race” as an elite group that is regarded as being superior to other races survive in some far-right European groups, such as Neo-Nazi parties, Russian ultra-nationalists, as well as in certain Iranian nationalist groups.
Echoes of “the 19th century prejudice about ‘northern’ Aryans who were confronted on Indian soil with black barbarians […] can still be heard in some modern studies.” In a socio-political context, the claim of a white, European Aryan race that includes only people of the Western and not the Eastern branch of the Indo-European peoples is entertained by certain circles, usually representing white nationalists who call for the halting of non-white immigration into Europe and limiting immigration into the United States. They argue that a large intrusion of immigrants can lead to ethnic conflicts such as the 2005 Cronulla riots in Australia and the 2005 civil unrest in France. The invasion theory, has however been questioned by several scholars.
- Fortson, IV: “The Sanskrit word ārya-, the source of the English word, was the self-designation of the Vedic Indic people and has a cognate in Iranian *arya, where it is also a self-designation.
- J. P. Mallory and Douglas Q. Adams: “Our ability to reconstruct a Proto Indo-Iranian intermediate between Proto-Indo-European on the one hand and Proto-Indic and Proto-Iranian is also supported by the self-designation, *aryo-.”
- Both the Indic and Iranian terms descend from a form *ārya that was used by the Indo-Iranian tribes to refer to themselves. (It is also the source of the country-name Iran, from a phrase meaning ‘kingdom of the Aryans’.)”
- Avestan airya may also be connected with Indo-Iranian *ara-.[a]
- The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language states at the beginning of its definition, “[it] is one of the ironies of history that Aryan, a word nowadays referring to the blond-haired, blue-eyed physical ideal of Nazi Germany, originally referred to a people who looked vastly different. Its history starts with the ancient Indo-Iranians, peoples who inhabited parts of what are now Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. “
- Under the 1933 Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service, a non-Aryan was defined as “an individual descended from a non-Aryan (in particular Jewish parents or grandparents)” (Campt 2004, p. 143).
- There is no shortage of ideas, even in the present day. For a summary of the etymological problems involved, see Siegert 1941–1942.
- The context being religious, Max Müller understood this to especially mean “the worshipers of the gods of the Brahmans”. If this is seen from the point of view of the religious poets of the RigVedic hymns, an ‘Aryan’ was then a person who held the same religious convictions as the poet himself. This idea can then also be found in Iranian texts.
- Jacques Duchesne-Guillemin: “It thus seems that Ved. arya and Avest. airya are to be connected […] with a Vedic homophone ari-, aryá- ‘righteous, loyal, devout’, and with Indo-Iranian *ara- ‘fitting, proper'” 
- “Aryan”. Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary.
- Gopal, Madan (1990). K.S. Gautam, ed. India through the ages. Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. p. 70.
- Michael Cook (2014), Ancient Religions, Modern Politics: The Islamic Case in Comparative Perspective, Princeton University Press, p.68: “Aryavarta […] is defined by Manu as extending from the great Himalayas in the north to the Vindhyas of Central India in the south and from the sea in the west to the sea in the east.”
- Mallory 1991, p. 125.
- Oxford English Dictionary: “Aryan from Sanskrit Arya ‘Noble'”
- Encyclopædia Britannica: ” …the Sanskrit term arya (“noble” or “distinguished”), the linguistic root of the word (Aryan)…” “It is now used in linguistics only in the sense of the term Indo-Aryan languages, a branch of the larger Indo-European language family” 
- Thomas R. Trautman (2004): “Aryan is from Arya a Sanskrit word”; page xxxii of Aryans And British India
- Fortson, IV 2011, p. 209.
- Anthony 2007, p. 11.
- Gnoli, Gherardo (1996), “Iranian Identity ii. Pre-Islamic Period”, Encyclopaedia Iranica, online edition, New York
- Reza Zia-Ebrahimi, Iranian Identity, the ‘Aryan Race,’ and Jake Gyllenhaal, PBS (Public Broadcasting Service), 6 August 2010.
- Anthony 2007, pp. 9–11.
- Encyclopædia Britannica: “It is now used in linguistics only in the sense of the term Indo-Aryan languages, a branch of the larger Indo-European language family” 
- William Hansen, Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science by Stefan Arvidsson (Book review) , Journal of Folklore Research, 22 February 2007.
- Leopold, Joan (July 1974), “British Applications of the Aryan Theory of Race to India, 1850-1870”, The English Historical Review, 89 (352): 578–603, JSTOR 567427
- cf. Gershevitch, Ilya (1968). “Old Iranian Literature”. Handbuch der Orientalistik, Literatur I. Leiden: Brill. pp. 1–31., p. 2.
- Michael Cook (2014), Ancient Religions, Modern Politics: The Islamic Case in Comparative Perspective, Princeton University Press, p.68: “Aryavarta […] is defined by Manu as extending from the Himalayas in the north to the Vindhyas of Central India in the south and from the sea in the west to the sea in the east.”
- Encyclopaedic dictionary of Vedic terms, Volume 1 By Swami Parmeshwaranand, pages 120 to 128 
- E. Laroche, Hommages à G. Dumézil, Brussels, 1960
- Szemerényi, Oswald (1977), “Studies in the Kinship Terminology of the Indo-European Languages”, Acta Iranica III.16, Leiden: Brill pp 125–146
- Mallory & Adams 1997, p. 304.
- Witzel 2000, p. 1.
- Bailey, Harold Walter (1989), “Arya”, Encyclopædia Iranica, 2, New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Duchesne-Guillemin 1979, p. 337.
- Schmitt, Rüdiger (1989), “Aryan”, Encyclopædia Iranica, 2, New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Wiesehofer, Joseph Ancient Persia New York:1996 I.B. Tauris
- Arbeitman 1981, p. 930.
- Mallory & Adams 1997, p. 213.
- Edelman 1999, p. 221.
- An Introduction to the Indo-European Languages by Philip Baldi, page 51: “The term Aryan used alone is often used to designate the Indic branch…” 
- Edwin Francis Bryant; Laurie L. Patton. The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History. psychology press. p. 408.
- Ansari, Ali M. Perceptions of Iran: History, Myths and Nationalism from Medieval Persia to the Islamic Republic. I.B.Tauris. p. 130.
- Rosenberg, Alfred, “The Myth of the 20th Century“. The term “Atlantis” is mentioned two times in the whole book, the term “Atlantis-hypothesis” is mentioned just once. Rosenberg (page 24): “It seems to be not completely impossible, that at parts where today the waves of the Atlantic ocean murmur and icebergs move along, once a blossoming land towered in the water, on which a creative race founded a great culture and sent its children as seafarers and warriors into the world; but if this Atlantis-hypothesis proves untenable, we still have to presume a prehistoric Nordic cultural center.” Rosenberg (page 26): “The ridiculed hypothesis about a Nordic creative center, which we can call Atlantis – without meaning a sunken island – from where once waves of warriors migrated to all directions as first witnesses of Nordic longing for distant lands to conquer and create, today becomes probable.” Original: Es erscheint als nicht ganz ausgeschlossen, dass an Stellen, über die heute die Wellen des Atlantischen Ozeans rauschen und riesige Eisgebirge herziehen, einst ein blühendes Festland aus den Fluten ragte, auf dem eine schöpferische Rasse große, weitausgreifende Kultur erzeugte und ihre Kinder als Seefahrer und Krieger hinaussandte in die Welt; aber selbst wenn sich diese Atlantishypothese als nicht haltbar erweisen sollte, wird ein nordisches vorgeschichtliches Kulturzentrum angenommen werden müssen. … Und deshalb wird die alte verlachte Hypothese heute Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass von einem nordischen Mittelpunkt der Schöpfung, nennen wir ihn, ohne uns auf die Annahme eines versunkenen atlantischen Erdteils festzulegen, die Atlantis, einst Kriegerschwärme strahlenförmig ausgewandert sind als erste Zeugen des immer wieder sich erneut verkörpernden nordischen Fernwehs, um zu erobern, zu gestalten.”
- Davies, Norman (2006). Europe at War: 1939-1945 : No Simple Victory, p. 167
- Ehrenreich, Eric (2007). The Nazi Ancestral Proof: Genealogy, Racial Science, and the Final Solution, pp, 9-11
- Watkins, Calvert (2000), “Aryan”, American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.), New York: Houghton Mifflin, ISBN 0-395-82517-2,
…when Friedrich Schlegel, a German scholar who was an important early Indo-Europeanist, came up with a theory that linked the Indo-Iranian words with the German word Ehre, ‘honor’, and older Germanic names containing the element ario-, such as the Swiss [sic] warrior Ariovistus who was written about by Julius Caesar. Schlegel theorized that far from being just a designation of the Indo-Iranians, the word *arya- had in fact been what the Indo-Europeans called themselves, meaning [according to Schlegel] something like ‘the honorable people.’ (This theory has since been called into question.)
- “The range of blond hair color in pure Nordic peoples runs from flaxen and red to shades of chestnut and brown… It must be clearly understood that blondness of hair and of eye is not a final test of Nordic race. The Nordics include all the blonds, and also those of darker hair or eye when possessed of a preponderance of other Nordic characters. In this sense the word “blond” means those lighter shades of hair or eye color in contrast to the very dark or black shades which are termed brunet. The meaning of “blond” as now used is therefore not limited to the lighter or flaxen shades as in colloquial speech. In England among Nordic populations there are large numbers of individuals with hazel brown eyes joined with the light brown or chestnut hair which is the typical hair shade of the English and Americans. This combination is also common in Holland and Westphalia and is frequently associated with a very fair skin. These men are all of “blond” aspect and constitution and consequently are to be classed as members of the Nordic race.” Quoted in Grant, 1922, p. 26.
- Ehrenreich, Eric (2007). The Nazi Ancestral Proof: Genealogy, Racial Science, and the Final Solution, p. 68
- Bissell, Kate (13 June 2005). “Fountain of Life”. BBC Radio 4. Retrieved 30 September 2011.
- The Sacred Books of the East, Volume 14, p. 2
- Wink, André (2002). Al-Hind: Early medieval India and the expansion of Islam, 7th–11th centuries. BRILL. p. 284. ISBN 0391041738, ISBN 978-0-391-04173-8.
- G. Gnoli,”Iranic Identity as a Historical Problem: the Beginnings of a National Awareness under the Achaemenians”, in The East and the Meaning of History. International Conference (23–27 November 1992), Roma, 1994, pp. 147–67. 
- G. Gnoli, “IRANIAN IDENTITY ii. PRE-ISLAMIC PERIOD” in Encyclopædia Iranica. Online accessed in 2010 at 
- R. Schmitt, “Aryans” in Encyclopædia Iranica:
Excerpt:”The name “Aryan” (OInd. āˊrya-, Ir. *arya- [with short a-], in Old Pers. ariya-, Av. airiia-, etc.) is the self designation of the peoples of Ancient India and Ancient Iran who spoke Aryan languages, in contrast to the “non-Aryan” peoples of those “Aryan” countries (cf. OInd. an-āˊrya-, Av. an-airiia-, etc.), and lives on in ethnic names like Alan (Lat. Alani, NPers. Īrān, Oss. Ir and Iron). Also accessed online:  in May 2010
- H.W. Bailey, “Arya” in Encyclopædia Iranica. Excerpt: “ARYA an ethnic epithet in the Achaemenid inscriptions and in the Zoroastrian Avestan tradition.  Also accessed online in May, 2010.
- The “Aryan” Language, Gherardo Gnoli, Instituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente, Roma, 2002.
- D.N. Mackenzie, “ĒRĀN, ĒRĀNŠAHR” in Encyclopædia Iranica. Accessed here in 2010: 
- Dalby, Andrew (2004), Dictionary of Languages, Bloomsbury, ISBN 0-7475-7683-1
- G. Gnoli, “ĒR, ĒR MAZDĒSN” in Encyclopædia Iranica
- R.G. Kent. Old Persian. Grammar, texts, lexicon. 2nd ed., New Haven, Conn.
- Professor Gilbert Lazard: “The language known as New Persian, which usually is called at this period (early Islamic times) by the name of Dari or Parsi-Dari, can be classified linguistically as a continuation of Middle Persian, the official religious and literary language of Sassanian Iran, itself a continuation of Old Persian, the language of the Achaemenids. Unlike the other languages and dialects, ancient and modern, of the Iranian group such as Avestan, Parthian, Soghdian, Kurdish, Balochi, Pashto, etc., Old Middle and New Persian represent one and the same language at three states of its history. It had its origin in Fars (the true Persian country from the historical point of view) and is differentiated by dialectical features, still easily recognizable from the dialect prevailing in north-western and eastern Iran” in Lazard, Gilbert 1975, “The Rise of the New Persian Language” in Frye, R. N., The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol. 4, pp. 595–632, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- R.W. Thomson. History of Armenians by Moses Khorenat’si. Harvard University Press, 1978. Pg 118, pg 166
- MacKenzie D.N. Corpus inscriptionum Iranicarum Part. 2., inscription of the Seleucid and Parthian periods of Eastern Iran and Central Asia. Vol. 2. Parthian, London, P. Lund, Humphries 1976–2001
- N. Sims-Williams, “Further notes on the Bactrian inscription of Rabatak, with the Appendix on the name of Kujula Kadphises and VimTatku in Chinese”. Proceedings of the Third European Conference of Iranian Studies (Cambridge, September 1995). Part 1: Old and Middle Iranian Studies, N. Sims-Williams, ed. Wiesbaden, pp 79–92
- The “Aryan” Language, Gherardo Gnoli, Instituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente, Roma, 2002
- Hamza Isfahani, Tarikh Payaambaraan o Shaahaan, translated by Jaf’ar Shu’ar, Tehran: Intishaaraat Amir Kabir, 1988.
- The Annals and Magazine of Natural History: Including Zoology, Botany, and Geology. Taylor & Francis, Limited. 1881. p. 162.
- Arora, Udai (2007). Udayana. Anamika Pub & Distributors. ISBN 9788179751688.
whole of Ariana (North-western India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran)
- Online Etymology Dictionary
- Robert K. Barnhart, Chambers Dictionary of Etymology pg. 54
- Simpson, John Andrew; Weiner, Edmund S. C., eds. (1989), “Aryan, Arian”, Oxford English Dictionary, I (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, p. 672, ISBN 0-19-861213-3
- James Cowles Prichard, Researches Into the Physical History of Mankid, Vol. 4 pg. 33
- Campt, Tina (2004), Other Germans: Black Germans and the Politics of Race, Gender, and Memory in the Third Reich, University of Michigan Press, p. 143.
- Widney, Joseph P. Race Life of the Aryan Peoples New York: Funk & Wagnalls. 1907 In Two Volumes: Volume One–The Old World Volume Two–The New World ISBN B000859S6O See Chapter II—”Original Homeland of the Aryan Peoples” Pages 9–25—the term “Proto-Aryan” is used to describe the people today called Proto-Indo-Europeans
- Hitler, Adolf Mein Kampf 1925
- Briant 2002, p. 180.
- Siegert, Hans (1941–1942), “Zur Geschichte der Begriffe ‘Arier’ und ‘Arisch‘“, Wörter und Sachen, New Series, 4: 84–99
- Kuz’mina 2007, pp. 371–372.
- Rose 2011.
- (Mbh: tasyam samsadi sarvasyam ksatttaram pujayamy aham/ vrttena hi bhavaty aryo na dhanena na vidyaya. 0050880521)
- Deshpande/ Gomez in Bronkhorst & Deshpande 1999
Kumar, Priya (2012). Elisabeth Weber, ed. Beyond tolerance and hospitality: Muslims as strangers and minor subjects in Hindu nationalist and Indian nationalist discourse. Living Together: Jacques Derrida’s Communities of Violence and Peace. Fordham University Press. p. 96. ISBN 9780823249923.
- Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship by Hans Henrich Hock, Brian D. Joseph, 2009: “Aryan was extended to designate all Indo Europeans, under the false assumption that the Irish word Eire is cognate with ārya; and ill-founded theories about the racial identity of these Aryans… “, page 57 
- Zwischen Barbarenklischee und Germanenmythos: eine Analyse österreichischer … by Elisabeth Monyk (2006), p. 31. 
- Schlegel, Friedrich. 1819. Review of J. G. Rhode, Über den Anfang unserer Geschichte und die letzte Revolution der Erde, Breslau, 1819. Jahrbücher der Literatur VIII: 413ff
- “Müller, Karl Otfried: Handbuch der Archäologie der Kunst. Breslau, 1830”.
- Robinson, Michael (2016). The Lost White Tribe: Explorers, Scientists, and the Theory that Changed a Continent. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 147–161. ISBN 9780199978489.
- Huxley, Thomas (1890), “The Aryan Question and Pre-Historic Man”, The Nineteenth Century (XI/1890).
- Thapar, Romila (January 1, 1996), “The Theory of Aryan Race and India: History and Politics”, Social Scientist, Social Scientist, 24 (1/3): 3–29, doi:10.2307/3520116, ISSN 0970-0293, JSTOR 3520116.
- Leopold, Joan (1974), “British Applications of the Aryan Theory of Race to India, 1850–1870”, The English Historical Review, 89 (352): 578–603, doi:10.1093/ehr/LXXXIX.CCCLII.578.
- Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna (1947) , The Secret Doctrine, the Synthesis of Science, Religion and Philosophy, II: Anthropogenesis (Fascimile of original ed.), Los Angeles: The Theosophy Company, p. 200, OCLC 8129381, retrieved 2011-06-14
- Wiesehofer, Joseph Ancient Persia New York:1996 I.B. Tauris
- Adib-Moghaddam, Arshin (2006), “Reflections on Arab and Iranian Ultra-Nationalism”, Monthly Review Magazine, 11/06.
- Keddie, Nikki R.; Richard, Yann (2006), Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution, Yale University Press, pp. 178f., ISBN 0-300-12105-9.
- Widney, Joseph P Race Life of the Aryan Peoples New York: Funk & Wagnalls. 1907 In Two Volumes: Volume One–The Old World, Volume Two–The New World ISBN B000859S6O:
Race Life of the Aryan Peoples Vol.1–“The Old World”:
Race Life of the Aryan Peoples Vol.2–“The New World”:
- Mein Kampf, tr. in The Times, 25 July 1933, p. 15/6
- Glover, Jonathan (1998), “Eugenics: Some Lessons from the Nazi Experience”, in Harris, John; Holm, Soren, The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice, and Regulation, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 57–65.
- Kuiper, B.F.J. (1991), Aryans in the Rigveda, Leiden Studies in Indo-European, Amsterdam: Rodopi, ISBN 90-5183-307-5
- Witzel, Michael (2001), “Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts”, Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 7 (3): 1–115
- Wells, H.G. The Outline of History New York:1920 Doubleday & Co. Chapter 19 The Aryan Speaking Peoples in Pre-Historic Times [Meaning the Proto-Indo-Europeans] Pages 271–285
- H.G. Wells describes the origin of the Aryans (Proto-Indo Europeans):
- See the Poul Anderson short stories in the 1964 collection Time and Stars and the Polesotechnic League stories featuring Nicholas van Rijn
- Renfrew, Colin. (1989). The Origins of Indo-European Languages. /Scientific American/, 261(4), 82–90. In explaining the Anatolian hypothesis, the term “Aryan” is used to denote “all Indo-Europeans”
- Madan Lal Goel. “The Myth of Aryan Invasions of India” (PDF). uwf.edu/lgoel. University of West Florida.
- Anthony, David W. (2007). The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-05887-3.
- Arbeitman, Yoel (1981), The Hittite is thy Mother: An Anatolian Approach to Genesis 23 (Ex Indo-European lux). In: Yoël L. Arbeitman, Allan R. Bomhard (eds), “Bono Homini Donum: Essays in Historical Linguistics, in Memory of J. Alexander Kerns. (2 volumes)”, John Benjamins Publishing
- Arvidsson, Stefan; Wichmann, Sonia (2006), Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science, University of Chicago Press
- Briant, Pierre (2002), From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire, Eisenbrauns
- Bronkhorst, J.; Deshpande, M.M., eds. (1999), Aryan and Non-Aryan in South Asia: Evidence, Interpretation, and Ideology, Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University, ISBN 1-888789-04-2
- Duchesne-Guillemin, Jacques (1979), Acta Iranica, BRILL Archive
- Edelman, Dzoj (Joy) I. (1999), On the history of non-decimal systems and their elements in numerals of Aryan languages. In: Jadranka Gvozdanović (ed.), “Numeral Types and Changes Worldwide”, Walter de Gruyter
- Fortson, IV, Benjamin W. (2011), Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction, John Wiley & Sons
- Fussmann, G.; Francfort, H.P.; Kellens, J.; Tremblay, X. (2005), Aryas, Aryens et Iraniens en Asie Centrale, Institut Civilisation Indienne, ISBN 2-86803-072-6
- Kuz’mina, Elena Efimovna (2007), Mallory, James Patrick, ed., The Origin of the Indo-Iranians, Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series, Leiden: Brill
- Lincoln, Bruce (1999), Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship, University of Chicago Press
- Mallory, J. P. (1991), In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Culture and Myth, London: Thames and Hudson
- Mallory, J.P.; Adams, Douglas Q. (1997), Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture, Taylor and Francis
- Morey, Peter; Tickell, Alex (2005). Alternative Indias: Writing, Nation and Communalism. Rodopi. ISBN 90-420-1927-1.
- Poliakov, Leon (1996), The Aryan Myth: A History of Racist and Nationalistic Ideas in Europe, New York: Barnes & Noble Books, ISBN 0-7607-0034-6
- Rose, Jenny (2011), Zoroastrianism: An Introduction, I.B.Tauris
- Robinson, Michael F. (2016), The Lost White Tribe: Explorers, Scientists, and the Theory that Changed a Continent, Oxford University Press
- Sugirtharajah, Sharada (2003). Imagining Hinduism: A Postcolonial Perspective. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-203-63411-0.
- Talageri, Shrikant G. (2000), The Rigveda: A Historical Analysis, New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan, ISBN 81-7742-010-0, retrieved 15 May 2007.
- Tickell, A (2005), “The Discovery of Aryavarta: Hindu Nationalism and Early Indian Fiction in English”, in Peter Morey; Alex Tickell, Alternative Indias: Writing, Nation and Communalism, pp. 25–53
- Trautmann, Thomas R. (1 December 2005). Aryans and British India. Yoda Press. ISBN 978-81-902272-1-6.
- Ivanov, Vyacheslav V.; Gamkrelidze, Thomas (1990), “The Early History of Indo-European Languages”, Scientific American, 262 (3): 110–116, doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0390-110
- Witzel, Michael (2000), The Home of the Aryans. In: A. Hinze and E. Tichy (eds), “Festschrift fuer Johanna Narten zum 70. Geburtstag”, Muenchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft, Beihefte NF 19 (PDF), J. H. Roell