Washington Initiative 732 (2016)

Washington Carbon Emission Tax and Sales Tax Reduction
Results
Choice Votes % Yes 1,265,123 40.75% No 1,839,414 59.25%
Precinct results Yes   90–100%   80–90%   70–80%   60–70%   50–60% No   90–100%   80–90%   70–80%   60–70%   50–60% Other   Tie   No data
Secretary of State, Washington

Elections in Washington
Federal government Presidential elections 1892 1896 1900 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 Presidential primaries Democratic 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 Republican 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 U.S. Senate elections 1889 1891 1893 1895 sp 1897 1899 1903 1905 1909 1911 1914 1916 1920 1922 1928 1934 1940 1946 1952 1956 1958 1962 1964 1968 1970 1974 1976 1980 1982 1983 sp 1986 1988 1992 1994 1998 2000 2004 2006 2010 2012 2016 2018 2022 2024 2028 U.S. House of Representatives elections 1889 1890 1892 1894 1896 1898 1900 1902 1904 1906 1908 1909 2nd sp 1910 1912 1914 1916 1918 1920 1922 1923 5th sp 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 1947 3rd sp 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 3rd sp 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1975 3rd sp 1976 1977 7th sp 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 1st sp 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
State government General elections 2004 2008 2010 2012 2016 2020 2024 Gubernatorial elections 1889 1892 1896 1900 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 Lieutenant gubernatorial elections 2020 2024 Secretary of State elections 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2022 sp 2024 Attorney General elections 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 Commissioner of Public Lands elections 2024 State Senate elections 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2013 26th sp 2014 2016 2017 45th sp 2018 2020 2022 House of Representatives elections 2006 2008 2010 21st 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 Supreme Court elections 2004 2006 2008 2012
Ballot measures 1972 276 2004 872 2006 920 933 937 4223 2007 67 2008 1000 2009 71 2012 74 502 1185 1240 2016 732 2018 1631 1639 2019 976
Seattle Mayoral elections 2005 2009 2013 2017 2021 City Attorney elections 2021 City Council elections 2019 2021 3rd recall 2023 Ballot measures Sound Transit 3
Spokane Mayoral elections 2011 2015 2019 2023

Washington Initiative 732 (I-732) was a ballot initiative in 2016 to levy a carbon tax in the State of Washington, and simultaneously reduce the state sales tax. It was rejected 59.3% to 40.7%.^[1] The measure appeared on the November 2016 ballot.^[2] The backers of I-732 submitted roughly 350,000 signatures in December 2015 to certify the initiative.^[3]

The initiative was spearheaded by environmental economist Yoram Bauman, a strong advocate of carbon pricing. It was modeled after the British Columbia carbon tax, which was considered "popular across the political spectrum".^[4] The carbon tax in British Columbia caused the province's fuel consumption to decrease by 16% and its greenhouse gas emissions to decrease 3.5 times faster than the emissions of Canada as a whole, while maintaining steady economic growth.^[5]

Ballot measure summary[edit]

The ballot measure summary as written by the Secretary of State of Washington:

"This measure would impose a carbon emission tax on the sale or use of certain fossil fuels and fossil-fuel-generated electricity, at $15 per metric ton of carbon dioxide in 2017, and increasing gradually to $100 per metric ton (2016 dollars adjusted for inflation), with more gradual phase-in for some users. It would reduce the sales tax rate by one percentage point over two years, increase a low-income sales tax exemption, and reduce certain manufacturing taxes.^[6]"

Provisions[edit]

Initiative 732 contained four provisions:^[7]

• Creates a new tax on the carbon content of fossil fuels initially set at $15 per ton, rising to $25 per ton after 6 months, and increasing annually to a cap of $100 per ton.
• Reduces the Washington State Sales Tax 1% from 6.5% to 5.5%
• Reduces the Business and Occupation Tax on Manufacturing Businesses in Washington State to .001%
• Funds the Working Families Tax rebate program, a 25% match on the state's version of the earned income tax credit for 460,000 Washington households.

Supporting organizations[edit]

The primary sponsor of Initiative 732 was CarbonWA, a group founded by environmental economist Yoram Bauman to promote carbon pricing. The Audubon Society was also a major proponent of Initiative 732, "Audubon Washington believes Initiative 732 provides swift and effective action to reduce carbon pollution".^[8] Other organizations that supported Initiative 732 included the Sightline Institute,^[9] and the Citizens' Climate Lobby. Other supporters include Washington State legislator Joe Fitzgibbon (D), Washington State Senator Steve Litzow (R), Washington State Senator Joe Fain (R), Washington State Senator Cyrus Habib (D),^[10] and the editorial board of The Olympian.^[11] Climate scientist James Hansen, who has been involved with the Citizens' Climate Lobby for many years, strongly supported the proposal.^[12]

The backers of initiative 732 claimed that I-732 "taxes carbon to fight climate change, boost clean energy, & save the environment for future generations".^[13]

Non-supporting organizations[edit]

Several environmental organizations chose to make a recommendation to "not support" the measure, as opposed to "support" or "oppose", including the Sierra Club,^[14] 350.org Seattle (who originally supported the measure, and later rescinded their support),^[15] and Climate Solutions.^[16]

Common points made in their statements included concerns that the initiative would result in a budget shortfall, and concerns over how the initiative would spend carbon fee receipts, e.g., Climate Solutions stated:^[17]

I-732 does not address the needs of communities hit hardest by pollution and the workers, energy-intensive businesses and others that will be most affected by the transition off of fossil fuels. These communities and sectors need investment in both infrastructure and services to address the health and environmental impacts of fossil fuel pollution and to enable them to benefit equitably from the transition to clean energy.

Opposing organizations[edit]

Opponents to Initiative 732 included the Washington State Labor Council, stating: "I-732 would send Washington in the wrong direction and create more damaging austerity choices",^[18] the Association of Washington Businesses,^[19] and Longview Daily News.^[20]

Several organizations opposed the measure from an "environmental justice" perspective, or with a reference to the necessary breadth of the supporting coalition, including Front and Centered (formerly: Communities of Color for Climate Justice),^[21] and the Washington Environmental Council, stating:^[22]

We have learned from past attempts in state and around the world, that in order to pass transformational carbon pollution policy and then defend against the oil industry’s attempts to repeal the law we must work with a broad, politically-powerful coalition. Washington Conservation Voters and Washington Environmental Council are part of a statewide coalition of leaders and grassroots activists representing communities of color, health organizations, labor groups, businesses, the faith community and others who are working together to develop, pass and defend a policy that will stand for the long haul in Washington and serve as an example for other states to follow.

Aftermath[edit]

Although I-732 failed to pass, Carbon Washington continued to work to put a price on carbon emissions in the State of Washington. They worked with others to support Washington Initiative 1631, a carbon tax measure that appeared on the ballots in 2018^[23][24] but was also rejected.

See also[edit]

• Citizen's Climate Lobby
• Pigouvian tax
• [1], the campaign website for this measure

References[edit]